The Effects of Impervious Cover on a Hydrologic System BRUSHY CREEK WATERSHED By Ruth Haberman.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Unit Hydrograph Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections , 7.5, 7.7,

Advertisements

Using HEC-1 for Subdivision Runoff Detention Pond Design Stacie Kato April 26, 2004.

CHARACTERISTICS OF RUNOFF

Runoff Estimation, and Surface Erosion and Control Ali Fares, PhD NREM 600, Evaluation of Natural Resources Management.

Runoff Processes Daene C. McKinney

Runoff Processes Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 5.6 to 5.8 and Chapter 6 for Tuesday of next week.

Hydrologic Simulation Models

Runoff Processes Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 5.6 to 5.8 and Chapter 6 for Thursday.

Transforming the Runoff

Continuous Hydrologic Simulation of Johnson Creek Basin and Assuming Watershed Stationarity Rick Shimota, P.E. Hans Hadley, P.E., P.G. The Oregon Water.

Infiltration Infiltration is the process by which water penetrates from ground surface into the soil. Infiltration rate is governed by: rainfall rate hydraulic.

Upper Brushy Creek Flood Study – Flood mapping and management Rainfall depths were derived using USGS SIR , Atlas of Depth Duration Frequency.

CURVE NO. DEVELOPMENT STEP 8 Soils data, land use data, watershed data, and CN lookup table are used to develop curve numbers for use in the SCS Curve.

PrePro2004: Comparison with Standard Hydrologic Modeling Procedures Rebecca Riggs April 29, 2005.

Development of a Hydrologic Model and Estimation of its Parameters Francisco Olivera, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University.

By Jennifer VerWest. Differences between Flat and Average/Steep Terrain Flat Terrain Steep/Average Terrain.

Hydrological Modeling FISH 513 April 10, Overview: What is wrong with simple statistical regressions of hydrologic response on impervious area?

Calculation of Hydrologic Parameters Using CRWR-PrePro Francisco Olivera, PhD Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin.

Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering Cven689 – CE Applications of GIS Instructor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Logan Burton April 29, 2003 Application.

CE 3372 – Lecture 10. Outline  Hydrology Review  Rational Method  Regression Equations  Hydrographs.

Impervious Cover and Erosion: Brushy Creek, Round Rock, Texas GRG 360-G Spring 2004 Beau Barnett Brett Franco.

Simulating the Hydrologic Response

Hydrologic Cycle. Hydrologic Cycle Processes Surface Water Soil water Atmospheric water Groundwater Processes Precipitation Evaporation Surface Runoff.

Upper Brushy Creek Water Control & Improvement District

Copyright [insert date set by system] by [CH2M HILL entity] Company Confidential Hydrologic Evaluation of the Little Thompson River Phase 2: Little Thompson.

WinTR-20 SensitivityMarch WinTR-20 Sensitivity to Input Parameters.

HEC-HMS Simulation Adding a detention pond at the outlet

FLASH FLOOD PREDICTION James McDonald 4/29/08. Introduction - Relevance  90% of all national disasters are weather and flood related  Central Texas.

Project Our group collaborated with students at the University of Zacatecas (UAZ) to accomplish the following: 1- Create an accurate hydrologic model which.

HEC-HMS Runoff Computation.

Frequency Analysis and Data Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections

ERT 246 Hydrology & Water Resources Engineering Siti Kamariah Md Sa’at School of Bioprocess Engineering, UniMAP.

Stormwater Management: TCNJ Townhouses South

Subbasin Loss Methods HEC-HMS.

Effect of Spatial Variability on a Distributed Hydrologic Model May 6, 2015 Huidae Cho Water Resources Engineer, Dewberry Consultants Part-Time Assistant.

Assessment of Economic Benefits of the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program Hydrologic and Hydraulic Case Studies Adapted from a Presentation to NRC.

Lab 13 - Predicting Discharge and Soil Erosion Estimating Runoff Depth using the Curve Number method –Land use or cover type –Hydrologic condition –Soil.

Time of Concentration and Lag Time in WMS Ryan Murdock CE 394K.2.

CRWR-PrePro Calculation of Hydrologic Parameters Francisco Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Texas Department.

Finding the S vs. Q relationship By: Cody Hudson.

WinTR-20 SensitivityFebruary WinTR-20 Sensitivity to Input Parameters.

WMS Investigation: Travel Time Variability with Method, Area, and Slope Ryan Murdock May 1, 2001.

Description of WMS Watershed Modeling System. What Model Does Integrates GIS and hydrologic models Uses digital terrain data to define watershed and sub.

1 Integrating Water Resources Engineering and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) National Weather Service NWSRFS International Workshop October 21-23,

Long Valley Creek: A Rainfall-Runoff Modeling Story Rob Thompson Hydrologist U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District

CE 3354 Engineering Hydrology Lecture 9: Rational Equation Method Introduction to HEC-HMS.

Alicia Sendrowski Quantifying the effect of land use on flood severity Alicia Sendrowski May 4, 2015.

Synthetic UH Definition: Synthetic Hydrograph is a plot of flow versus time and generated based on a minimal use of streamflow data. Example: A pending.

Watershed Modeling Risk Assessments/Decisions

Andrea Ryan April 22,2010. Increased imperviousness on the Texas A&M West Campus is damaging the watershed.

CE 374 K – Hydrology Second Quiz Review Daene C. McKinney.

Hydrologic Calibration: October 2010 U PDATE OF E FFECTIVE H YDROLOGY FOR M ARYS C REEK.

Rainfall and Runoff Reading: Haested Section 2.4 Computing Hydrographs.

DES 606: Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS Watershed Subdivision Theodore G. Cleveland, Ph.D., P.E. 6 OCT 11.

Sanitary Engineering Lecture 4

BUILDING AND RUNNING THE HYDROLOGICAL MODEL

CTC 260 Hydrology Introduction

Water supply Flood prediction and forecasting. Water quality

S Curves From Mays, 2011, Ground and Surface Water Hydrology.

Lauren Schneider CE394K.2 Surface Water Hydrology Dr. Maidment 4/28/05

Hydrologic Simulation Models

Hydrograph Computation

Watersheds in Austin Area

SCS Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph

SCS Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph

CTC 260 Hydrology Introduction

The Effects of Land Cover Change on the Brushy Creek Watershed

CRWR-PrePro Calculation of Hydrologic Parameters

Example Determine the 1- hr unit hydrograph for a watershed using the precipitation pattern and runoff hydrograph below. The abstractions have a constant.

Presentation transcript:

The Effects of Impervious Cover on a Hydrologic System BRUSHY CREEK WATERSHED By Ruth Haberman

OUTLINE: Introduction to Brushy Creek Watershed HEC-HMS Model Effects of Impervious Cover Conclusions Future Work

Williamso n County Brushy Creek Watershed Texa s Getting Oriented

Source: WILLIAMSON COUNTY 27th most rapidly growing county in the US between 2000 and % Growth rate (U.S. Census Bureau) Round Rock 41.2% Cedar Park 84.8% Leander 135.0%

HEC-HMS Model Parameters : ArcHydro/NHDPlus Subbasin Areas and Centroids Longest Stream Paths Stream Slopes Developed Area (percent) Assumptions/Methods Synthetic Storm - SCS Type III Rainfall Distribution Snyder Unit Hydrograph Muskingum-Cunge Routing Method Type C Soils Calculations/Derivations Curve Numbers Impervious Area (percent) Lag Time Initial Abstraction (based on Curve Numbers)

Parameter Calculations: Areas to improve model – Calibration: Better terrain data - LIDAR More accurate slope calculations Actual impervious cover Include soil types in CN derivation Incorporate actual precipitation data

Effects of Impervious Cover Increased Impervious Cover in Subbasins 1 and 5 Existing Conditions Decreased Impervious Cover in Subbasins 2, 3. 4 and 6 Peak 8,500 CFS at 6:50 PM Peak 8,300 CFS at 6:55 PM Peak 8,800 CFS at 10:35 AM DECREASED IMPERVIOUS COVER OVER 13% OF AREA Existing Conditions INCREASED IMPERVIOUS COVER OVER 14% OF AREA Peak 8,500 CFS at 6:50 PM

Effects of Impervious Cover Increased Impervious Cover in Subbasins 1 and 5 Existing Conditions Decreased Impervious Cover in Subbasins 2, 3. 4 and 6 Peak 4,900 CFS at 5:30 AM Peak 3,250 CFS at 7:55 AM Peak 6,400 CFS at 4:35 AM DECREASED IMPERVIOUS COVER OVER 13% OF AREA INCREASED IMPERVIOUS COVER OVER 14% OF AREA

` New Subdivision Improvements New Educational Facility New Development

Impervious cover affects runoff Quantity Timing Hydrologic models can help predict the effect of a development site Model should cover an entire watershed Conclusions:

Future Work: Refine and calibrate model Develop hydraulic model – HEC-RAS Model water quality

QUESTIONS?