Click to edit Master title 1 1 Raymond W. Blowitski, Office of Analysis, HS-32 Phone: (301) 903-3393 Strategy for Implementing DOE O 210.2, DOE Corporate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
Advertisements

EMS Checklist (ISO model)
Short Service Worker Program
Safety Committee Orientation Environmental Energy Technologies Division November 18, 2011.
[Organisation’s Title] Environmental Management System
Quality Assurance Update Presented byRay Hardwick Presented by: Ray Hardwick.
Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.
More CMM Part Two : Details.
Safety Culture Improvement Program At LBNL Presentation to DOE Operating Experience Committee on January 14, 2014 Mike Ruggieri Chair of the LBNL Safety.
Contractor Assurance System AC Overview October 13, 2009.
California Department of Public Health Loriann De Martini, Pharm.D. Chief Pharmaceutical Consultant Center for Healthcare Quality Medication Error Reduction.
1 7/24/09 National Nuclear Security Administration Office of Defense Nuclear Security (DNS) DNS Security Lessons Learned Program Ted Wyka Director, Security.
1 Presenter: Tracy Wessler June 6, 2007 Outsourcing Quality Assurance and Contract Surveillance Activities U.S. Census Bureau Decennial Response Integration.
Safety and Health Programs
Quality evaluation and improvement for Internal Audit
Departmental Initiative to Enhance Activity-level Work Planning and Control DOE and DOE Contractors Industrial Hygiene Meeting in Conjunction with the.
Purpose of the Standards
Supplier Ethics: Program Checklist
CD NS Chief, Defense Nuclear Safety FIRE PROTECTON FUNCTIONAL AREA CDNS BIENNIAL REVIEWS May 15, 2012 Carl Sykes.
Guidelines for constructing a Compliance Program for Medicaid Managed Care Organizations and PrePaid Health Plans As provided by the Medicaid Alliance.
RST processes Session 6 Presentation 3. A framework for RST processes Establishing an RST Membership Terms of reference Work programme (schedule, agenda,
Elements of Internal Controls Preventing Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Urban and Rural Transit Systems.
FDA Recalls Risk Communication Advisory Committee David K. Elder Director, Office of Enforcement.
Implementation of DOE Order 450.1: Self-Declaration and Report Letters Steven R. Woodbury US Department of Energy March 9, 2005.
The Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable Ralph Covington David Wang.
Ship Recycling Facility Management System IMO Guideline A.962
Unit 5:Elements of A Viable COOP Capability (cont.)  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises (TT&E)  Explain the importance of a.
Colorado Springs Utilities Environmental Services Functional Assessment Presentation for the American Public Power Association’s 2001 Engineering & Operations.
A Proposed Risk Management Regulatory Framework Commissioner George Apostolakis Presented at the Organization of Agreement States 2012 Annual Meeting Milwaukee,
11/27/20071 DOE Corporate Operating Experience Program, DOE O Briefing to the Operating Experience Committee Meeting And the ISM Champions Workshop.
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
1 DOE IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP ASSESSING MY EMS Steven R. Woodbury
Military Family Services Program Participant Survey Training Presentation.
ISMS Best Practices Workshop Initial Steps to Integrate HPI into ISMS Continuous Improvement CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc. September 12-13, 2006.
ISM at the Savannah River Site Department of Energy Best Practices Workshop Lesson Learned Program Bill Luce, Manager Regulatory Services Washington Savannah.
CERTIFICATION In the Electronics Recycling Industry © 2007 IAER Web Site - -
TQP Accreditation Program September 13, Technical Qualification Program (TQP) Accreditation ISMS Champions Meeting Aurora, CO September 13, 2006.
Georgia Institute of Technology CS 4320 Fall 2003.
Geoffrey L. Beausoleil Assistant Manager, Office of Operational Support DOE Idaho Operations Office September 12, 2006 Presentation to DOE ISM Champions.
Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.
DOE Integrated Safety Management (ISM) Conference Knoxville, TN August 24-27, 2009 Colette Broussard, DOE-HQ Office of Quality Assurance Policy.
ISM at the Savannah River Site Department of Energy Best Practices Workshop Facility Evaluation Board Steve Johnson, Manager Operations Evaluation Department.
DOE-RL Safety Oversight Planning – Documenting - Reporting Rob Hastings, Director Mat Irwin, Team Lead Operations Oversight Division ISM Best Practices.
ISM at the Savannah River Site Department of Energy Best Practices Workshop Work Planning and Control Tim Flake, Principle Technical Advisor Maintenance.
Integrating EM QA Performance Metrics with Performance Analysis Processes August 26, 2009 Robert Hinds, Manager, Quality Assurance Engineering & Greg Peterson,
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
| Los Alamos National Laboratory | April 2013 | UNCLASSIFIED | 1 Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy's NNSA.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level TOOLBOX TALK MANAGING AIRSIDE SAFETY.
ISM WORKSHOP April 24-27, 2006 Albuquerque, NM Feedback and Improvement Assessment Results and Path Forward Michael N. Worley Office of Nuclear Energy.
Office of the Under Secretary 1 CENTRAL TECHNICAL AUTHORITY A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO NUCLEAR SAFETY Dr. Tim Arcano Deputy Chief of Nuclear Safety Office.
Monitoring the Long-Term Effectiveness of Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) Implementation Through Use of a Performance Dash Board Process Mike.
Lead Agency Viability Assessment Consistent with OPPAGA Report 04-65, DCF contracted with FMHI to assist in the design and implementation of a centralized.
PRESENTED TO: ENERGY FACILITY CONTRACTORS GROUP SAFETY ANALYSIS WORKING GROUP SAFETY ANALYSIS WORKSHOP BY: CHRIS CHAVES NSR&D PROGRAM OFFICE OF NUCLEAR.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP OVERVIEW OF ORDER Larry Stirling
APPROACH TO A FULLY INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE ASSURANCE SYSTEM Integrated Safety Management Summit Knoxville, TN August 24-27, 2009 Presented by: Gary Grant.
0 Software Quality Assurance Implementation Plan Briefing to the Board June 20, 2003.
Visual 4.1 Incident Commander and Command Staff Functions Unit 4: Incident Commander and Command Staff Functions.
Revision N° 11ICAO Safety Management Systems (SMS) Course01/01/08 Module N° 9 – SMS operation.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master title 1 1 ISM Best Practices Workshop September 13, 2006 John L. McCabe, P.E., CSP Office of Corporate.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
Safety Management Systems Session Four Safety Promotion APTA Webinar June 9, 2016.
1 OPEXSHARE Implementing and Effective Operating Experience Program DOE OEC Workshop October 29, 2015 Las Vegas, NV.
DOE NNSA CAS EFCOG/DOE CAS Effectiveness Task Team Sharon Steele Office of the Chief Defense Nuclear Safety (NA-511) November 16, 2016.
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
RST processes Session 5 Presentation 2.
Trending Requirements and Results
Kenya Mann Faulkner Chief Ethics & Compliance Officer April 2019
Presentation transcript:

Click to edit Master title 1 1 Raymond W. Blowitski, Office of Analysis, HS-32 Phone: (301) Strategy for Implementing DOE O 210.2, DOE Corporate Operating Experience Program ISM Best Practices Workshop Aurora, CO September 12, 2006

Click to edit Master title 2 2 Contents  Status of Order  Basic Order Requirements  Roles and Responsibilities  Contractors Requirement Document Requirements  Recommendations concerning Metrics

Click to edit Master title 3 3 Order Status  DOE O 210.2, DOE Corporate Operating Experience Program, was issued on June 12, 2006  Order Fulfilled Commitment 18 to DOE Implementation Plan for DNFSB Recommendation  Order Requires the Contractors Requirements Document to be Incorporated Without Change into Operating Contracts within 6 Months – DUE 12/12/06  DOE is required to Demonstrate Implementation by December 12, 2007 – per Commitment 19 to DNFSB Recommendation

Click to edit Master title 4 4 Basic Order Requirements  Prescribes a Formal Process that: Evaluates DOE Internal and External Operating Experiences (OPEX) to assess trends and safety issues and Promotes sharing of Good Work Practices that may affect safety and success of DOE missions OPEX Clearing House Function: collection, storage, retrieval OPEX Screened for Significance – by all stakeholders Timely Communication of Screening Results and Insights DOE Corporate Communication – thru Actionable or Informational Products Effectiveness Evaluated – Periodic Safety Meetings and Metrics

Click to edit Master title 5 5 Corporate Operating Experience Program Approach

Click to edit Master title 6 6 Organizational Roles & Responsibilities Organizational Roles & Responsibilities are defined for:  DOE Corporate Operating Experience Program Lead Office  Headquarters Program Secretarial Officers/NNSA Deputy Administrators  DOE Field Elements  Government Owned/Government Operated (GOGO) Facilities  DOE Contractors and Subcontractors

Click to edit Master title 7 7  Designated Lead Office (EH) for DOE Corporate Operating Experience Program – responsible for: Clearinghouse Function – computer resources Collects and analyzes DOE operating experience information to identify significant corporate level performance trends and issues related to Safety Issues Collects and analyzes External operating experience related to Safety Issues Communicates safety performance trending and analysis information to Management – Dailys, Weeklys, Monthly, Quarterly  HSS will assume functions described for EH Basic Order Requirements and Organizational Roles & Responsibilities

Click to edit Master title 8 8  Designated Lead Office responsibilities (continued): Develop/Disseminate Corporate lessons learned related to Safety Issues – SOR, SA, SB, SAd, OE Sum, JIT, DCS Order Interpretation – Develop Guidance, interpret requirements, designate which Contracts must include the CRD, etc. Operating Experience Committee– Columbia Davis-Besse Action 1.c –Membership will consist of designated DOE and Contractor Operating Experience Coordinators Sponsor Periodic Safety Forums – to discuss safety trends, issues, lessons learned and good work practices – Columbia Davis-Besse Action 1.e Basic Order Requirements and Organizational Roles & Responsibilities

Click to edit Master title 9 9 DOE Program Secretarial Offices  Collect and analyze DOE operating experience information to identify significant corporate level performance trends and issues related to Programmatic and Mission Related Issues  Review Mission and Safety Performance with Senior Management Periodically  Designate an OPEX Program Coordinator – who will be a member of the Operating Experience Committee  Screen and Disseminate Lessons Learned (forwarded by Field Elements) for Program and Mission Applicability. Basic Order Requirements and Organizational Roles & Responsibilities (Continued)

Click to edit Master title 10 DOE Program Secretarial Offices (continued)  Develop/Promulgate Program Unique Operating Experience Documents Ensure lessons learned are developed and disseminated following completion of major program missions (e.g., RFETS closure) Incorporation of Safety into Design Initiative  Participate (with Lead Office) in development and Concur on Safety related Corporate Operating Experience documents  Conduct Self-Assessment of OPEX Program during ISM Assessments  Oversight of Field Element Participation per DOE O Basic Order Requirements and Organizational Roles & Responsibilities (Continued)

Click to edit Master title 11 DOE Field Elements  Responsible for Oversight of Contractor OPEX Program – (per DOE O and DOE O 226.1) Screen Contractor OPEX for Operational Awareness, Performance and Trending, Lessons Learned Recommend Local Lessons Learned to be shared locally – between contractors  Ensure Contractors held accountable – e.g.,contractor fee and performance mechanisms, CPOF clause  Designate an OPEX Program coordinator – who will be a member of the Operating Experience Committee Basic Order Requirements and Organizational Roles & Responsibilities (Continued)

Click to edit Master title 12 DOE Field Elements (Continued)  Forward Mission Related Lessons Learned to PSOs for Consideration  Share Field Element Developed LLs (DOE Database)  Self Assessment of OPEX Program during ISM Assessments Basic Order Requirements and Organizational Roles & Responsibilities (Continued)

Click to edit Master title 13 Operating Experience Coordinators  Develops and Manages Organization’s OPEX program: Develop processes, procedures, communications methods, and documentation of OPEX program implementation Maintains Oversight of Contractor’s OPEX Program Communicate OPEX, including both DOE and external lessons learned, throughout the Organization Obtain implementation feedback - effectiveness Monitor overall safety and mission performance and trends Raises OPEX issues to Management Basic Order Requirements and Organizational Roles & Responsibilities (Continued)

Click to edit Master title 14 Facility Representatives Role  Maintain Day-to-Day Oversight of Contractor Activities: Ensure Reportable Occurrences are identified and reported Ensure that Contractor identifies effective corrective actions and lessons learned – recommend lessons learned to be shared across site, PSO, and Corporately across DOE Monitor overall safety performance and identify trends Ensure information is brought to the attention of the Operating Experience Coordinators Basic Order Requirements and Organizational Roles & Responsibilities (Continued)

Click to edit Master title 15 GOVERNMENT OWNED/GOVERNMENT OPERATED (GOGOs) – Parallel requirements in the CRD  MUST Participate in Corporate OPEX Program Share GOGO Developed LLs (DOE Database) Screen DOE Corporate and External OPEX: Distribute applicable OPEX to GOGO Personnel for review, analysis, internalization and corrective action Basic Order Requirements and Organizational Roles & Responsibilities (Continued)

Click to edit Master title 16 GOVERNMENT OWNED/GOVERNMENT OPERATED (Continued)  Implement Required Actions of Corporate OPEX Documents (e.g., SORs, SAs, SBs, etc.) and Formally respond as required  Trend GOGO Operating Events for Lesson Learned from Recurring Issues  Conduct Causal Analysis  Trend Corrective Actions and Develop Lessons Learned on Successful Actions  Assess OPEX Program Performance during ISM Assessment  Designate an Operating Experience Program coordinator Basic Order Requirements and Organizational Roles & Responsibilities (Continued)

Click to edit Master title 17 Contractors Requirements Document (CRD)  MUST Have an OPEX Program that Participates in Corporate OPEX Program  MUST Share Contractor Developed LLs (DOE Database) –Required for Type A & B Accidents, Signficance Category 1 and R Occurrences –Optional for all other OPEX  MUST Screen DOE Corporate and External OPEX: –DOE OPEX Documents (e.g., SORs, SAs, SBs, SAd, OE Summaries, LL Database, JITs, DCS and respond as required –Major OPEX from other Government Agencies or Industry Accidents – As deemed Significant and Relevant by Contractor Management

Click to edit Master title 18 Contractors Requirements Document (CRD) (Continued)  MUST Distribute applicable OPEX to Contractor Personnel for review, analysis, internalization and corrective action implementation  MUST Designate an Operating Experience Program coordinator – who will be a member of the Operating Experience Committee  MUST Implement Required Actions of Corporate OPEX Documents (e.g., SORs, SAs, SBs, etc.) and Formally respond as required  MUST Trend Contractor Operating Events for Lesson Learned from Recurring Issues

Click to edit Master title 19 Contractors Requirements Document (CRD)  MUST Conduct Causal Analysis  MUST Trend Corrective Actions and Develop Lessons Learned on Successful Actions  MUST Establish Metrics and Assess OPEX Program Performance during ISM Assessment  Head of Contractor Organization – MUST Apply CRD requirements to Subcontracts within 6 months

Click to edit Master title 20 Metrics  DOE O Requires: DOE HQ and Field Elements MUST evaluate OPEX Program Effectiveness during ISM Assessments Contractors – MUST Establish Metrics and Assess OPEX Program Performance during ISM Assessment  Specific Metrics are NOT Specified  Feedback and Improvement CRADs provide a basis for evaluation

Click to edit Master title 21  Metrics Should Evaluate: 1.Effectiveness of Lessons Learned Communication Lessons making it to those who need them Lessons Delivered in a Timely Manner (i.e., when needed) Feedback Provided to Originator on Value/Needed Improvements Response on Actions Taken/Planned are Provided on Actionable Corporate Operating Experience Documents in Timely Manner Recommendation for Metrics

Click to edit Master title 22  Metrics Should Evaluate: 2.Effectiveness of the Lessons Learned in Correcting/ Preventing Re-occurrence of Adverse Events Lessons Learned solved a Performance Problem No New Occurrences with the Same Type Problem, or have decreased in significance The Same Lessons Learned are not being Repeatedly Developed Lessons Learned are Actively sought by planners/workers to plan work Recommendation for Metrics

Click to edit Master title 23 Recommendation for Metrics  Metrics Should Evaluate: 3.Effectiveness of Lessons Learned in Improving Operations Good Work Practice resulted in More Efficient Operations Time or Cost Savings Resulted 4.Management Has Demonstrated Its Commitment to Lessons Learned

Click to edit Master title 24 QUESTIONS?