The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Advertisements

The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Simulation priorities for 2015 R. Bruce for task 5.2.
Luminosity Prospects of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel DESY Colloquium May F. Willeke, DESY.
Crab Cavities in IR1 and IR5 Some considerations on tunnel integration What will be the situation in the tunnel after the LHC IR Phase-1 Upgrade. What.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
The ATS MD part III (Achromatic Telescopic Squeezing scheme) Participants: Any (active) volunteers Goal: 1)MD1 (S. Fartoukh & R. Assmann  10h): “Pre-squeeze’’
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
HL-LHC WP2 Brainstorming Meeting 1 Purpose of this meeting:  Introduce the main objectives of the new HL-LHC project: Prepare technical proposal by 2013.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
HL-LHC optics S. Fartoukh, CERN-BE-ABP  Performance goal & basic ingredients  Optics & beam parameters  Optics limitations & the Achromatic Telescopic.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
S. Fartoukh1st General HL-LHC meeting, The Achromatic Telescopic Squeeze (ATS) S. Fartoukh CERN/BE-ABP  Motivations  Basic principles of.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Optimization of Field Error Tolerances for Triplet Quadrupoles of the HL-LHC Lattice V3.01 Option 4444 Yuri Nosochkov Y. Cai, M-H. Wang (SLAC) S. Fartoukh,
Evian 2014 historical perspective run 1: 2010: L peak >10 32 cm -2 s -1  2x10 32 cm -2 s : produce >1 fb -1  delivered.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Review of FCC-hh optics & beam dynamics IPNO, Orsay, Paris November 2015 Reviewers: S. Fartoukh (CERN), O. Napoly (CEA), E. Todesco (CERN), F. Zimmermann.
LHC-CC Validity Requirements & Tests LHC Crab Cavity Mini Workshop at CERN; 21. August Remarks on using the LHC as a test bed for R&D equipment.
Aperture in case of an asynchronous beam dump with ATS optics R. Bruce, E. Quaranta, S. Redaelli With valueable input from: A. Bertarelli, C. Bracco, F.
S. FartoukhLSWG Day, Monday 18th, ATS MDs for Run II S. Fartoukh for the ATS MD team  Reminder  Goal & overall strategy  Proposals for 2016/
S. FartoukhLSWG Day, Monday 18th, ATS MDs for Run II S. Fartoukh for the ATS MD team  Reminder  Goal & overall strategy  Proposals for 2016/
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Beta* leverage during RHIC AuAu Run14 G. Robert-Demolaize, M. Bai, C. Harper, A. Marusic, X. Shen, S. White Work supported, in parts, by the European Commission.
Collimator settings for 2012 R. Bruce, R. Assmann for the collimation team
Β*-dependence on collimation R. Bruce, R.W. Assmann C. Alabau Pons, F. Burkart, M. Cauchi, D. Deboy, M. Giovannozzi, W. Herr, L. Lari, G. Muller, S. Redaelli,
1 Task particle simulations studies: progress report M. Giovannozzi Objectives To study the field quality tolerances for new magnetic elements for.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
WP2: Beam dynamics and optics Workflow between Work Packages 1 O. Brüning – BE-ABP WP2 HL-LHC meeting 17. November 2011.
Overview of Wire Compensation for the LHC Jean-Pierre Koutchouk CARE-HHH Meeting on beam-beam effects and beam-beam compensation CERN 08/28/2008.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
E. Todesco LAYOUT FOR INTERACTION REGIONS IN HI LUMI LHC E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland Acknowledgements: B. Dalena, M. Giovannozzi, R. De Maria,
08/11/2007M. Giovannozzi – CARE-HHH-APD IR’071 Optics issues for Phase 1 and Phase 2 upgrades Massimo Giovannozzi, CERN Outline: –Option for Phase 1 and.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Collimation Aspects for Crab Cavities? R. Assmann, CERN Thanks to Daniel Wollmann for presenting this talk on my behalf (criticism and complaints please.
Field Quality Specifications for Triplet Quadrupoles of the LHC Lattice v.3.01 Option 4444 and Collimation Study Yunhai Cai Y. Jiao, Y. Nosochkov, M-H.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
How low can we go? Getting below β*=3.5m R. Bruce, R.W. Assmann Acknowledgment: T. Baer, W. Bartmann, C. Bracco, S. Fartoukh, M. Giovannozzi, B. Goddard,W.
R. Bruce, M. Giovannozzi, S. Redaelli With essential input from G. Arduini, R. De Maria, S. Fartoukh, M. Fitterer, R. Tomas, J. Wenninger, aperture team.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
First evaluation of Dynamic Aperture at injection for FCC-hh
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Tracking simulations – where we are and what needs to be done R. Bruce on behalf of task 5.2.
C. Bracco, R. Bruce, B. Goddard, C. Wiesner, A. Lechner, M. Frankl
Operating IP8 at high luminosity in the HL-LHC era
Field quality update and recent tracking results
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Optimization of Triplet Field Quality in Collision
Optics and operational modes for the HL-LHC
Status and needs of dynamic aperture calculations
Β*-reach in 2017 R. Bruce, S. Redaelli, R. De Maria, M. Giovannozzi, A. Mereghetti, D. Mirarchi Acknowledgement: collimation and optics teams, BE/ABP,
Field quality to achieve the required lifetime goals (single beam)
Asynchronous free ATS optics for LHC & HL-LHC S. Fartoukh, BE-ABP
Optics Development for HE-LHC
Alternative design of the matching section for crab-cavity operation
Collimation after LS1: cleaning and β* reach
Collimation margins and *
HL-LHC operations with LHCb at high luminosity
Triplet corrector layout and strength specifications
HL-LHCV1.4 (BI) R. De Maria WP13 meeting 3/9/2018.
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Update on study of chromaticity correction schemes for ion ring
Large emittance scenario for the Phase II Upgrade of the LHC
HL-LHCV1.4 (BI) R. De Maria WP13 meeting 3/9/2018.
Presentation transcript:

The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme, Grant Agreement Review of Q5 in IR6 and MS10 in IR1-IR5 R. De Maria, S. Fartoukh, M. Giovannozzi with input from R. Bruce, M. Korostelev, Y. Uythoven.

 ATS scheme has been adopted as the baseline optics for HL-LHC.  The ATS can be fully exploited in the LHC by an additional lattice sextupole in Q10 (MS10) of IR1- IR5 and a stronger Q5 in IR6 in order to keep a balanced β* reach in ATLAS and CMS. “In practice, the scheme proposed requires rather limited hardware modifications in 95% of the LHC ring (new Q5 at least 20% longer in IR6, additional lattice sextupoles equipping Q10 in IR1 and IR5, see Sections 4.1 and 4.2) but of course more deeper interventions in LSS1 and LSS5 in order to replace the existing magnets with other ones of larger aperture (see Section 4.3)” S. Fartoukh, sLHC PR Introduction

Blow-up β in the arc to reduce β* done by perturbing optics of IR8,2 for ATLAS and IR4,6 for CMS. IR6 optics not flexible enough with Q5 going out of strengths. Specific phase advances are enforced to compensate chromatic aberrations of the triplet, however geometric aberrations are enhanced by the increase arc β. 3 ATS scheme principles ATS factor S. Fartoukh, sLHC PR

4 Additional MS10 Option The additional MS in Q10 is needed: To bring the β* reach at 7 TeV of the pre-squeeze optics to 44 cm at 7 TeV instead of 48 cm already taking counting on the lattice sextupoles at 600A. To compensate the geometric aberrations of the MS14 that are enhanced by the blow-up in the arc. It has been part of the baseline since the beginning. ArcMS14MS13MS12MS11 B1: 81,45F1(9)D1(12)F2(10)D2(12) B2: 81,45D1(11)F1(10)D2(12)F2(10) B1: 12,56D2(11)F2(10)D1(12)F1(10) B2: 12,56F2(9)D2(12)F1(10)D1(12) Sextupole Families in ATS arcs: no change ATS factors R. De Maria, S. Fartoukh, 64 th LMC 2010, sLHC PR.50, sLHC PR.55

5 Additional MS10 Option The additional MS in Q10 is needed: To bring the β* reach at 7 TeV of the pre-squeeze optics to 44 cm at 7 TeV instead of 48 cm already taking counting on the lattice sextupoles at 600A. To compensate the geometric aberrations of the MS14 that are enhanced by the blow-up in the arc. It has been part of the baseline since the beginning. Sextupole Families in ATS arcs adding MS10 ATS factors R. De Maria, S. Fartoukh, 64 th LMC 2010, sLHC PR.50, sLHC PR.55 ArcMS10MS13MS12MS11 B1: 81,45F1(10)D1(12)F2(10)D2(12) B2: 81,45D1(12)F1(10)D2(12)F2(10) B1: 12,56D2(12)F2(10)D1(12)F1(10) B2: 12,56F2(10)D2(12)F1(10)D1(12)

R. De Maria, S. Fartoukh, 64 th LMC 2010, sLHC PR.50, sLHC PR.55 6 Additional MS10 Option The additional MS in Q10 is needed: To bring the β* reach at 7 TeV of the pre-squeeze optics to 44 cm at 7 TeV instead of 48 cm already taking counting on the lattice sextupoles at 600A. To compensate the geometric aberrations of the MS14 that are enhanced by the blow-up in the arc. It has been part of the baseline since the beginning. ATS factors ArcMS18MS13MS12MS11 B1: 81,45F1(8)D1(12)F2(10)D2(12) B2: 81,45D1(10)F1(10)D2(12)F2(10) B1: 12,56D2(10)F2(10)D1(12)F1(10) B2: 12,56F2(8)D2(12)F1(10)D1(12) Sextupole Families in ATS arcs by passing MS14

7 Sextupole options R. De Maria, S. Fartoukh, 64 th LMC 2010, sLHC PR.50, sLHC PR.55 Optics v3.01 (valid for any layout) Min DA with only arc errors and no bb (relative loss matters) ATS factors 1,5With MS10No MS10 (2x,8x) (8x,2x)11.0 σ8.3 (-2.7) σ (8x,2x) (2x,8x)11.3 σ9.9 (-1.4) σ (4x,4x) 15.0 σ13.4 (-1.8) σ Due to sextupole-induced resonances, the absence of MS10 results in an expected reduction of DA of about 2 sigma for low β*. The number of sextupoles is also relevant for the minimum pre-queeze β* ArcMS14MS13MS12MS11 B1:81,45F1(9)D1(12)F2(10)D2(12) B2: 81,45D1(11)F1(10)D2(12)F2(10) B1: 12,56D2(11)F2(10)D1(12)F1(10) B2: 12,56F2(9)D2(12)F1(10)D1(12) Sextupole Families

8 Mitigation strategies for MS10 Different phase advances for IR1-IR5 could have avoided the MS in Q10, but no optics solution has been found or presented yet. It is possible to bypass MS14 at the cost of increasing β* of the pre-squeeze to 52 cm, thus increasing the ATS factor to reach the same β* and about the same DA as the baseline. The increase of the ATS factor has implications on IR6 optics, collimation performance and machine protection that are yet to be quantified. Other ideas of mitigation strategies are under consideration with semi-local compensation, requiring a smaller increase of the ATS factor but they could be evaluate when more information and experiments on lifetimes will be available. We recommend installing the additional MS in Q10 as it is the best option based on the current knowledge of the machine models.

Different squeeze sequences are needed depending on the final β* for CMS. IR6 optics is very rigid due to position of the quadrupoles and internal phase advances. 9 IR6 Layout Since the beginning the ATS optics had stronger Q5: SLHCV3.0, SLHCV3.01: double MQY SLHC3.1b, HLLHCV1.0: MQYL HLLHCV1.1: Double MQY Basic needs taken into account: MKD – Septum phase advance, beam size at dumps. However optics are not validated for collimator settings and failure scenarios (WP5 - WP14): beta functions at collimators do vary during the squeeze phase advance between MKD TCT are not optimal optimized.

10 R. De Maria, M. Korestelev, Task2.2 Meeting March ‘14 Squeeze of Q5 to reach final optics. β* CMS: 10cm/10cm β* CMS: 15cm/15cm IR6 Optics and Q5 Squeeze assuming the exiting MQY A similar squeeze has been develop and tested with pilot beam in the LHC. S. Fartoukh et al. ATS MD notes I-II-III.

11 IR6 Optics and Q5 Squeeze assuming the exiting MQY R. De Maria, M. Korestelev, Task2.2 Meeting March ‘14 β* CMS: 20cm/7.5cm β* CMS: 30cm/7.5cm

12 IR6 Optics and Q5 Squeeze assuming the exiting MQY R. De Maria, M. Korestelev, Task2.2 Meeting March ‘14 β* CMS: 7.5cm/30cm

13 IR6 Optics and Squeeze Basic needs taken into account: MKD – Septum phase advance Beam size at dumps. However optics and squeeze are not fully validated (WP5, WP14): phase advance between MKD and TCT are neither optimal nor optimized and impact TCDQ – TCT retraction. Failure scenarios with ATS in the arc β-functions at TCDQ, TCDS, TDE do vary during the squeeze. Warnings issued for low β y TCDQAR6.B1- TCDQAL6.B2 in sflathv and flat resp. large and large β y in flathv, sflathv (Y. Uythoven 10/4/2014).

14 Mitigation strategies for Q5 in IR6 Adding an MQY in Q5 solves all issues. No changes in the present Q5 is not an option unless downgrading β*. Powering the existing Q5 at 200T/m at 1.9K like in IR1-5 fulfills the β* reach for CMS for the present optics (without margins for most push flat). However this solution: still limits the β* reach in CMS with respect to ATLAS does not leave much margins in case new optics in IR6 are required after all validations are conclusive. 200 T/m at 1.9 K is a viable option if the optics is frozen as is. Otherwise doubling MQY is the best solution in terms of potential. (R. De Maria, 26 th WP2 TLM meeting)

Scenarios without MS10 and no stronger Q5 in IR6 have been explored for the RLIUP workshop [1], implying a β* reach of 16cm/36cm or 20 cm for CMS compared to 10 cm, or 5/20 cm for ATLAS. Limits are not hard, but additional risks are put on performance reach of the HL-LHC if today’s best solutions are not used. Some of the risks could be mitigated by further studies and experiments with ATS optics in the present LHC. 15 Outlook [1] M. Fitterer et al, CERN-ACC-NOTE