Inside the Planning Fallacy The study of Buehler et al. (1994):Buehler et al. (1994): People often commit a planning fallacy where they are overly optimistic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Study Skills 101.
Advertisements

+ I’m Almost Done! Preparing your Thesis draft Assoc. Prof. Dr. Neo Mai (Chair, FCM Postgraduate Affairs Committee) Postgraduate Affairs Lecture Series.
The Transmogrifying Experimenter The study of Proulx & Heine (2008):Proulx & Heine (2008): Based on the meaning maintenance model (Heine et al., 2006),
SAMPLING. Next week  2 book chapters  Outline of thesis proposal/paper intro  Find a scale and answer questions  Thought paper.
Kahneman & Tversky, (1982) Kahneman & Tversky, (1982) have shown that actions, or errors of commission, generate more regret in the short term. In a telephone.
G. Alonso, D. Kossmann Systems Group
Fluency and Processing Styles The study of Alter et al. (2007):Alter et al. (2007): It is known that positive mood signal that the interaction between.
Standard Normal Table Area Under the Curve
MA-250 Probability and Statistics
Chapter 3 Producing Data 1. During most of this semester we go about statistics as if we already have data to work with. This is okay, but a little misleading.
Cognitive Psychology Chapter 7. Cognitive Psychology: Overview  Cognitive psychology is the study of perception, learning, memory, and thought  The.
458 More on Model Building and Selection (Observation and process error; simulation testing and diagnostics) Fish 458, Lecture 15.
Making Good Arguments Booth et al: Chapter 7. Research Process When you start your research you should have: 1) A Question. 2) A Tentative Answer (Thesis).
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved Chapter Eleven Decision Making.
Clinical decision making Carl Thompson UK, Centre for Evidence Based Nursing Editor, Evidence Based Nursing
Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Companies
SUNITA RAI PRINCIPAL KV AJNI
Traps in the Decision Making Process ******* Thinking Styles Recognizing and Countering Heuristic Traps Harold V. Langlois.
Finance 30210: Managerial Economics Demand Forecasting.
When did Elvis die? Contributor© POSbase 2004 People may not use the availability heuristic for judging only frequencies (Lichtenstein et al., 1978; Tversky.
Software Reliability Growth. Three Questions Frequently Asked Just Prior to Release 1.Is this version of software ready for release (however “ready” is.
The Role of Savings Goals in the Prediction of Personal Spending Johanna Peetz and Roger Buehler Wilfrid Laurier University Peetz & Buehler (in press),
Fundamentals of Data Analysis Lecture 4 Testing of statistical hypotheses.
Learning Structure in Bayes Nets (Typically also learn CPTs here) Given the set of random variables (features), the space of all possible networks.
Chapter Twelve Census: Population canvass - not really a “sample” Asking the entire population Budget Available: A valid factor – how much can we.
Memory Bias in Anxiety Studies have found evidence that anxious participants selectively attend to threatening information (Mathews & MacLeod, 1986; MacLeod.
Concept of Power ture=player_detailpage&v=7yeA7a0u S3A.
User Study Evaluation Human-Computer Interaction.
9 Mar 2007 EMBnet Course – Introduction to Statistics for Biologists Nonparametric tests, Bootstrapping
In a discussion of experienced flight instructors, some noted that praise for an excellent a smooth landing is useless because it is typically followed.
Debate: Reasoning. Claims & Evidence Review Claims are statements that serve to support your conclusion. Evidence is information discovered through.
Interviewing the Internalized Other Part 2: applied in couple work Workshop for OAMFT in Toronto 2 November 2012 by Karl Tomm MD.
Let’s Talk Assessment Rhonda Haus University of Regina 2013.
Ui Hock Cheah SEAMEO RECSAM APEC Tsukuba International Conference 14 – 18 February 2012, Tsukuba.
Page 1 Online Aggregation for Large MapReduce Jobs Niketan Pansare, Vinayak Borkar, Chris Jermaine, Tyson Condie VLDB 2011 IDS Fall Seminar
Introductory Topics PSY Scientific Method.
What's yours is mine, what's mine is yours: unconscious plagiarism and its opposite. Tim Perfect, Nicholas Lange & Ian Dennis Plymouth University.
Fluency and The Moses Illusion The study of Song & Schwarz (2008):Song & Schwarz (2008): It is known that positive mood signal that the interaction between.
Julian Betts, Department of Economics, UCSD and NBER.
ENGLISH II SEPTEMBER 26, 2011 Turn in worksheet for “And of Clay Are We Created” now. No warm-up today. Right now, get out a piece of paper to take notes.
Introduction to Web Authoring Ellen Cushman Class mtg. #21.
Chapter Thirteen Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Sample Size Determination.
AMSc Research Methods Research approach IV: Experimental [1] Jane Reid
The study of Reber et al. (2006):Reber et al. (2006): © POSbase 2008Contributor People often misjudge their own performance (Kruger, 1999). There are different.
ICORD, Rome Promises and risks of Bayesian analyses in trials of rare diseases Dr Simon Day
Question Wording and Eyewitness Testimony © POSbase 2005 The study of Loftus & Palmer (1974):Loftus & Palmer (1974): Participants viewed films about a.
Opening Worlds KS4 Sample GCSE (Unit 2) Questions Compare the presentation of poverty and its effects in two short stories of your choice. Compare and.
Alcohol Stroop Task Aim of the task: To find out whether alcohol-related content of a stimulus distracts attention from the color-naming task. It is a.
Sampling and estimation Petter Mostad
Debate 101 Basic Debate Workshop. Your Turn! What comes to mind when you think of debate?
Teacher's Notes Topic: Probability L7 Coins A teacher has some coins in his pocket. He is going to take one of the coins at random. He says: List all the.
Understand “textual evidence” Evaluate summary/analysis drafts Continue to work on Paper 3 Goals: Summarize, analyze, compare.
Defaults and Organ Donation The study of Johnson and Goldstein (2003):Johnson and Goldstein (2003): In some countries, people have to opt in that they.
LOGO Change blindness in the absence of a visual disruption Professor: Liu Student: Ruby.
Integrating The Pacific Institute (TPI) Thought Patterns for Success.
Understanding the Expense Prediction Bias Chuck Howard Sauder School of Business University of British Columbia David Hardisty Sauder School of Business.
Reflective Thinking. Reflective thinking Critical thinking and reflective thinking are often used synonymously. However, where critical thinking is used.
Adult Learners Are there differences between children as learners and adults as learners? Images retrieved on May 15/15 from
Interactive Read Aloud *Turn and Talk *Text impressions *Rally Robin *Round Robin (using turn and talk model) *Story Cards.
Steps in Planning a Usability Test Determine Who We Want To Test Determine What We Want to Test Determine Our Test Metrics Write or Choose our Scenario.
Speakers‘ overestimation of their effectiveness The study of Keysar & Henly (2002):Keysar & Henly (2002): It has been shown that people who tap a popular.
Instructor: Kelley Edds.  Everything is due by 11:59pm (EST)  Please communicate to me if something comes up and you can not turn your assignment in.
Fundamentals of Data Analysis Lecture 4 Testing of statistical hypotheses pt.1.
1 Usability Analysis n Why Analyze n Types of Usability Analysis n Human Subjects Research n Project 3: Heuristic Evaluation.
Topics In Social Computing (67810) Module 1 Introduction & The Structure of Social Networks.
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition ECE 8527 – Introduction to Machine Learning and Pattern Recognition Objectives: Bayes Rule Mutual Information Conditional.
Thinking Skills in RE Part I Lesley Prior Roehampton University, London.
Reasoning and Judgment PSY 421 – Fall Overview Reasoning Judgment Heuristics Other Bias Effects.
Virtual University of Pakistan
Starter Imagine - you did not do as well as you wanted to in a biology test, but your teacher praises you for working hard and trying your best. You feel.
Presentation transcript:

Inside the Planning Fallacy The study of Buehler et al. (1994):Buehler et al. (1994): People often commit a planning fallacy where they are overly optimistic in predicting when they will finish a project. One such planning disaster has been the Sidney Opera House: original estimates in 1957 predicted that it would be completed early in 1963 for $7 million. A scale-downed version of the opera house opened 1973 at a cost of $102 million. © POSbase 2005Contributor

Buehler and his colleagues examined the planning fallacy in individual students. In their Experiment 1, they asked students towards the end of their year-long honors thesis project when they expected to submit their thesis. In addition, the students had to provide a worst-case prediction if “everything went as poorly as it possibly could”. Inside the Planning Fallacy © POSbase 2005

Inside the Planning Fallacy Although the predicted completion time correlated highly with actual completion time (r =.77), students showed an optimistic bias: Only 30% of the students finished their project by the time they predicted. On average, students took 55 days to complete their theses. This is 22 days longer than they had anticipated, and 7 days longer than the average prediction of the worst case. People are highly confident about their predictions (Buehler et al, 1995). © POSbase 2005

Inside the Planning Fallacy Why do people commit the planning fallacy? One reason is that they focus on the different steps they will take in the future to complete the task, but neglect their earlier experience (prior probability) with finishing, or not finishing, projects that early. The authors tested this prediction in their Experiment 3; they let their participants say aloud every thought or idea that came during predicting when they would finish their upcoming project. © POSbase 2005

Inside the Planning Fallacy An overwhelming majority (M = 74%) of the students’ thoughts were directed toward the future. Only 3% of the respondents thought about possible problems, only 7% of the thoughts were about past experiences, and only 1% of the thoughts were about past experiences others had with similar projects. Such a neglect of prior probabilities has also been observed in many studies on the representativeness heuristic. representativeness heuristic © POSbase 2005

Inside the Planning Fallacy Is there a way to eliminate the planning fallacy? Three ways have been tried:  Regarding distributional information (Griffin & Buehler, 1999; small effects);  Alternative scenarios (Newby-Clark et al., 2000; no effect);  Linking relevant past experience to specific plans for their upcoming task (Buehler et al, 1994, Experiment 4). Let us look at this study: © POSbase 2005

Inside the Planning Fallacy  The control group made just a prediction;  The recall group had to recall past experiences before the prediction;  The recall relevant group had in addition to recalling past experiences to answer two questions: (a) when they would finish the project if they do as far before the deadline as in past projects; (b) to write down a typical scenario based on past experience. © POSbase 2005 Three groups of participants made predictions about completion of a computer assignment.

Inside the Planning Fallacy ______________________________________________________ ControlRecallRecall Relevant ______________________________________________________ Predicted days Actual days Difference %participants 29% 38%60% completed in predicted time ______________________________________________________ © POSbase 2005 The results showed that the planning fallacy was eliminated in the recall relevant group, but not in the two other groups.

Inside the Planning Fallacy © POSbase 2005 In sum, the planning fallacy is a very robust phenomenon, and it is not easy to reduce it. People are overly optimistic in predicting when they finish a project, and the only promising way to eliminate it is making people aware of the likelihood with which they finished similar tasks in the past and to connect this information with the plans for the future.