Methodology n Step 1: Identify MOG (EDR ≥ 0.25) observations at cruising altitude (≥ FL250). n Step 2: Account for ascending/descending flights by filtering.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Enhancement of Satellite-based Precipitation Estimates using the Information from the Proposed Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) Part II: Drizzle Detection.
Advertisements

Accessing and Interpreting Web-based Weather Data Clinton Rockey National Weather Service Portland, Oregon.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to operations GOES-R Proving Ground Activities at the NASA Short-term Prediction Research and.
Petra Mikuš DHMZ, Croatia, EUMeTrain project 1.
Using McIDAS-V for Satellite-Based Thunderstorm Research and Product Development Kristopher Bedka UW-Madison, SSEC/CIMSS In Collaboration With: Tom Rink,
Danielle M. Kozlowski NASA USRP Intern. Background Motivation Forecasting convective weather is a challenge for operational forecasters Current numerical.
UW-CIMSS/UAH MSG SEVIRI Convection Diagnostic and Nowcasting Products Wayne F. Feltz 1, Kristopher M. Bedka 1, and John R. Mecikalski 2 1 Cooperative Institute.
ATS 351 Lecture 8 Satellites
DETECTION OF UPPER LEVEL TURBULENCE VIA GPS OCCULTATION METHODS Larry Cornman National Center for Atmospheric Research USA.
Satellite Imagery Meteorology 101 Lab 9 December 1, 2009.
Image Interpretation for Weather Analysis Part 2 27 February 2008 Dr. Steve Decker.
Analysis of High Resolution Infrared Images of Hurricanes from Polar Satellites as a Proxy for GOES-R INTRODUCTION GOES-R will include the Advanced Baseline.
The use of satellite water vapor imagery and model output to diagnose and forecast turbulent mountain waves Nathan Uhlenbrock Steve Ackerman Wayne Feltz.
GOES-R Synthetic Imagery over Alaska Dan Lindsey NOAA/NESDIS, SaTellite Applications and Research (STAR) Regional And Mesoscale Meteorology Branch (RAMMB)
Overshooting Convective Cloud Top Detection A GOES-R Future Capability Product GOES-East (-8/-12/-13) OT Detections at Full Spatial and Temporal.
Data Changes from GOES- 12/NOP Imagers Timothy J. Schmit NOAA/NESDIS/STAR (formerly ORA) SaTellite Applications and Research (STAR) Advanced Satellite.
GOES-R Risk Reduction New Initiative: Storm Severity Index Wayne M. MacKenzie John R. Mecikalski John R. Walker University of Alabama in Huntsville.
NOAA Satellite Conference Special Panel on the Importance of NOAA Satellites Tom Fahey, Mgr. Meteorology & Chair A4A Meteorology Work Group April 12, 2013.
GOES-R ABI PROXY DATA SET GENERATION AT CIMSS Mathew M. Gunshor, Justin Sieglaff, Erik Olson, Thomas Greenwald, Jason Otkin, and Allen Huang Cooperative.
AWIPS Tracking Point Meteogram Tool Ken Sperow 1,2, Mamoudou Ba 1, and Chris Darden 3 1 NOAA/NWS, Office of Science and Technology, Meteorological Development.
Improvement of Short-term Severe Weather Forecasting Using high-resolution MODIS Satellite Data Study of MODIS Retrieved Total Precipitable Water (TPW)
Detection of Fog Using Derived Dual Channel Difference of MODIS Data Dr. Devendra Singh,Director Satellite Meteorology Division,India Meteorological Department,
GOES-R ABI Synthetic Imagery at 3.9 and 2.25 µm 24Feb2015 Poster 2 Louie Grasso, Yoo-Jeong Noh CIRA/Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO
GOES–R Applications for the Assessment of Aviation Hazards Wayne Feltz, John Mecikalski, Mike Pavolonis, Kenneth Pryor, and Bill Smith 7. FOG AND LOW CLOUDS.
Long-Term High-Temporal and Spatial Resolution Overshooting Storm Climatologies Using Geostationary Imagery INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND VALIDATION PROBABILISTIC.
 Rapidly developing convection is a known source of CIT  Satellite derived cloud top infrared (IR) cooling rate, overshooting tops (OT)/enhanced-V and.
On the Use of Geostationary Satellites for Remote Sensing in the High Latitudes Yinghui Liu 1, Jeffrey R. Key 2, Xuanji Wang 1, Tim Schmit 2, and Jun Li.
Cloud Evolution and the Sea Breeze Front
Hyperspectral Infrared Alone Cloudy Sounding Algorithm Development Objective and Summary To prepare for the synergistic use of data from the high-temporal.
Applications Of A Satellite-Based Objective Overshooting Convective Cloud Top Detection Product Kristopher Bedka 1, C. Wang 1, P. Minnis 2, R. Dworak 3,
Next Week: QUIZ 1 One question from each of week: –5 lectures (Weather Observation, Data Analysis, Ideal Gas Law, Energy Transfer, Satellite and Radar)
High impact weather studies with advanced IR sounder data Jun Li Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies (CIMSS),
Modeling GOES-R µm brightness temperature differences above cold thunderstorm tops Introduction As the time for the launch of GOES-R approaches,
Preparing for GOES-R: old tools with new perspectives Bernadette Connell, CIRA CSU, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA ABSTRACT Creating.
5.32 Estimating regions of tropopause folding and clear-air turbulence with the GOES water vapor channel Tony Wimmers, Wayne Feltz Cooperative Institute.
GOES-R Aviation Weather Applications Frederick R. Mosher NWS/NCEP Aviation Weather Center.
Operational Uses for an Objective Overshooting Top Algorithm Sarah A. Monette* #, Wayne Feltz*, Chris Velden*, and Kristopher Bedka^ Cooperative Institute.
Objective Overshooting Cloud Top and Enhanced-V Signature Detection Products Algorithm Description, Validation, and Applications Kristopher Bedka 1, Jason.
Developers: John Walker, Chris Jewett, John Mecikalski, Lori Schultz Convective Initiation (CI) GOES-R Proxy Algorithm University of Alabama in Huntsville.
1 Recommendations from the 2 nd GOES-R Users’ Conference: Jim Gurka Tim Schmit NOAA/ NESDIS Dick Reynolds Short and Associates.
Real-time Display of Simulated GOES-R (ABI) Experimental Products Donald W. Hillger NOAA/NESDIS, SaTellite Applications and Research (STAR) Regional And.
Satellites Storm “Since the early 1960s, virtually all areas of the atmospheric sciences have been revolutionized by the development and application of.
Identifying CIT cases using in situ data and satellite cloud top temperatures Jamie Wolff NCAR/RAL CIT mini-workshop Oct 12, 2006.
An Overview of Satellite Rainfall Estimation for Flash Flood Monitoring Timothy Love NOAA Climate Prediction Center with USAID- FEWS-NET, MFEWS, AFN Presented.
Satellites and NWS Aviation Activities Mark Andrews NWS Headquarters OCWWS/Meteorological Services Div. Aviation Weather Services Branch Frederick R. Mosher.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Nearcasting Severe Convection.
High impact weather nowcasting and short-range forecasting using advanced IR soundings Jun Li Cooperative Institute for Meteorological.
4 th Workshop on Hyperspectral Science of UW-Madison MURI, GIFTS, and GOES-R Hyperspectral Applications for Aviation Advanced Satellite Aviation-weather.
Assimilating Cloudy Infrared Brightness Temperatures in High-Resolution Numerical Models Using Ensemble Data Assimilation Jason A. Otkin and Rebecca Cintineo.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Combining GOES Observations with Other Data to Improve Severe Weather Forecasts.
NASA, CGMS-44, 7 June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS LIMB CORRECTION OF POLAR- ORBITING IMAGERY FOR THE IMPROVED INTERPRETATION.
A. FY12-13 GIMPAP Project Proposal Title Page version 26 October 2011 Title: WRF Cloud and Moisture Verification with GOES Status: New GOES Utilization.
SIGMA: Diagnosis and Nowcasting of In-flight Icing – Improving Aircrew Awareness Through FLYSAFE Christine Le Bot Agathe Drouin Christian Pagé.
GEO Turbulence Detection: Tropopause Folds and Clear Air Turbulence Tony Wimmers Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies (CIMSS), UW-Madison.
Section 12.3 – Gathering Weather Data
A comparison of GOES and MODIS imagery in operational forecasting
Turbulence Avoidance Technologies
GOES-R Risk Reduction Research on Satellite-Derived Overshooting Tops
TIROS-1: The First Weather Satellite
ASAP Convective Weather Analysis & Nowcasting
Objective Overshooting Top and Cold V Detection
Turbulence-Related Products Robert Sharman NCAR/RAP
Wayne Feltz. , Kaba Bah. , Kristopher Lee Cronce. , Jordan Gerth
Industry Update on Turbulence
Promoting New Satellite Applications Within the AWIPS Environment
GOES -12 Imager April 4, 2002 GOES-12 Imager - pre-launch info - radiances - products Timothy J. Schmit et al.
Satellite Foundational Course for JPSS (SatFC-J)
Studies of convectively induced turbulence
Generation of Simulated GIFTS Datasets
Convectively Induced Turbulence
Presentation transcript:

Methodology n Step 1: Identify MOG (EDR ≥ 0.25) observations at cruising altitude (≥ FL250). n Step 2: Account for ascending/descending flights by filtering out those with an altitude change of 333 ft/min. n Step 3: Identify events which occurred within +/- 15 mins and in the field-of-view of a Aqua or Terra MODIS scan. n Step 4: Correct EDR observations for parallax to better match satellite signatures n Step 5: Display IR, WV, and Visible imagery using McIDAS, overlaying and centering the intensity-rated EDR reports. n Step 6: Analyze each event and sort by phenomena associated with turbulence; mountain or gravity waves, transverse banding, shear zones, convection, etc. Cases Satellite Observed Signatures Associated With Moderate to Severe Turbulence Events 2013 NOAA Satellite Conference, College Park, MD Figure 2. MOG turbulence associated with convection; robust cores and developing cells. Introduction Moderate or greater (MOG) turbulence is one of the biggest weather related causes of aviation incidents. However given the subjective nature of Pilot Reports (PIREPs), identifying exactly where the turbulence actaully occurred and which phenomena may be responsible is a challenge. For this reason, several airlines have begun to use onboard equipment on various 737s and 757s to record information that can be used to infer the presence of turbulence is-situ. One such measurement is the calculation of Eddy Dissipation Rate (EDR), which provides valuable in-situ data regarding the nature and location of turbulence, and is based on the ‘sea state’ of the atmosphere rather than aircraft response Purpose Using the EDR data, specifically MOG observations, in conjunction with satellite imagery from the Moderate-resolution Imaging Spectro-radiometer (MODIS), allows for a more detailed study of turbulence and associated weather phenomena and highlights the benefit of higher spatial resolution satellite imagery that will be provided by GOES-R ABI. An overview of MOG EDR reports from 2010 – 2011 Delta Airlines flights and the associated satellite signatures observed by MODIS imagery are detailed in the following sections. References Bedka, K., J. Brunner, R. Dworak, W. Feltz, J. Otkin, T. Greenwald, 2010: Objective Satellite-Based Detection of Overshooting Tops Using Infrared Window Channel Brightness Temperature Gradients. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 49, 181–202. Lenz, A., K. M. Bedka, W. F. Feltz, S. A. Ackerman, 2009: Convectively Induced Transverse Band Signatures in Satellite Imagery. Wea. Forecasting, 24, 1362–1373. Feltz, W. F., K. M. Bedka, J. A. Otkin, T. Greenwald, S. A. Ackerman, 2009: Understanding Satellite-Observed Mountain-Wave Signatures Using High-Resolution Numerical Model Data. Wea. Forecasting, 24, 76–86. Uhlenbrock, N. L., K. M. Bedka, W. F. Feltz, S. A. Ackerman, 2007: Mountain Wave Signatures in MODIS 6.7-μm Imagery and Their Relation to Pilot Reports of Turbulence. Wea. Forecasting, 22, 662–670. Conclusions Gravity waves or mountain waves, transverse banding, and shear zones (WV gradients) were the most prominent satellite signatures associated with MOG turbulence events. Features associated with intense convection, such as overshooting tops, are easily identified via visible imagery and generally avoided by aircraft. Thus there were very few MOG reports within robust convective cores. A number of cases showed MOG turbulence within developing convection. These cases were likely due to aircraft encountering the updraft within the developing convective cloud. There were a number of cases that showed no unique satellite signature, indicating other atmospheric conditions not seen from satellite as the cause. In these cases, NWP model fields must also be used – 2011 EDR Statistics Figure 1. MOG turbulence associated with gravity waves, mountain waves, and transverse banding > EDR < >= EDR <.45 EDR >= > EDR < >= EDR <.45 EDR >=.45 Main Phenomena Gravity or Mountain Waves Transverse Banding Convection – robust or developing cores Broad precipitation but no obvious IR or visible satellite feature Clear Air Turbulence Bad image (error or off MODIS swath Summary of EDR cases and associated phenomena a) Gravity waves in convective outflow b) Transverse banding along a jet axis c) Banded precipitation structures d) Mountain waves a) Robust convective core b) Developing convection Figure 3. MOG associated with a water vapor gradient, or shear zone. GOES-13 IR Window GOES-13 Visible GOES-13 Water Vapor MODIS IR WindowMODIS Visible MODIS IR WindowMODIS Visible