On the spectroscopic detection of magnetic reconnection evidence with Solar B – I. Emission line selection and atomic physics issues P. F. Chen 1,2, H.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Masuda Flare: Remaining Problems on the Looptop Impulsive Hard X-ray Source in Solar Flares Satoshi Masuda (STEL, Nagoya Univ.)
Advertisements

Initial Results of EIS Shinsuke Imada (NAOJ) EIS Team.
1 / 22 Solar Flares and Magnetic Reconnection T. Yokoyama (NAOJ) Solar-B science meeting ISAS, NAOJ.
Observations on Current Sheet and Magnetic Reconnection in Solar Flares Haimin Wang and Jiong Qiu BBSO/NJIT.
MHD modeling of coronal disturbances related to CME lift-off J. Pomoell 1, R. Vainio 1, S. Pohjolainen 2 1 Department of Physics, University of Helsinki.
Multi-Wavelength Studies of Flare Activities with Solar-B ASAI Ayumi Kwasan Observatory, Kyoto University Solar-B Science February 4, 2003.
Low-Energy Coronal Sources Observed with RHESSI Linhui Sui (CUA / NASA GSFC)
TRACE Downflows and Energy Release Ayumi ASAI Kwasan Observatory, Kyoto University Magnetic Reconnection and the Dynamic Sun 9 September, Andrews.
Science With the Extreme-ultraviolet Spectrometer (EIS) on Solar-B by G. A. Doschek (with contributions from Harry Warren) presented at the STEREO/Solar-B.
Non-Equilibrium Ionization Modeling of the Current Sheet in a Simulated Solar Eruption Chengcai Shen Co-authors: K. K. Reeves, J. C. Raymond, N. A. Murphy,
000509EISPDR_SciInvGIs.1 EIS Science Goals: The First Three Months…. Louise Harra Mullard Space Science Laboratory University College London.
“The Role of Atomic Physics in Spectroscopic Studies of the Extended Solar Corona” – John Kohl “High Accuracy Atomic Physics in Astronomy”, August.
Measuring the Temperature of Hot Solar Flare Plasma with RHESSI Amir Caspi 1,2, Sam Krucker 2, Robert P. Lin 1,2 1 Department of Physics, University of.
Evidence of Thick Reconnection Layers in Solar Flares John Raymond Work with A. Ciaravella, Y.-K. Ko and J. Lin White Light and UV Observations Apparent.
Center for Space Environment Modeling Ward Manchester University of Michigan Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory SHINE July.
Reconstructing Active Region Thermodynamics Loraine Lundquist Joint MURI Meeting Dec. 5, 2002.
Properties of Prominence Motions Observed in the UV T. A. Kucera (NASA/GSFC) E. Landi (Artep Inc, NRL)
Solar-B Science Objectives - Overview of the Mission - Kazunari Shibata (Kyoto Univ.)
X-ray Emission from O Stars David Cohen Swarthmore College.
990901EIS_RR_Science.1 Science Investigation Goals and Instrument Requirements Dr. George A. Doschek EIS US Principal Investigator Naval Research Laboratory.
Coronal Heating of an Active Region Observed by XRT on May 5, 2010 A Look at Quasi-static vs Alfven Wave Heating of Coronal Loops Amanda Persichetti Aad.
Solar-B/EIS high-cadence observation for diagnostics of the corona and TR S. Kamio (Kyoto Univ.) Solar-B domestic meeting.
EIS - MSSL/NRL EUV Imaging Spectrometer SOT - ISAS/NAOJ Solar Optical Telescope XRT - SAO/ISAS X-ray Telescope FPP - Lockheed/NAOJ Focal Plane Package.
Kazunari Shibata Kwasan and Hida Observatories Kyoto University
Looking for the heating function of solar coronal loops Miriam Ritchie 1 and Rahul Sharma 2 MSU Solar Physics REU – 2011 Petrus (Piet) Martens 3, Joseph.
High Resolution Imaging and EUV spectroscopy for RHESSI Microflares S. Berkebile-Stoiser 1, P. Gömöry 1,2, J. Rybák 2, A.M. Veronig 1, M. Temmer 1, P.
Magnetic Reconnection in Flares Yokoyama, T. (NAOJ) Reconnection mini-workshop Kwasan obs. Main Title 1.Introduction : Reconnection Model of.
The Relation between Soft X-ray Ejections and Hard X-ray Emission on November 24 Flare H. Takasaki, T. Morimoto, A. Asai, J. Kiyohara, and K. Shibata Kwasan.
The Solar-B EUV Imaging Spectrometer: an Overview of EIS J. L. Culhane Mullard Space Science Laboratory University College London.
Where is Coronal Plasma Heated? James A. Klimchuk NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, USA Stephen J. Bradshaw Rice University, USA Spiros Patsourakos University.
Observational Evidence for Magnetic Reconnection in the Solar Corona Len Culhane Mullard Space Science Laboratory University College London.
Coronal Dynamics - Can we detect MHD shocks and waves by Solar B ? K. Shibata Kwasan Observatory Kyoto University 2003 Feb. 3-5 Solar B ISAS.
Observations of Moreton waves with Solar-B NARUKAGE Noriyuki Department of Astronomy, Kyoto Univ / Kwasan and Hida Observatories M2 The 4 th Solar-B Science.
Evolution of Emerging Flux and Associated Active Phenomena Takehiro Miyagoshi (GUAS, Japan) Takaaki Yokoyama (NRO, Japan)
3D Reconnection Simulations of Descending Coronal Voids Mark Linton in collaboration with Dana Longcope (MSU)
1 Introduction: Onset of solar flares and coronal mass ejections Yokoyama, T. Dept. Earth & Planetary Science, University of Tokyo Isobe, H. Univ. Tokyo.
Coronal Loops Workshop 6, La Roche-en-Ardenne, Belgium, Jun 2013 Density of active region outflows derived from Fe XIV 264/274 Naomasa KITAGAWA &
Current Sheets from WL and UV data: open questions Alessandro Bemporad INAF – Arcetri Astrophysical Observatory 1° ISSI Group Meeting October 23-27, 2006,
EVE Sun-as-a-Star Spectra Milligan et al “Fe Cascade” for SOL
Spectroscopic Detection of Reconnection Evidence with Solar-B II. Signature of Flows in MHD simulation Hiroaki ISOBE P.F. Chen *, D. H. Brooks, D. Shiota,
Coronal loops: new insights from EIS observations G. Del Zanna 1,2, S. Bradshaw 3, 1 MSSL, University College London, UK 2 DAMTP, University of Cambridge,
Spectroscopic observations of CMEs Hui Tian Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Collaborators: Scott W. McIntosh, Steve Tomczyk New England Space.
RHESSI Hard X-Ray Observations of an EUV Jet on August 21, 2003 Lindsay Glesener, Säm Krucker RHESSI Workshop 9, Genova September 4, 2009.
XRT and EIS Observations of Reconnection associated Phenomena D. Shiota, H. Isobe, D. H. Brooks, P. F. Chen, and K. Shibata
Model instruments baseline specification and key open issues EUV/FUV High-Throughput Spectroscopic Telescope Toshifumi Shimizu (ISAS/JAXA) SCSDM-4.
UV Spectroscopy of CME Currrent Sheets John Raymond Angela Ciaravella Silvio Giordano Dave Webb.
IMAGING AND SPECTOROPIC INVESTIGATIONS OF A SOLAR CORONAL WAVE: PROPERTIES OF THE WAVE FRONT AND ASSOCIATED ERUPTING MATERIAL L OUISE K. HARRA AND A LPHONSE.
XUV monochromatic imaging spectroscopy in the SPIRIT experiment on the CORONAS-F mission I. Diagnostics of solar corona plasma by means of EUV Spectroheliograph.
2005/11/15STEREO/Solar-B Workshop1 Solar-B X-ray Telescope (XRT) R. Kano (NAOJ) and XRT Team XRT.
Cycle 24 Meeting, Napa December 2008 Ryan Milligan NASA/GSFC Microflare Heating From RHESSI and Hinode Observations Ryan Milligan NASA-GSFC.
Coronal X-ray Emissions in Partly Occulted Flares Paula Balciunaite, Steven Christe, Sam Krucker & R.P. Lin Space Sciences Lab, UC Berkeley limb thermal.
What Can We Learn About the Ejecta from Solar-B/EIS P. F. Chen 1,2, D. H. Brooks 1, H. Isobe 1, K. Shibata 1 1. Kwasan Observatory, Kyoto University, Japan.
Review: Recent Observations on Wave Heating S. Kamio Kwasan and Hida Observatories Kyoto University.
The Slow Solar Wind Tom Holzer NCAR/HAO NCAR/HAO.
X-ray Spectroscopy of Coronal Plasmas Ken Phillips Scientific Associate, Natural History Museum, and Honorary Prof., QUB 1.
Spectroscopic Observations with SolarB-EIS Helen E. Mason DAMTP, Centre for Mathematical Sciences Giulio Del Zanna, MSSL.
Marina Battaglia, FHNW Säm Krucker, FHNW/UC Berkeley
Planning Flare Observations for Hinode/EIS
N. Giglietto (INFN Bari) and
TRACE Downflows and Energy Release
Supervisors - Professor Dana Longcope and Professor Jiong Qiu
XRT Particle Acceleration at Magnetic Reconnection Sites
Downflows and Plasmoid Ejections as a Reconnection Outflow
Direct Observations of the Magnetic Reconnection Site of an Eruption on 2003 November ,ApJ, 622,1251 J. Lin, Y.-K. Ko, L. Sui, J. C. Raymond, G.
High-cadence Radio Observations of an EIT Wave
MHD Simulation of Plasmoid-Induced-Reconnection in Solar Flares
Nonthermal Electrons in an Ejecta Associated with a Solar Flare
A Mach Number Behind a Slow Shock (Ahead a Fast
Downflow as a Reconnection Outflow
Periodic Acceleration of Electrons in Solar Flares
Presentation transcript:

On the spectroscopic detection of magnetic reconnection evidence with Solar B – I. Emission line selection and atomic physics issues P. F. Chen 1,2, H. Isobe 1, K. Shibata 1, A.C. Lanzafame 3 2. Nanjing University, China 3. Catania University, Italy 相模原 David H. Brooks 京都大学花山天文台 1. Kwasan Observatory, Kyoto University 2月4日2月4日

1.Reconnection evidence from images Tsuneta et al. ( 1992) Masuda et al. (1994) Expansion and cusp shape of Soft X-ray post-flare loops Above the loop top hard X-ray source

2.Reconnection evidence from images Plasmoid ejection Reconnection related inflow? Ohyama & Shibata (1998)Yokoyama et al. (2001)

Spectroscopic Observations will: A.Remove ambiguity between ‘ real ’ and ‘ apparent ’ motions B. Allow accurate measurement of plasma flow velocities C. Study reconnection physics, reconnection rate etc.

Objectives of this work 1.Study the signatures in EUV line profiles of plasma flows associated with magnetic reconnection 2.Determine which lines are best for detecting different flows e.g. reconnection inflow, jet etc. 3.Determine whether Solar-B can really detect the signatures and what are the best observation targets 95 spectral lines studied for SERTS DEM analysis (Lanzafame, Brooks, Lang, Summers, Thomas 2002) within Solar-B/EIS wavelength range. ADAS (Summers 1994) collisional-radiative models including density dependence of ionisation balance * 2.5D MHD simulations (Chen & Shibata 2000) * Extra. Consider effect of improved atomic data

MHD Simulation CME-flare relation Chen & Shibata (2000) 2.5D resistive MHD simulation No heat conduction Flows associated with magnetic reconnection: Inflow: about 1 MK Jet: about MK Flux rope: 5000 K-1 MK Coronal Moreton waves: 1-3 MK

Example: Reconnection Inflow Select a line within the expected temperature range of the inflow (from simulations) e.g. Fe XII A formed at 1.6-2MK, and compute line profile along a chosen line of sight Difficult to distinguish inflow emission from expanding flux rope emission Observer Intensity (x 0.9) – Velocity

Ex: Inflow Emission Intensity at different velocities Optimise line of sight for detection Inflow (approx.) < +/- 40 km s -1 Red shifted component mainly inflow (30% approx.) Observer I (x 0.9) - v Intensity map

Ex: Reconnection jet Fe XXIV A formed at 13-16MK Intensity map Observer I (x 400) - v

Ex: Slow shock pair attached to CME Ca XVII A formed at 4-5MK Intensity map Observer I (x 15) - v

Result: Classification of 95 lines Classification codes: I - Inflow, S - Shock, J - Jet, M - coronal Moreton wave

Crude approx. of effect of simulation Te Fe XII 195 logT=6.15 Fe XV 284 logT=6.3 S XIII 256 logT=6.4 Heat conduction will change simulation temperatures and affect choice of lines

Preliminary selection of emission lines – dependent on this model lines Log (T) Fe XIV Fe XV S XII lines Log (T) S XIII Ca XVII Fe XV slow shocks coronal Moreton wave lines Log (T) Fe IX Fe XV S X Inflow lines Log (T) Fe XXIII Fe XXIV jet

Density dependence of Fe IX A Solid line – 10 4 cm -3 Dashed Line – cm -3 G(Te,Ne) function Line Profile Inaccurate treatment of density sensitivity of G (Te, Ne) function leads to incorrect prediction of strong inflow for this line! Log scale factor 3

Summary Using Chen & Shibata (2000) MHD simulations and ADAS data we have simulated the profiles of 95 spectral lines which will be observed by EIS Examined signatures of reconnection inflow, jet, slow shock attached to expanding CME, coronal Moreton wave Classified 95 lines: guide for planning observations & line selection. Preliminary recommendation: Fe XV 195A (inflow), Fe XXIV 192A (jet), etc. Some line profile shapes may be altered as a result of including density sensitivity of ionisation balance: could lead to criticism of reconnection model if strong flows are not detected

Future work Results based on these specific simulations so: 1. Parameter survey 2. Larger range of electron densities 3. Effect on classifications 4. Include heat conduction Lines of sight etc. in the ideal case so: 1. Consider whether EIS can really observe the inflows given the instrumental characteristics 2. Consider best targets to detect evidence (Isobe)