Regulation of the IP 3 Receptor by Ca 2+ and Ca 2+ -binding Proteins.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Chapter 24 Calcium Copyright © 2012, American Society for Neurochemistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Advertisements

Calcium Homeostasis and Signaling in Yeast Cells and Cardiac Myocytes Jiangiun Cui, J.A. Kaandorp, P.M.A. Sloot Section Computational Science University.
Regulatory pathways acting on inositol trisphosphate receptor localization and function Jan B. Parys K.U.Leuven Univ. Alberta Edmonton July 2004.
Cellular Communication Chapter 11 Local communication In what ways do cells communicate locally? In what ways do cells communicate over longer distances?In.
Cell Communication Chapter 11 Local regulators – in the vicinity a.Paracrine signaling – nearby Cells are acted on by signaling Cell (ie. Growth factor)
Signal Transduction Pathways
Medical Biochemistry Membranes: Membrane receptors; G-proteins Lecture 73 Membranes: Membrane receptors; G-proteins Lecture 73.
Calcium Signals Copyright © by Joyce J. Diwan. All rights reserved. Biochemistry of Metabolism.
By what mechanisms are calcium signals read and translated into biochemical response? What is the structural basis for the function of the proteins involved?
11.2 Reception: A signaling molecule binds to a receptor protein, causing it to change shape A receptor protein on or in the target cell allows the cell.
Cell Communication (Signaling) Part 2
Cytosolic [Ca] RyR2 open probability ECC gain Ca transient contractility DADs - SCD [Ca] Time Iso CHF.
Cellular Neuroscience (207) Ian Parker Lecture # 6 - Second messenger and Ca 2+ signaling.
Ligand Receptor Cortisol Receptor is located in the cytosol Retinoid Receptors are in the nucleus Target gene in the nucleus Regulation of Transcription.
Mapping of Calmodulin Binding Sites on the IP 3 R1 N. Nadif Kasri, I. Sienaert, J.B. Parys, G. Callewaert, L. Missiaen and H. De Smedt Laboratory of Physiology,
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings Chapter 11 Cell Communication.
Calcium-dependent gating of Voltage-gated ion channels.
The four units of the Ca 2+ signalling network Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 1, (2000) Speed Amplitude Spatio-temporal pattern.
Please turn in your completed case study (all parts!)
Calmodulin in action: Diversity in target recognition and Activation Mechanism.
Cytokines, Growth Factors and Hormones SIGMA-ALDRICH.
Cell Communication.  Cell-to-cell communication is important for multicellular organisms.
Calcium-dependent gating of Voltage-gated Ca 2+ channels Regulation by Calmodulin.
University of Jordan1 Receptors Functions and Signal Transduction- L3 Faisal I. Mohammed, MD, PhD.
Modulation de la structure, localisation et fonction des récepteurs pour l’inositol trisphosphate: le rôle des interactions protéiques. Jan B. Parys K.U.Leuven.
Voltage-gated Ca 2+ Channels (VGCCs) For review, see: Catterall, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 16:
Cell Communication.
Signal Transduction Lecture 14. Ligands & Receptors n Ligand l Neurotransmitters & drugs n Receptor proteins l ligand binds to multiple receptors n Binding.
Cell Communication Chapter Cell Communication: An Overview  Cells communicate with one another through Direct channels of communication Specific.
Calcium [Ca2+]i very low ~ nM –Many calcium binding proteins = high buffering capacity Divalent cation forms ionic bridges –Glutamic acid –Aspartic.
Regulation of the IP3 Receptor by Ca2+ and Ca2+-Binding Proteins
Chapter 11 Cell Communication. Concept Check Questions Chapter 11 Cell Communication.
Chapter 11 Cell Communication. LE 11-2 Exchange of mating factors Mating Receptor a   factor a  a factor Yeast cell, mating type a Yeast cell, mating.
Cell Signaling (BIO-203) Lecture 5. Signal amplification occurs in many signaling pathways Receptors are low abundance proteins The binding of few signaling.
Chapter 14. Signal Transduction Signal transduction is the process by which an extracellular signal alters intracellular events. 1. First and second messengers.
Lecture: Cell Signaling
Intracellular calcium release channels as multi-protein complexes Jan B. Parys K.U.Leuven 7 th ECS meeting, June 13th, 2002.
IP 3 R SERCA Ca 2+ BiP Endoplasmic reticulum Ca 2+ = 5x10 -5 M Inactive PERK RyR ATP Ca 2+ Activated PERK Ca 2+ IP 3 GCPR Ligand Receptor-mediated generation.
ms [Ca] i (nM) 10 µm Ca 2+ Signaling Mark T Ziolo, PhD Department of Physiology & Cell Biology 019 Hamilton Hall
AP Biology Cell Communication. AP Biology Communication Methods  Cell-to-cell contact  Local signaling  Long distance signaling.
Mapping of Calmodulin binding sites on the IP3R1 N. Nadif Kasri; I. Sienaert, S. Vanlingen, J.B. Parys, G. Callewaert, L. Missiaen and H. De Smedt Laboratory.
Regulation of intracellular Ca 2+ -release channels by Ca 2+ and Ca 2+ -binding proteins Nael Nadif Kasri September 21st, 2004.
IP 3 -induced Ca 2+ release and calmodulin Laboratory of Physiology KULeuven Leuven, Belgium.
Contraction Mechanism Actin and myosin interact via to the sliding filament mechanism Resting State –Actin bound by caldesmon –Myosin light chain (MLC)
Cleavage of IP 3 R1 by caspase-3 and intracellular Ca 2+ homeostasis during Apoptosis Laboratory of Physiology, KULeuven, Belgium Assefa Z, Bultynck G,
Regulation of the IP 3 Receptor by Ca 2+ and Ca 2+ -binding Proteins.
Regulation of inositol 1,4,5- trisphosphate (IP 3 ) receptors and IP 3 -induced Ca 2+ release H. De Smedt K.U.Leuven, Belgium.
IP3-induced Ca2+ release and calmodulin
Chapter 11 Cell Communication.
Cell Communication.
What does the following have in common?
Translation initiation factor eIF2: Initiation and Recycling
Cell Communication (Signaling) Part 2
You have identified a novel cytoplasmic protein
Cell Communication (Signaling) Part 2
Intracellular Receptors
Gene expression, LTP, ion channels, enzymes, cell death
Cell Communication.
HFpEF, a Disease of the Vasculature: A Closer Look at the Other Half
Signal Transduction Dr. Nasim.
The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator: an intriguing protein with pleiotropic functions  Anne Vankeerberghen, Harry Cuppens, Jean-Jacques.
Cell Communication (Signaling) Part 2
Fig Figure 11.1 How do the effects of Viagra (multicolored) result from its inhibition of a signaling-pathway enzyme (purple)?
Calcium Signals Tune the Fidelity of Transcriptional Responses
Calcium Channel Regulation and Presynaptic Plasticity
Protein Kinase D Inhibitors Uncouple Phosphorylation from Activity by Promoting Agonist-Dependent Activation Loop Phosphorylation  Maya T. Kunkel, Alexandra C.
Cell Communication (Signaling) Part 2
Signal Transduction Lecture 14. Ligands & Receptors n Ligand l Neurotransmitters & drugs n Receptor proteins l ligand binds to multiple receptors n Binding.
Vocabulary Match-Fest
Long-distance signaling
Presentation transcript:

Regulation of the IP 3 Receptor by Ca 2+ and Ca 2+ -binding Proteins

Introduction IP 3 R Regulation of the IP 3 R by Ca 2+ and CaM Results Localization and characterization of the CaM-binding sites Function of CaM Regulation of the IP 3 R by Neuronal Ca 2+ -binding proteins Conclusions

IP 3 R I, II, III Agonists IP 3 Ca 2+ Intraluminal proteins: Chromogranins; Calnexin, Calreticulin Cytosolic proteins: Calmodulin; CaBP IRBIT; CARP Cytoskeletal proteins: Actin; MyosinII Ankyrin; Talin; Vinculin 4.1N Plasma membrane associated: Homer-mGluR TRPs; G  Kinases and phosphatases: PKA; PKC; Fyn BANK- PTK IRAG-PKG FKBP12-Calcineurin PP1  ER cytosol

Ca 2+ is the primary modulator of its own release Structure of the IP 3 R Regulation of the IP 3 R by Ca 2+ Bell-shaped IICR Hamada et al., 2002 Bezprozvanny et al., 1991

IICR Regulation of the IP 3 R by CaM + CaM (Missiaen et al., 1999) [Ca 2+ ] (nM)300 - CaM (Michikawa et al., 1999) CaM Ca 2+ dependently inhibits IP 3 R I, II and III IP 3 R I II III

Calmodulin binding sites on IP 3 R1 13 Endoplasmic reticulum Cytosol R1:LDSQVNNLFLKSHN-IVQKTAMNWRLSARN-AARRDSVLA R2:LDSQVNTLFMKNHSSTVQRAAMGWRLSARSGPRFKEALGG R3:LDAHMSALLSSGGSCSAAAQRSAANYKTATRTFPRVIPTA CaCaM CaM (Adkins et al,2000) W1577A (Zhang et al, 2001; Nosyreva et al, 2002)

Localization and characterization of the CaM-binding sites Results

Calmodulin effects on IP 3 binding CaM inhibits IP 3 binding in Ca 2+ -independent way C N B/F Bound (nM) [ 3 H]IP 3 binding (%) Control CaM Ca 2+ /CaM CaM 1234 Ca 2+ /CaM 1234 Ca 2+ IP 3 binding core

Localisation of a calmodulin-binding site GST-fusion protein pull down of CaM 1234 CaM 1234 pGST GST-Cyt1 GST-Cyt2 50  M free Ca 2+ 1 mM EGTA CaM 1234 Cyt1 Cyt IP 3 binding core

Detailed localisation using peptides A B C D E F CaM A B C E D F % IQ 76% IQ 53% IQ A B C D E F CaM Ca 2+ EGTA Discontinue Ca 2+ -independent CaM-binding site in the N- terminal region

A B C E D F 1159 control∆ B∆ E [ 3 H]IP 3 binding Both CaM-binding sites are essential for inhibiting IP 3 binding CaM

Calmodulin-binding sites on IP 3 R1 13 ER Cytosol R1:LDSQVNNLFLKSHN-IVQKTAMNWRLSARN-AARRDSVLA R2:LDSQVNTLFMKNHSSTVQRAAMGWRLSARSGPRFKEALGG R3:LDAHMSALLSSGGSCSAAAQRSAANYKTATRTFPRVIPTA R1:PPKKFRDCLFKLCPMNRYSAQKQFWKAAKPGAN R2:PPKKFRDCLFKVCPMNRYSAQKQYWKAKQAKQG R3:PPKKFRDCLFKVCPMNRYSAQKQYWKAKQTKQD CaCaM CaMCa 2+

0.5 µM1 µM100 µM Control CaM IICR is inhibited by CaM and CaM 1234 Time (s) ATP Ca 2+ i (nM) CaM 1234 CaM CaM 1234 Control

 CaM is not the Ca 2+ sensor for the IP 3 R 200 nM IP 3 CaM 1234 CaM [Ca 2+ ] (µM) 45 Ca 2+ flux 0.11 IICR is inhibited by CaM and CaM Ca 2+ release (%)

Half CaM’s CaM C-CaM N-CaM 3 HIP 3 binding control 45 Ca 2+ flux control Both CaM lobes are necessary to inhibit the IP 3 R

Ca 2+ closed open IICR [Ca 2+ ] (nM) 300 inactive Other regulators PKC? The N-terminal Ca 2+ -independent CaM-binding Site on the IP 3 R is Responsible for CaM Inhibition, even though this Inhibition Requires Ca 2+

Summary  Two CaM-binding sites on the IP 3 R Ca 2+ dependent in the regulatory domain Ca 2+ independent in the N-terminus  CaM inhibits IICR only in the presence of Ca 2+  CaM inhibits IICR by lowering the affinity for IP 3, CaM is not the Ca 2+ sensor

1-225 EGTACa 2+ IP 3 R1 input - Seph CaM-Seph Seph Suramin +-+- Suramin interacts with the CaM-binding sites on the IP 3 R1 (1) Suramin: polysulfonated naphthylurea Interacted with the RYR CaM-binding sites (papineni et al., 2002)

Suramin interacts in a direct way with the CaM-binding sites Suramin CaM BE B E 0 µM100 µM0 µM100 µM Suramin interacts with the CaM-binding sites on the IP 3 R1 (2)

Suramin inhibits IICR Does Suramin counteract the effects of CaM? IP 3 R1IP 3 R3 suramin Contr ol 10 µM CaM Missiaen et al., 1999 Suramin inhibits IICR

IP 3 binding core Suramin [ 3 H]IP 3 Binding Suramin inhibits IP 3 binding [ 3 H]IP 3 Binding [Suramin] (µM) B/F Bound (nM) 05 suramin

Summary  Suramin inhibits IICR by lowering the IC 50 for activation by IP 3  Suramin interacts with the CaM-binding sites on the IP 3 R Suramin is a potent inhibitor of IICR Suramin mimicks the effects of CaM

Regulation of calcium release by neuronal Calcium Binding Proteins (CaBP)

CaM CaM-like L-CaBP1 S-CaBP1 Caldendrin S-CaBP5 S-CaBP2 L-CaBP2 S-CaBP3 CaBP3 GCAP GCAP3 GCAP2 Recoverin Visinin Neurocalcin VILIP3 VILIP1 VILIP2 NCS1 EF1EF2EF3EF4 CaM EF1EF2EF3EF4 CaBP1 EF1EF2EF3EF4 CaBP2 EF3EF4 CaBP3 EF1EF2EF3EF4 CaBP4 EF1EF2EF3EF4 CaBP5 Adapted from Haeseleer et al., 2000 CaBP NCS

NUCLEUS High Ca 2+ Golgi Why so many CaBPs….? Cellular localisation Ca 2+ myristyol switch NUCLEUS Golgi Low Ca 2+ Burgoyne et al., 2004

Exocytosis in Endocrine cells Exocytosis in Synapses Channel regulation Basal Ca2+ NCS1VILIP-1CaMSynaptotagmin Ca 2+ bound -log[Ca 2 ] + Adapted from Burgoyne and Weiss 2001 Why so many CaBPs….? Cellular Localisation and….

CaBPs agonist of the IP 3 R? Taken from Yang et al., 2002 CaBPs are agonists of the IP 3 R CaBPs bind to N-terminus of the IP 3 R CaBPs binding is Ca 2+ dependent CaBPs co-localize with the IP 3 R

sCaBP1 GST GST GST CaBP1 binds to the IP 3 R NH 2 COOH ER CYT IP 3 binding core ( ) caldendrin lCaBP1 sCaBP1

A B C E D F CaM sCaBP1 ABCDEF ABCDEF + Ca 2+ EGTA CaBP1 binds to a similar region of the IP 3 R as CaM

CaBP 1/11/21/41/5 1/6 1/8 1/10 1/3 CaBP Ratio of CaBP: peptide B Band intensity Peptide B: CaBP + Calcium + EGTA Binding of CaBP to the IP 3 R is Ca 2+ independent

EF1EF2EF3EF4 CaBP1 lCaBP1 sCaBP1 Cellular localization of CaBP1

sCaBP 0.5µM 1µM 100µM ATP Control lCaBP Time (s) Ca 2+ i (nM) Both Long and Short CaBP1 inhibit IICR

SCaBP1 (n=22) LCaBP1 (n=17) Control (n=44) * * * *

CaBP overexpression inhibits IP 3 Ester induced Calcium release  M InsP 3 ester SCaBP1 Control time (s) Ca2+ i (nM) CaBP acts directly on the IP 3 R

CaBP1 inhibits IP 3 binding to the IP 3 R control sCaBP1Ca 2+ sCaBP1 100 [ 3 H]IP 3 Binding (% vs control) IP 3 binding 45 Ca 2+ flux 45 Ca 2+ -release (%) [IP 3 ] (µM) control sCaBP ,

EF1EF2EF3EF Time (s) 0 Ca 2+ i (nM) µM ATP Control CaBP 134 CaBP1 inhibits IICR independent of Ca 2+ binding (1) % responsive cells ATP (  M)

 CaBP1 is not a Ca 2+ sensor for the IP 3 R 200 nM IP 3 CaBP1 134 CaBP1 [Ca 2+ ] (µM) 45 Ca 2+ flux (%) CaBP1 inhibits IICR independent of Ca 2+ binding (2)

IICR is inhibited by CaBP1 CaBP1 binds to the receptor in a Ca 2+ independent manner resulting in inhibition of IP 3 binding to its receptor. To summarise.. But, how is CaBP1 activity regulated? CaBP does not activate Ca 2+ release as previously reported

sCaBP1sCaBP1-G2A lCaBP1-G2AlCaBP1 Membrane Targeting of CaBP may regulate its activity (1) EF1EF2EF3EF4 CaBP1-G2A

ATP (µM ) Membrane Targeting of CaBP1 may regulate its activity (2) time (s) Control sCaBP -G2A Ca 2+ i (nM) % responsive cells ATP (  M) Peak amplitude (nM) * * * *

32 P- CaBP YFPS120A wt Time (s) Ca 2+ i (nM) ATP (µM) 100 Control CaBP1 S120A ATP (  M) Peak amplitude (nM) * * % responsive cells * * * Phosphorylation of CaBP1 decreases it’s potency EF1EF2EF3EF4 S120A CaBP1 S120A Casein kinase [ST]xx[DE]

10µM CCh 0.5mM Caf 1mM Caf 2mM Caf [ C a 2 + ] i ( n M ) CaBP1 does not Affect Ca 2+ release through RyRs Time (s) Control sCaBP1

Summary  CaBP inhibits IICR  CaBP binds to the InsP 3 R inhibiting IP 3 binding  CaBP activity is Calcium independent  Myristoylation is not necessary for CaBP activity, although it may have a regulatory role  Phosphorylation of CaBP decreases it’s potency  RyRs are not modulated by CaBP In Neurons: CaM preferentially modulates RyRs CaBPs preferentially modulate IP 3 R?

CaBP1CaM Neurons IP 3 RRyR In Neurons: CaM preferentially modulates RyRs CaBPs preferentially modulate IP 3 R? Conclusions

VGCC LGCC SOCC (TRP) MSCC PMCA NCX IP 3 RRYR ER/SR SERCA IP 3 R Golgi PMR1 Mitochondria NCX Uniporter Others?? Buffers Second messenger

Control Calbindin 0.5µM ATP1µM ATP100µM ATP Time (s) Ca2+ i (nM) Inhibition of IICR by CaBP is not due to Calcium Buffering

% responsive cells  M1M1M0.5  M 0 Peak Amplitude (nM) ATP Control Calbindin Calbindin Decreases Peak Response without decreasing number of responsive cells