Presented by: Angela Smith ∙ Dennis Hugo ∙ Kevin Messer Marie Barraclough and Austin Hanson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Previous Conclusions Concrete will continue to be a dominant construction material Reinforced concrete must crack in order for reinforcing to work lower.
Advertisements

Group 5 Self-Assembling Picnic Table
The Design, Construction and Testing of a Human-Powered Moonbuggy Faculty Advisor: Dr. Paul Shiue Industry Advisors: Dr. Paul Shiue Christian Brothers.
Standardization of the process flow at the wash and weigh station will allow for three advantages to the previous process. One would allow you to know.
Rolling Chassis Team Todd Anderson Matt Blackwood David Hovater Josh Smith Jessica Yoho.
Moonbuggy Rear Suspension Analysis ME450: Computer-Aided Engineering Analysis Department of Mechanical Engineering, IUPUI Instructor: Dr. Koshrow Nematollahi.
Your Friendly Neighbourhood Folding Bike Company.
Adaptive Adjustable Wakeboarding System Lorielle Alter 1, Cory Gerken 2, Lauren Mitchell 3, Nick Pilkington 2, Katy Serowka 1 Advisors: Dr. Paul King 1,
Design Of Sno–Bike Propulsion System Joe Fitzpatrick & Jeremy Lindeman Advisor: Prof. Eben C. Cobb Mechanical Engineering Department Design Concepts: Bikes.
A Hands-on Workshop for Primary-Junior-Intermediate Science and Technology Teachers Susan Sitter Terry Wilkinson Richard Michaud OCTE Conference 2009 Understanding.
EASELECTRIC Team 4 Adam Frank Jackie Jon. Introduction NSF Program: Expanding world of disabled artists Growing demand for adjustable easels Disabilities.
Team Tie-Master Brittany Ballard Cam Leslie Steve May Tie-down Finishing Machine.
Michael White & Erik Mueller.  The thruster involved works by the principle of chemical decomposition  Catalyst renders the mixture unstable  Propellant.
Automatic Dental Bur Loader NCDA Dental Products Development Group Progress Review Team 99.06: Jason Dickey, Greg Frantz, Allison Martin, Nancy Meyer Sponsor:
Team JADS 1 The PFADS Competition Team JADS Sean McNary John Yoshimura ENGR 5 - Lab 5.
Team Uno 9/30/04 Stephanie Rohrs Chuck Smith Mechanical Actuation Systems.
Team JADS1 The PFADS Competition Team JADS David Rosenberry Adam Yee ENGR 5 - Lab 5.
Detailed Design Phase Review: P14415 Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.
Development Processes and Organizations
Product Design Specifies materials Determines dimensions & tolerances
Naval Architecture Bureau Veritas Training Course Questionnaire For the benefit of business and people.
Design Review S13-44-GLCK 4/18/2013. Who We Are Baker Alotaibi Mechanical Engineer Fahad Alotaibi Electrical Engineer Devin Scarborough Mechanical Engineer.
Harry McMullan. Design brief In my project I am manufacturing a tipping swarf bin/ dumper for workshop in Bangor There are many others on the market although.
Alternative Terrain Wheelchair Team # 1: Team ARROW Brent Fischer Mitchell Kane Eric Goyette Brennan McVeigh Chris MacKenzie.
Objectives:  To define RAD  Describe RAD as a system development method  List the advantages of RAD as a method  List the disadvantages of RAD  State.
Team Gun Show Final Presentation December 1, 2004 Group Members: Nate Griggs Clay Hamlin Marc Manning Jon Megahy Van Vo Joel Williamson.
Unit 91 Week 13 Jon Gutierrez, Chris Sauer, Simon Radomski, Chat Huynh, Jeff Burton, & Robert Platt November 12, 2008 Prototype Review Week 2.
Team 14: The Design and Construction of an Ackerman-Steered Robot Members: Kyle Quinn Julio Sosa Robert Steel.
UCSD Human Powered Submarine Team – Odin’S Rage
Instant Design Challenge
Instant Design Challenge
Instant Design Challenge Using the Design Process and Engineering Notebook.
ET 493 Instructor: Dr. Koutsougeras By Rhett Falcone and Scott Dauzat Advised by Dr. Mitra.
Basic Utility Vehicle (BUV) ME 462 Capstone Design Presentation Department of Mechanical Engineering, IUPUI December 14, 2005 Presented by: Tom Peters.
Stand Alone Group Members: Jaime Alvarez Austin Chamberlain Trey Smith Jung Hoon Kim.
1 CERTIFIED SOLIDWORKS ASSOCIATE (CSWA) EXAM Nov 26, 20119:00-12:00 Dec 3, :00-12:00 SEB1015 NOTES We’ll take registrations in November but you’ll.
Autonomous Air & Ground Surveillance Unit Objectives, Preliminary Specifications, and Option Analysis.
Fall Final Presentation November 30, 2004 MAVerick Solutions Todd Adkins Leroy Cohen Jr. Adam Hollrith Brian Moore.
Anti-Tip Bar for manual wheelchair Nick Burjek Andrew Dawson Austin Dirks Katie Gallup Harrison Lamons.
Anti-Tip Bar for manual wheelchair
Intel ® Robotic Tablet Charger Presenters Hung Nguyen Kevin Hughes Group Members Garrett Pauwels Justin Carey Nolan Igarashi Richard Mullenburg PSU Faculty.
The Spiral Model Sultana & Mahmood. Systems development life-cycle The process of creating or altering computer systems The models that define the processes.
ME Students: Richard Dzionara-Norsen Jeffery Flowerday Jonathan Nguyen IE Student: Kassandra Schlott Project Design Review.
Lightweight UXO system Concept design For Berkeley Geophysics Concept design For Berkeley Geophysics.
Unit 91 Week 7 Jon Gutierrez, Chris Sauer, Simon Radomski, Chat Huynh, Jeff Burton, & Robert Platt October 1, 2008 Final Presentation.
Solar Energy Comenius Project. Experiment Connect the solar panel to the multi meters Let the light fall onto the panel and measure the production Find.
P14006: Assistive Bathtub Chair The chair is operated by a two-direction remote to raise and lower the chair by retracting or extending the battery-powered.
1 Team Mieux Critical Design Review ASME Bulk Material Transporter AME 470 Ltd. December 7, 2004.
Anti-tip bar leg attached to a collar fitted with side plates with guiding grooves designed to provide stopping points to the tip system Addition of copper.
Chapter 2: Development process and organizations
Conceptual Design Presentation
All-Terrain Walker Angel Hambrecht, Justin Kibler, Nate Watts, Maxine Laroche, Kurtis Unruh-Kracke, and Tatiana Ferrucio Ferreira.
Team 14: The Design and Construction of an Ackerman-Steered Robot Members: Kyle Quinn Julio Sosa Robert Steel.
Adam Karges Leader Alicia Martin Recorder Britta O’Keeffe Project Engineer Chris BattistiProject Engineer Steve Boyd Project Engineer 2011 NASA Great Moonbuggy.
NASA Great Moonbuggy Race 2012 SpacePokes Design Lesley Young Leader Davis FayRecorder Alisa FrohbieterProject Engineer Ryan WilliamsProject Engineer.
ME 4182 Mid-Term Presentation The Likus Group 6/21/00 Philip Reale, Group Leader Matt Berrell Justin Disney Anthony Godfrey Gwyneth Smith Lisa Smith The.
AUTOMATED ROD SINGULATION SYSTEM Student: James Welch Concentration: Mechanical Class: ET-494 Spring 2015 Instructor: Dr. Cris Koutsougeras Advisors: Dr.
Southeast Engineering Center University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign BENTLEY Handi-Gator Wheel chair storage team Brian Mullen Kyle Kremer Dan Santos.
Wegmans Swirl Cake Automation
Design Review Off-Road Wheelchair Project.
CUSTOM DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICE
My engineering project tipping swarf bin
Team P09009 One-Arm Wheel Chair System Level Design
CycloPower Faculty Advisor Team Members Faryar Etesami
Chapter 2 The Process of Design.
STEEL AS A CONSTRUCTIONAL MATERIAL
Stand Alone Group Members: Jaime Alvarez Austin Chamberlain Trey Smith
Human Powered Vehicle (HPV)
Chapter 2: Development process and organizations
Presentation transcript:

Presented by: Angela Smith ∙ Dennis Hugo ∙ Kevin Messer Marie Barraclough and Austin Hanson

 Create device to make surrey accessible to people in wheelchairs  Find the most cost-effective solution  Device should be simple to use

(More specific details in handout)  Customer Requirements  Minimize additional turning resistance  Mount on two different surreys  Install/Remove the device quickly  No seating modification  Cost less than $500

 Additional Requirements ◦ Minimize:  Weight  Length  Or exclude frame modification ◦ Unloading mechanism (ramp) travels with surrey

 Rear Mounted Concepts  Allow surrey to travel over uneven terrain while preventing failure at device mounting locations (see chalkboard).

 November ◦ Present design approach ◦ Based on feedback, focus design ◦ Materials Research

 December ◦ Detailed Design ◦ Stress Analysis ◦ Research Manufacturing Costs (i.e. welding)

 January ◦ Construct Wooden Prototype ◦ Test and Refine Prototype

 February ◦ Detailed Design Review ◦ Fabrication and Testing  Early May ◦ Presentation on final product

 Aluminum - $590 Total ◦ Parts - $440 ◦ Labor - $150  Advantages ◦ Lightweight ◦ No corrosion  Disadvantages ◦ Cost ◦ Manufacturing ◦ More susceptible to fatigue  Steel -$355 Total ◦ Parts- $355  Advantages ◦ Cost ◦ Manufacturability ◦ Adaptability  Disadvantages ◦ Weight ◦ Corrosion