REQUIREMENTS & ASSUMPTIONS C Neumeyer 4/10/3. FIELD AND CURRENT Base GRD requirement: 3kG at R 0 =0.854m with 4.5 sec flat top, once every 300s 35580.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Electricity & Magnetism
Advertisements

Control calculations Heat Engines & Boilers.
Protection study options for HQ01e-3 Tiina Salmi QXF meeting, 27 Nov 2012.
Is the shape below a function? Explain. Find the domain and range.
Fasteners / Joint Design Michael Kalish NSTX TF FLAG JOINT REVIEW 8/7/03.
J. H. ChrzanowskiNSTX TF Flag Joint Design Review1 NSTX TF Flag Joint Design Review Fabrication and Assembly April 10, 2003 By: James H. Chrzanowski.
NSTX TF Flag Joint Review ANALYSIS & DESIGN C Neumeyer 9/3/3.
NSTX Center Stack Upgrade Workshop Brainstorming on Design Solutions for TF Joint C Neumeyer Jan 22, 2009.
Component Testing Test Setup TapLok Insert Shear Key Copper Threads Friction Tests Collar Shear Tests NSTX TF FLAG JOINT REVIEW 8/7/03 Michael Kalish.
Fasteners / Joint Design Michael Kalish NSTX TF FLAG JOINT REVIEW 4/10/03.
Fasteners / Joint Design Michael Kalish NSTX TF FLAG JOINT REVIEW 8/7/03.
Electricity & Magnetism Static, Currents, Circuits Magnetic Fields & Electro Magnets Motors & Generators.
Electricity & Magnetism
Inner PF Coil Design Updated C Neumeyer 2/2/10. Changes Since Prior Version Added electrical insulation – Account for 3-wire system ground fault – Account.
NSTX OH Coil Optimization Ali Zolfaghari Amir Salehzadeh.
What is a conductor? What is an insulator? Agenda for Tuesday Feb 22 nd 1.Electricity notes/demo All late work is due by Next Friday, March 4 th.
NSTX/MAST Engineering Workshop C. Neumeyer National Spherical Torus Experiment (NSTX) NSTX Design Overview NSTX/MAST Engineering Workshop C. Neumeyer
Proposed TF Joint Design C Neumeyer 2/26/9 Notes: 1)Several concepts included are based on ideas developed by R Woolley 2)No analysis has yet been performed.
NSTX TF Flag Joint Design Review INTRODUCTION C Neumeyer 8/7/3.
NSTX TF Flag Joint Design Review OVERVIEW C Neumeyer 8/7/3.
NSTX Center Stack Upgrade Workshop Requirements & Design Point C Neumeyer Jan 22, 2009.
NSTXU-CALC TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub
NSTX-U NSTX-U PAC-31 Response to Questions – Day 1 Summary of Answers Q: Maximum pulse length at 1MA, 0.75T, 1 st year parameters? –A1: Full 5 seconds.
Failure of Original TF Inner Leg Assembly C Neumeyer 4/10/3.
HT-7U CASIPP 1 The Engineering Design of the Poloidal Field System of HT-7U Tokamak PF Group of HT-7U Team Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plasma.
Progress to Date PPPL Advisory Board Meeting May 20101NSTX Upgrade – R. L. Strykowsky CD-0 Approved February 2009 The NSTX Upgrade Project organization.
Conceptual Design Requirements for FIRE John A. Schmidt FIRE PVR March 31, 2004.
Summary of Winding Pack Thermal Results K. Freudenberg
TF Joint Operations Review Introduction C Neumeyer 2/10/05 Scope and Outline of Review Summary of Findings from 2004 Run Review of Joint Force, Pressure.
ITER In-Vessel Coils (IVC) Interim Design Review Thermal Structural FEA of Feeders A Brooks July 27, 2010 July 26-28, 20101ITER_D_353BL2.
Design Point Studies for next step device National High-heat-flux Advanced Torus Experiment NHTX C Neumeyer 6/8/6.
Subscale quadrupole (SQ) series Paolo Ferracin LARP DoE Review FNAL June 12-14, 2006.
NSTX TF Flag Joint Torque Collar Chit Review C Neumeyer 9/11/3.
Evaluation of Modular Coil Cooldown Time with Thicker Insulation and Comparison of Original and Proposed Insulation Design H.M. Fan PPPL January 15, 2003.
Evaluation of Modular Coil Cooldown Time with Thicker Insulation and Comparison of Original and Proposed Insulation Design H.M. Fan PPPL January 14, 2003.
NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus April 14, 2010 PF4/5 Terminal Stress Existing PF4/5 Support Weld Algorythm Moment Influence.
NCSX B. Nelson for the NCSX Engineering Team NCSX modular coil cooling workshop June 10-11, 2004 PPPL NCSX Modular Coil Cooling Requirements and Initial.
TF Joint Operations Review Commissioning Plan C Neumeyer 2/10/05 Test Shots Instrumentation Benchmarking.
NCSX NCSX Trim Coil Peer Review 11/6/07 1 Tom Brown Art Brooks Raki Ramakrishnan Mike Kalish NCSX Trim Coil Peer Review.
NSTX TF Flag Joint Design Review SUMMARY C Neumeyer 8/7/3.
TF Joint Operations Review Simplified Modeling & Protection C Neumeyer 2/10/05 IP and OOP Load Modeling Linear Model of IP and OOP pressure at Joint FEMLAB.
Spacing of Cu clamp = 10” Clamp plate width = 2.5”, thickness = 0.375” Thickness of conductor insulation = 0.03” Thickness of coil ground wrap = 0.03”
Proposed TF Joint Design Concept #1 C Neumeyer 3/23/9 Notes: 1)Several concepts included are based on ideas developed by R Woolley 2)No analysis has yet.
NSTX TF Flag Joint Status of Design, Analysis, Test Activities & Design Review Preparations C Neumeyer NSTX Team Meeting 7/24/3.
AWB NSTX TF Flag Joint Design Review April 10, 2003 Art Brooks.
A View of NCSX Structural System and Load Path for the Base Support Structure.
Electricity & Magnetism Static, Currents, Circuits Magnetic Fields & Electro Magnets Motors & Generators.
NCSX NCSX TF Coil Conductor FDR 5/17/05 1 Michael Kalish NCSX TF Conductor.
Design Point Studies for Next Step Device National High-power Advanced Torus Experiment NHTX C Neumeyer 7/25/06.
NSTX OH Coil Optimization Ali Zolfaghari. Optimization Parameters: Coolant channel diameter –Larger coolant diameter will lead to coil temp above 100°
A PROPOSED TF JOINT DESIGN FOR THE NSTX CENTERSTACK UPGRADE Robert D Woolley 25 February 2009.
Engineering Operations Outage Schedule The vessel & beamline are under vacuum. 1st Bake-out complete. Air leaks found and fixed. The OH coil will be installed.
Engineering Operations TF Commissioning Mechanical testing of TF flag/box assemblies complete, inner bundle installed, and all joints made up. Joint resistance.
Preliminary Analysis of TF Joint Behavior* C Neumeyer NSTX Team Meeting 2/12/4 *Summary from 1/29/4 Presentation.
1 ECE 3301 General Electrical Engineering Section 23 Inductance.
Electricity & Magnetism Static, Currents, Circuits Magnetic Fields & Electro Magnets Motors & Generators.
Thermal screen of the cryostat Presented by Evgeny Koshurnikov, GSI, Darmstadt September 8, 2015 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (Dubna)
TF Joint Testing Data Acquisition Special Test Equipment Hans Schneider with Robert Marsala (609) Engineering Operations April.
CHATS-AS 2011clam1 Integrated analysis of quench propagation in a system of magnetically coupled solenoids CHATS-AS 2011 Claudio Marinucci, Luca Bottura,
NSTX TF Flag Joint Design Review OVERVIEW C Neumeyer 8/7/3.
Electricity & Magnetism
Massimo Sorbi on behalf of INFN team:
ECE 3301 General Electrical Engineering
Electricity & Magnetism
The Quench Detection-Wire-Feedthrough Plug-In of W7-X
Electricity & Magnetism
Electricity & Magnetism
Electricity & Magnetism
Electricity & Magnetism
Electricity & Magnetism
Presentation transcript:

REQUIREMENTS & ASSUMPTIONS C Neumeyer 4/10/3

FIELD AND CURRENT Base GRD requirement: 3kG at R 0 =0.854m with 4.5 sec flat top, once every 300s Amp with 36 turn coil High field GRD requirement: 6kG at R 0 =0.854m with 0.6 sec flat top, once every 300s Amp with 36 turn coil

CURRENT WAVEFORMS Engineering design accounts for PS response, inc’l L/R decay in case of fault from I max ∫I 2 T = 6.0 x 10 9 A 2 -s for 3kG-4.5s ∫I 2 T = 6.15 x 10 9 A 2 -s for 6kG-0.6s Design basis ∫I 2 T = 6.5 x 10 9 A 2 -s which causes adiabatic  T of 80 o C in Cu 6kG pulse is most critical for joint since forces are maximum and time for heat diffusion is minimum Current (kA) Time (sec)

VOLTAGES TF PS is 1kV DC no-load – volts DC avg –750*sqrt(2)=1060 volts peak High resistance grounded, V line-ground =500V nominal, 1kV max CHI can elevate hub assembly and OH tension tube to 1kV Max design voltages: –turn-to-turn = 1000/36 ~ 30V for adjacent conductors, 1kV max –turn-to-ground (hub and OH tension tube) = 2kV –base hipot = 2E+1= 5kV –routine hipot ~ 3kV

CONTACT PRESSURE & RESISTANCE ASSUMPTIONS Contact Resistance vs. Pressure behavior is key design driver –contact pressure requirement drives structural design –contact resistance determines heating and potentially limit flat top time Achievable resistance range is bracketed by two cases... –virgin silver plated joints as tested during NSTX R&D –actual installed silver plated joints after operational cycling Prior in-situ measurements hint at what is achievable –QC will be enhanced to improve results and lessen variability Future measurements will establish actual values and be used to set operating envelope

THEORETICAL Cu-Cu JOINT Ref. Copper Development Association (CDA) pub. “Copper for Busbars”, ch. 5, p. 82 R=10000/P 1.04

NSTX R&D MEASUREMENTS

IN-SITU MEASUREMENTS 10/6/98: Prior to 1st Plasma 5/25/00: After 1st Ops Campaign ILL=Inner Layer Lower ILU= Inner Layer Upper OLL=Outer Layer Lower OLU= Outer Layer Upper

FIELD DATA INTERPRETATION ANSYS Finite Element Model Used to Extract Contact Resistance Field Values:0.8 min, 1.8 avg, 3.0 max  /in 2 Min Avg Max

COMPARISON OF DATA Goal

CONTACT RESISTANCE IMPACT Contact resistance and temperature allowable will essentially dictate the realizable system performance Req’t = 0.6 sec

DESIGN REQ’TS & ASSUMPTIONS Maintain 1ksi minimum contact pressure across joint Goal contact resistance of 1       P ≥ 1ksi –evaluate impact of higher resistance on flat top time –perform measurements during prototype testing and on installed system to track actual range of values –Improved procedures (surface prep, silver plating) and QC can improve situation compared to original installation, reduce variation joint-to-joint Peak local temperatures to be limited to 120 o C

OTHER ASSUMPTIONS & CONSTRAINTS TF flag  T - 5 o C per pulse - 25 o C including ratcheting - impacts fastener requirements OH Coil must slide over TF Inner Leg Assembly - joints must be demountable at least on one end