Sanitary Transportation of Human and Animal Food Analysis of Economic Impacts 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FDA’s Proposed Rule under FSMA for Preventive Controls
Advertisements

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration U.S. Department of Transportation 2010 COHMED Conference Training Session IV James O. Simmons Chief, Hazardous.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing Fiscal Estimate.
Module 3C Trucks And Trains…... Ohio Department of Health The 24-Hour Hazmat Emergency Communications Center Backed by the resources of the Chemical.
ACACSO – New Orleans, LA May 11, 2012 Lynn Brown LB Rail Consultant, Inc. 1.
Complying with FSMA: What a cashew exporter to the U.S. needs to do.
Final Round - Question 2 In the United States, which of the following modes was deregulated first? A.railroads B.trucking C.air passenger service D.air.
FHWA Talking Freight Seminar: Security and the Trucking Industry October 19, 2005.
National Animal Identification Working Together to Address Implementation Challenges Chelsea Good, LMA VP of Government and Industry Affairs NIAA Annual.
1 Proposed Rule to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration
Freight Transportation Economic Regulation Transportation Logistics Spring 2009.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
FSMA: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going Supplemental Notices of Proposed Rulemaking Public Meeting November 13, 2014 Roberta F. Wagner, B.S., M.S.
Proposed Rules under the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act
Focus on Prevention FDA Food Safety Modernization Act.
Proposed Rule to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration 1.
California Freight Advisory Committee Trucking Industry Overview Spring 2015.
Managing Motor Fleet Safety Programs: Training for the Safety Director Unit 2 – Safety is Good Business NATMI © 2014.
Proposed Rules to Help Ensure the Safety of Imported Food 1.
Focused Mitigation Strategies to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration 1 Regulatory Impact Analysis Summary.
Natural Resource Concerns. In 2007 there were a number of food borne illness attributed to fresh produce People became sick Business’s lost market share.
Proposed Rule for Sanitary Transportation of Human and Animal Food
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration COHMED 2009 Ted Willke Associate Administrator Hazardous.
Measuring and Enhancing Services Trade Data and Information Conference September 14, 2010 U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC Service Statistics.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
Food Safety Modernization Act Proposed Rules Tim Slawinski Food and Dairy Division Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development.
TSA Air Cargo Update June Air Cargo Landscape U.S. Air Cargo Supply Chain Millions of Shippers ~3,800 Freight Consolidators (IACs) ~ 300 Air Carriers.
Public Utilities Commission of Ohio Rail Division Overview.
We’re proposing to modernize our Rodeo Refinery to recover propane from our refining process, and better recover butane — to cut sulfur dioxide emissions.
AIEA 2011 Group 6 Members: #2 Wei Duen Ho, #4 Penny Chu, #8 Sam Su, #10 Bryant Tseng, #12 Lori Chuang, #13 Chin-Mo Chen Regulation Reform- New Zealand.
Size Standards Analysis: SBA Methodology Presented to: The Council on Federal Procurement of Architectural & Engineering Services (COFPAES) By: Khem R.
Proposed Regulations for Foreign Supplier Verification Programs (FSVPs)
Importer Security Filing and Additional Carrier Requirements “10+2” Program.
Impact of FSMA on the Regulation of Domestic and Imported Animal Food by Daniel G. McChesney, Ph.D. at Wild Bird Feeding Industry 2011 Annual Meeting Naples,
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Analysis of HOS Rules briefing to the Motor Carrier Safety Advisory Committee December 7, 2009 Mark Johnson,
June 9, 2011 Joseph Poire` Executive Director. The Port of Whitman County is dedicated to improving the quality of life for all citizens of Whitman County.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food September 16, THE FUTURE IS NOW 1.
This class cannot be shared or copied without the written permission of PracticeWorks Systems, LLC.
Foreign Supplier Verification Programs Supplemental Proposal 1.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food.
Proposed Rule: 21 CFR 507 Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
Analyzing Changes to Truck Size and Weight Regulations Methods for States presented to AASHTO Subcommittee on Highway Transport presented by Donald Ludlow,
1 Shipping Scrap Steel with Union Pacific September 2014.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 THE FUTURE IS NOW.
Regulatory Impact Assessment of the Proposed RTE Rule Dr. Felix Spinelli Economist Regulations and Directives Development Staff USDA - Food Safety and.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food to Wild Bird Feed Industry Annual Meeting 2015 by Daniel G. McChesney, Ph.D. Director, Office of Surveillance.
Awareness Training: ‘HARPC’ for Food Safety Complimentary Presentation by Quality Systems Enhancement 1790 Wood Stock Road Roswell GA E. mail:
FDA Preventive Control Regulation Ernest Julian, Ph.D., Chief Office of Food Protection RI Department of Health AFDO 2014.
FSMA: Preventative Controls for Human Food Final Rule In this presentation we discuss the Preventative Controls for Human Food rule and compliance dates.
Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) Overview Leah Wilkinson Vice President, Legislative, Regulatory & State Affairs American Feed Industry Association.
Freight Railway Integration Strategy For Inter-American Development Bank Transport Week 2009 by Transportation Technology Center, Inc. (TTCI) Subsidiary.
Office of the Repealer Kansas Department of Administration.
Lowell Randel Vice President, Government and Legal Affairs Global Cold Chain Alliance.
Final Rule for Sanitary Transportation. Background Proposed Rule: February 5, 2014 Public Comments: More than 200 Final Rule: On Display April 5, 2016.
FDA Food Safety Modernization Act Primer on Act and the Final Rules June 8, 2016 Producer: Claire Carter Edited by: Afzal Bari Director: Afzal Bari.
The impact of FSMA’s Sanitary Transportation of Food Rules April 2016.
Scott D. Cole, COSS, CSP What is GHS? UN-developed system for chemical classification and hazard communication through harmonized.
Canadian Supply Chain Food Safety Coalition
INDIANA AGRICULTURE Grow With Us!.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food
The Hazardous Materials Transportation Act (HMTA)
FSMA Implementation Jennifer Thomas
An Integrated Risk Management & Safety Program: IRMSP
Sanitary Transportation of Human and Animal Food Seminar
Proposed Rule to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration
Managing Motor Fleet Safety Programs: Training for the Safety Director
Final Rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs
Cross Contamination Flow through the Food Supply Chain.
FINAL RULE OVERVIEW Prepared By: Danielle Bauer
Moving Blankets vs. Thermal Pallet Covers
Presentation transcript:

Sanitary Transportation of Human and Animal Food Analysis of Economic Impacts 1

Economic Analysis Overview Cost to industry: –$149.1 million in the first year ($1,784 per covered firm) –$30.08 million in following years ($360 per covered firm) Administrative costs ($118.9 million, first year only) Written specifications, sanitary requirements ($1.3 million Precooling of refrigerated trucks ($22.7 million) Training ($2.4 million) 2

Economic Analysis Overview Public health benefits: –Data is not available that would allow quantification of benefits of the proposed rule –Uniform sanitation practices could reduce: Risk of future recalls Adverse health effects related to contamination during transport Adverse health effects related to contamination introduced before the transportation process but amplified during shipping 3

Primary Data Sources Department of Transportation Motor Carrier Identification database (2012) Commodity Flow Survey (2007) Association of American Railroads (2013) Railinc (2012) Related FSMA proposed regulations 4

Small Business Provisions Any carrier, shipper or receiver with annual revenues of less than $500,000 are not covered by this proposed rule 2 year compliance period for motor carriers with less than $25.5 million in annual revenue, and any firm with less than 500 employees 5

Impact on Industry $30.08 million annually 83,609 carriers, shippers, and receivers affected –Human and Animal Food Facilities (24,917) –USDA-inspected establishments (2,412) –Trucking carriers (55,717) –Rail carriers (563) 6

Primary Components of Cost Administrative costs ($118.9 million, first year only) Requirements for shippers ($2.7 million annually) Requirements for carriers ($24.8 million annually) Training ($2.5 million annually) 7

Public Health Benefits Benefits = P E * N loads * D per E * R H% –P E - Probability of an adverse health event, per shipment –N loads - Number of shipments –D per E - Est. value of the adverse health effect –R H% - Percent reduction of probability of adverse health effects 8

Some Areas for Comments Data on current industry practices Intrastate carriers Benefits methodology, data Efficacy of proposed requirements Costs to comply with the rule 9