TETRA Experience – Poland Public Safety Shared Networks Kees Verweij ISC/C2000.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 University of Economics of Prague Western Bohemian University, Pilsen Actual challenges of implementation of PPP projects in Czech republic Zuzana Khendriche.
Advertisements

International Telecommunication Union Accra, Ghana, June 2009 Emergency Communications Systems: Nigeria Bashir Gwandu, PhD, MBA, CEng MIEE, MIEEE.
IMPLEMENTING FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS FOR GOVERNMENT CHRISTIAN T. SOTTIE THE CONTROLLER AND ACCOUNTANT-GENERAL GHANA.
Enhancing ICT development and connectivity in Africa Erik Habers Head of Cooperation EU Delegation Nairobi.
TATIONpRÆSEN AARHUS UNIVERSITET 1 AARHUS UNIVERSITET Aarhus University - The new administration.
All Transportation Counts The Sky’s the Limit! Greg Jackson State of Ohio Chief Information Officer October 7-8, 2003 Ohio University, Athens.
Ministry of Health Sources of Dissatisfaction in Albanian Health Care System Zamira Sinoimeri, MD, MSC Deputy Minister of Health Albania.
UNRESTRICTED Infrastructure Assessment as Viewed by Technology Holders IAEA Technical Meeting December 10-12, 2008 R. Godden.
Public Procurement in Albania in the framework of recent reforms PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AGENCY 1.
South Carolina Finance Workshop for Small Water Systems June 4, 2013 Water Partnerships: Financial Advantages and Challenges SC Case Study: Lowcountry.
Applications of TETRA in Police Networks Devdarsh Jain Product Marketing Director Artevea Digital Limited 1 st Indian TETRA MoU Conference New Delhi 8.
TETRA Inter System Interface (ISI)
Presentation on behalf of the TETRA + Critical Communications Association Current Status of TETRA and the Way Forward Ali Helenius Hungarian TETRA Forum.
Network operator processes - Investment aspects "Layering" of investments.
Best practices Narva-Ivangorod Frankurt (Oder), April ’06.
1 TETRA Put To The Test: Case Studies From Hungarian Practice (UDR) Mr. Géza Meichl, Section Head, Office for Public Safety Organization, Office of the.
“Lessons Learnt” workshop on 18 th June, Sofia Project Implementation Support Service Agreement (PISSA) TA BG BSF S6 - Capacity building István.
Stakeholders and Food Security: Managing Interfaces José Filipe Fonseca FANRPAN Policy Dialogue on Regional Strategies for Addressing the Global Food Crisis.
ETSI Sophia Antipolis France 26th - 27th February 2002Emergency Telecommunications Workshop UK Disasters and Emergency Service Communications Ronald Hewlett.
Leading global excellence in procurement and supply David Smith CB FCIPS PROCUREMENT SYSTEMS PERFORMANCE A UK GOVERNMENT CASE STUDY David Smith CB FCIPS.
Defence and Communications Systems EADS Secure Networks The role of TETRA in Homeland Security.PPT /HVi The Role of TETRA in a Holistic Homeland.
Challenges of a Harmonized Global Safety Regime Jacques Repussard Director General IRSN IAEA 2007 Scientific Forum.
CERN General Infrastructure Services Department CERN GS Department CH-1211 Geneva 23 Switzerland SMS CERN General Infrastructure.
1 st Ireland TETRA Conference, Dublin 13 th April 2005 Opportunities for TETRA in the Utilities Industry Chris Venemore – Technology Manager 1 st Ireland.
DEVELOPING SUSTAINABLE ICT INFRASTRUCTURE. Start Feasibility assessment – Understanding our core business In 1998 it was clear that a disproportionate.
Project Implementation Plan and Principal Activities
© BWCS Operating Model for Digital PMR 3rd TETRA Middle East Conference Graham Wilde BWCS 6 September 2005
© Economics Department, King’s School, Chester Enlargement of the EU: investigating the issues.
Lessons from Ethiopia’s Productive Safety Net Programme & Aid Effectiveness.
Jari Wilén Emergency Response Center Administration VIRVE PUBLIC AUTHORITY NETWORK EMERGENCY RESPONSE SYSTEM IN FINLAND.
Jari Juvonen Emergency Response Centre Administration INTEGRATION OF EMERGENCY RESPONSE CENTRES.
Electricity trading in emerging markets Vienna Economic Forum Tirana, Albania 8-9 June 08 1 EXAA 2008.
Svetlana Spassova, MD Ministry of Health, Bulgaria Chisinau
KNX – the benefits. Schneider Electric 2 - IS&C – Aug Content ●Basic arguments ●Added value for: ●Investors ●Wholesalers ●Installers and System.
The International e-Depot to Guarantee Permanent Access to Scholarly Publications Marcel Ras Tartu, June 2012.
Three Country Pilot The way to ISI ”Jeppe” Jepsen Motorola.
Less is more? (or how to make the most of our new hospitals) Nanna Skovgaard Head of Division.
O 2 Airwave presentation to the LGA Forum 16 th February 2007 Andrew Farrar – Central Client Manager, Fire ( )
Management of large TETRA project 1 Structure and management of very large TETRA project Seppo Seitsonen, JP-Epstar Ltd. tel ,
K. Lautso K. Lautso: Research and Development – effectiveness through international co-operation Financing for Research and Development EIB.
1 Roger Dowling TETRA Association Board Member. 2 A TETRA Market Overview.
How to achieve real interoperability Peter Clemons Clemons Consulting.
Critical Communications World, 21st-24th May © 3GPP 2012 © 3GPP 2013 LTE Standards for Public Safety – 3GPP view Balazs Bertenyi Chairman of 3GPP.
National School Feeding Scheme Report to the Portfolio Committee October 2002.
Cross-Border Cooperation November 17, Purpose Highlight how Canada and US advance cross-border cooperation  Canada-US law enforcement context.
1 © NOKIA Emergency Telecommunications Workshop, Raising the emergency preparedness of communication infrastructure by organizational and.
The Global TETRA Market John Cox Chief Executive Officer TETRA MoU Association.
Illinois Century Network Illinois Broadband Opportunity Partnership – East Central Project.
TETRA in Transportation
1 Experience from Finland Christian Llull, Ho Chi Minh City, 23rd November 2015 ? Cooperation & Partnership in Wind Project Development.
Investing in Children’s services - Improving outcomes across Europe 26 November 2015, Paris, ChildONEurope seminar esn-eu.org.
Stellenbosch Municipality STELLENBOSCH MUNICIPALITY INTER-MUNICIPAL CO-OPERATION Regional or inter-municipal co-operation to deal with LED Initiatives.
Interoperability, Interworking, Sharing Risto Toikkanen Beijing November
RADIO FREQUENCY SPECTRUM POLICY NOVEMBER Making South Africa a Global Leader in Harnessing ICTs for Socio-economic Development 2 WHAT IS SPECTRUM?
Observations on uses of telecommunication in emergency management Harriet Lonka, Gaia Group Ltd Emergency Telecommunications Workshop.
Key factors in the transport policy to encourage better integration Sixty-Third Session of UNECE, Geneva, 30th March 2009 "Economic Integration in the.
A Strategy for the Business. INTRODUCTION BUSINESS VISION OBJECTIVES CHALLENGES PLANNING BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY Always Thinking.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 28 – Consumer and Health Protection.
Auditing for achievement Does Partnering Work ? Partnerships.
Using the Membership Model Membership Engineering… Using the Membership Model to find Solutions Mervyn Pilley Not For Profit Business Services.
Key business enablers of Growth and ICT at the forefront Andre Joubert9 June 2016.
Paris Bruxelles MoscouRabat HIV financing and social health protection mechanisms Elements for analysis and propositions.
Transition Readiness Event – Background Reading May 2016
Introduction to HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
TETRA (CERN’s Safety Radio Communication Network)
A Higher Education Model
Finnish TETRA PPDR Authority Radio Network VIRVE
Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada Leveraging Infrastructure Funds
IT Economics Conflict between
ETSI Technical Committee TCCE
Presentation transcript:

TETRA Experience – Poland Public Safety Shared Networks Kees Verweij ISC/C2000

June 2006TETRA Experience - Poland Background and involvement in TETRA  ISC: involved in TETRA since the early start in 1990 –Myself: representing the Netherlands in Operator/User Association,Technical Forum and ETSI TCTETRA  C2000 project in the Netherlands: country-wide shared TETRA network for Police, Fire brigade, Ambulance and Military Police

June 2006TETRA Experience - Poland Agenda  How it starts (in the Netherlands)  Pros and cons of a Shared Network  Consequences  The choices to make  NL, Fin, B and UK experience  Summary and conclusions

June 2006TETRA Experience - Poland How it starts (in the Netherlands)  The old situation in the Netherlands: –>100 small analogue Public Safety radio networks using >1600 sites in total In 1 area 7 or more separate Public Safety radio networks –Growing user demand for: Enhanced features (status, AVLS, mobile data applications) Cooperation with other Public Safety organisations Cooperation with other areas Higher security More capacity  Police and fire brigade developed a plan for their own, separate national digital trunking system

June 2006TETRA Experience - Poland How it starts (in the Netherlands)  Political decision: Their will be one, shared PS radio network: C2000 –Will be built and operated under responsibility of the government –Should cover the user requirements of Ambulance Police Fire Brigade Military police

June 2006TETRA Experience - Poland The benefits of sharing  Operational –Common and enhanced functionality, coverage and security –Possibilities for closer cooperation and new procedures Multi-disciplinary fleetmap Common control rooms Cross border operation  Economics –One network built and managed by a dedicated organisation (“Policemen should be out on the street catching criminals”) –Larger volumes  Lower prices for radios –High network capacity to the users (trunking efficiency)  Environment –Lower number of base stations sites

June 2006TETRA Experience - Poland Perceived disadvantages of sharing  Tied to the operator: no direct influence on –Functionality –Coverage –Reliability  Security –Other users –Operator  Capacity –Guarantee during large incidents

June 2006TETRA Experience - Poland Overcoming disadvantages  Before roll-out: –To ensure that user requirements are met by the network: User organisations should be involved in setting the requirements for the network –The user organisations should closely work together on: A national fleetmap structure including talkgroup priority settings  After roll-out –To ensure that the operator performs: User organisations should be represented in the political body controlling the operator  To fully exploit the possible advantages users should work on: –Common radio procurement providing a frame contract –Common control room procurement?

June 2006TETRA Experience - Poland The consequences  Big investment: –High profile political environment Media attention External audits –Extra requirements: Should be future proof Should enable international cooperation? Common control rooms?  Many parties with different backgrounds involved –High complexity

June 2006TETRA Experience - Poland The consequences  Higher requirements –cost explosion –extra delay  Develop a procedure between central government and users to define and weigh the user requirements

June 2006TETRA Experience - Poland The choices to make: Potential Sharers  Decision on permitted sharers dependent on National Governments and importance of national response to a major disaster or emergency –Emergency Services –Government organisations –Military –Utilities –Transport –Others

June 2006TETRA Experience - Poland The choices to make: Operator models  Government Operator –Dedicated organisation Pro:flexibility for adding coverage, capacity, new functionality Con: efficiency?, technical challenge  Commercial Operator –Long term detailed contract with professional commercial organisation Pro:clear responsibility Con:long term commitment?, less direct influence on coverage, capacity, new functionality

June 2006TETRA Experience - Poland The choices to make: Fee/Cost Structure  How to split/differentiate between organisations Same price for primary users and secondary users? –Number of radios –Usage of the network  Different cost structures: –Monthly fee per radio/user organisation Pro: Stimulates the operator to perform Con: Users may hesitate to use the new network –Central budget Pro: Stimulates the users to use the new network Con: The operator may not perform and become inefficient  Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for use of network –Clear agreement on operator performance –(Monthly) reports showing network performance and actual usage

June 2006TETRA Experience - Poland The Netherlands Experience  Main organisations: Police, Fire Brigade, Ambulance, Military police –25 multi-disciplinary control rooms –>20 other Public Safety related organisations have limited access under responsibility of one of the main organisations  Government operator, central budget  Highlights: –During the project Ambulance and Firebrigade have strongly improved their organisation structure –Successful large scale multi-disciplinary disaster training in April 2006

June 2006TETRA Experience - Poland Belgium Experience  Network was built for more than 15 organisations, including: –Ambulance –Fire brigade –Customs  Semi-government operator, monthly fee  Highlights: –In the procurement 20 parties from 7 Ministries were involved –It has been hard to level the requirements of all the parties

June 2006TETRA Experience - Poland Finnish Experience  Network built for wide user community, currently more than 20 different organisations, including: –Police –Fire and Rescue service –Frontier Guard –Military –Social and Health service –Municipalities  Government operator, monthly fee  Highlights: –Operational since 2002 –Common control rooms

June 2006TETRA Experience - Poland UK Experience  Network was built for Police  Commercial operator, monthly fee  Highlights: –No participation from Fire brigade and Ambulance in beginning –Common sense prevailed and both Ambulance and Fire chose to be a subscriber to Airwave –Next step: sharing common control rooms

June 2006TETRA Experience - Poland Polish experience?  Who will be the users of a Public Safety TETRA network in Poland?

June 2006TETRA Experience - Poland Common causes for historical problems  Emergency services have a different background and different organisation structures –government departments –Area –Financing model –Organisation grade –Operational need –Level of technical knowledge.. which make it hard to work together on a project  High media attention can introduce extra project complexity

June 2006TETRA Experience - Poland Summary & Conclusions  Building a national Shared Public Safety Network –has many advantages to the users and the government –the possible disadvantages can be handled –is complex (mainly organisational)  Successful examples in B, Fin, NL and UK  A successful project for a Shared Network depends on getting and keeping all parties involved!

Thank You!! Questions??