Office of Science January 28, 2008J.Blazey / SiD Workshop / SLAC1 The View from DOE Moving ForwardMoving Forward HEPAPHEPAP FY08 “in review”FY08 “in review”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
State of Illinois – Budgeting for Results
Advertisements

Briefing to the Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories (CRENEL) Joseph McBrearty, Deputy Director for Field Operations.
Federal Budget Process Steve Kidd and Allison Boehm Budget and Program Analysis Staff April 2009.
The Federal Budget Outlook and NSF Presented by Beth Blue National Science Foundation Office of Budget, Finance, and Award Management Budget Division/Program.
THE NSF BUDGET Overview of Agency Funding Processes Presented by Beth Blue National Science Foundation Office of Budget, Finance, and Award Management.
Full-Day Kindergarten in the Hingham Public Schools A Planning Update January 29, 2015.
FY 2013 Request: Total R&D by Agency Budget Authority in Billions of Dollars.
Department of Energy Office of Science HEP FY08 Budget Status and Issues Robin Staffin preCRB Discussion April
Master Plan. Citizens’ Health Care Working Group Master Plan November 2005.
DOE Neutrino Program Plans
The Federal R&D Budget: Context, Overview, Outlook Matt Hourihan January 28, 2015 for the AWIS Leadership Series 2015 AAAS R&D Budget and Policy Program.
Department of Energy Office of Science Report from DOE Office of High Energy Physics Report from DOE Office of High Energy Physics Dr. Robin Staffin Associate.
Department of Energy Office of Science Yet Another Report from DOE Office of High Energy Physics Presented to SLUO September 10, 2006 Dr. Robin.
Illinois Cooperative Education and Internship Association Spring Conference “The Illinois Cooperative Work Study Program Overview And a Showcase of the.
View from the NSF: Later Years J. Whitmore (EPP-PNA) M. Pripstein (LHC) M. Goldberg, J. Reidy (EPP) LEPP – CLEO CESR Symposium at Cornell, May 31, 2008.
NuMI Offaxis Costs and Whither Next Stanley Wojcicki Stanford University Cambridge Offaxis workshop January 12, 2004.
PLS 121: American Politics and Government The Constitution The Budget Making Process.
Reorganization at NCAR Presentation to the UCAR Board of Trustees February 25, 2004.
Montana University System Allocation Model Redevelopment Retreat Report of Progress for Board of Regents November 16, 2005.
HEPAP and P5 Report DIET Federation Roundtable JSPS, Washington, DC; April 29, 2015 Andrew J. Lankford HEPAP Chair University of California, Irvine.
Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science, CDER, FDA ACPS Subcommittee on Manufacturing Science: Identification and Prioritization.
CMS Budget Update March 10, CMS Budget Update.
Character of the EOP Discussions on EPP Seeking adiabatic transition pathways that provides a future for EPP research in the US. The majority of the discussions.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program July 10, 2002 eGovernment Working Group Meeting Chris Niedermayer, USDA eGovernment Executive.
F R&D on Monolithic and Vertically Integrated Pixel Detectors Special Focus Meeting Marcel Demarteau LCWS08 November 17, 2008 Chicago.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 1 3. Cost Estimate Gines, Fisher 2.Are the estimated cost and proposed schedule ranges realistic, consistent with the technical and budgetary.
24 April 2015 FY 2016 Budget Request to Congress for DOE’s Office of Science Dr. Patricia M. Dehmer Acting Director, Office of Science
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy RHIC Users Meeting BNL; June 8, 2006 Gulshan Rai RHIC/AGS Users Meeting Gulshan Rai Program Manager for Heavy.
DOE Annual Review of SLAC HEP Research Program June 14-16, 2005 SLAC Charge to Committee Issues Procedures.
10 Railway Parade Penshurst NSW 2222 p: e: 1 Strategic Direction.
Summary of Timeline Discussion: The three timeline options in the following slides reflect opportunities to evaluate progress on the draft and potential.
John Peoples for the DES Collaboration BIRP Review August 12, 2004 Tucson1 DES Management  Survey Organization  Survey Deliverables  Proposed funding.
U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science High Energy Physics Advisory Panel Meeting FY 2009 Budget Request.
Keith O. Hodgson SSRL Director Brief Update on the Linac Coherent Light Source - LCLS February 26, 2002 Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Undulator.
P5 and the HEP Program A. Seiden Fermilab June 2, 2003.
Introduction & NSF Overview NSF Tribal College Workshop November 14, 2008.
Management Report Meeting Wednesday, April 29, 2009.
LIGO-G M Planning and Implementation Strategy for Advanced LIGO Gary Sanders LSC Meeting Hanford, August 14, 2001.
All Hands Meeting FY 2008 Budget Pier Oddone Fermilab December 20, 2007.
24-Aug-11 ILCSC -Mumbai Global Design Effort 1 ILC: Future after 2012 preserving GDE assets post-TDR pre-construction program.
PPAN Programmatic Review Presentation to PP town meeting Jordan Nash.
11 DOE Office of Science High Energy Physics Program AAAC Meeting October 15, 2009 National Science Foundation Dennis Kovar Associate Director of the Office.
WWSWWS Report of the World Wide Study J. Brau June 4, 2008 Dubna ILCSC Meeting.
AGS RSVP Weekly Meeting P. Pile 2 December 2004 AGS RSVP Weekly Meeting 2 Dec 2004 Useful Links: RSVP Project : C-AD AGS Project: Office.
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson MAV Rate Capping Forum 26 November 2015.
Welcome and Presentation of Charge Steve Holmes Accelerator Advisory Committee ( May 10-12, 2005.
Christopher M. Quinn, MACC, CPA, CFE, CGFO, CGMA Finance Director Lina Williams Budget & Financial Analyst Tuesday, July 14 th 2015.
AAPM&R Annual Assembly Boston, Massachusetts NIH - Promoting a Robust Pain, Musculoskeletal, and Rehabilitation Research Portfolio Jennifer Zumsteg, M.D.
THE APPROPRIATIONS PROCESS RITA MARTIN CSAVR DEPUTY DIRECTOR.
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Dr. Raymond L. Orbach Director, Office of Science April 29, 2004 PRESENTATION FOR THE BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL.
Future Direction of the U.S. Fusion Materials Program Dr. Pete Pappano US Department of Energy Fusion Energy Sciences Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting.
Department of Energy Office of Science  FY 2007 Request for Office of Science is 14% above FY 2006 Appropriation  FY 2007 Request for HEP is 8% above.
Office of Science Statement on Digital Data Management Laura Biven, PhD Senior Science and Technology Advisor Office of the Deputy Director for Science.
URPC Budget Update January 29, CA Governor’s Budget Reflects ongoing economic recovery o Projects economy will continue to grow in 2016 and 2017.
Budget Outlook Glen Crawford P5 Meeting Sep
National Claims Research Workshop October 8 & 9, 2014 Chiefs Committee on Claims: Update.
The categories for ILC budget planning are: R&D – work done in laboratories to develop and verify subsystem components. This supports the cost reduction.
AB 32 Update December 6, Outline Cap and Trade Program 2013 Update to Scoping Plan Looking ahead to
SLAC All Hands Briefing: FY2008 Budget Persis S. Drell SLAC Director 1/7/08.
Eric Prebys, Fermilab Program Director, LARP July 10, 2012.
PP 620: Public Policy and Health Administration Unit One Seminar Kris R. Foote, J.D., M.P.A., M.S.W. Kaplan University.
Torbay Council Partnerships Review August PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Date Page 2 Torbay Council Partnerships Background The Audit Commission defines.
Time to resolve Design Issues 1. Disclamer Due to the engineering meeting last week I have not had time to coordinate this material with Tim or the L3.
Detector R&D at Fermilab Some Perspectives Marcel Demarteau For the Fermilab Detector & Physics R&D Group SiD Workshop SLAC January 28-30, 2008.
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson
Yet Another Report from DOE Office of High Energy Physics
Roselle Park School District
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson
Two-Year Budgeting Workshop
Preliminary Project Execution Plan
Presentation transcript:

Office of Science January 28, 2008J.Blazey / SiD Workshop / SLAC1 The View from DOE Moving ForwardMoving Forward HEPAPHEPAP FY08 “in review”FY08 “in review” Detector R&D SupportDetector R&D Support

Office of Science January 28, 2008J.Blazey / SiD Workshop / SLAC2 Moving Forward on ILC Independent of recent events DOE plans to remain a strong, active partner in the ILC and envisages supporting a focused U.S. ILC program.Independent of recent events DOE plans to remain a strong, active partner in the ILC and envisages supporting a focused U.S. ILC program. FY09 request will be released first week of February.FY09 request will be released first week of February. As Undersecretary Orbach has made clear, a decision on the ILC requiresAs Undersecretary Orbach has made clear, a decision on the ILC requires –convergence of the R&D program –guidance from the LHC –well developed internationalization Planning on similar levels of support through 2012.Planning on similar levels of support through All of which leads to a decision mid-decade

Office of Science January 28, 2008J.Blazey / SiD Workshop / SLAC3 Community Input HEPAP has been charged to identify and evaluate scientific opportunities that can be pursued at different funding levels.HEPAP has been charged to identify and evaluate scientific opportunities that can be pursued at different funding levels. Requested by Orbach & impelled by recent eventsRequested by Orbach & impelled by recent events Scenarios have been updated to reflect current eventsScenarios have been updated to reflect current events –Constant effort at the FY 2008 (Omnibus) funding level –Constant effort at the FY 2007 funding level –Doubling of funding starting in FY 2007 –Additional funding above the previous level, in priority order, associated with specific activities needed to mount a leadership program that addresses the scientific opportunities identified in the EPP2010 report. Meetings at Fermilab(ILC), SLAC( ,astro,DUSEL), Brookhaven(Precision, LHC, R&D).Meetings at Fermilab(ILC), SLAC( ,astro,DUSEL), Brookhaven(Precision, LHC, R&D). Report due in April, preliminary report to help with FY10 budget.Report due in April, preliminary report to help with FY10 budget. There are a number of possible facilities and projects, be sure your voice is heard: (would encourage comments on detector R&D)There are a number of possible facilities and projects, be sure your voice is heard: (would encourage comments on detector R&D)

Office of Science January 28, 2008J.Blazey / SiD Workshop / SLAC4 The First Quarter of FY08 In proposed Presidential and Congressional budgets for FY2008 OHEP faired well.In proposed Presidential and Congressional budgets for FY2008 OHEP faired well. ILC (including detector) at $60M, SRF at $23.5M.ILC (including detector) at $60M, SRF at $23.5M. Due to difference between congressional and executive branches funding bills were delayed.Due to difference between congressional and executive branches funding bills were delayed. Accordingly OHEP operated under a Continuing Resolution from Oct ‘07 through end of Dec ‘07.Accordingly OHEP operated under a Continuing Resolution from Oct ‘07 through end of Dec ‘07. Funding for Continuing Resolution is held at previous year’s level and rate. In this case, spending occurred at the rate dictated by FY07 total. For the ILC a total of $42M.Funding for Continuing Resolution is held at previous year’s level and rate. In this case, spending occurred at the rate dictated by FY07 total. For the ILC a total of $42M.

Office of Science January 28, 2008J.Blazey / SiD Workshop / SLAC5 The FY08 Omnibus The final budget or Omnibus Appropriations was released to the public December 17 th, 2008.The final budget or Omnibus Appropriations was released to the public December 17 th, Due to a spending limit enforced by the executive branch and different priorities of the legislative branch there was significant reallocation of discretionary funding.Due to a spending limit enforced by the executive branch and different priorities of the legislative branch there was significant reallocation of discretionary funding. These reallocations were not anticipated by DOE.These reallocations were not anticipated by DOE. OHEP was reduced significantly. Major impactsOHEP was reduced significantly. Major impacts –No a construction funding set to $0. –ILC funding set to $15M from $60M. –SFR funding set to $5M from $24M. Severely reduced activities at Fermilab and SLACSeverely reduced activities at Fermilab and SLAC Incidentally, ITER construction was set to zero.Incidentally, ITER construction was set to zero.

Office of Science January 28, 2008J.Blazey / SiD Workshop / SLAC6 The Remainder of FY08 Any further ILC work must be consistent with $15M budget cap on ILC.Any further ILC work must be consistent with $15M budget cap on ILC. This has stopped ILC work in the U.S., as nearly all funds were utilized during the continuing resolution.This has stopped ILC work in the U.S., as nearly all funds were utilized during the continuing resolution. We have nearly completed collecting information from laboratories on obligations and costs.We have nearly completed collecting information from laboratories on obligations and costs. Subject to last minute surprises, remaining funding will be used forSubject to last minute surprises, remaining funding will be used for –U.S. DOE portion of the GDE Common Fund. –GDE Management at a reduced level (Director, Project Manager, ART Director, ART Project Manager). –CESRTA e-cloud project led by NSF but jointly supported by DOE and NSF. This was in process prior to the Omnibus. All other work terminated, should any funds remain, we will consider options.All other work terminated, should any funds remain, we will consider options.

Office of Science January 28, 2008J.Blazey / SiD Workshop / SLAC7 Detector R&D For better or for worse, FY08 budget explicitly linked ILC detector R&D with ILC budget line.For better or for worse, FY08 budget explicitly linked ILC detector R&D with ILC budget line. Given the outcome this was unfortunate.Given the outcome this was unfortunate. In the short termIn the short term –There are no ILC FY08 funds available. –We are looking at the possibility of closing out efforts gracefully and efficiently. This probably applies only to the high priority supplemental proposals now in their 2 nd year. –A possibility is to assist a limited set of efforts with a combination of DOE research funds and NSF funds. –All this is uncertain, conversations within DOE and with NSF are early and ongoing.

Office of Science January 28, 2008J.Blazey / SiD Workshop / SLAC8 Long Term Detector R&D Current thinking places all detector R&D proposals in the Advanced Technology R&D programCurrent thinking places all detector R&D proposals in the Advanced Technology R&D program –Therefore must have a generic aspect. –This will be the case for all programs and projects. –Admin. & management not yet fully formulated. –Not sure how joint DOE & NSF program works. LOIsLOIs –Situation further clouded by recently changed timescales –Engineering a final detector inconsistent with DOE protocol. –However, R&D does include prototyping, there should be sufficient flexibility to proceed. For instance PFA R&D would require engineering R&D to understand integration. –We will need to continue discussing this.

Office of Science January 28, 2008J.Blazey / SiD Workshop / SLAC9 Personal Comments Although the longer time scale and funding loss are extremely disappointing, the need for and benefits of advanced detector R&D remain.Although the longer time scale and funding loss are extremely disappointing, the need for and benefits of advanced detector R&D remain. Given the utility of better performing devices and the quality of past ILC R&D results, very likely many of the ongoing ILC efforts will be supported in any program.Given the utility of better performing devices and the quality of past ILC R&D results, very likely many of the ongoing ILC efforts will be supported in any program. This is a long march: we need to keep moving forward with whatever resources are made available.This is a long march: we need to keep moving forward with whatever resources are made available.