Fifth (19 th ) meeting of the UNECE/FAO Team of Specialists on Monitoring Sustainable Forest Management Palais des Nations, Geneva, Switzerland, 21-22.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Institutional coordination of climate change policy: Lessons from the South African experience B.A.S.I.C Project Beijing Michael Goldblatt 18 th February.

Advertisements

MSc Dissertation Writing

T HE ROLE OF GOVERNMENTS AND STAKEHOLDERS IN THE ICT PROMOTION DEVELOPMENT.

Fifth (19 th ) meeting of the UNECE/FAO Team of Specialists on Monitoring Sustainable Forest Management Palais des Nations, Geneva, Switzerland,

Formative assessment of the Engineering Design process

The need for gender disaggregated data and its impact on policies, and achieving gender equality goals Hamidan Bibi.

INITIATING THE PLANNING PROCESS. CONTENT Outputs from this stage Stage general description Obtaining government commitment Raising awareness Establishing.

Inaugural meeting of the UNECE/FAO Team of Specialists on “Monitoring forest resources for SFM in the UNECE Region” Areas and modalities of the cooperation.

Basic Considerations  outlines the process by which the Government of Kenya will develop its national strategy for participating in an evolving international.

MID-TERM REPORT FOR THE UGANDA IAP PROJECT By Telly Eugene Muramira Director; Policy, Planning and Information NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT AUTHRORITY.

Session 3 - Plenary on implementing Principle 1 on an Explicit Policy on Regulatory Quality, Principle 3 on Regulatory Oversight, and Principle 6 on Reviewing.

UNECEFAO REGIONAL REALITIES AND CHALLENGES IN SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT: COOPERATIVE APPROACHES AND ACTIVITIES IN EUROPE MCPFE - Peter Mayer UNECE/FAO.

National circumstances and inventories of GHG emissions Mirja Kosonen UNFCCC WS, Dublin.

Special Session for the countries in Eastern Europe, Caucasus, Central Asia and South East Europe Geneva, 6 May 2014 UNSD Developing a Programme on Integrated.

System of Environmental-Economic Accounting SEEA Implementation Guide and Diagnostic Tool and Suggested Structure for Assessment United Nations Statistics.

External Examiners’ Briefing Day Assessment Policy Tuesday 6 th January 2015.

NCCSAD Advisory Board1 Research Objective Two Alignment Methodologies Diane M. Browder, PhD Claudia Flowers, PhD University of North Carolina at Charlotte.

LISTENING TEAM REPORT Comprehensive Review Presentation prepared by Jacob Black-Lock.

© GEO Secretariat 5.2 Monitoring and Evaluation John Adamec Co-Chair, M&E Working Group GEO-XI Plenary November 2014 Geneva, Switzerland.

The Value of the UN/ECE “Land Administration Guidelines” and some considerations for its Upgrading Dr Chryssy A Potsiou National Technical University of.

VPA Impact Monitoring. an “evidence-based policy cycle” reiterative/adjustable to steer by based on reality checks to show if implementation leads to.

MAINSTREAMING MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Can education be effectively managed without an M & E system in place?

How to write a good Higher Essay

PACIFIC AID EFFECTIVENESS PRINCIPLES. Purpose of Presentation Provide an overview of Pacific Principles on Aid Effectiveness Provide an overview of Pacific.

Is it possible to reconcile relationships and quality assurance in the Assessment Only Route? Isabelle SchäferCatriona Robinson Friday 16 th May 2014.

 Read through problems  Identify problems you think your team has the capacity and interest to solve  Prioritize the problems and indicate the.

Peter Gondo. Session overview Introduction Why monitor What to monitor How to monitor Exercise: Developing a performance monitoring plan for the FI.

April_2010 Partnering initiatives at country level Proposed partnering process to build a national stop tuberculosis (TB) partnership.

EUROPEAN FORESTRY COMMISSION FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION Freiburg MEG Briefing 20 February 2007 TIMBER COMMITTEE ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE TIMBER.

Project Management Learning Program 7-18 May 2012, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Writing Project Report Multi-Purpose Reporting.

Dr. Kelly Bruning 1. 2 If you have any trouble in seminar, please call Tech Support at: They can assist if you get “bumped” from the seminar.

Budget support training Module 5 Transparency and oversight of the budget (Third eligibility criterion) Version October 2013.

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UNECE Transport Division 1 TRANS-EUROPEAN RAILWAY (TER) PROJECT 2 nd Expert Group Meeting (Budapest, 23 September.

SC. Asia Project Training on Developing National Action Plans on Sustainable Consumption Adriana Zacarias & Fu Lu UNEP SC. Asia Project 17 March 2005 Manila.

QAAP Workshop (Basic). Conduct of the peer review * Commitment * Contribution to a smooth and effective process * The Developmental Engagement Report.

Division of Technology, Industry, and Economics Economics and Trade Branch SESSION 7 - How to do Integrated Assessment Stage D: Issuing policy recommendations.

Access Control in Collaborative Systems William Tolone, Gail-Joon Ahn, Tanusree Pai & Seng-Phil Hong.

UEF Congress Poland Activity Report Piotr Grygier Vice President Multifunctional forest management and society matters.

Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.

Regional Workshop to disseminate Water Supply and Sanitation Standards of Service, adapted to LDCs Préparation to the ISO TC 224 Drafts Standards test.

Embracing the Paris Principles and AAA to Curb Corruption and Enhance Development Performance Mitchell O’Brien Governance Specialist Team Lead – Parliament.

Quality Assessment of MFA’s evaluations Rita Tesselaar Policy and operations Evaluation Department Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The 3rd Meeting of Team of Specialists Edinburgh, UK, May 2007 UNECE/FAO Team of Specialists Joint Working Party on Forest Economic and Statistics.

ICP Regional Coordinators Meeting The regional activities Following the release of the final regional 2011 ICP results in February 2014, the Western.

January 2013 Action Plan Skills Building: Module 4 Implementing and Evaluating the Action Plan.

1 Introduction to UNEP/ UCCEE Project on Capacity Development for CDM Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand 10 December 2002 Manila, Philippines.

An overview of OECD Strategies for Improving Regulatory Performance Regulatory Reform and Building Governance Capacities – New Delhi 3 December 2009 Mr.

Module 7- Evaluation: Quality and Standards. 17/02/20162 Overview of the Module How the evaluation will be done Questions and criteria Methods and techniques.

Evaluating Engagement Judging the outcome above the noise of squeaky wheels Heather Shaw, Department of Sustainability & Environment Jessica Dart, Clear.

UNECE TIMBER COMMITTEE Fifty-ninth session 2-5 October 2001 STRATEGIC REVIEW OF INTEGRATED PROGRAMME Kit Prins Chief, Timber Section.

UN Economic Commission for Europe “SOUND” WOOD: NEW MARKETS or NEW BARRIERS TO TRADE? - Dr. S. Kouzmine - (UNECE technical harmonization and standardization.

Assisting African countries to improve compilation of basic economic statistics: an outline of the UNSD strategy Vladimir Markhonko United Nations Statistics.

International Network Of Basin Organizations topic 3.1: “Basin Management and Transboundary Cooperation”. Operational tools  Long term basin management.

EUROPEAN FORESTRY COMMISSION FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION Inter-Secretariat Coordination Group on Monitoring Forest Policies and Institutions, 2 nd.

Mexico’s Experience Monitoring Millennium Development Goals New York, 17 th December, 2013 Enrique Ordaz INEGI 1 Open Working Group.

Determinations / verifications under JI – Experience to date UNFCCC Technical Workshop on Joint Implementation Bonn, February 13 th, 2007 For the benefit.

Shared Environmental Information System (SEIS) state of play, outlook into the future Lukasz Wyrowski UNECE, EMA programme manager Task Force on Access.

Assessment of EPQ What is assessed? AO1 Managing the project AO2 Use resources Where’s the evidence? Production log – aims of project, detailed project.

Evaluation What is evaluation?

Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.

Monitoring Forest Resources for SFM in the UNECE Region

The most represented stakeholders within the NAPA process were governments, followed by research institutions, UN Agencies and local communities. Private.

Southampton City Council School School Improvement Service

Eastern European Partner countries

Public School Monitoring Roadmap

Joint Working Party on Forest Economic and Statistics

Good Governance and Sustainable Development

EUROSTAT Working Group ”Forestry Statistics”

Task Force on Target Setting and Reporting TFTSR

The Estonian experience with ex-ante evaluation – set-up and progress

Presentation transcript:

Fifth (19 th ) meeting of the UNECE/FAO Team of Specialists on Monitoring Sustainable Forest Management Palais des Nations, Geneva, Switzerland, February 2013 Assessment of SFM Kit Prins

UNECE/FAO Team of Specialists on Monitoring Sustainable Forest Management Outline Background: –Why assess SFM? –Principles of proposed method –How it would work? Tasks for sub-group work

UNECE/FAO Team of Specialists on Monitoring Sustainable Forest Management Why assess SFM at country level? Evidence based policy making Communication: a clear story for the sector and the world Monitoring progress and learning from others Get maximum benefit from descriptive SoEF data

UNECE/FAO Team of Specialists on Monitoring Sustainable Forest Management Three questions to be answered (all at level of country or subnational level when forest policy responsibility at that level) What are the areas of concern with regards to sustainability? How are the areas of concern being addressed?

UNECE/FAO Team of Specialists on Monitoring Sustainable Forest Management Principles of the proposed method Based on agreed pan-European criteria and indicators of SFM Objectivity and transparency Comprehensiveness (all criteria covered, all indicators considered) Take account of national circumstances: no single ideal situation, rather « areas of concern » Participation of national correspondents Address policies and institutions

UNECE/FAO Team of Specialists on Monitoring Sustainable Forest Management Each pan-European indicator is assigned to one of three types: Context: descriptive, structural, impossible to change in the short to medium term Assessment: used to identify areas of concern, when they go over a warning level Background: not usable because of data quality, lack of real meaning or other reasons

UNECE/FAO Team of Specialists on Monitoring Sustainable Forest Management How it would work? Data collection as part of SoEF Calculation of size-neutral indicators, identification of countries/indicators where warning level surpassed Dialogue with national correspondents (measured warning level is only first filter, not final judgement): –Accuracy of data –Background and context –Policy response Publication of agreed « areas of concern » - with policy response - and regional synthesis

UNECE/FAO Team of Specialists on Monitoring Sustainable Forest Management TASKS OF THE SUBGROUPS

UNECE/FAO Team of Specialists on Monitoring Sustainable Forest Management For all indicators in their area, review: Context, assessment or background? Formulation of parameter (state or change, absolute or relative?) Warning level (for assessment parameters only) Check that data can be derived from enquiry Report back tomorrow

UNECE/FAO Team of Specialists on Monitoring Sustainable Forest Management Plenary discussion on Friday Sub-groups report back to: –Main conclusions –Major unresolved issues –(in written form) indicator by indicator recommendations Discussion on principles and methods

UNECE/FAO Team of Specialists on Monitoring Sustainable Forest Management Questions or suggestions?