DESIGN WINDOWS FOR THIN AND THICK LIQUID PROTECTION SCHEMES IN IFE REACTOR CHAMBERS M. Yoda and S. I. Abdel-Khalik G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Plasma Window Options and Opportunities for Inertial Fusion Applications Leslie Bromberg Ady Herskovitch* MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting.
Advertisements

Fluid Dynamic Aspects of Thin Liquid Film Protection Concepts S. I. Abdel-Khalik and M. Yoda ARIES Town Meeting (May 5-6, 2003) G. W. Woodruff School of.
First Wall Heat Loads Mike Ulrickson November 15, 2014.
G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Atlanta, GA Experimental Results for Thin and Thick Liquid Walls M. Yoda and S. I. Abdel-Khalik.
Design Constraints for Liquid-Protected Divertors S. Shin, S. I. Abdel-Khalik, M. Yoda and ARIES Team G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Atlanta,
MAE 5130: VISCOUS FLOWS Introduction to Boundary Layers
..perhaps the hardest place to use Bernoulli’s equation (so don’t)
Pharos University ME 352 Fluid Mechanics II
Basic bluff-body aerodynamics I
First Wall Thermal Hydraulics Analysis El-Sayed Mogahed Fusion Technology Institute The University of Wisconsin With input from S. Malang, M. Sawan, I.
Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Heavy Ion Fusion Modeling Update* ARIES e-Meeting October 17, 2001 * This work was performed under the auspices.
An Overview of the Fluid Dynamics Aspects of Liquid Protection schemes for IFE Reactor Chambers S. I. Abdel-Khalik and M. Yoda US-Japan Workshop on Fusion.
September 3-4, 2003/ARR 1 Liquid Wall Ablation under IFE Photon Energy Deposition at Radius of 0.5 m A. René Raffray and Mofreh Zaghloul University of.
G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Atlanta, GA USA CHAMBER CLEARING : THE HYDRODYNAMIC SOURCE TERM S.I. ABDEL-KHALIK, S.G. DURBIN,
MECH 221 FLUID MECHANICS (Fall 06/07) Chapter 9: FLOWS IN PIPE
Preliminary Assessment of Porous Gas-Cooled and Thin- Liquid-Protected Divertors S. I. Abdel-Khalik, S. Shin, and M. Yoda ARIES Meeting, UCSD (March 2004)
ARIES-IFE Study Page 1 Nozzle Motion/Phasing Over Reactor Lifetime (AI#4) L. Waganer and W. Meier 6 May 2003 ARIES Meeting at Livermore.
Overview of US Power Plant Studies: A) Results from ARIES-IFE Study B) Plans For Compact Stellarator Farrokh Najmabadi US/Japan Workshop October 9-11,
HYDRODYNAMIC EVOLUTION OF IFE CHAMBERS WITH DIFFERENT PROTECTIVE GASES AND PRE-IGNITION CONDITIONS Zoran Dragojlovic and Farrokh Najmabadi University of.
November 20, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Thin Liquid Wall Behavior under IFE Cyclic Operation 1 Thin Liquid Wall Behavior under IFE Cyclic Operation A.
MECH 221 FLUID MECHANICS (Fall 06/07) Chapter 10: OPEN CHANNEL FLOWS
October 24, Remaining Action Items on Dry Chamber Wall 2. “Overlap” Design Regions 3. Scoping Analysis of Sacrificial Wall A. R. Raffray, J.
ARIES-IFE Assessment of Operational Windows for IFE Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego 16 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.
1 THERMAL LOADING OF A DIRECT DRIVE TARGET IN RAREFIED GAS B. R. Christensen, A. R. Raffray, and M. S. Tillack Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department.
An Overview of the Fluid Dynamics Aspects of Liquid Protection Schemes for Fusion Reactors S. I. Abdel-Khalik and M. Yoda TOFE-16 Meeting - Madison (September.
Temperature Gradient Limits for Liquid-Protected Divertors S. I. Abdel-Khalik, S. Shin, and M. Yoda ARIES Meeting (June 2004) G. W. Woodruff School of.
Aug. 8-9, 2006 HAPL meeting, GA 1 Advanced Chamber Concept with Magnetic Intervention: - Ion Dump Issues - Status of Blanket Study A. René Raffray UCSD.
Heat Flux Gradient Limits for Liquid-Protected Divertors S. I. Abdel-Khalik, S. Shin, and M. Yoda ARIES Meeting, San Diego (Nov 4-5, 2004) G. W. Woodruff.
Computation of FREE CONVECTION P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department IIT Delhi Quantification of Free …….
ILE, Osaka Concept and preliminary experiment on protection of final optics in wet-wall laser fusion reactor T. Norimatsu, K. Nagai, T. Yamanaka and Y.
Design Considerations for Thin Liquid Film Wall Protection Systems S.I. Abdel-Khalik and M.Yoda Georgia Institute of Technology ARIES Project Meeting,
G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Atlanta, GA USA THE HYDRODYNAMIC SOURCE TERM: S.G. DURBIN, S.I. ABDEL-KHALIK, and M. YODA BOUNDARY.
RRP:10/17/01Aries IFE 1 Liquid Wall Chamber Dynamics Aries Electronic Workshop October 17, 2001 Robert R. Peterson Fusion Technology Institute University.
M. Yoda, S. I. Abdel-Khalik, D. L. Sadowski and M. D. Hageman Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Extrapolating Experimental Results for Model Divertor.
March 20-21, 2000ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design, ARIES Project Meeting/ARR Status ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design The ARIES Team Presented.
Distribution of Advanced Design Research FY02 FY03 (Current) ARIES (IFE & MFE) System Studies1,9661,939 Socio-economic Studies UCSD/UW/RPI 1,189.
1 NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THIN-LIQUID-FILM WALL PROTECTION SCHEMES S.I. ABDEL-KHALIK AND M. YODA G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering.
ARIES-IFE Study L. M. Waganer, June 7, 2000 Page 1 Considerations of HI Beam and Vacuum System Arrangement L. Waganer The Boeing Company 7 June 2001 ARIES.
Convection Prepared by: Nimesh Gajjar. CONVECTIVE HEAT TRANSFER Convection heat transfer involves fluid motion heat conduction The fluid motion enhances.
Hydrodynamics of Liquid Protection schemes for IFE Reactor Chambers S. I. Abdel-Khalik and M. Yoda IAEA Meeting - Vienna (November 2003) G. W. Woodruff.
Opportunities and Issues for IFE Chamber Science Jeff Latkowksi, Wayne Meier Fusion Energy Program, LLNL Per F. Peterson, Philippe Bardet, Haihua Zhao.
A H. Kyotoh, b R. Nakamura & a P. J. Baruah a a Institute of Engineering Mechanics and Systems, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan b Third Plan Design.
M. Yoda, S. I. Abdel-Khalik, D. L. Sadowski, B. H. Mills, and J. D. Rader G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Updated Thermal Performance of.
Practise questions Answers later.
ARR/April 8, Magnetic Intervention Dump Concepts A. René Raffray UCSD With contributions from: A. E. Robson, D. Rose and J. Sethian HAPL Meeting.
Free Surface Flow Phenomena: Effects on MHD flow control and interfacial transport Mohamed Abdou DOE Budget Meeting, Germantown March 13, 2001.
Unit 1: Fluid Dynamics An Introduction to Mechanical Engineering: Part Two Fluid dynamics Learning summary By the end of this chapter you should have learnt.
Aerosol Limits for Target Tracking Ronald Petzoldt ARIES IFE Meeting, Madison, WI April 22-23, 2002.
ME 101: Fluids Engineering Chapter 6 ME Two Areas for Mechanical Engineers Fluid Statics –Deals with stationary objects Ships, Tanks, Dams –Common.
Bedforms in Unidirectional Flow
Some slides on UCLA LM-MHD capabilities and Preliminary Incompressible LM Jet Simulations in Muon Collider Fields Neil Morley and Manmeet Narula Fusion.
1 NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THIN-LIQUID-FILM WALL PROTECTION SCHEMES S.I. ABDEL-KHALIK AND M. YODA G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering.
M. Yoda, S. I. Abdel-Khalik, D. L. Sadowski, B. H. Mills and M. D. Hageman G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Correlations for Divertor Thermal-Hydraulic.
Convection Heat Transfer in Manufacturing Processes P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Mode of Heat Transfer due to.
Heat Transfer Su Yongkang School of Mechanical Engineering # 1 HEAT TRANSFER CHAPTER 9 Free Convection.
05:53 Fluid Mechanics Basic Concepts.
Liquid Walls Town Meeting May 5, 2003, Livermore, CA Work performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department of Energy by University of California Lawrence.
1 Radiation Environment at Final Optics of HAPL Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI HAPL Meeting ORNL March.
Subject Name: FLUID MECHANICS Subject Code:10ME36B Prepared By: R Punith Department: Aeronautical Engineering Date:
Date of download: 9/18/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Droplet Detachment Mechanism in a High-Speed Gaseous Microflow J. Fluids Eng.
Qs. 1 on VI The coefficient of dynamic viscosity values for a high grade oil and a low grade oil at 40 oC are 15 cp and 60 cp respectively. It is required.
Design of Port Injection Systems for SI Engines
Action Items from ARIES IFE Meeting, GA, July 1-2, 2002 (DRAFT)
Internal Incompressible
Outline Uses of Gravity and Magnetic exploration
Thermoforming Process
Spray Impingement & Formation of Films In Ports
Estimation of Profile Losses
Fundamentals of Convection
Shearing Stresses in Beams and Thin-Walled Members
Presentation transcript:

DESIGN WINDOWS FOR THIN AND THICK LIQUID PROTECTION SCHEMES IN IFE REACTOR CHAMBERS M. Yoda and S. I. Abdel-Khalik G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Atlanta, GA 30332–0405

ARIES-IFE (1/03) 2 Overview Thin liquid protection schemes (Prometheus)  Major design questions  “Wetted wall” concept: low-speed normal injection through a porous surface  “Forced film” concept: high-speed tangential injection along a solid surface Thick liquid protection (HYLIFE-II)  Major design questions  Turbulent liquid sheets: rectangular or 2D turbulent jets at high density ratio

ARIES-IFE (1/03) 3 Thin Liquid Protection Major Design Questions Can a stable liquid film be maintained over the entire surface of the reactor cavity? Can the film be re-established over the entire cavity surface prior to the next target explosion? Can a minimum film thickness be maintained to provide adequate protection over subsequent target explosions? Study wetted wall/forced film concepts over “worst case” of downward-facing surfaces

ARIES-IFE (1/03) 4 Wetted Wall Liquid Injection Prometheus: 0.5 mm thick layer of liquid lead injected normally through porous SiC structure X-rays and Ions ~ 5 m First Wall

ARIES-IFE (1/03) 5 Wetted Wall Parameters Length, velocity and time scales Nondim. drop detachment time  Droplet detachment time t d Nondim. min. film thickness  Minimum film thickness  min Nondim. initial film thickness  Initial film thickness z o Nondim. injection velocity  Liquid injection velocity w in

ARIES-IFE (1/03) 6 Drop Detachment Time Re ** z o * = 0.1; w * in = 0.01 z o * = 0.5; w * in = 0.05 z o * = 0.5; w * in = 0.01 Nondim. mass flux  Mass flux Reynolds number = –0.005= = –0.002= 0.01 = –0.001= 0.02 = 0 increasing

ARIES-IFE (1/03) 7 Minimum Film Thickness Re  * min z o * = 0.1; w * in = 0.01 z o * = 0.5; w * in = 0.01 z o * = 0.5; w * in = 0.05 Nondim. mass flux  Mass flux Reynolds number = –0.005= = –0.002= 0.01 = –0.001= 0.02 = 0 increasing

ARIES-IFE (1/03) 8 Wetted Wall Summary General nondimensional charts applicable to a wide variety of candidate coolants and operating conditions Stability of liquid film imposes  Lower bound on repetition rate (or upper bound on time between shots) to avoid liquid dripping into reactor cavity between shots  Lower bound on liquid injection velocity to maintain minimum film thickness over entire reactor cavity required to provide adequate protection over subsequent fusion events

ARIES-IFE (1/03) 9 Forced Film First Wall Injection Point Detachment Distance x d Forced Film X-rays and Ions Prometheus: Few mm thick Pb “forced film” injected tangentially at >7 m/s over upper endcap ~ 5 m

ARIES-IFE (1/03) 10 Forced Film Parameters Length scale  = initial film thickness Froude number  Mean injection speed U  Surface orientation  (  = 0°  horizontal surface)  Prometheus: for  = 0 – 45  ; Fr = 100 – 680 over nonwetting surface Nondimensional detachment length x d /   Mean detachment length x d from injection point Nondimensional lateral extent W /   Mean lateral extent W

ARIES-IFE (1/03) 11 x d /  vs. Fr: Wetting Surface x d increases linearly with Fr x d  as  x d  as  Fr x d /    = 0   = 10    = 30    = 45   = 1 mm1.5 mm2 mm Design Window: Wetting Surface

ARIES-IFE (1/03) 12 x d /  : Wetting vs. Nonwetting Smaller x d  conservative estimate x d indep. of  Nonwetting vs. Wetting: Fr x d /  Open symbols Nonwetting Closed symbols Wetting  = 1 mm  = 1.5 mm  = 2 mm  = 0  Design Window

ARIES-IFE (1/03) 13 W / W o : Wetting vs. Nonwetting Wetting Marked lateral growth (3.5  ) at higher Re Nonwetting Negligible lateral spread  Contact line “pinned” at edges? Contracts farther upstream x / x /  W / WoW / Wo  = 2 mm  = 0   Re = 3800  OpenNonwetting Closed Wetting

ARIES-IFE (1/03) 14 Cylindrical Dams In all cases, cylindrical obstructions modeling protective dams around beam ports incompatible with forced films Film either detaches from dam, or flows over dam x y x y x y

ARIES-IFE (1/03) 15 Forced Film Summary Design windows for streamwise (longitudinal) spacing of injection/coolant removal slots to maintain attached protective film  Detachment length increases linearly with Froude number Wetting chamber first wall surface requires fewer injection slots than nonwetting surface  wetting surface more desirable Cylindrical protective dams around chamber penetrations incompatible with effective forced film protection  “Aerodynamically tailored” protective dam shapes

ARIES-IFE (1/03) 16  Oscillating sheets create protective pocket to shield chamber side walls  Lattice of stationary sheets shield front/back walls while allowing beam propagation and target injection Turbulent Liquid Sheets Pictures courtesy P.F. Peterson, UCB HYLIFE-II: Use slab jets or liquid sheets to shield IFE chamber first walls from neutrons, X-rays and charged particles

ARIES-IFE (1/03) 17 Thick Liquid Protection Major Design Questions Is it possible to create “smooth” prototypical turbulent liquid sheets?  5 mm clearance between driver beam, sheet free surface in protective lattice  > 30 year lifetime for final focus magnets Can adjacent sheets, once they collide, separate and re-establish themselves before the next fusion event? Can the flow be re-established prior to the next fusion event?  Chamber clearing

ARIES-IFE (1/03) 18 Liquid Sheets Parameters Length scale  = initial sheet thickness Velocity scale U o = mean speed at nozzle Reynolds number  HYLIFE-II: Re  200,000 Nondimensional distance downstream of nozzle x /   Measured from nozzle  HYLIFE-II: x /  < 30 over protective pocket Nozzle dimensions W o    W o = 10 cm;  = 1 cm  aspect ratio AR = 10

ARIES-IFE (1/03) 19 Image after thresholding, edge detection Surface Ripple Measurements Free surface  interface between fluorescing water and air  Planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF) Free surface found w/edge detection  Threshold individual images  z = standard deviation of free surface z-position spatially averaged over central 7.5 cm of flow x z y g Light sheet CCD Nozzle Original image 1 cm x y z

ARIES-IFE (1/03) 20 Surface Ripple Results  z measure of average surface ripple  z /  < 6% for x /  < 25  z essentially independent of Re  z  slightly as x   z /  x / x /  Re = 25,00050,00097,000

ARIES-IFE (1/03) 21 ILASP  z y x WoWo yy zz zozo Instantaneous liquid area averaged spatial probability (ILASP) = liquid volume fraction  within a  y   z“box” located at z at given x  Results for box at nozzle edge useful in neutronics calculations Calculate liquid volume fraction in rectangular box at given x location: box spans –0.5  y  y  +0.5  y; z o  z  z o +  z   z /  = 0.01   y / W o = 0.8

ARIES-IFE (1/03) 22 ILASP Results: Re = 130,000 z o /  Liquid Volume Fraction  x /  = 5 x /  = 10 x /  = 15 x /  = 20 x /  = 25 Fluctuations  as x  Width of “fully flooded” (  = 1) region  as x  Box dimensions 0.01 cm  8 cm z o /  = 0.5  nozzle edge x /  increasing zozo

ARIES-IFE (1/03) 23 Liquid Sheets Summary Results at Re half of prototypical values imply HYLIFE-II jets will have average surface ripple (based on standard deviation) < 5 mm  Sheets smooth enough to allow close spacing of jets as dictated by magnet shielding requirements  Fluctuations similar for all Re studied  Design standard 5 th order polynomial contraction along z- dimension with flow straightener upstream ILASP results useful in neutronics calculations Minor (2.5% of total cross-section) blockage upstream of nozzle greatly increases surface ripple