................................................................................. Maximum Value.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Layer 3 Messaging and Call Procedures
Advertisements

Final Year Project Presentation FYP 08 Arsalan Tariq Mir Saad Najeeb Syed Ammar Faheem.
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 Chapter 8: EIGRP Advanced Configurations and Troubleshooting Scaling.
LTE-A Carrier Aggregation
Telecommunications and Multimedia Unit UTRA TDD Overview Agostinho Castro Rui Sarmento Castro
Kampala, Uganda, 23 June 2014 ITU-T Recommendation E.807: “Definitions and associated measurement methods of user-centric parameters for call handling.
Improving TCP Performance over Mobile Ad Hoc Networks by Exploiting Cross- Layer Information Awareness Xin Yu Department Of Computer Science New York University,
A Dynamic Buffer Management Scheme for End-to-end QoS Enhancement of Multi-flow Services in HSDPA Suleiman Y. Yerima, Khalid Al-Begain Integrated Communications.
Radio Network Tuning and Optimization for Universal
11 TROUBLESHOOTING Chapter 12. Chapter 12: TROUBLESHOOTING2 OVERVIEW  Determine whether a network communications problem is related to TCP/IP.  Understand.
Performance analysis of Enhanced Uplink in UMTS network Jukka Pihonen Supervisor: Prof. Riku Jäntti Instructor: Laura Koskela, M.Sc
PDCCH LINK ADAPTATION tuning
Handoff Trigger via Access Channel Lucent Technologies Bell Labs Innovations ChingYao Huang 67 Whippany Road Room 4C-258 Whippany, NJ Telephone
Channel Switching Capability Impacting features Channel Switching
Block error(BLER) target
HSDPA Technology 1 Survey on High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) Technology Chaoyi Chen April. 17, 2007.
1 HSDPA Overview By: Syed Asif Hussain Shah Mohammad Reza Akhavan 10th March, 2005 Networking Project.
HSDPA/HSUPA Packet Scheduling JARNO NIEMELÄ
Master’s Thesis: Case Studies of Network Planning for Wireless Broadband Services – HSDPA and WiMAX Author: Simo-Ville Hönö Supervisor: Prof. Riku Jäntti.
Capacity and Load Sharing in Dual-Mode Mobile Networks
August 21, Mobile Computing COE 446 IS-95 Tarek Sheltami KFUPM CCSE COE Principles of Wireless Networks.
Slide title In CAPITALS 50 pt Slide subtitle 32 pt H igh S peed D ownlink P acket A ccess Naren Mohan
Slide title In CAPITALS 50 pt Slide subtitle 32 pt HANDOVER Overview.
1© Nokia Siemens NetworksSeminaariesitelmä / Jukka Valtanen / Transport Formats in UMTS Radio Network Controller’s Software Implementation Seminaariesitelmä.
GSM Signaling Protocol Architecture. Protocols above the link layer of the GSM signaling protocol architecture provide specific functions: Radio Resource.
Using Probability Factor for MS feedback in E-MBS Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0071 Date Submitted: Source: Hua Xu, Steven Xu, Suresh Kalyanasundaram,
QUALCOMM PROPRIETARY QUALCOMM Corporate R & D1 Performance of VoIP Services over 3GPP WCDMA Networks Ozcan Ozturk Qualcomm.
An Adaptive, High Performance MAC for Long- Distance Multihop Wireless Networks Presented by Jason Lew.
1 © 2006 Nokia pullola_ ppt / Extending Base Station Active Radio Link Set for Improved Uplink Scheduling Esa-Pekka Pullola Supervisor:
ECEN4533 Data Communications Lecture #2711 March 2013 Dr. George Scheets n Problems Web n Corrected Exams u One week after return (DL) n Design #2.
Slide title In CAPITALS 50 pt Slide subtitle 32 pt Dynamic and Persistent Scheduling for Voice over IP Traffic in the Long-Term Evolution Uplink Master’s.
Copyright 2008 Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. Controlling Flow Last Update
Business Id © NetHawk All rights reserved. Confidential April 2005NetHawk NetHawk Quality of Service products Markus Ahokangas, MSc Product.
Copyright © Lopamudra Roychoudhuri
A Study of Non Real Time Radio Bearer Packet Data Performance in UMTS Radio Access Network Seema Gyanwali Supervisor: Professor Sven Gustav Häggman Instructor:
1 TCP - Part II Relates to Lab 5. This is an extended module that covers TCP data transport, and flow control, congestion control, and error control in.
IEEE Communications Magazine February 2006 Stefan Parkvall, Eva Englund, Magnus Lundevall, and Johan Torsner, Ericsson Research 2015/12/31.
INTRODUCTION. Homogeneous Networks A homogeneous cellular system is a network of base stations in a planned layout and a collection of user terminals,
Analyze Assure Accelerate TM HSDPA Roadmap. Analyze Assure Accelerate TM SR3420 WCDMA Network Emulator SR3420 is a new WCDMA network emulator platform.
Cdma2000 Release C (1xEV-DV) Status and Summary. Outline Cdma2000 1xEV-DV Release C Overview –Design compatibilities –Release C enhancements to cdma2000.
1 Harmonization Meeting on 3GPP HSDPA and 3GPP2 1xEV-DV Work New-Jersey Nov 2001 HSDPA presentation 3GPP TSG RAN WG2 Chairman, Nortel Networks 3GPP.
TCP OVER ADHOC NETWORK. TCP Basics TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) was designed to provide reliable end-to-end delivery of data over unreliable networks.
1 Session 2, Presentation: Modelling of physical layer behaviour in a HS-DSCH network simulator Modelling of physical layer behaviour in a HS-DSCH network.
Long Term Evolution (LTE) and System Architecture Evolution (SAE)
6/ EN/LZU Rev A WCDMA Air Interface Part 6: 1 of 17 WCDMA Air Interface Training Part 6 WCDMA TDD Mode.
© Janice Regan, CMPT 128, CMPT 371 Data Communications and Networking Congestion Control 0.
2G Vs 3G Drive TEST with tems
TCP/IP1 Address Resolution Protocol Internet uses IP address to recognize a computer. But IP address needs to be translated to physical address (NIC).
1 Wireless Networks Lecture 21 WCDMA (Part I) Dr. Ghalib A. Shah.
3.5G-High Speed Downlink Packet Access(HSDPA) Under the Guidance of Dr.T.Kishore Kumar Associate Professor SEMINAR By K.Vamsi Krishna Roll no:EC09425.
GLOBAL SYSTEM FOR MOBILE COMMUNICATION
Optimization: Introduction. Contents  Global indicators  Typical Radio Network Problem  Coverage Problem  Interference problem  Unbalanced power.
TEMS Parameter. Module Objectives On completion of the module one should be clear about the parameters required during drive test what does it mean and.
Managing Retransmission Timers in Sleep Mode
UMTS Evolution High Speed Packet Access (HSPA)
Long Term Evolution (LTE) and System Architecture Evolution (SAE)
2.10 Flow and Error Control Before that ...
Managing Retransmission Timers in Sleep Mode
UMTS Call Drop Analysis
Configuring EtherChannels and Switch Troubleshooting
Nortel Corporate Presentation
Hauwei hcs in dual band netwrok
Intra LTE Handover.
TCP - Part II Relates to Lab 5. This is an extended module that covers TCP flow control, congestion control, and error control in TCP.
Lecture 22 WCDMA (Part II) Dr. Ghalib A. Shah
Resource allocation principles for coexistence system
Network-Health Report
Lecture 23 WCDMA (Part III) Dr. Ghalib A. Shah
Radio Link Layer tuning in HSPA Evolution Laura Kneckt Supervisor : Professor Jyri Hämäläinen Instructor: M. Sc. Stefan Wager.
Cellular Systems.
Presentation transcript:

Maximum Value

Maximum Value 1.HO Failures  C0-BCCH Interference on Target Cell.  C0-BCCH Interference on Serving Cell.  DL Interference on serving cell / UL Interference on Target cell.  Data Link Failures.  Bad radio Conditions. 2.Dropped calls  Delayed HO Command  Bad Quality.  HO Failure  Bad Quality. 3.Blocked calls  NO Immediate Assignment.  NO TCH Assignment 4.Missing Neighbors 5.Data link failures

Maximum Value Analysis summary

Maximum Value  HO Failures :- Problem ( 1 ) CO-BCCH Interference On  HO Failure Description. Serving Cell (CI: 12592, BCCH/BSIC: 79/7-0).. Target Cell (CI: 12593, BCCH/BSIC: 67/0-7).. HO Failure occurred due to target cell suffering from C0-BCCH Interference on BCCH: 67 from cell 6403 (CI: 6403, BCCH/BSIC: 67/7-1). Recommendation Check Frequency Plane.

Maximum Value

Problem ( 2 ) CO-BCCH Interference On  HO Failure Description. Serving cell C12964 (CI: 12968, BCCH/BSIC: 722/5-0).. Target cell C12963 (CI: 12967, BCCH/BSIC: 724/2-3).. HO failure occurred due to serving cell C12964 (CI: 12968, BCCH/BSIC: 722/5-0) suffers from CO-BCCH interference on BCCH: 722 from cell C12293 (CI: 12267, BCCH/BSIC: 722/1-5).. HO command was not sufficient because there was cell 1823 (CI: 1823, BCCH/BSIC: 67/5-0) appeared with better Rx_Lev but no HO command sent, cell may be congested. Recommendation. Check FP.. Check congestion on cell 1823.

Maximum Value

Problem ( 3 ) HO Failure Description. Serving Cell C06063 (CI: 6067, BCCH/BSIC: 718/1-7). Target Cell 5901 (CI: 5901, BCCH/BSIC: 71/1-0). HO Failures occurred due to target cell didn’t send, may be due to DL decoding problem because of bad FER as figure shows or due to target cell didn’t send physical information because of UL interference. Recommendation. Check DL interference on serving cell.. Check UL interference on target cell.. Open trace for HO success rate on target cell to check main reasons for HO Failures.

Maximum Value

Problem ( 4 ) Data Link Failure  HO Failure. Description. Serving Cell 1253 (CI: 1253, BCCH/BSIC: 67/3-5).. HO Failure occurred due to Data Link Failure. Recommendation Not RF problem.

Maximum Value

Problem ( 5 ) Bad Radio Conditions  HO Failure. Description. Serving Cell (CI: 19101, BCCH/BSIC: 79/5-5).. Target Cell (CI: 15601, BCCH/BSIC: 72/1-5).. HO Failure occurred due to bad radio conditions on serving cell. Recommendation Check alarms on cell

Maximum Value

Problem ( 6 ) Adjacent Channel Interference  HO Failure. Description. Serving Cell 3393 (CI: 3393, BCCH/BSIC: 80/6-6).. Target Cell (CI: 12204, BCCH/BSIC: 66/4-1).. HO failure occurred due to target cell (CI: 12204, BCCH/BSIC: 66/4- 1) suffers from adjacent channel interference on BCCH: 66 from BCCH: 65 of cell 7771 (CI: 7771, BCCH/BSIC: 65/1-7).. HO command was a wrong one because target cell was not better than the serving cell, although there is cell 7771 (CI: 7771, BCCH/BSIC: 65/1-7) appeared with better Rx_Lev no HO command sent cell may be congested. Recommendation. Check HO parameters.. Check FP.. Check Congestion on cell 7771.

Maximum Value

 Dropped Calls :- Problem ( 1 ) Delayed HO  Bad Quality  Dropped Call Description. Dropped call occurred on cell 1541 (CI: 1541, BCCH/BSIC: 66/1-5) due to delayed HO which leads to very bad radio condition, although cell K31281 (CI: 1969, BCCH/BSIC: 67/2-5) appeared with a better Rx_Lev, No HO command has been sent, cell may be congested. Recommendation. Check outgoing HO parameter of serving cell.. Check congestion and HO parameter of cell K31281.

Maximum Value

Problem ( 2 ) HO Failure  Bad Quality  Dropped call Description. Serving cell: 7751 (CI: 7751, BCCH/BSIC: 66/5-5).. Target cell: K31284 (CI: 1978, BCCH/BSIC: 72/3-7)..HO failure occurred due to:  Co channel interference on BCCH: 72 of target cell from BCCH: 72 of cell 6543 (CI: 6543, BCCH/BSIC: 72/0-6).  Adjacent channel interference on BCCH: 66 of serving cell from BCCH: 65 of cell 7713 (CI: 7713, BCCH/BSIC: 65/1-1).. Dropped call occurred due to bad quality of serving cell. Cell 7714 (CI: 7714, BCCH/BSIC: 81/5-6) was nearer to the MS, but it appeared with a very bad Rx_Lev. This cell suspected to be down. Recommendation. Check FP.. Check alarms on cell 7714.

Maximum Value

 Blocked Calls :- Problem ( 1 ) No Immediate Assignment  Blocked call Description. A Blocked call occurred while Cell 1513 (CI: 1513, BCCH/BSIC: 77/4-4) due to No Immediate assignment. Recommendation Check SDCCH Congestion on serving cell. Check Dynamic SDCCH allocation availability.

Maximum Value

Problem ( 2 ) No TCH Assignment  Blocked call Description. A Blocked call occurred while Cell (CI: 13471, BCCH/BSIC: 121/4-3) due to No TCH Assignment. Recommendation Check TCH Congestion on serving cell. Check Half Rate Availability to overcome congestion.

Maximum Value

 Missing Neighbors :- Problem Missing Neighbors  Coverage Gap  Dropped call Description. Dropped call occurred on cell (CI: 12203, BCCH/BSIC: 64/5-5) due to very bad radio condition.. Cell K25861 (CI: 395, BCCH/BSIC: 83/5-2) and cell C06093 (CI: 6097, BCCH/BSIC: 728/4-7) supposed to serve in this area, but they are Missing neighbors.. Cell (CI: 41142, BCCH/BSIC: 79/0-2) appeared with a better Rx_Lev, but No HO command sent, cell may be congested. Recommendation. Add cells K25861 & C06093 to neighbor list of serving cell.. Check congestion and HO parameter of cell

Maximum Value

 Data Link Failures :- Problem Data Link Failure  HO Failure. Description. Serving Cell 1253 (CI: 1253, BCCH/BSIC: 67/3-5).. HO Failure occurred due to Data Link Failure. Recommendation Not RF problem. Check SAPM Timer adjustments.

Maximum Value

1.HO from UTRAN Failure  Bad radio conditions on 2G target cell.  Bad radio conditions on 3G serving cell. 2.Pilot pollution 3.Dropped Calls  Missing Neighbor  Bad Quality  Dropped Call.  DL Bad Quality / RL congestion  Bad Quality  Dropped call. 4.Blocked calls  RRC Connection Abnormal release.  NO Radio Bearer Setup. 5.Missing Neighbors 6.Coverage Misbehavior  Fast 2d Event triggering  Unnecessary HO from UTRAN.  Fast 2d Event triggering  Ping Pong compressed Mode entering.

Maximum Value Analysis Summary

Maximum Value  HO From UTRAN Failure :- Problem ( 1 ) HO from UTRAN Failure Description. Serving cell: with SC: Target cell: C02101 (CI: 2105, BCCH/BSIC: 719/0-4).. HO from UTRAN failure occurred due to bad radio condition on target cell.. HO from UTRAN command was wrong where there is a Neighbor with SC: 174 appeared with a better radio condition, but no active set update occurred, cell may be congested.. UE send event to replace cell with cell with SC: 175 and this command was not sufficient where cell appeared with better condition than cell Recommendation Check active set update parameter. Check RL Congestion on cell / SC: 174.

Maximum Value

 Pilot pollution :- Problem Pilot Pollution  Unnecessary HO from UTRAN Description. Cell with SC: 358 suffer from pilot pollution within this area which leads to bad EcNo coverage occurring event triggering. Recommendation Try to make dominant server at this area by  Down tilting some sites.  Increasing power for one of the cells to be dominant.

Maximum Value

 Dropped calls :- Problem ( 1 ) Missing Neighbor  Bad Coverage  Dropped call Description.A dropped call occurred while cell SC: 474 serving with bad Radio condition due to there is a missing Neighbor SC: 83 which leads to coverage Misbehavior. Recommendation Add cell to the neighbor list of cell

Maximum Value Problem ( 2 ) DL Bad Quality / RL Congestion  Dropped Call Description. A Dropped call occurred while Cell with SC:139 serving due to delayed AS update may be coz of  DL bad quality which leads to RNC response can’t be decoded by UE.  There is RL congestion on the Neighbor with SC:218 Recommendation.Try to make a dominant server at this area to overcome pilot pollution.. Check RL congestion on cell

Maximum Value

Problem ( 1 ) RRC Connection Abnormal release  Blocked call Description. A Blocked call occurred while Cell: / CI: / SC: 94 serving with bad radio condition due to RRC Connection Abnormal release.. Although there is MN appeared with better conditions, No AS Update occurred, cells may be suffering from RL congestion Recommendation Not RF problem. Check RL Congestion on MN Neighbors.  Blocked calls :-

Maximum Value Problem ( 2 ) No Radio Bearer Setup  Blocked call Description. A blocked call occurred while cell / CI:15301 / SC: 3 due to No RB setup complete, cell may suffering from DL interference that’s why RB setup message can’t be decoded. Recommendation Try to make dominant server at this area to over come bad coverage in order to make DL Interference limitations.

Maximum Value

 Missing Neighbors :- Problem Missing Neighbor  HO from UTRAN Description.Cell / SC: 369 is A missing Neighbor to cell / SC: 366 which leads to HO from UTRAN regarding bad EcNo. Recommendation. Add cell to the neighbor list of cell

Maximum Value

 Coverage Misbehavior:- Problem ( 1 ) Fast 2d Event Triggering  Unnecessary HO from UTRAN Description. There is early event threshold triggering which leads to unwanted HO from UTRAN & lost 3G coverage. Recommendation. Check 2d event triggering regarding.

Maximum Value

Problem ( 2 ) Fast 2d Event Triggering  Ping pong Compressed mode entering Description.Fast 2d event triggering which leads to ping pong compressed mode entering which leads to high RNC processing load & increases UL Interference. Recommendation. Adjust usedFreqThreshold to overcome unwanted compressed mode entering.

Maximum Value

1.No HS-DCCH Assignment  C0-BCCH Interference on Target Cell.  C0-BCCH Interference on Serving Cell. 2.Low CQI  Delayed HO Command  Bad Quality.  HO Failure  Bad Quality. 3.High DTX % 4.High NACK %

Maximum Value Analysis Summary

Maximum Value  No HS-DCCH Assignment:- Problem HS-PSDCCH Not Available Description. If the HS-PSDSCH is not available the UE will be assigned (resource dependent) a R99 DCH bearer. This will result in lower than expected throughput as R99 DCH bearers have a maximum bearer rate of 384kbps. Recommendation.Confirm parameter set is aligned to CIQ and HSDPA is enabled in the cell..Check for abnormally high load (UL and DL) using RNC counters over a low traffic period..Fault related loading may result in the allocation of a non-HSDPA bearer, If high load is present with low traffic, this indicates a problem with the Node B or antenna system, escalate to field operations to investigate further.

Maximum Value  LOW CQI:- Problem Low CQI Observed Description. CQI – Channel Quality Indicator – is a measure of channel quality, estimated and reported by the UE and possibly adjusted by the NodeB before being used with lookup tables to determine the appropriate TFRC to use in the next scheduled TTI. As the NodeB does may not directly use the reported CQI values, discrepancy between the allocated TFRC and expected TFRC is possible..Low CQI results in a TFRC with low user data throughput and a high CQI results in high throughput within the capability of the UE and network. Recommendation. low CQI indicates poor channel quality, resulting from low RSCP and or Ec/No. Optimize the downlink coverage in the area of concern to improve coverage and or dominance.

Maximum Value  High DTX %:- Problem Missing Neighbor  HO from UTRAN Description. DTX – The DTX percentage is a measure of the percentage of available TTI’s a given UE has not been scheduled for, that is, a high value near to 100% indicates that the UE is rarely being scheduled, a value close to 0% indicates that the UE is nearly always being scheduled. The following are possible causes of high DTX: a. UE is incapable of receiving subsequent TTI’s as defined by UE class. b. UE is being starved (under-scheduled) by an unfair scheduler. c. Lack of data to transmit, ie. The Node B’s buffer for the given UE is empty at or for a number scheduling intervals. i. Congestion on the Iub preventing the NodeB buffer from being replenished. ii. Slow or congested application server. d. UE does not receive scheduling indications on the HS-SCCH due to poor downlink coverage/interference. e. Level of sharing on the HS-PDSCH – ie. Number of users. If there are two active HSDPA users in a cells coverage area, DTX will approximate 50% per user (assuming round robin scheduling) and throughput will be halved. Recommendation. Where a consistently high DTX rate is observed in good RF across a wide area of a cells footprint it is probable that there is a hardware issue at the NodeB, this should be escalated to field operations to investigate further on site. It may be necessary to re-commission HSDPA on the site.. Where high DTX is observed sporadically throughout a session it is probable that there is insufficient data in the buffers for the UE to be continuously scheduled, this can be due to congestion in the Iub or an under-performing FTP server. Verify the performance of the FTP server with static testing and check RNC counters for Iub congestion events.

Maximum Value  HIGH NACK %:- Problem High NACK % Observed Description. ACK vs. NACK – For every TTI in which a UE is scheduled to receive data, the UE will respond by sending an ACK or NACK depending on whether or not the transmission was correctly received or not.. As each NACK requires a physical layer retransmission of the transport block a high percentage of NACK’s can cause low throughput.. A consistently high NACK % indicates that the link adaptation algorithm is not able to adequately track the radio environment, this can result from: a. NodeB or ATS problem – when a site or cell is consistently showing high NACK % for all sessions on the site / cell, this can indicate a problem with the NodeB configuration or antenna system. b. UE is over reporting CQI – less likely scenario as CQI reporting accuracy is standardized. There is still a possibility that a UE under performs in this area however and this will cause a reduction in system throughput when more than one user is active in a cell. Recommendation. If the problem is observed on all HSDPA connections in a particular cell escalate to a field technician to verify the antenna system and antenna system settings in the NodeB for the affected cell/cells, and to confirm the HSDPA commissioning parameters, these should align to the CIQ data.. To overcome UE CQI over reporting it is possible to use the This activates the NodeB CQI adjustment algorithm which targets a NACK% of 10%. Warning – this can result is reduced user throughput in good RF. This parameter should not be changed without prior approval, if high NACK % observed :-  BER < 10 %  CQI is real so increase CQI  BER > 10 %  CQI Not Real so Decrease CQI

Maximum Value