Radiometric Comparison between Suomi NPP VIIRS and AQUA MODIS using Extended Simultaneous Nadir Overpass in the Low Latitudes Sirish Uprety a Changyong.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NOAA National Geophysical Data Center
Advertisements

A33C-0161 On the New Satellite Aerosol Measurements for Atmospheric Applications: VIIRS Aerosol Products Summary Different match-up criteria also were.
Evaluating Calibration of MODIS Thermal Emissive Bands Using Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer Measurements Yonghong Li a, Aisheng Wu a, Xiaoxiong.
Characterization of ATMS Bias Using GPSRO Observations Lin Lin 1,2, Fuzhong Weng 2 and Xiaolei Zou 3 1 Earth Resources Technology, Inc.
VIIRS LST Uncertainty Estimation And Quality Assessment of Suomi NPP VIIRS Land Surface Temperature Product 1 CICS, University of Maryland, College Park;
Page 1 Study of Sensor Inter-calibration Using CLARREO Jack Xiong, Jim Butler, and Steve Platnick NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD with contributions from.
Sirish Uprety a and Changyong Cao b a Perot Systems Government Services, Fairfax, VA, b NOAA/NESDIS/STAR, Camp Springs, MD, August 1, 2010.
Destriping of VIIRS and MODIS SST imagery Marouan Bouali and Alexander Ignatov NOAA/NESDIS/STAR and CSU/CIRA 1 Workshop: “SST from polar orbiters: use.
Reduction of stripe noise in ACSPO clear-sky radiances and SST Marouan Bouali and Alexander Ignatov NOAA/NESDIS/STAR and CSU/CIRA 1 SPIE Security, Defense.
Likun Wang 1, Yong Han 2, Xin Jin 3, Yong Chen 1, Xiaozhen Xiao 3 and Denis Tremblay 4 1. UMD/ESSIC/CICS, College Park, MD
Liang APEIS Capacity Building Workshop on Integrated Environmental Monitoring of Asia-Pacific Region September 2002, Beijing,, China Atmospheric.
Green Vegetation Fraction (GVF) derived from the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) sensor onboard the SNPP satellite Zhangyan Jiang 1,2,
Xin Kong, Lizzie Noyes, Gary Corlett, John Remedios, Simon Good and David Llewellyn-Jones Earth Observation Science, Space Research Centre, University.
Calibration Working Group L1b Cal/Val Update 1 Presented by Changyong Cao NOAA/NESDIS/STAR GOES-R Calibration Working Group January 9, 2014.
Simultaneous Nadir Overpass Method for Inter-satellite Calibration of Radiometers Changyong Cao NOAA/NESDIS/Center for Satellite Applications & Research.
Surface Reflectance over Land: Extending MODIS to VIIRS Eric Vermote NASA GSFC Code 619 MODIS/VIIRS Science Team Meeting, May.
Prospects for Improved Global Mapping of Development Using VIIRS Data Chris Elvidge Earth Observation Group NOAA-NESDIS National Geophysical Data Center.
Monitoring Bio-Optical Processes Using NPP-VIIRS And MODIS-Aqua Ocean Color Products Robert Arnone (1), Sherwin Ladner (2), Giulietta Fargion (3), Paul.
AIRS: Grating spectrometer; IASI and CrIS: Interferometer Likun Wang 1, Yong Han 2, Fuzhong Weng 2, Mitch Goldberg 3 1. UMD/ESSIC/CICS, College Park, MD.
Orbit Characteristics and View Angle Effects on the Global Cloud Field
OpenDAP Server-side Functions for Multi-Instrument Aggregation ESIP Session: Advancing the Power and Utility of Server-side Aggregation Jon C. Currey (NASA),
NASA, CGMS-41, July 2013 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Calibration/validation of Operational Instruments at NASA Langley Research.
Terra Launched December 18, 1999
NASA Ocean Color Research Team Meeting, Silver Spring, Maryland 5-7 May 2014 II. Objectives Establish a high-quality long-term observational time series.
Evaluation of the Suomi NPP VIIRS Land Surface Temperature Product 1 CICS, University of Maryland, College Park; 2 STAR/NESDIS/NOAA Yuling Liu 1, Yunyue.
As components of the GOES-R ABI Air Quality products, a multi-channel algorithm similar to MODIS/VIIRS for NOAA’s next generation geostationary satellite.
Inter-calibration of Operational IR Sounders using CLARREO Bob Holz, Dave Tobin, Fred Nagle, Bob Knuteson, Fred Best, Hank Revercomb Space Science and.
Validation and comparison of Terra/MODIS active fire detections from INPE and UMd/NASA algorithms LBA Ecology Land Cover – 23 Jeffrey T. Morisette 1, Ivan.
Introduction GOES-R ABI will be the first GOES imaging instrument providing observations in both the visible and the near infrared spectral bands. Therefore.
Satellites Storm “Since the early 1960s, virtually all areas of the atmospheric sciences have been revolutionized by the development and application of.
AVHRR Visible Band Calibration / Intercalibration (for Climate Studies) Andrew Heidinger and Michael Pavolonis* Changyong Cao, Aleksandar Jelenak, Jerry.
Data acquisition From satellites with the MODIS instrument.
Analysis of Simultaneous Nadir Observations of MODIS from AQUA and TERRA Andrew Heidinger and many others NOAA/NESDIS Office of Research and Applications.
Preliminary results from the new AVHRR Pathfinder Atmospheres Extended (PATMOS-x) Data Set Andrew Heidinger a, Michael Pavolonis b and Mitch Goldberg a.
Pushing the limits of dark-target aerosol remote sensing from MODIS Robert C. Levy (SSAI and 613.2) Contributors: S. Mattoo (SSAI), L. Remer (NASA), R.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Double Differences of BTs in AVHRR Ch4 from MICROS Climate Quality Calibration.
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Dome C, MODIS/AVHRR TOA reflectance time series for (a) band 1, (b) band 2, (c)
Bias analysis and correction for MetOp/AVHRR IR channel using AVHRR-IASI inter-comparison Tiejun Chang and Xiangqian Wu GSICS Joint Research and data Working.
OMI BSDF Validation Using Antarctic and Greenland Ice Glen Jaross and Jeremy Warner Science Systems and Applications, Inc. Lanham, Maryland, USA Outline.
Inter-Sensor Comparison for Soumi NPP CrIS Likun Wang 1, Yong Han 2*, Denis Tremblay 3, Fuzhong Weng 2, and Mitch Goldberg 4 1. CICS/ESSIC/University of.
Desert-based calibration of co-located geostationary visible sensors using a daily exoatmospheric radiance model (DERM) Raj Bhatt, Dave Doelling, Ben Scarino,
Aqua-MODIS and VIIRS DCC calibration
GRWG UV Sub-Group Briefing Report
Paper under review for JGR-Atmospheres …
NOAA VIIRS Team GIRO Implementation Updates
PATMOS-x Reflectance Calibration and Reflectance Time-Series
Aisheng Wua, Jack Xiongb & Changyong Caoc  
VIS/NIR reference instrument requirements
Benjamin Scarino, David R
V2.0 minus V2.5 RSAS Tangent Height Difference Orbit 3761
Wang Ling, Hu Xiuqing, Chen Lin
Fangfang Yu and Xiangqian Wu
MODIS and VIIRS Reflective Solar Bands Calibration Methodologies and
Spectral Band Adjustment Factor (SBAF) Tool
Meteorological Satellite Center Japan Meteorological Agency
Using Sun Glint and Antarctic Ice Sheets to Calibrate MODIS and AVHRR Observations of Reflected Sunlight William R. Tahnk and James A. Coakley, Jr Cooperative.
Using SCIAMACHY to calibrate GEO imagers
On the use of Ray-Matching to transfer calibration
Introduction of the SCIAMACHY SBAF web tool
MODIS Characterization and Support Team Presented By Truman Wilson
CLARREO Pathfinder Inter-calibration: Requirements and Objectives
Characterizing DCC as invariant calibration target
Calibration monitoring based on snow PICS over Tibetan Plateau
Inter-Sensor Comparison for Soumi NPP CrIS
Status of MODIS and VIIRS Reflective Solar Calibration
S-NPP Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) Lunar Calibration using GSICS Implementation of the ROLO model (GIRO) for Reflective Solar Bands.
Consistent calibration of VIRR onboard FY-3A to FY-3C
Using VIIRS I or M band as the calibration reference
GSICS Annual Meeting March 06, 2019 Frascati, Italy
Andrew Heidinger JPSS Cloud Team Lead
Presentation transcript:

Radiometric Comparison between Suomi NPP VIIRS and AQUA MODIS using Extended Simultaneous Nadir Overpass in the Low Latitudes Sirish Uprety a Changyong Cao b Slawomir Blonski c Xi Shao d a CIRA, Colorado State University, College Park, MD, b NOAA/NESDIS/STAR, College Park, MD, c, d CICS, University of Maryland, College Park, MD Extended Simultaneous Nadir Overpass (SNO-x) in low latitudes is a recently introduced approach (inherited from traditional SNO approach) that extends SNO orbits to low latitudes for inter-comparing sensors in tropical region over a wide dynamic range such as over ocean surface, desert targets, green vegetation etc. In addition to SNO events at high latitude polar region, there exists SNO events between Suomi NPP VIIRS and AQUA MODIS at low latitudes, every 2-3 days apart but with larger time differences of more than 8 minutes. The two sensors are compared at overlapping regions of extended SNO orbits at North African deserts whereas the inter-comparison is done at both the exact orbital intersection and extended overlapping orbits over ocean. VIIRS moderate resolution channels (M-1 through M-8) are compared to MODIS equivalent channels to assess radiometric bias. The observed bias is target dependent due to a) spectral differences of targets and b) differences in spectral response functions of matching VIIRS and MODIS channels c) BRDF due to time difference between MODIS and VIIRS observation, atmospheric variability etc. Expected bias due to spectral differences is quantified using instruments such as Hyperion and AVIRIS and using radiative transfer models such as MODTRAN Stable earth targets such as Antarctica Dome C site is also used to evaluate the temporal radiometric calibration stability of VIIRS and verify the radiometric bias of VIIRS bands. VIIRS radiometric bias trends for VNIR channels are consistent at both targets, desert and ocean, for most of the bands suggesting decreasing trend in the beginning and getting more stable after May, VIIRS band M5 indicates the largest bias relative to MODIS of more than 8% at desert primarily due to spectral differences between MODIS and VIIRS RSR. The major uncertainties are due to 1) cloud movement, residual cloud contamination and cloud shadow, 2) sun glint over ocean surface 3) BRDF 4) spectral differences 5) co-location errors 6) atmospheric absorption variability etc. More than 8 minutes of time difference between MODIS and VIIRS observations for SNO-x comparison introduces larger uncertainties. After accounting for the expected bias due to spectral differences and uncertainties in bias trends, VIIRS measurements for VNIR bands agree with MODIS within 2% with uncertainty less than 1%. VIIRS SWIR band M-8 indicate larger than 2% bias over desert. Bias results at Dome C are consistent with the bias estimated at desert suggesting less 2% bias for VIIRS VNIR channels. VIIRS bands M-8 indicate larger than 3% bias with uncertainty greater than 2%. The larger bias in M-8 needs to be investigated further. Comparison of VIIRS observations over different target types with consistent results helps to understand and quantify the on-orbit radiometric performance of VIIRS in more detail. SNO-x approach has been successfully implemented for inter-sensor comparison between S-NPP VIIRS and AQUA MDOIS. The study suggests that SNO-x is a potential approach for continuously monitoring VIIRS radiometric accuracy and stability to keep the radiometric calibration well within the specification. References: [1] Cao, C, Weinreb, M, Xu, H: Predicting simultaneous nadir overpasses among polar-orbiting meteorological satellites for the intersatellite calibration of radiometers. Journal of Atmospheric Technology 21(4), (2004) [2] Heidinger, A. K., C. Cao, and J. T. Sullivan: Using Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS) to calibrate advanced very high resolution radiometer reflectance channels, Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 107, no. 0, XXXX, doi: /2001JD (2002) [3] Cao, C., F. Deluccia, X. Xiong, R. Wolfe, and F. Weng: Early on orbit performance of VIIRS, submitted to TGRS, (2013). [4] Uprety. S. and C. Cao: Radiometric and spectral characterization and comparison of the Antarctic Dome C and Sonoran Desert sites for the calibration and validation of visible and near-infrared radiometers, J. Appl. Remote Sens., (2012) Acknowledgment : This study is partially funded by the Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) program. Introduction Summary Methodology Figure 2. a) MODIS and b) VIIRS image mapped to MODIS latitude/longitude Figure 4. Reflectance spectra at desert, ocean and Dome C along with VIIRS and MODIS matching RSRs Results Figure 3. VIIRS radiometric bias time series over Left: Desert; and Right: Ocean surface; for matching bands, Bias=(V-M)×100%/M Table 3. VIIRS radiometric bias at Antarctica Dome C 1. Sensors and data sets used: a) SNPP VIIRS Moderate channels (M1 to M8 with spatial resolution ~750 m) b) AQUA MODIS (1 km L1B data) c) EO-1 Hyperion (30 m) and NASA AVIRIS (~10 m) 2. Data Processing: Figure 1. Flowchart: Computing observed bias using SNO-x and expected bias Identify low latitude SNO events and collect VIIRS and MODIS data for extended exact and extended SNO orbits Start ROI selection  spatial uniformity < 2% (Desert), < 1% (Ocean)  sensor zenith: <10 ⁰ (Desert), <6 ⁰ (Ocean)  apply strict cloud mask criteria for ocean  size: VIIRS and MODIS: 9km × 9km Hyperion and AVIRIS: 3km × 3km Map VIIRS into MODIS grid using fast geospatial matching (GSM) algorithm 1 1  Extract TOA reflectance mean for each ROI and compute bias between VIIRS and MODIS matching pairs, Bias=(VIIRS – MODIS)*100%/MODIS  Calculate the mean and stdev of all ROI mean values of an SNO event.  Construct the time series using all existing SNO events and analyze the observed bias Stop Convolve Hyperion/AVIRIS/MODTRAN reflectance with RSR of VIIRS and MODIS Calculate Spectrally induced bias Stop Figure 2. b) Orbits showing Low latitude SNO events i) Extended SNOs to desert ii) SNOs over ocean Desert Ocean MODIS a) Mapped VIIRS b) Start VIIRS Desert Bias (V-M)×100%/MOcean Bias (V-M)×100%/M HyperionMODTRANAVIRISMODTRAN M %-1.10%-1.40% M % ± 0.03%0.01%0.52%0.70% M % ± 0.07%0.00%-0.45%0.36% M % ± 0.17%-1.04%0.79%-1.17% M-57.8% ± 0.06%9.72%0.92%0.45% M %0.40% M-71.56% ± 0.16%1.22%2.76%0.87% M-80.18% ± 0.18%-0.39%-- VIIRSMODISObserved Bias (May 2012 to Dec. 2012) BandWavelength (µm)BandWavelength (µm)Ocean (V-M)×100%/MDesert (Mean ± Stdev) M % ± 1.2%-1.51% ± 1.5% M % ± 0.86%-2.49% ± 0.73% M % ± 0.69%-1.23% ± 0.39% M % ± 0.27% % ± 0.96%- M % ± 0.69% % ± 1.22%- M % ± 1.03%Saturated M % ± 0.65% % ± 1.22%- M % ± 0.71% VIIRSMODIS Observed Bias Day 350 (V-M)×100%/M Expected Bias (V-M)×100%/M Residual Bias (observed – Expected) M1 ( µm)B8 ( µm)-0.16%-0.76%0.6% ± 0.63% M4 ( µm)B4 ( µm)1.69%0.11% ± 0.05%1.58% ± 1.57% M5 ( µm)B1( µm)4.40%3.06% ± 0.35%1.34% ± 1.25% M7 ( µm)B2( µm)2.32%0.1% ± 0.05%2.22% ± 1.01% M8 ( µm)B5 ( µm)4.47%0.98% ± 0.09%3.49% ± 2.28% Figure 6. VIIRS and MODIS TOA reflectance time series at Antarctica Dome C Figure 5. Residual Bias trends (linear trends from Table 2 and 3 after subtracting expected bias) left: Desert and right: Ocean Table 2. VIIRS expected bias at ocean and desert Table 1. VIIRS observed radiometric bias at ocean and desert