Overview of Discussion  What are the pros and cons of the options?  Are there other options? A2 SUBCOMMITTEE.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

CONTRACT A binding agreement between two or more parties for performing, or refraining from performing, some specified act(s) in exchange for lawful consideration.

Advertisements

1. (c) Alan Rowley Associates Laboratory Accreditation Dr Alan G Rowley Quality Policy based on Quality Objectives Quality Management System Communicate.

The Hungarian experience in implementing European Regulation about seasonal products 26 May 2014, Geneva Workshop: Treatment of seasonal products Borbála.

A2 SUBCOMMITTEE GUIDELINES FOR COMPLIANCE WITH AB 1404 REQUIREMENTS Baryohay Davidoff Department of Water Resources.

EG Medical Systems Maintenance BU MEDICAL SYSTEMS Service Department Scope  Service Department offers after sales service for products sold by EG Medical.

Washington State Department of Health Division of Environmental HealthOffice of Drinking Water Mike Dexel Water Resources Policy Lead Municipal Water Law.

PGP Scenario #4 You are not qualified for PGP coverage. You may need an Individual NPDES Permit.

Project Procurement Management

TALOS Total ATM Life-cycle operational Solution. The Cost equation Life cycle costs are high Life cycle costs are complex Life cycle costs involve all.

Turf Wars Real Grass vs. Artificial Turf EGR 403H – Winter 2010 Team 7 Phillip Allen, Juan Castillo, Geoffrey Cheung.

Joe SimonettiT-FLEx Workshop T-FLEx October Workshop The Future of Fare Collection Bank Card Transactions & Merchant Processing Joseph Simonetti October.

1 REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING and SYSTEMS ANALYSIS Elements and Definitions.

Uncertainty analysis is a vital part of any experimental program or measurement system design. Common sources of experimental uncertainty were defined.

Small specimen testing – ASTM approach M P Metcalfe ASTM Symposium on Graphite Testing for Nuclear Applications: The Significance of Test Specimen Volume.

Quality Control Testing

Laboratory Information Management Systems (LIMS) Lindy A. Brigham Div of Plant Pathology and Microbiology Department of Plant Sciences PLS 595D Regulatory.

Water | Slide 1 of 16 January 2006 Water for Pharmaceutical Use Part 4: Commissioning, Qualification and validation Supplementary Training Modules on Good.

Integration Between Purchasing and Advanced Pricing in Oracle Applications Release Tina Mitchell & Arwen Hawes BIAS Corporation July 20 th, 2007.

How to Develop a Project Evaluation Plan Pat Gonzalez Office of Special Education Programs

OFCCP Compliance Evaluation 101 Sandra M. Dillon, Branch Chief

Distribution System Control Strategies.  Tank Management/Operations  Flushing  Rerouting Water  Others  optimizing existing booster chlorination.

Seafood HACCP Alliance for Training and Education Chapter 10 Principle 6: Establish Verification Procedures.

DOES WATER = JOBS? Dr. Jeff Michael Director, Business Forecasting Center Eberhardt School of Business.

ISO EMS OVERVIEW May ISO EMS OVERVIEW TRAINING Contents What is an EMS? Why ISO & Certification? EMS Basic Elements Environmental.

CONTRACTUAL FLOW DOWN OF DPAS PRIORITY RATINGS

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Harold Winnie, CATS Manager (Central Region) Leak detection for.

Financial Statement Modeling & Spreadsheet Engineering “Training in spreadsheet modeling improves both the efficiency and effectiveness with which analysts.

Municipal Regional Permit Provision C.6 Dan Cloak, P.E. Principal Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting.

Guidelines for the Development and Maintenance of RTF- Approved Measure Savings Estimates December 7, 2010 Regional Technical Forum Presented by: Michael.

Trade Effluent: Settlement and Configuration of Premises Workshop 18 th August 2015.

Scientific Irrigation Scheduling provisional analysis and research plan BPA December 2014.

Agricultural Stakeholder Committee August 3, 2011 DWR’s Discussion Paper on Proposed Methodology for Quantifying the Efficiency of Agricultural Water Use.

Entities & Attributes Overview By the end of this section participants will be able to discuss the main components of Section 5, and be able to incorporate.

Ch 3-1 © 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ Ostwald and McLaren / Cost Analysis and Estimating.

Proposed Regulation for the Measurement of Agricultural Water Deliveries Department of Water Resources Water Use and Efficiency PUBLIC.

Drinking Water + Compressed Air = Dangerous Mixture Spokane Regional Cross Connection Control Chapter Requirements for Winterizing Irrigation Systems with.

Session 14 Preparation of Tables for the CPIP Project for Capacity Development for the Implementing the Organic Law at the Capital and Provincial Level.

2008 EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project Geospatial Metadata: Intermediate Course Module 1: Introduction and Standards Overview.

Organization Name Presenter Name Presenter Title.

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 Kenneth Petersen, DVM, MPH Assistant Administrator Office of Field Operations.

Supply Processes and Technology

Key Performance Area (Optional) Performance Criteria Considerations 1. Major Concerns 2. Minor Concerns 3. Meeting Expectations 4. Exceeding Expectations.

ISO Registration Common Areas of Nonconformances.

Registration Process Environmental Management Systems Workshop Mobile, AL June 20-21, 2001 Beth Graves NC Division of Pollution Prevention and Environmental.

Oakdale Irrigation District Agricultural Water Management Plan Briefing on 2015 Update January 5, /5/2016 OID AWMP Update Briefing.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Presenter Name School of Drafting Regulations for Borehole Disposal of DSRS 2016 Vienna, Austria Siting Strategies.

The Pros and Cons of Contract Financing. Industry Goals For many companies, delighting their customers through continuous innovation has become their.

1 januari 2008 RIBASIM input data by Wil N.M. van der Krogt.

JLAB Pressure Systems Considerations Ed Daly. Outline Introduction Federal Law - 10CFR851 Compliance JLAB Pressure Systems Program –Complies with 10CFR851,

Bio Digester System Overview of Experience and Cost Benefit Analysis.

ADA Compliance Program Implementation 28 Image from wikipedia.org.

Neal T. Colwell, P.E. July 13, Stages of Agricultural Water Measurement SBx7-7 10,000 ac AB1404 2,000 ac Statements of Diversion & Use Measure &

Identify & Prevent Duplicate Payments Presenter: Daniel Kimpton.

Energy and Environmental Solutions Company Confidential—Siemens Building Technologies 2008 SLS 242/342: Performance Contracting - Proposing Opportunities.

Water Efficiency Ordinance ZCA No. 750

Cross Connection Survey Training

Severn Trent is a leading operator of U.S. water & wastewater assets

Light Rail Transit Project

Contract Award Procedures

Water for Pharmaceutical Use

NERSA presentation at the PPC meeting held on 24 May 2006

Purchasing supplies at CERN

Accuracy of Soil Moisture Devices

Reporting with Precision and Accuracy

WinTIM, Indices methodology and tool Wiking Althoff, CESD Communautaire External trade experts meeting on the CARDS Programme, Luxembourg, May.

Figure IV.2-6. DSM2 results on the source water and salinity (“volumetric and constituent fingerprints) for the period November 2004 to February 2005.

What Is VQIP? FDA required to establish a program to provide for the expedited review of food imported by voluntary participants. Eligibility is limited.

Henriette Faergemann DG Environment, 04/09/2013

Trihalomethanes Removal Evaluation

Presentation transcript:

Overview of Discussion  What are the pros and cons of the options?  Are there other options? A2 SUBCOMMITTEE

Overview of Options 1. +/- 6% msmt. accuracy by volume or flow rate (consistent with CVP contractors’ requirement) at individual customer 2. +/- 15% msmt. accuracy by volume or flow rate at individual customer 3. Combination of measurement at laterals, and/or at individual customers 4. Measurement at basin level or supplier level, with estimation for individual customers 5. Others? A2 SUBCOMMITTEE

Option 1: +/- 6% msmt. accuracy by volume or flow rate  Can this meet requirements of section (b) Annual report of aggregated farm-gate delivery Implement pricing structure at least in part volumetric  What are pros/cons of this option, such as: Kinds of devices that can provide this accuracy Appropriate maintenance, checks, calibration Typical range of installation cost Other considerations A2 SUBCOMMITTEE

Option 2: +/- 15% msmt. accuracy by volume or flow rate  Can this meet requirements of section (b) Annual report of aggregated farm-gate delivery Implement pricing structure at least in part volumetric  What are pros/cons of this option, such as: Kinds of devices that can provide this accuracy Appropriate maintenance, checks, calibration Typical range of installation cost Other considerations A2 SUBCOMMITTEE

Option 3: Lateral-level Measurement  Can this meet requirements of section (b) Annual report of aggregated farm-gate delivery Implement pricing structure at least in part volumetric  What are pros/cons of this option, such as: Kinds of devices that can provide this accuracy Appropriate maintenance, checks, calibration Typical range of installation cost Other considerations A2 SUBCOMMITTEE

Option 4: Supplier-level Measurement  Can this meet requirements of section (b) Annual report of aggregated farm-gate delivery Implement pricing structure at least in part volumetric  What are pros/cons of this option, such as: Kinds of devices that can provide this accuracy Appropriate maintenance, checks, calibration Typical range of installation cost Other considerations A2 SUBCOMMITTEE

Option X: Other Option?  Can this meet requirements of section (b) Annual report of aggregated farm-gate delivery Implement pricing structure at least in part volumetric  What are pros/cons of this option, such as: Kinds of devices that can provide this accuracy Appropriate maintenance, checks, calibration Typical range of installation cost Other considerations A2 SUBCOMMITTEE

Revisiting Questions to Consider  What are the details to define a standard?  Is defining an accuracy standard as a +/- percentage appropriate?  Should the definition include additional details (e.g. operating flow range, field conditions, etc.)?  Should open-channel and piped delivery systems have different accuracy standards?  How should the “irrigation season” be defined for an agricultural water supplier? A2 SUBCOMMITTEE

Compliance, Applicability, and Exceptions  How does a supplier comply? Initial compliance of installed devices On-going compliance – sampling program or all devices during defined period of years o Compliance = every device compliant? o Compliance = xx% of devices compliant? o Demonstrate plan to fix non-compliant devices? Reporting of devices’ accuracy Must every delivery point be measured regardless of size?  What is a reasonable program for maintenance, checks, and calibration of measurement devices?  Other exceptions (e.g., parcel size)?