Metadata and eGovernment The Danish Approach and Experience Palle Aagaard National IT and Telecom Agency, Denmark ERPANET training Seminar September 3-5,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Seven Pillars of Open Language Archiving: Introducing the OLAC Vision Gary Simons SIL International LREC Symposium: The Open Language Archives Community.
Advertisements

The Seven Pillars of Open Language Archiving: Introducing the OLAC Vision Gary Simons SIL International LSA Symposium: The Open Language Archives Community.
E-Government Use of Metadata in Denmark. Presentation of a project by Palle Aagaard Web Standards & Guidelines. The Danish State Information Service.
Member States' Expert Group on Digitisation and Digital Preservation – 13. December 2007 Jakob H. Petersen Head of Division Danish Library Agency
METS Awareness Training An Introduction to METS Digital libraries – where are we now? Digitisation technology now well established and well-understood.
The PREMIS Data Dictionary Michael Day Digital Curation Centre UKOLN, University of Bath JORUM, JISC and DCC.
Metadata and the UK Data Archive CESSDA Expert Seminar Odense September 2008 Margaret Ward Lenin Ageer.
IUFRO International Union of Forest Research Organizations Eero Mikkola Description of WP2 – NEFIS Metadata and Controlled Vocabularies Standards - work.
Implementation of the CoP in SLOVENIA Cooperation with data users Genovefa RUŽIĆ Deputy Director-General.
An Leabharlann UCD Órna Roche UCD James Joyce Library Metadata Documenting your data
1 Organizational Reform and Technological Modernization in the Public Sector or A view over some Information Society initiatives in Portugal Pedro Veiga.
Utilization of Basic Register Information from the PSI Perspective Aki Siponen, Counsellor, Ministry of Finance Business with Public Information National.
Current issues and trends in bibliographic control Overview of the Division’s interests and activities Bibliography Section Bohdana Stoklasova, Chair Talbott.
1 Archiving Workflow between a Local Repository and the National Library Archive Experiences from the DiVA Project Eva Müller, Peter Hansson, Uwe Klosa,
INSPIRE educational requirements: Challenges for the vocational training community VESTA-GIS Workshop 1 July 2008, Salzburg Danny Vandenbroucke SADL/K.U.Leuven.
Introducing Symposia : “ The digital repository that thinks like a librarian”
Introduction to Implementing an Institutional Repository Delivered to Technical Services Staff Dr. John Archer Library University of Regina September 21,
An Introduction to the Hennepin County Hennepin County GIS Technical Advisory Group (eGTAG) 10/20/2009.
The RDF meta model: a closer look Basic ideas of the RDF Resource instance descriptions in the RDF format Application-specific RDF schemas Limitations.
Dublin Core as a tool for interoperability Common presentation of data from archives, libraries and museums DC October 2006 Leif Andresen Danish.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Two Paths to Interoperable Metadata Jean Godby, Devon Smith, Eric Childress DC-2003 September 29, 2003.
At the NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION LIBRARY CIL 2007 Washington, DC Joyce W. Koeneman Digital Librarian, NTL Research and Innovative Technology Administration.
MDA/KE EMu/ MDA Initiatives and SPECTRUM Nick Poole MDA Director.
UKOLUG - July Metadata for the Web RDF and the Dublin Core Andy Powell UKOLN, University of Bath UKOLN.
RDA Wheat Data Interoperability Working Group Outcomes RDA Outputs P5 9 th March 2015, San Diego.
By Carrie Moran. To examine the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) metadata scheme to determine its utility based on structure, interoperability.
Teaching Metadata and Networked Information Organization & Retrieval The UNT SLIS Experience William E. Moen School of Library and Information Sciences.
The European Transport Research Alliance - ETRA Short Presentation… …of the new European Organisation created by the voluntary grouping of 5 major partner.
‘The Universal Catalogue’ a cultural sector viewpoint David Dawson Senior Policy Adviser (Digital Futures) Museums, Libraries and archives Council.
Today First bit –Searching problems/background –What is metadata –Dublin Core, GILS etc –Examples of use in e-government –International scene 11:15 - Coffee.
Architecture Models to Support Accessible eGovernment Services for All Karl Wessbrandt, the Swedish Administrative Development Agency 19 April 2007.
Nationally Significant Databases and Collections Providers’ Group Emma Kelly Environmental Information Advisor Environmental Monitoring and Reporting Team.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
The ten-year framework of the Global Centre for ICT in Parliament ECPRD Working Group on ICT Annual Meeting November 2010 Bucharest,
The Danish Approach to Standardization of Public Sector XML-Interfaces and Localization of International Standards OASIS Adoption Forum, Wednesday, 6 October.
Mike Collett Schemeta Interoperability in E-learning.
E-Transformation Turkey Project State Planning Organization March 17, 2005 Interoperability and Metadata Workshop Ankara, Turkey.
ERPANET works to enhance the preservation of cultural and scientific digital objects through raising awareness, providing access to experience,
CBSOR,Indian Statistical Institute 30th March 07, ISI,Kokata 1 Digital Repository support for Consortium Dr. Devika P. Madalli Documentation Research &
Publications Office Metadata Registry (MDR) INSPIRE Registry and Registers Workshop Willem van Gemert Publications Office of the EU Dissemniation and Reuse.
MEDIN Work Plan for By March 2011 MEDIN will be 3 years into the original 5 year development plan started in Would normally ask for continued.
© euroCRIS/Keith G Jeffery 1 euroCRIS and e-Infrastructure Keith G Jeffery President, euroCRIS Premium Members.
The DARLIN Initiative Bas Savenije University Librarian Utrecht University the Netherlands LIBER, July 2005.
Information Asset Registers Jo Ellis 12 September 2008.
Enhancing Institutional Capacities for Urban Management Vinod Tewari Director National Institute of Urban Affairs
Agenda Why discuss Digital Libraries What is a digital Library History Meta-data FEDORA NSDL D Space.
Pierpaolo Campostrini CORILA, Consortium for Managing Research Activities in the Venice Lagoon NEREUS – Working Group on GNSS Round table GNSS - Navigation.
A Danish perspective: Challenges of strengthening e-governance Adam Grønlykke Mollerup The 21st October 2009.
21 June 2001Managing Information Resources for e-Government1 The Dublin Core Makx Dekkers, Managing Director, Dublin Core Metadata Initiative
Resource Description and Access (RDA) information session Deirdre Kiorgaard Australian Committee on Cataloguing Representative to the Joint Steering Committee.
The Importance of Standards in Digital Preservation Tina Norris Kayla Payne Jennifer
Integrated metadata systems History Status Vision Roadmap
EESSI - project Advisory Committee meeting 22 October 2010 DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities1.
Open Archive Forum Rachel Heery UKOLN, University of Bath UKOLN is funded by Resource: The Council for Museums, Archives.
SEMIC.EU Semantic Interoperability Centre Europe Open Days Workshop eGovernment for Regions Aldo Laudi 7th October 2008.
XBRL for Statistical Reporting Giuseppe Sindoni Eurostat Statistical Information Technologies.
EPSIplus: an introduction Brian Green ePSIplus Analyst National Meeting - Slovenia Ljubljana, 7 November 2007 funded by eContentPlus.
Government Answers © Knowledge models for government information Marco Aarts Oslo, april
National Association of Local Authorities in Denmark The Danish plan - open government, coherent information and multichannel service Michael Bang Kjeldgaard.
19-20 October 2010 IT Directors’ Group meeting 1 Item 6 of the agenda ISA programme Pascal JACQUES Unit B2 - Methodology/Research Local Informatics Security.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
Metadata Schema Registries: background and context MEG Registry Workshop, Bath, 21 January 2003 Rachel Heery UKOLN, University of Bath Bath, BA2 7AY UKOLN.
The European Transport Research Alliance - ETRA Prof. G. A. Giannopoulos Chairman, ETRA.
MICHAEL and the European Digital Library: promoting teaching, learning and research The MICHAEL Project is funded under the European Commission eTEN Programme.
The State and University Library, Aarhus
Introduction to Implementing an Institutional Repository

Scanning the environment: The global perspective on the integration of non-traditional data sources, administrative data and geospatial information Sub-regional.
The INTERACT Website: Important source of information for the ETC Community Karen Vandeweghe, Communications Manager, IS Bratislava 27 January 2010.
Bird of Feather Session
Presentation transcript:

Metadata and eGovernment The Danish Approach and Experience Palle Aagaard National IT and Telecom Agency, Denmark ERPANET training Seminar September 3-5, 2003; Marburg

About the speaker Chair of the Danish eGovernment WG for Information and Documentation (metadata) Member Advisory Committee Dublin Core Member Advisory Board for MIReG (Management Information Resources for eGovernment) Co-chair Dublin Core Government WG Has worked with Danish eGovernment usability guidelines for public web-sites Has a background in information and library science

About the next 30 minutes Metadata and Danish eGovernment The past and the present The building process and organization International relations The projects and initiatives Something about the future

The metadata approach in eGovernment The purpose Interoperability Free flow of information

The metadata approach in eGovernment Why interoperability? Improve quality: Connecting ”all” information and resources Improve possibilities for the use of information and resources from different sources and stored in different ways Minimize costs : Easy re-use of information and resources ”Full automatic” handling the information and resources

Why interoperability. Example free flow Information Resource Document ERM system ERM system CMS Interne t Publishe d Paper Publishe d Paper Archive system Library Co-operation of institutions Exchange of information

Why interoperability. Example free access to information Internet Archive system Library system ERM system CMS Metadata + resources Metadata Metadata + resources One access to information

The metadata approach in eGovernment What was/is the challenge Interoperability - free flow of information: not depending on media not depending on system not depending on sector or administrative level not depending on content or type of information

The metadata approach in eGovernment What was illustrated about free flow and free acces – interoperability - is only possible with: Standardized metadata

The metadata approach in eGovernment The ideal situation A comprehensive metadata element model and framework is defined and established – ´a priory ”Users” know about the model and framework and just pick from it when needed The metadata model and framework in use is internationally standardized

The metadata approach in eGovernment The real situation Only some models exists – and they are often not co-ordinated (mapped) If models exist they are often not in use by actual working systems If there are common European models and framework – there is only little knowledge about them

The past in Denmark How was the situation There was already launched several projects for services etc. Some very succesfull But they was not co-ordinated In the metadata-area there was no common eGovernment standard eGovernment was isolated islands of information

The past in Denmark Some initiatives OIO preliminary metadata survey – spring 2001 (OIO = Open public Information Online) A decision for using XML when transporting data between IT-systems – summer 2001 An organization for the XML initiative The Infostructurebase was initiated. A XML- schema and eGov standards repository

XML-initiative in Denmark The organization XML-Committee XML- secretariate Standardization group DokForm Standardization group Key-elements Infostructure database XML secretariate Board State, Municipalities, Counties Experts from State, Municipalities, Counties COP COP = Community of Practise. Domain specific work Standardization groups Basic and central work The Danish Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation is the vital factot in it all

2 years of work The XML infostructure database was established – launched March 2003 The workgroups finished their initial standardization work Several projects and work groups delivered XML schemas to the Infostructurebase describing data-interfaces

The present in Denmark XML and the Infostructurebase

The present in Denmark Infostructurebase repository

The present in Denmark Metadata models in the standards repository

XML-initiative Denmark DokForm group The Danish Government WG for Information and Documentation Tasks at the moment: Metadata standardization regarding information – elements and encoding schemes Metadata core for exchange between ERM systems Standardization (mark-up) for documents and legislation

DokForm group How do it work Use international standards: Dublin Core MIReG (from EU IDA programme) Moreq (from EU IDA programme) Use local expertise: Experts in the group Hearing industry – solution vendors Hearing relevant community

DokForm group What was/are the obstacles MIReG (Managing Information Resources for eGovernment) the EU-IDA work item was not finished. Risk: lack of international interoperability An almost total lack of appropriate encoding schemes (except for dates and language). Risk: lack of interoperability Standardization in areas with a lot of practise but no standards. Risk: a lot of discussion and some has to change registration rutines and perhaps gets extra work

The metadata approach in eGovernment A Danish example 1 Task: Make a metadata core for exchange of metadata between ERM systems Ressources: 7 meetings. 2 public hearing processes Time: A little year Results: Agreement about 17 elements. And the knowledge that many encoding schemes do not exist

DokForm group What is the outcome Metadata core for exchange between ERM systems – in XML Metadata core for exchange between ERM systems – in XML OIO subject scheme – in XML XML schemes for the structure of letters, mails, notes, agendas and minutes XML schemes for the generic structure of Danish legislation Chosen the authority file for corporation and institution names (”encoding scheme”) Chosen the authority file for corporation and institution names (”encoding scheme”)

Standardization in the area of eGovernment information and documentation Future work Endorsing MIReG Look more closely in the area of encoding schemes A comprensive metadata model for an almost complete ERM systems Maintaining the core for ERM systems for special use

The metadata approach for eGovernment in Denmark Relevant links