Calibration/validation of the AS_Q_FAST channels Rick Savage - LHO Stefanos Giampanis – Univ. Rochester ( Daniel Sigg – LHO )

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut) HOMODYNE AND HETERODYNE READOUT OF A SIGNAL- RECYCLED GRAVITATIONAL WAVE DETECTOR.
Advertisements

Cascina, January 25th, Coupling of the IMC length noise into the recombined ITF output Raffaele Flaminio EGO and CNRS/IN2P3 Summary - Recombined.
Calibration of the gravitational wave signal in the LIGO detectors Gabriela Gonzalez (LSU), Mike Landry (LIGO-LHO), Patrick Sutton (PSU) with the calibration.
Spring LSC 2001 LIGO-G W E2 Amplitude Calibration of the Hanford Recombined 2km IFO Michael Landry, LIGO Hanford Observatory Luca Matone, Benoit.
E2 Correlations Nelson Christensen Carleton College LSC Detector Characterization LIGO-G Z.
Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik - Albert-Einstein-Institut DC Meeting Golm - Karsten Kötter1 Current status of DAQ System
1 Virgo commissioning status M.Barsuglia LAL Orsay.
LIGO-G D LIGO calibration during the S3 science run Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory Justin Garofoli, Luca Matone, Hugh Radkins (LHO),
E2E school at LLO1  Han2k »Model of the LHO 2k IFO »Designed for lock acquisition study  SimLIGO1 »Model of all LIGO 1 IFOs »Designed for –noise hunting.
LIGO-G W LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting – LLO March Summary of recent measurements of g factor changes induced by thermal loading.
LIGO Reduced Data Sets E7 standard reduced data set RDS generation for future runs decimation examples LIGO-G Z Isabel Leonor (w/ Robert Schofield)
LIGO-G W Proposed LHO Commissioning Activities in May 02 Fred Raab 29 Apr 02.
LIGO-G W LIGO II Pre-stabilized Laser System Design Requirements and Conceptual Design David Ottaway, Todd Rutherford, Rick Savage, Peter Veitch,
NSF : Nov. 10, LIGO End to End simulation overview  Time domain simulation written in C++  Like MATLAB with Interferometer toolbox  Major physics.
LIGO-G W S5 Calibration Status and Comparison of S5 results from three interferometer calibration techniques Rick Savage LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory1 Characterization of LIGO Input Optics University of Florida Thomas Delker Guido Mueller Malik Rakhmanov.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group
LIGO-G W S5 Calibration Status and Comparison of S5 results from three interferometer calibration techniques Rick Savage LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO- G060XXX-00-R E2E meeting, September How to design feedback filters? E2E meeting September 27, 2006 Osamu Miyakawa, Caltech.
Frequency Response of LIGO Interferometers Andrew Weber University of Maryland (no relation) SURF Student Lecture Series Advisor: Andri Gretarsson.
8/18/06Gxxxxxx Introduction to Calibration Brian O’Reilly SciMon Camp 2006 Brian O’Reilly SciMon Camp 2006.
ALLEGRO G Z LSC, Livingston 23 March, Calibration for the ALLEGRO resonant detector -- S2 and S4 Martin McHugh, Loyola University New Orleans.
Optical Anchor / Interferometer Status: June, 2004 Josef Frisch.
Stefan Hild 1Ilias WG1 meeting, Sep 2005, Perugia Title GEO 600 Commissioning progress Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut)
LIGO-G D Commissioning PAC11, 2001 Daniel Sigg, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
S4/S5 Calibration The Calibration team G Z.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group
G D Electronics Infrastructure for advanced LIGO LSC Meeting, Boston, July 25, 2007 Daniel Sigg, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
GEO‘s experience with Signal Recycling Harald Lück Perugia,
Advanced VIRGO WG1: Status VIRGO, Cascina Andreas Freise University of Birmingham.
3/19/08G D S5 Calibration Status Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC March 2008 Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC.
LIGO-G I S5 calibration status Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory for the LSC Calibration Committee LSC/Virgo Meeting May 22, 2007 Cascina,
G D LSC Changes in Preparation of High Power Operations Commissioning Meeting, May 5, 2003 Peter Fritschel, Daniel Sigg, Matt Evans.
Matt Evans, LSC March 2003 (G E)1 Lock Acquisition in LIGO  Who am I? »Matt Evans »Caltech graduate  What is Lock Acquisition? »The process.
LIGO-G D Commissioning, Part II PAC 12, June 2002 Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT.
1 ATF2 Q BPM electronics Specification (Y. Honda, ) Design System –Hardware layout –Software –Calibration Testing Production schedule ATF2 electronics.
LSC-March  LIGO End to End simulation  Lock acquisition design »How to increase the threshold velocity under realistic condition »Hanford 2k simulation.
Status of the Advanced LIGO PSL development LSC Virgo meeting, Caltech, March 2008 LIGO G Z Benno Willke for the PSL team.
LIGO-G D 1 Status of Detector Commissioning LSC Meeting, March 2001 Nergis Mavalvala California Institute of Technology.
3/21/06G D S4/S5 Calibration Status Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC March 2006 Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC.
Laser Frequency Stabilization – 2004, May 04 1 Laser Frequency Stabilization François BONDU CNRS – ARTEMIS, Nice VIRGO How it works (Design) Make it work.
Stefan Hild 111th WG1 meeting, Hannover, January 2007 DC-Readout for GEO Stefan Hild for the GEO-team.
Martin Hewitson and the GEO team Measuring gravitational waves with GEO600.
LSC Meeting at LHO LIGO-G E 1August. 21, 2002 SimLIGO : A New LIGO Simulation Package 1. e2e : overview 2. SimLIGO 3. software, documentations.
Gabriele Vajente ILIAS WG1 meeting - Frascati Noise Analysis Tools at Virgo.
Development of a Readout Scheme for High Frequency Gravitational Waves Jared Markowitz Mentors: Rick Savage Paul Schwinberg Paul Schwinberg.
1 Locking in Virgo Matteo Barsuglia ILIAS, Cascina, July 7 th 2004.
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
LIGO-G D Commissioning at Hanford Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 12 December 2000 LIGO Livingston Observatory.
LIGO-G Z GWDAW9 December 17, Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO Science Run 2 Data John G. Zweizig LIGO / Caltech for the LIGO.
LIGO-G Z March 2007, LSC meeting, Osamu Miyakawa 1 Osamu Miyakawa Hiroaki Yamamoto March 21, 2006 LSC meeting Modeling of AdLIGO arm lock acquisition.
ALLEGRO GWDAW-9, Annecy 16 December, Generating time domain strain data (h(t)) for the ALLEGRO resonant detector or calibration of ALLEGRO data.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
LIGO-G W Interferometer and modecleaner transients during the E2 run Rauha Rahkola and Ray Frey University of Oregon Rick Savage LIGO Hanford.
Development of a Readout Scheme for High Frequency Gravitational Waves Jared Markowitz Mentors: Rick Savage Paul Schwinberg.
Calibration and the status of the photon calibrators Evan Goetz University of Michigan with Peter Kalmus (Columbia U.) & Rick Savage (LHO) 17 October 2006.
Daniel Sigg, Commissioning Meeting, 11/11/16
Commissioning Progress and Plans
Homodyne readout of an interferometer with Signal Recycling
Some notes on the Electro-Static Drives
Electronics: Demod + 4Q FE
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
Digital Control Systems (DCS)
Line tracking methods used in LineMon
Advanced LIGO optical configuration investigated in 40meter prototype
ALLEGRO calibration for the LLO-ALLEGRO stochastic analysis
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
LIGO Photon Calibrators
Calibration: S2 update, S3 preliminaries
Talk prepared by Stefan Hild AEI Hannover for the GEO-team
Presentation transcript:

Calibration/validation of the AS_Q_FAST channels Rick Savage - LHO Stefanos Giampanis – Univ. Rochester ( Daniel Sigg – LHO )

LIGO-G W March 2006 LSC meeting - LHO 2 High frequency length response 1FSR2FSR

LIGO-G W March 2006 LSC meeting - LHO 3 Length response TF detail DC 1FSR

LIGO-G W March 2006 LSC meeting - LHO 4 Comparison with single pole approximation 1% error at 1 kHz 12% error at 10 kHz

LIGO-G W March 2006 LSC meeting - LHO 5 “FAST” channels All three interferometers have FAST (262 kHz) data acquisition systems generating AS_Q_FAST signals with 100 kHz bandwidths The signals are also digitally heterodyned at 1024 Hz and kHz and downsampled to 2048 Hz to generate the 0FSR and 1FSR channels »AS_Q_0FSR.magAS_Q_1FSR.mag »AS_Q_0FSR.phsAS_Q_1FSR.phs »AS_Q_0FSR.realAS_Q_1FSR.real »AS_Q_0FSR.imgAS_Q_1FSR.img At LHO the full 262 kHz AS_Q_FAST channels are written to the frames. Not yet implemented at LLO.

LIGO-G W March 2006 LSC meeting - LHO 6 AS signal flow AS_Q path Whitening filter ICS 130 ADC (262 kHz) Monitor outputs abababab AS port photodetectors DAQ channels AS_Q_FAST and 0FSR and 1FSR channels AS1 demodAS2 demodAS3 demodAS4 demod AS_Q_FAST path Pentium front-end processor (e.g. h1adcufast)

LIGO-G W March 2006 LSC meeting - LHO 7 Hardware – AS demod end ASn outputs ASn-mon outputs (x 2 gain) whitening filters for ICS 130

LIGO-G W March 2006 LSC meeting - LHO 8 Hardware – ADC end ICS 130 – 8 channels running at 262,144 Hz Pentek code generates the AS_Q_FAST and hetrodyned channels

LIGO-G W March 2006 LSC meeting - LHO 9 Whitening filter transfer function

LIGO-G W March 2006 LSC meeting - LHO 10 ASPD summation for AS_Q and AS_Q_FAST »Similar calculation done in adcufast »Presently, startup.cmd must be updated manually every time medm settings are changed »LLO adjusts ASPD matrix coefficients for each lock stretch »Working toward reading epics settings on the fly.

LIGO-G W March 2006 LSC meeting - LHO 11 AS_Q : AS_Q_FAST comparison

LIGO-G W March 2006 LSC meeting - LHO 12 AS_Q_FAST signals during full ifo. lock

LIGO-G W March 2006 LSC meeting - LHO 13 0FSR signals

LIGO-G W March 2006 LSC meeting - LHO 14 1FSR signals

LIGO-G W March 2006 LSC meeting - LHO 15 Calibration options Drive test mass at 37.5 kHz »Attempted during Oct –Factor of five larger value than expected –Electronics not designed to be driven at this frequency –Uncertainty in force/displacement too high Photon calibrator »Now driving at ~ 1600 Hz –To resolve peak in ASD factor at the level of a factor of a few above the background requires hundreds of seconds of integration –At 37.5 kHz one data point would require ~ one year integration time Thermally-excited TM internal mode vibrations »Modeling (and more thought) required

LIGO-G W March 2006 LSC meeting - LHO 16 “Blind” extrapolation of low-freq. calibration Use cal line at ~1150 Hz Replace cavity pole approximation with length response given by H L (f) Extrapolate to 100 kHz without HF measurement »Analytic model used to date for single FP cavity - probably gets differential mode right, but not leakage of common mode effects into AS port – doesn’t model noise floor. »Use full interferometer model such as Finesse to study noise couplings at high frequencies. Effort underway to implement “blind” calibration