BAY AREA MODELING Status of Modeling Work Technical Committee Meeting November 18, 2003 Bay Area Air Quality Management District and Environ Corp.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OThree Chemistry Modeling of the Sept ’00 CCOS Ozone Episode: Diagnostic Experiments—Round 2 Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation.
Advertisements

A numerical simulation of urban and regional meteorology and assessment of its impact on pollution transport A. Starchenko Tomsk State University.
Updates on NOAA MM5 Assessment Where we left off Buoy assessment Temperature problems Solar radiation assessment Z T simulation Analysis nudging Where.
OThree Chemistry MM5/CAMx Model Diagnostic and Sensitivity Analysis Results: Base B and Emissions Sensitivities Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly.
Template Evaluating NOx Emission Inventories for Regulatory Air Quality Modeling using Satellite and Model Data Greg Yarwood, Sue Kemball-Cook and Jeremiah.
Coupled NMM-CALMET Meteorology Development for the CALPUFF Air Dispersion Modelling in Complex Terrain and Shoreline Settings Presented at: European Geoscience.
Template Summary of FY12-13 Work Plan Technical Activities Sue Kemball-Cook and Greg Yarwood NETAC Technical Committee Meeting April 22, 2014.
The Use of High Resolution Mesoscale Model Fields with the CALPUFF Dispersion Modelling System in Prince George BC Bryan McEwen Master’s project
Improving the Representation of Atmospheric Chemistry in WRF William R. Stockwell Department of Chemistry Howard University.
Simulations of ozone over Israel, West Bank, and Jordan E. Weinroth, M. Luria, A. Ben-Nun, C. Emery, J. Kaplan, M. Peleg and Y. Mahrer Seagram Center for.
Working together for clean air Puget Sound Area Ozone Modeling NW AIRQUEST December 4, 2006 Washington State University Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Washington.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Carolina Environmental Programs Emissions and meteorological Aspects of the 2001 ICAP Simulation Adel Hanna,
Model Evaluation with Satellite Data: NO 2, HCHO, and Beyond Monica Harkey Tracey Holloway Alex Cohan Rob Kaleel.
Improving Cloud Simulation in Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Through Assimilation of GOES Satellite Observations Andrew White Advisor: Dr. Arastoo.
Simulation of Houston-Galveston Airshed Ozone Episode with EPA’s CMAQ Daewon Byun: PI Soontae Kim, Beata Czader, Seungbum Kim Emissions input Chemical.
Krish Vijayaraghavan, Prakash Karamchandani Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA 3rd Annual CMAS Models-3 Conference October 18-20, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC.
OThree Chemistry MM5 Model Diagnostic and Sensitivity Analysis Results Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation 1 T. W. Tesche Dennis McNally.
Earth System Sciences, LLC Suggested Analyses of WRAP Drilling Rig Databases Doug Blewitt, CCM 1.
Template Improving Sources of Stratospheric Ozone and NOy and Evaluating Upper Level Transport in CAMx Chris Emery, Sue Kemball-Cook, Jaegun Jung, Jeremiah.
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
NOAA Contributions to the Central California Ozone Study and Ongoing Meteorological Monitoring Jim Wilczak Jian-Wen Bao, Sara Michelson, Ola Persson, Laura.
The Impact of Biogenic VOC Emissions on Tropospheric Ozone Formation in the Mid-Atlantic Region Michelle L. Bell Yale University Hugh Ellis Johns Hopkins.
1 Recent Advances in the Modeling of Airborne Substances George Pouliot Shan He Tom Pierce.
OThree Chemistry MM5/CAMx Model Diagnostic and Sensitivity Analysis Results: Continued Diagnostics and PA Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation.
OThree Chemistry MM5/CAMx Model Diagnostic and Sensitivity Analysis Results: Recent Diagnostics and PA Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation.
Soontae Kim and Daewon W. Byun Comparison of Emission Estimates from SMOKE and EPS2 Used for Studying Houston-Galveston Air Quality Institute for Multidimensional.
1 CCOS Update November 3, 2006 PC Meeting Project Status –Completed Projects Results –On-Going Projects Status Plan for CCOS Final Phase –Guiding Principles.
RAMS Input Data. Types of input data Meteorological data  First guess gridded data – NCEP, ECMWF, etc.  Surface observations (single level measurements.
Presentation by: Dan Goldberg Co-authors: Tim Vinciguerra, Linda Hembeck, Sam Carpenter, Tim Canty, Ross Salawitch & Russ Dickerson 13 th Annual CMAS Conference.
Recent Developments in California and the U.S. Bart Croes Air Resources Board Sacramento, California 6 March, 1996.
1 Neil Wheeler, Kenneth Craig, and Clinton MacDonald Sonoma Technology, Inc. Petaluma, California Presented at the Sixth Annual Community Modeling and.
Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency Ozone SIP Schedule and CCOS Products Policy Committee Meeting John DaMassa April 18, 2002.
Accounting for Uncertainties in NWPs using the Ensemble Approach for Inputs to ATD Models Dave Stauffer The Pennsylvania State University Office of the.
Preliminary Study: Direct and Emission-Induced Effects of Global Climate Change on Regional Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter K. Manomaiphiboon 1 *, A.
Meteorological Data Analysis Urban, Regional Modeling and Analysis Section Division of Air Resources New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.
Melanie Follette-Cook Christopher Loughner (ESSIC, UMD) Kenneth Pickering (NASA GSFC) CMAS Conference October 27-29, 2014.
OThree Chemistry MM5/CAMx Model Diagnostic and Sensitivity Analysis Results Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation 2 T. W. Tesche Dennis.
Seasonal Modeling (NOAA) Jian-Wen Bao Sara Michelson Jim Wilczak Curtis Fleming Emily Piencziak.
Georgia Institute of Technology Initial Application of the Adaptive Grid Air Quality Model Dr. M. Talat Odman, Maudood N. Khan Georgia Institute of Technology.
1 Prepared by: Neil Wheeler Sonoma Technology, Inc. Petaluma, CA Presented to: CCOS Technical Committee Sacramento, CA August 15, Central California.
PM Model Performance & Grid Resolution Kirk Baker Midwest Regional Planning Organization November 2003.
An air quality information system for cities with complex terrain based on high resolution NWP Viel Ødegaard, r&d department.
Operational Evaluation and Comparison of CMAQ and REMSAD- An Annual Simulation Brian Timin, Carey Jang, Pat Dolwick, Norm Possiel, Tom Braverman USEPA/OAQPS.
January 24, Update to CCAQS PC Final Projects for CCOS & CRPAQS.
METEOROGICAL AND CHEMICAL PREDICTION WEB BASED SYSTEM USING RAMS AND CAMx NUMERICAL MODELS By Maria Victoria Toro G. PhD Nestor Waldyd Alvarez V. E.E.
Regional Modeling Joseph Cassmassi South Coast Air Quality Management District USA.
Statewide Protocol: Regional Application August 27, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency Luis F. Woodhouse.
Applications of Models-3 in Coastal Areas of Canada M. Lepage, J.W. Boulton, X. Qiu and M. Gauthier RWDI AIR Inc. C. di Cenzo Environment Canada, P&YR.
1 Impact on Ozone Prediction at a Fine Grid Resolution: An Examination of Nudging Analysis and PBL Schemes in Meteorological Model Yunhee Kim, Joshua S.
May 22, UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PRECURSOR REDUCTIONS IN LOWERING 8-HOUR OZONE CONCENTRATIONS Steve Reynolds Charles Blanchard Envair 12.
Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency OZONE SIP MODELING and DATA ANALYSIS Policy Committee Meeting John DaMassa Saffet Tanrikulu.
Boundary layer depth verification system at NCEP M. Tsidulko, C. M. Tassone, J. McQueen, G. DiMego, and M. Ek 15th International Symposium for the Advancement.
MM5 studies at Wageningen University (NL) Title Jordi Vilà (Group 4) NL North sea Radar MM5 NL North sea.
Peak 8-hr Ozone Model Performance when using Biogenic VOC estimated by MEGAN and BIOME (BEIS) Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium October.
June 29, 2011NASA/ARB Data Analyses Discussion1 What can We Learn from ARCTAS-CARB Data? Modeling and Meteorology Branch Planning and Technical Support.
SIP Modeling Inventories Based on CCOS episodes (year 2000) SIP Gridded Inventory Coordination Group provided a forum for discussing inventory issues as.
MRPO Technical Approach “Nearer” Term Overview For: Emissions Modeling Meteorological Modeling Photochemical Modeling & Domain Model Performance Evaluation.
1 DRAFT Report for Air Quality Analysis on Cumulative Emissions, Barrio Logan Tony Servin, P.E. Modeling Support Section Planning and Technical Support.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside CCOS 2000 Model Intercomparison: Summary of.
NW-AIRQUEST projects on Agricultural and Wildfire Smoke in the Inland Northwest: ClearSky and AIRPACT-3 presented by: Joe Vaughan WSU-LAR contributors:
Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency CCOS STATUS REPORT Policy Committee Meeting Saffet Tanrikulu, Ph.D. October 25, 2002.
Institute for Environment and Sustainability1 Date & Time 09: :30Status review and improvements  BaseCase (1) problem review and actions taken (20’)
Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency March 13, 2003Presentation to the Policy Committee1 Ozone SIP Modeling and Data Analysis:
Evaluations of CMAQ Simulations in southern Taiwan
gWRF Workflow and Input Data Requirements
Suggested Analyses of WRAP Drilling Rig Databases
Some thoughts on future air quality models from a WRF-Chem modeler
Simulation of Ozone and PM in Southern Taiwan
WRAP Modeling Forum, San Diego
REGIONAL AND LOCAL-SCALE EVALUATION OF 2002 MM5 METEOROLOGICAL FIELDS FOR VARIOUS AIR QUALITY MODELING APPLICATIONS Pat Dolwick*, U.S. EPA, RTP, NC, USA.
Presentation transcript:

BAY AREA MODELING Status of Modeling Work Technical Committee Meeting November 18, 2003 Bay Area Air Quality Management District and Environ Corp.

Status of Bay Area/Environ Work Performing QA/QC for CCOS data Investigating potential causes of current underestimation of predicted ozone ( CAMx with CB-IV) –Meteorological fields (MM5 simulations) –Emissions (temperature inputs, wildfires, diesel NOx, weekday/weekend differences)

QA/QC of CCOS Data Temperatures: surface and RASS Winds: surface and profilers Ozone, NO, NOy: surface and aircraft NMOC: surface and aircraft

QA/QC of CCOS Data (cont.) Purpose: –Model input development –Model evaluation –Develop a conceptual model of ozone formation Problems found: –Units conversion errors –Missing aircraft coordinate data –Missing NMOC data

Meteorological Inputs CAMx model performance is sensitive to temperature –MM5 is under-predicting temperatures CAMx model performance is sensitive to sea-breeze strength –RAMS is over-predicting on-shore flow

Meteorological Inputs (cont.) Some MM5 parameters are not representative of the CCOS domain: –Soil moisture –Deep soil temperature –Surface roughness (land and sea) –Terrain barriers and terrain smoothing –Grid resolution

Livermore

Cool

Clovis

Arvin

Lodi

CAMx Simulations CAMx simulations show under- predictions of ozone Problem identified with CAMx albedo/haze/ozone column file –Ozone column too low –Higher ozone predicted with incorrect O3 column input

Emissions Revised temperatures for biogenic and mobile source emissions –Significant differences between 3/03 and 4/03 emissions: temperature differences? –Analysis temperature fields under-predicted Bay Area and Sierra temperatures – Produced new hybrid temperature fields: RAMS/obs. –Relatively small differences in emissions and predicted ozone in the Bay Area

Emissions (cont.) Emissions Inventory Working Group to identify potential uncertainties –Diesel NOx, especially in SJV –Observed ratios of VOC/CO, NOx/CO not in agreement with MVEI estimates –Documentation will help direct efforts

Modeling Boundary Conditions Based on CCOS Aircraft Sampling * Recommended based on off-shore aircraft data ** Original CCOS boundary conditions.