CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 Status of CAM Bill Collins and Leo Donner National Center for Atmospheric Research and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Met Office Hadley Centre, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, Devon, EX1 3PB United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) Fax: +44 (0)
Advertisements

Quantifying sub-grid cloud structure and representing it GCMs
Recent Evidence for Reduced Climate Sensitivity Roy W. Spencer, Ph.D Principal Research Scientist The University of Alabama In Huntsville March 4, 2008.
Evaluating parameterized variables in the Community Atmospheric Model along the GCSS Pacific cross-section during YOTC Cécile Hannay, Dave Williamson,
Clouds and Climate A. Pier Siebesma KNMI What are clouds? How do they form? Cloud climatology Clouds and Radiation Clouds in Climate models Cloud Climate.
Double ITCZ Phenomena in GCM’s Marcus D. Williams.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
By : Kerwyn Texeira. Outline Definitions Introduction Model Description Model Evaluation The effect of dust nuclei on cloud coverage Conclusion Questions.
Clouds and Climate: Cloud Response to Climate Change SOEEI3410 Ken Carslaw Lecture 5 of a series of 5 on clouds and climate Properties and distribution.
Radiative Properties of Clouds SOEE3410 Ken Carslaw Lecture 3 of a series of 5 on clouds and climate Properties and distribution of clouds Cloud microphysics.
The Radiative Budget of an Atmospheric Column in Tropical Western Pacific Zheng Liu Department of Atmospheric Science University of Washington.
Clouds and Climate: Cloud Response to Climate Change ENVI3410 : Lecture 11 Ken Carslaw Lecture 5 of a series of 5 on clouds and climate Properties and.
Radiative Properties of Clouds SOEE3410 Ken Carslaw Lecture 3 of a series of 5 on clouds and climate Properties and distribution of clouds Cloud microphysics.
John J. Cassano - University of Colorado Wieslaw Maslowski -Naval Postgraduate School William Gutowski - Iowa State University Dennis Lettenmaier – University.
Chapter 6: Global Fluxes and The Deep Circulation Heat Budget Conservation of Salt Oceanic Water Masses Oceanic Mixing Temperature - Salinity Diagrams.
Part 1. Energy and Mass Chapter 3. Energy Balance and Temperature.
Radiative Properties of Clouds ENVI3410 : Lecture 9 Ken Carslaw Lecture 3 of a series of 5 on clouds and climate Properties and distribution of clouds.
The Radiative Budget of an Atmospheric Column in Tropical Western Pacific Zheng Liu 1 Thomas Ackerman 1,2, Sally McFarlane 2, Jim Mather 2, University.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Total Amount Altitude Optical Depth Longwave High Clouds Shortwave High Clouds Shortwave Low Clouds.
CCSM Meeting June 23-27, 2003 Status of CCSM2.2 Bill Collins Incoming Chair, CCSM Scientific Steering Committee National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Applications and Limitations of Satellite Data Professor Ming-Dah Chou January 3, 2005 Department of Atmospheric Sciences National Taiwan University.
Clouds, Aerosols and Precipitation GRP Meeting August 2011 Susan C van den Heever Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University Fort Collins,
How Do the Clouds Form?. The global water cycle Ocean water covers 70% of the Earth’s surface.
Radiative Properties of Eastern Pacific Stratocumulus Clouds Zack Pecenak Evan Greer Changfu Li.
Ch3: Energy Balance and Temperature. 1.About the first in-class assignment 2.About reading the textbook.
Science Jeopardy Prop. Of AirHeat TransferWindsWater.
Arctic Cloud Biases in CCSM3 Steve Vavrus Center for Climatic Research University of Wisconsin.
Fanglin Yang Work Done at Climate Research Group
Kinematic Structure of the WAFR Monsoon ATS mb NCEP Climatology Zonal Winds.
Synthesis NOAA Webinar Chris Fairall Yuqing Wang Simon de Szoeke X.P. Xie "Evaluation and Improvement of Climate GCM Air-Sea Interaction Physics: An EPIC/VOCALS.
Forecast simulations of Southeast Pacific Stratocumulus with CAM3 and CAM3-UW. Cécile Hannay (1), Jeffrey Kiehl (1), Dave Williamson (1), Jerry Olson (1),
C LOUD R ADIATIVE K ERNELS : C LOUDS IN W/m 2 with T. Andrews, J. Boyle, A. Dessler, P. Forster, P. Gleckler, J. Gregory, D. Hartmann, S. Klein, R. Pincus,
CCSM Atmospheric Model Working Group Summary J. J. Hack, D. A Randall AMWG Co-Chairs CCSM Workshop, 28 June 2001 CCSM Workshop, 28 June 2001.
Morrison/Gettelman/GhanAMWG January 2007 Two-moment Stratiform Cloud Microphysics & Cloud-aerosol Interactions in CAM H. Morrison, A. Gettelman (NCAR),
CCSM Atmospheric Model Working Group Report J. J. Hack, D. A Randall AMWG Co-Chairs CCSM 2001 Workshop, Breckenridge CCSM 2001 Workshop, Breckenridge.
AMWG Breakout, CCSM Workshop June 25, 2002 Overview of CAM status and simulations Bill Collins and Dave Randall National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Large Eddy Simulation of Low Cloud Feedback to a 2-K SST Increase Anning Cheng 1, and Kuan-Man Xu 2 1. AS&M, Inc., 2. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton,
An evaluation of satellite derived air-sea fluxes through use in ocean general circulation model Vijay K Agarwal, Rashmi Sharma, Neeraj Agarwal Meteorology.
Boundary Layer Clouds.
Workshop on Tropical Biases, 28 May 2003 CCSM CAM2 Tropical Simulation James J. Hack National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado USA Collaborators:
Cloud-Aerosol-climate feedback
Chapter 3 Atmospheric Radiative Transfer and Climate To date, we have learned 1)The greenhouse effects, through understanding the simplest greenhouse model,
Representation of Subgrid Cloud-Radiation Interaction and its Impact on Global Climate Simulations Xinzhong Liang (Illinois State Water Survey, UIUC )
Ocean Surface heat fluxes
ISCCP SO FAR (at 30) GOALS ►Facilitate "climate" research ►Determine cloud effects on radiation exchanges ►Determine cloud role in global water cycle ▬
Andrew Conley¹², Mike Iacono¹³, Bill Collins¹², Brian Eaton², Phil Rasch², Francis Vitt², Pat Worley², Jean-Francois Lamarque¹², And Many Others ¹ Supported.
Update on the 2-moment stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in CAM Hugh Morrison and Andrew Gettelman National Center for Atmospheric Research CCSM Atmospheric.
Joint AMWG/CVWG Workshop March 6-7, 2003 Improvements in Radiation Processes Bill Collins Andrew Conley, David Fillmore, Julia.
The Arctic boundary layer: Characteristics and properties Steven Cavallo June 1, 2006 Boundary layer meteorology.
12 th annual CMAS conference Impact of Biomass Burning Aerosols on Regional Climate over Southeast US Peng Liu, Yongtao Hu, Armistead G. Russell, Athanasios.
Air Masses and ITCZ. Topic 4: Air Masses and ITCZ Global wind circulation and ocean currents are important in determining climate patterns. These are.
AMWG Meeting April 3-4, 2002 Overview of CAM status and simulations Bill Collins and Jim Hack National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado.
Water Cycle, Cloud Formation, and Severe Weather.
Impact of Convective Triggering Mechanisms on CAM2 Model Simulations Shaocheng Xie, Gerald L. Potter, Richard T. Cederwall, and James S. Boyle Atmospheric.
Mayurakshi Dutta Department of Atmospheric Sciences March 20, 2003
Status of CAM, March 2004 Phil Rasch. Differences between CAM2 and CAM3 (standard physics version) Separate liquid and ice phases Advection, sedimentation.
Towards development of a Regional Arctic Climate System Model ---
Jeffrey T. Kiehl CCSM Scientific Steering Committee Chairman
Performance of the VIC land surface model in coupled simulations
Initial Implementation of VIC within CCSM System through CPL7
National Center for Atmospheric Research
Update on CAM and the AMWG. Recent activities and near-term priorities. by the AMWG.
The Next Release of CCSM: IPCC and Community Applications
A. Gettelman, X. Liu, H. Morrison, S. Ghan
Update on CAM2.X Development and Future Research Directions
Short Term forecasts along the GCSS Pacific Cross-section: Evaluating new Parameterizations in the Community Atmospheric Model Cécile Hannay, Dave Williamson,
VOCALS Open Ocean: Science and Logistics
Recent CCSM development simulations: Towards CCSM4
Climate sensitivity of the CCM3 to horizontal resolution and interannual variability of simulated tropical cyclones J. Tsutsui, K. Nishizawa,H. Kitabata,
Presentation transcript:

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 Status of CAM Bill Collins and Leo Donner National Center for Atmospheric Research and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Model biases in CAM2 Creation of CAM2.X Physics and dynamics proposed for CAM 2.X ⁻ Integrated physics package ⁻ Simulated climate ⁻ Effects of new physics on model biases

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 AMWG Agenda

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 Ongoing Development of CAM CAM Spring 2003 CAM 2.X Major changes to physics, code structure CCSM 2.2 Integration “Late” Spring 2003 CCSM X, CAM3 Physics adjustments, dycore decision Fall 2003

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 Main Model Biases in CAM2/CCSM2 Overestimation of winter land surface temperatures  Bias largely eliminated in CAM 2.X Underestimation of tropical tropopause temperatures  Bias reduced in CAM 2.X Double ITCZ and extended cold tongue  Double ITCZ mitigated in CAM 2.X Erroneous cloud response to SST changes  Signs and pattern of response corrected in CAM 2.X Errors in E. Pacific surface energy budget  Overestimation of insolation larger in CAM 2.X Underestimation of tropical variability  Underestimation still present

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 Winter Land Surface Temperatures CAM 2CAM 2.X

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 Tropical Tropopause Temperatures CAM 2CAM 2.X

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 Tropical Precipitation CAM 2CAM 2.X CAM 2.X - CAM 2

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 Cloud Forcing during Warm-Cold Events CAM 2CAM 2.XERBE

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 E. Pacific Surface Energy Budget Net SW Net LWLatent Heat Flux

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 E. Pacific Cloud Properties Cloud FractionCloud Optical Depth

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 Surface Stresses CAM 2 CAM 2.X - CAM2

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 MJO Variability CAM 2.X NCEP

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 New Physics in CAM 2.X Relative to CAM Clouds and condensate:Clouds and condensate: –Improved prognostic cloud water & moist processes –Transfer of mixed phase precipitation to land surface –Improved cloud parameterization Radiation:Radiation: –Shortwave forcing by diagnostic aerosols –Updated SW scheme for H 2 O absorption –Updated LW scheme for LW absorption and emission Surface models:Surface models: –Introduction of CLM 2.2 –Reintroduction of Slab Ocean Model (SOM) Energy fixers for dynamics + diagnosticsEnergy fixers for dynamics + diagnostics

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 Other Changes in CAM 2.X Updated boundary data sets –Navy  USGS orography –NOAA  new PCMDI ozone New diagnostics –ISCCP cloud simulator Software improvements –Update to CPL 6 –Performance enhancements to SLD, FV dycores

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 Increased Cloud Condensate Separate cloud liquid and ice variables Advect cloud condensate Include latent heat of fusion Use ice & water variables for cloud optics New dependence on temperature for cirrus particle size Sedimentation of cloud droplets and ice particles Modified evaporation of rain CAM 2CAM 2.X CAM 2.X – CAM 2

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 Increased Cloud Amounts PBL height constrained Rain rate > 0 Convection cloud amounts from convective mass fluxes Stratocumulus clouds in lowest 2 levels Changes to autoconversion thresholds Changes to relative humidity thresholds Fall speed of droplets is function of effective radius  NET TOA =  4.5 Wm  2 NET TOA = 0.53 Wm  2 CAM 2CAM 2.X CAM 2.X – CAM 2

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 Changes in Cloud Amounts New – Old Cloud Parameterization

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 Reduction in Net Surface Flux (Effects of Increased Cloud Amounts) New – Old Cloud Parameterization

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 Changes in Temperature and Humidity (Effects of Increased Cloud Amounts) New – Old Cloud Parameterization

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 Addition of Prescribed Aerosol Forcing

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 Changes in Longwave Cooling Rates: New H2O Lines and Continuum Change in LBL Cooling Change in CAM Cooling

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 Dipole Changes in LW Cooling Rates

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 Global Decrease in Longwave Fluxes

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 Changes in Shortwave Heating Rates: New H2O Lines and Continuum LBL Heating CAM2 Heating CAM2x Heating Tropics

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 Global Increase in SW Heating Rates

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 Global Decrease in Surface Insolation

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 Acknowledgements The senior scientists of CMS, for their work and dedication to create CAM 2.X Jim McCaa and Tom Henderson, for their tireless efforts to build the next versions of CAM The Software Engineers of CMS, for their ongoing support of the climate model Andrew Conley, David Fillmore, and Julia Lee-Taylor, for their development of new radiation schemes Mark Stevens, for producing a steady stream of diagnostics to guide the development effort Tony Craig, for integrating CAM into CCSM The AMWG, for contributing new physics, dynamics, and diagnostics, and applications for CAM

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 The Near Future Next steps for FV: –AMIP-style integration –Parallel Eulerian and FV integrations of CCSM –Decision by WGs and SSC later this summer Higher resolution versions of CAM needed: –T85 and T170 equivalent for IPCC –Issue: will physics scale to higher resolution? –Issue: release of higher resolution to AMWG Release of new CAM & CCSM to AMWG – dates? Vectorization – SSC has provisionally endorsed

CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 Conclusions A new version of CAM has been developed. Several critical biases have been reduced: –Winter land surface temperature error –Response of SW cloud forcing to tropical SST –Underestimate of tropopause temperatures –Double ITCZ Several critical biases remain: –Underestimate of intraseasonal variability –Errors in surface fluxes and stress in E. Pacific Challenges for next generation CAM: –Convection –Cloud/radiation interactions –Incorporation of atmospheric chemistry –“Your issue here”