Measuring road traffic volume through passenger mobility surveys Vasilis Nikolaou AGILIS SA Task Force on statistics on the volume of road traffic (vehicle-kilometres),

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COST 355 Madrid mai Estimating total mileage at the national level Estimating total mileage at the national level Modelling versus mobility survey.
Advertisements

GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
David Connolly & Lucy Barker MVA TRPG and SHS Topic Report Long Distance Commuting.
Feb Travel Time and Sustainable Travel Behaviour David Metz Centre for Transport Studies University College London.
™ Steve Phillips POLIS, October 2006 ERTRAC Priorities for Road Transport Research until 2020 Steve Phillips, FEHRL & ERTRAC Research Area Leader.
Census 2001 Your window to Census information. What is a Census? The Census of population and housing is undertaken every 5 years by the ABS. It aims.
 Travel patterns in Scotland Frank Dixon and Stephen Hinchliffe, Transport Statistics branch, Scottish Executive.
TRIPS, MODE & DISTANCE February MILLION TRIPS EACH DAY Out-of-Home impacts a big audience Source: Total Zenith.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Transport statistics Demarcation of the domain 1.
BETTER AIR QUALITY 2004 SPECIFIC TRANSPORT MEASURES TO REDUCE EMISSIONS IN HYDERABAD, INDIA Yash Sachdeva, RITES Ltd Viresh Goel, RITES Ltd D.S.Chari,
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lectures 8: The Performance and Condition of Transit in the United States.
ACT Canada 2012 Sustainable Mobility Summit – Hamilton, Ontario Personal Travel Planning in the UK.
National Consumer Agency Market Research: Economiser – Transport Section February 2011 Research Conducted by.
Economic Analysis and Statistics Division, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry Beirut, 7-10 June 2005 Martin Schaaper OECD METHODOLOGIES AND.
Joint Intersectoral Task Force on Environmental Indicators Geneva 5 – 7 November 2013 Transport and environment: newly proposed indicators Vladislav Bizek.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics U.S. Department of Transportation Overall Travel Patterns of Older Americans Jeffery L. Memmott
Chapter 15 Travel Permission granted to reproduce for educational use only.© Goodheart-Willcox Co., Inc. Objectives List the two major segments of the.
National Travel Survey Past, Present & Future Presentation to the Transport Liaison Group Olive Loughnane 19/09/2013.
Rochdale Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 998 – GMATS Rochdale Key Centre report Whereas report.
Characteristics of Weekend Travel in the City of Calgary: Towards a Model of Weekend Travel Demand JD Hunt, University of Calgary DM Atkins, City of Calgary.
Business Statistics Seminar Programme- 11th November :30 Registration 14:00 Opening remarks - Richard McMahon, CSO 14:20 Using administrative data.
Wigan Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 1001 – GMATS Wigan Key Centre report Whereas report.
NHTS Update and Data Analysis Plans presented to Florida Model Task Force presented by Krishnan Viswanathan November 10, 2009.
Tameside Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 999 – GMATS Tameside Key Centre report Whereas report.
Where’s the carbon? Transport carbon big hitters and what can be done about them Alistair Kirkbride Sustainable Transport Advisor.
Mobility energy use for different residential urban patterns in India Anil Kashyap, Jim Berry, Stanley McGreal, School of the Built Environment.
How do people travel in Peja? Results from the Peja Household Travel Survey, 2010 MobKos II - Mission 2 - September Kobe Boussauw.
Sustainable Development Background indicators Presentation at meeting of Scottish Sustainable Development Advisory Group February 2005.
Pilot National Travel Survey 2009 Summary Findings Prepared by Mairead Griffin.
Assessing the Impact of Transportation on Society How do we evaluate how well transportation is serving the needs of society? In the past, the focus was.
Stockport Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 947 – GMATS Stockport Key Centre report Whereas.
Bolton Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 974 – GMATS Bolton Key Centre report Whereas report.
Trafford Park Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 995 – GMATS Trafford Park report Whereas report 995 presents.
Marie-Odile GASCON, CertuSHANGHAI, Forum THNS, 11 – 14 Novembre /11/ Household travel surveys how to carry them out ? Method and a few results.
Designing a survey of Long Distance Transportation by Busses and Coaches: The Swedish approach Dimitrios Tsatsas Anette Myhr Swedish Institute for Transport.
Oldham Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 997 – GMATS Oldham Key Centre report Whereas report.
David Connolly MVA Transport, Travel and SHS Data SHS Topic Report: Modal Shift.
National Household Travel Survey 2010 Introduction NHTS provides very valuable information for Transport Malta and other entities involved in transport.
1 Measuring the economic contribution of Tourism to the economy of South Africa Pali Lehohla Statistician-General Tourism Summit: Parliament 28 February.
Trafford Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 1000 – GMATS Trafford Key Centre report Whereas report.
Transport Model for Scotland SHS-based inputs and forecast trends SHS User Day David Connolly and Lucy Barker| November 2007.
Local Government and Public Body Analysts Survey Conference Scottish Household Survey Survey Review March 2010 Hugh Munro SHS Project Team.
Manchester Regional Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 996 – GMATS Manchester Regional Key Centre.
Eurostat Workshop on Passenger Mobility Eurostat activities and possible future actions – Towards common indicators on passenger mobility?
David Sutton, Chief Officer Integrated Transport Strategy Directorate.
Impacts of Free Public Transport – An Evaluation Framework Oded Cats Yusak Susilo Jonas Eliasson.
Athens, Conference Hall, Ministry of Infrastructure, Transport and Networks, 5&6 November 2015 ALTERNATIVE-COLLECTIVE PATTERNS OF OWNERSHIP AND USE OF.
Kobe Boussauw – 15/12/2011 – Spatial Planning in Flanders: political challenges and social opportunities – Leuven Spatial proximity and distance travelled:
EUROPEAN FORUM FOR GEOGRAPHY AND STATISTICS KRAKOW CONFERENCE October, Krakow, Poland Travel Behaviour in Pristina City Author 1: Naim Kelmendi.
Urban Mobility Management and Emissions Measurement System Boile Maria 1,2 Afroditi Anagnostopoulou 1 Evangelia Papargyri 1 1 Centre for Research and Technology.
How may bike-sharing choice be affected by air pollution
Passenger Mobility Statistics 28 April 2016
CHANGES IN OUR TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR 2018 Household Travel Survey Results
Modernising the Swedish National Travel Survey to be launched in RVU Sverige Luxembourg
Energy Consumption in Transport
Paolo Bolsi DG MOVE - Unit A3 Economic Analysis and Impact Assessment
Passenger mobility and road traffic statistics
Passenger Mobility Statistics Passenger Mobility guidelines
Contents Timeline of the project (since September 2017) Quick facts
Passenger Mobility Statistics 10 April 2014
Passenger Mobility Statistics 21 May 2015
Passenger Mobility Statistics 10 April 2014
Task Force on Passenger Mobility Statistics 11 October 2018
Passenger Mobility Task Force 21 May 2015
Task Force on Cultural Employment.
Paolo Bolsi DG MOVE - Unit A3 Economic Analysis and Impact Assessment
Passenger Mobility Statistics 21 May 2015
Rail transport developments Agenda point 7.2
Passenger Mobility Statistics 21 May 2015
Geospatial data for cities and FUAs: state of play and opportunities
Presentation transcript:

Measuring road traffic volume through passenger mobility surveys Vasilis Nikolaou AGILIS SA Task Force on statistics on the volume of road traffic (vehicle-kilometres), 21-22/09, 2006

Background information –Agilis’ aim as contractor of Eurostat: To assist in the further development of the Community statistics on passenger mobility Emphasis is given on car passenger mobility –Specific contract tasks: Updating the non-harmonised database of national surveys on passenger mobility Updating the methodological analysis of the existing surveys on passenger mobility Proposing a set of indicators for measuring passenger mobility and particularly car passenger mobility –This presentation describes proposed indicators relevant to measuring road traffic volume

Task Force on statistics on the volume of road traffic (vehicle- kilometres), 21-22/09, 2006 Passenger mobility surveys –Passenger mobility surveys are: Mainly household surveys, but also Surveys of companies whose main activity is passenger transport –Their aim is to describe travel behaviour –They are running regularly in at least one third of the EU25 member states, candidate and EFTA countries –Mobility surveys are car-specific in three of them (Bulgaria, Estonia, Romania). ‘Car’ means private car, coach, bus, etc. In Bulgaria and Romania such surveys are surveys of companies

Task Force on statistics on the volume of road traffic (vehicle- kilometres), 21-22/09, 2006 Information collected in passenger mobility surveys –Travel undertaken during the reporting period Specific type of travel, e.g. professional trips – Travel-related information involves: Origin and destination Total distance Purpose Travel time Modes of travel Sequence of modes Duration of stay at destination Status of respondent (driver or co-passenger) Car owned by respondent or not Number of co-passengers

Task Force on statistics on the volume of road traffic (vehicle- kilometres), 21-22/09, 2006 Information collected in passenger mobility surveys –Socio-economic characteristics Age Gender Place of residence Employment status Occupation Education Marital status Number of adult persons within the households Level of urbanization Income Car ownership Number of cars within the household Driving license

Task Force on statistics on the volume of road traffic (vehicle- kilometres), 21-22/09, 2006 Passenger mobility indicators compiled –Average number of trips/person/day by Mode of transport Purpose of travel Distance class Age of respondent –Average travel distance (km)/person/day by Age of respondent –Average total travel time(min)/person/day by Mode of transport Purpose of travel –Passenger-kilometres (Bulgaria) by type of passenger traffic (Urban, Coach, International) –Vehicle-kilometres (Germany)

Task Force on statistics on the volume of road traffic (vehicle- kilometres), 21-22/09, 2006 Proposed car passenger mobility indicators –Car VKMs –Car PKMs by Type of fuel (diesel, gasoline) Distance travelled Purpose of travel Distance travelled by purpose Age by gender of passenger Purpose of travel by age by gender (optional) Car passenger status (driver, co-passenger) –Objective: To describe daily car mobility and fuel consumption

Task Force on statistics on the volume of road traffic (vehicle- kilometres), 21-22/09, 2006 Proposed car passenger mobility indicators –Average total travel time/person/day(minutes) by Purpose of travel Distance travelled Distance travelled by purpose Age by gender of passenger Car passenger status (driver, co-passenger) –Average travel distance / person / day (km) by Purpose of travel Type of fuel Age by gender of passenger Car passenger status (driver, co-passenger) –Objective: To describe daily car mobility and assess congestion

Task Force on statistics on the volume of road traffic (vehicle- kilometres), 21-22/09, 2006 Proposed car passenger mobility indicators –Number of trips/person/day by Purpose of travel Age by gender of passenger Car passenger status  Objective: To describe daily car mobility –Number of cars in the household by Number of adult members of household  Objective: To understand factors affecting car ownership –Car occupancy rate (PKM/seat-kilometre) by Distance travelled  Objective: To assess rational use of cars

Task Force on statistics on the volume of road traffic (vehicle- kilometres), 21-22/09, 2006 Concepts & proposed classifications –Main mode of transport: The mode used for the longest part of a trip or journey Non-motorised private transport –Walking –cycling, –other non-motorised Motorised private transport –passenger car (driver or passenger) –other motorised private transport Public transport –Bus&coach –Rail –Air –Water –Other public transport

Task Force on statistics on the volume of road traffic (vehicle- kilometres), 21-22/09, 2006 Concepts & proposed classifications –Purpose of travel: The main purpose of a journey or a trip without which the journey or a trip would not have occurred Work (travel to/from regular working place) Education (travel to/from school, conference, seminars etc) Shopping Business (meeting clients, other professional activities) Leisure (all other personal purposes, like culture, sports, going to restaurants)

Task Force on statistics on the volume of road traffic (vehicle- kilometres), 21-22/09, 2006 Concepts & proposed classifications –Distance travelled: The distance traveled in direct line (kms) < < < < –Age of traveller (years): < – – – –

Task Force on statistics on the volume of road traffic (vehicle- kilometres), 21-22/09, 2006 Concepts & proposed classifications –Household size: The number of all members in the household

Task Force on statistics on the volume of road traffic (vehicle- kilometres), 21-22/09, 2006 … your comments are welcome