Sensitivity Analysis and Building Laterally-Variable Ocean Conductivity Grid 1 N. R. Schnepf (UoC/CIRES) C. Manoj (UoC/CIRES) A. V. Kuvshinov (ETHZ)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Effects of solar activity, co-rotating interaction regions, and climate change on thermospheric density during the solar cycle 23/24 minimum Stan Solomon.
Advertisements

(Mt/Ag/EnSc/EnSt 404/504 - Global Change) Climate Models (from IPCC WG-I, Chapter 8) Climate Models Primary Source: IPCC WG-I Chapter 8 - Climate Models.
Coestimating models of the large-scale internal, external, and corresponding induced Hermean magnetic fields Michael Purucker and Terence Sabaka Raytheon.
Modelling the Thermosphere-Ionosphere Response to Space Weather Effects: the Problem with the Inputs Alan Aylward, George Millward, Alex Lotinga Atmospheric.
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 43 Science and.
Glacial Rebound Glacial Rebound Studies depend on many factors. What are they ? Ice load History of the load Ocean water load on coastlines and globally.
Ocean Water Chemistry Section Salinity -The amount of dissolved salt in water The ocean has 35g of salt per 1kg water or 35g salt per 1000g water.
GE SPACE Geomagnetic Earth Observation from SPAce.
J. Ebbing & N. Holzrichter – University of Kiel Johannes Bouman – DGFI Munich Ronny Stolz – IPHT Jena SPP Dynamic EarthPotsdam, 03/04 July 2014 Swarm &
An Assimilating Tidal Model for the Bering Sea Mike Foreman, Josef Cherniawsky, Patrick Cummins Institute of Ocean Sciences, Sidney BC, Canada Outline:
MTR, swarm E2E study, Nov 11, 2003, DSRI Copenhagen, nio #1 7-Sep-15 swarm End-To-End Mission Performance Study Mid Term Review The swarm E2E Consortium.
Kick off meeting, swarm E2E study, nio #1 8-Sep-15 Development Approach Task 1: Industrial Module –to be used by industry for their system simulation –Output:
Icebase: A proposed suborbital survey to map geothermal heat flux under an ice sheet Michael Purucker SGT at Planetary Geodynamics Lab, Goddard Space Flight.
Using GPS data to study the tropical tropopause Bill Randel National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado “You can observe a lot by just watching”
Department of Geology & Geophysics
The Intrinsic Magnetic Field of Saturn: A Special One or an Averaged One? H. Cao, C. T. Russell, U. R. Christensen, M. K. Dougherty Magnetospheres of the.
“ New Ocean Circulation Patterns from Combined Drifter and Satellite Data ” Peter Niiler Scripps Institution of Oceanography with original material from.
Toward closing the globally averaged sea level budget on seasonal to interannual time scales Josh K. Willis Jet Propulsion.
“ Combining Ocean Velocity Observations and Altimeter Data for OGCM Verification ” Peter Niiler Scripps Institution of Oceanography with original material.
Altitude (km) January Global AverageTemperature (K) Pressure (hPa) With O( 3 P) Cooling WACCM-X The Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model – eXtended.
June, 2003EUMETSAT GRAS SAF 2nd User Workshop. 2 The EPS/METOP Satellite.
Secular variation in Germany from repeat station data and a recent global field model Monika Korte and Vincent Lesur Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, German Research.
What’s the story?.
Tidal hydrodynamics of the Hudson Bay and its impact in the global ocean tides L. Chevallier 1,2, D. Greenberg 3, F. Lyard 1 1 LEGOS, Toulouse, France.
SOES6002: Modelling in Environmental and Earth System Science CSEM Lecture 1 Martin Sinha School of Ocean & Earth Science University of Southampton.
Modeling the upper ocean response to Hurricane Igor Zhimin Ma 1, Guoqi Han 2, Brad deYoung 1 1 Memorial University 2 Fisheries and Oceans Canada.
Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #1 1-Nov-15 Swarm End-To-End Mission Performance Study Final Presentation The Swarm E2E.
GP33A-06 / Fall AGU Meeting, San Francisco, December 2004 Magnetic signals generated by the ocean circulation and their variability. Manoj,
Oceanic Magnetic Fields Robert Tyler -Planetary Geodynamics Branch, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center -Astronomy Department, University of Maryland College.
Department of Earth Sciences “A. Desio”
Image credit: NASA Response of the Earth’s environment to solar radiative forcing Ingrid Cnossen British Antarctic Survey.
Study on the Impact of Combined Magnetic and Electric Field Analysis and of Ocean Circulation Effects on Swarm Mission Performance by S. Vennerstrom, E.
Lesson 2: Earth’s Interior. Clues to Earth’s Interior – What’s below Earth’s surface? – Temperature and Pressure Increase with Depth – Using Earthquake.
Schumann Resonance from Earth to Titan Dana Ionita School of Earth & Atmospheric Sciences Georgia Institute of Technology.
CHAPTER 5 Water and Seawater
Future China Geomagnetism Satellite Mission (CGS) Aimin Du Institute of Geology and Geophysics, CAS 2012/11/18 Taibei.
Earth’s Dynamic Magnetic Field: The State of the Art Comprehensive Model Terence J. Sabaka Geodynamics Branch NASA/GSFC with special thanks to Nils Olsen.
What is a geomagnetic storm? A very efficient exchange of energy from the solar wind into the space environment surrounding Earth; These storms result.
STSE Swarm + Innovation Science Study: MTR Meeting Magnetic Tidal Signals and Their Use in Mapping the Electrical Conductivity of the Lithosphere and Upper.
STSE Tides to Sense Earth, MTR 25 January 2016DTU, Lyngby/DK REPORT ON WP2X00: TIDAL SIGNAL RECOVERY USING THE COMPREHENSIVE INVERSION (CI) RESULTS FROM.
TS 15 The Great Salt Lake System ASLO 2005 Aquatic Sciences Meeting Climatology and Variability of Satellite-derived Temperature of the Great Salt Lake.
We live on the crust, which varies in thickness from about 11km under the ocean to about 33km under the continents. The earths crust is made up of a great.
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 5 Water and Seawater Salinity.
TEKS: 6.10A. Inner Core  Thickness:  Composition:  Temperature:  Interesting Fact(s): 1,250 km Solid Fe 6,000°C The deepest, most dense layer in.
THE BC SHELF ROMS MODEL THE BC SHELF ROMS MODEL Diane Masson, Isaak Fain, Mike Foreman Institute of Ocean Sciences Fisheries and Oceans, Canada The Canadian.
Earth’s Layers G 103. General Information -Iron,Oxyge, Silicon, & Magnesium - Deepest drill 12 km -Radius of Earth 6371 km - How do we know about the.
5 th Swarm Data Quality Workshop 7 – 10 September 2015IPG Paris/F PRELIMINARY NEW VERSION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE INVERSION (CI) LEVEL-2 PRODUCTS Terence.
Structure of the Earth.
Summary of the Layers of the Earth,
Introduction to Planet Earth
Earth’s Interior EQ: Describe the different layers of the earth. Explain how scientist learned about these layers.
Swarm DISC call for ideas
The 3rd Swarm Science Meeting, June 2014, Copenhagen, Denmark
Rapid core field variations just before Swarm
Danish National Space Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
Proposals of new Swarm data products
Nils Holzrichter, Jörg Ebbing
OceanMag II EM-Raying the Ocean
Earth’s Interior EQ: Describe the different layers of the earth. Explain how scientist learned about these layers.
Lijuan He Institute of Geology and Geophysics, CAS, Beijing,
Effects of Dipole Tilt Angle on Geomagnetic Activities
Astrid Maute, Art Richmond, Ben Foster
Length scale of heterogeneity
Ocean Water Chemistry Section 13.3.
New "quite time" concept: application to Champ lithospheric field modelling Nils Olsen, Jesper Gjerløv & Co.
Introduction to Planet Earth
M1/M2 BUOY DATA: OCEAN TEMPERATURE ANALYSIS
Investigating the Influence of Meteorological Parameters on Atmospheric Electric Field (AEF) Variations for Islamabad and Balakot, Pakistan Dr. Samia.
Supervisor: Eric Chassignet
Session 5: Higher level products (Internal)
Presentation transcript:

Sensitivity Analysis and Building Laterally-Variable Ocean Conductivity Grid 1 N. R. Schnepf (UoC/CIRES) C. Manoj (UoC/CIRES) A. V. Kuvshinov (ETHZ)

Outline 3-D modeling of tidal signals Sensitivity analysis Laterally-variable ocean conductivity 2

Modeling tidal signals Simulate tidal magnetic fields under different conductivity regimes – Satellite height (430 km) – Sea-level – Seafloor 3

Modeling tidal signals 3-D global EM induction code to predict ocean magnetic fields on 1°x1° grid (Kuvshinov, 2008) 4 TidePeriod (hours) TypeVertical amplitude (mm) M Lunar semi-diurnal A. V. Kuvshinov (2008). 3-D Global Induction in the Oceans and Solid Earth: Recent Progress in Modeling Magnetic and Electric Fields from Sources of Magnetospheric, Ionospheric and Oceanic Origin. Surveys in Geophysics, 29(2):139–186.

Modeling tidal signals 3-D global EM induction code to predict ocean magnetic fields on 1°x1° grid (Kuvshinov, 2008) 5 Tidal depth-integrated velocity model for Average ocean conductivity for (3.2 S/m) Local conductance map and underlying 1-D conductivity for World Magnetic Model (year 2014) for Kuvshinov & Olsen (2006) for 1-D conductivity model A. Kuvshinov and N. Olsen (2006). A global model of mantle conductivity derived from 5 years of CHAMP, Ørsted, and SAC-C magnetic data. Geophysical Research Letters, 33(18):L18301.

Tidal depth-integrated velocity model 6 HAMTIDE: depth-integrated assimilated tidal model (0.25 o x0.25 o interpolated to 1 o x1 o ) (Taguchi et al., 2014) E. Taguchi, D. Stammer, and W. Zahel (2014). Inferring deep ocean tidal energy dissipation from the global high- resolution data-assimilative HAMTIDE model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 119: 4573–4592.

Local conductance map 7 C. Manoj, A. Kuvshinov, and S. Maus. Ocean circulation generated magnetic signals. Earth Planets Space, 58:429–437, 2006.

World Magnetic Model (year 2014, B r ) 8 Chulliat, A., Macmillan, S., Alken, P., Beggan, C., Nair, M., Hamilton, B., … Thomson, A. (2015). The US/UK World Magnetic Model for Boulder, CO. doi: /V5TH8JNW

CM5 vs Modeled tidal signals 9 T. J. Sabaka, N. Olsen, R. H. Tyler, and A. Kuvshinov (2015). CM5, a pre-Swarm comprehensive geomagnetic field model derived from over 12 yr of CHAMP, Orsted, SAC-C and observatory data. GJI, 200:1596–1626.

Sensitivity analysis 10

Sensitivity analysis 11 is a 1°x1° grid Layer 1 k= C5 M2 radial field at satellite height Continents masked out for analysis

Sensitivity analysis: M2 results 12 Promising for probing upper mantle. Promising for probing upper mantle & lithosphere.

Incorporating noise into the sensitivity analysis Randomly add noise to each grid point – 0 to 0.2 nT – 0 to 0.5 nT 13

Sensitivity analysis with noise added: M2 results 14

Sensitivity analysis conclusions 15 Satellite Br is sensitive to the lithosphere & upper mantle  Satellite and seafloor tidal data may be used to constrain lithospheric and upper mantle conductivity

Laterally-variable ocean conductivity (LVOC) 16 For models used in sensitivity analysis: was the average ocean conductivity (3.2 S/m) For LVOC: Method of Fofonoff (1985) to create 1°x1° map of depth-averaged conductivity from salinity, temperature and pressure data NOAA’s 2009 World Ocean Atlas salinity (s) & temperature (t)  3-D 1°x1° with 33 layers (depths of m) Pressure (p) determined from depth and latitude (Saunders 1981). N. P. Fofonoff (1985). Physical Properties of Seawater: A New Salinity Scale and Equation of State for Seawater. Journal of Geophysical Research, 90(C2):3332–3342. P. M. Saunders (1981). Practical conversion of pressure to depth. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 11:573–574.

Laterally-variable ocean conductivity (LVOC) 17 Conductivity may be determined for a given salinity (s), temperature (t) & pressure (p) using the reference conductivity of 4.29 S/m.

Laterally-variable ocean conductivity (LVOC) 18 Annual average

Laterally-variable ocean conductivity (LVOC) 19 Different between LVOC annual average and 3.2 S/m

Laterally-variable ocean conductivity (LVOC) 20 Difference between summer & annual average

Laterally-variable ocean conductivity (LVOC) 21 Difference between winter & annual average

Laterally-variable ocean conductivity (LVOC) conclusions 22 Minimal seasonal difference (under 0.1 S/m) Standard dev of 0.37 S/m, average S/m Greater conductivity  In warmer, saltier regions  By river mouths Lower conductivity in cooler, fresher regions

Laterally-variable ocean conductivity (LVOC) conclusions 23  Improve accuracy of inversions  Local variations in conductivity especially important when incorporating seafloor data