DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers August 2013 Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.

Advertisements

Danielson Framework: Review and Card Sort Activity

Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.

Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility

Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.

Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?

C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST

Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching

Academy School District 20. Licensed staff of Academy School District 20 will engage in a differentiated, collaborative, and reflective evaluation process.

August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.

Matrix 101: The Oregon Matrix and Summative Evaluations Spring 2015 Technical Assistance Webinar.

The Framework for Teaching An Overview of the Danielson Model.

Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson

Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.

Differentiated Supervision

The Framework for Teaching

M EASURING T EACHER E FFECTIVENESS (MTE). H OW DID WE GET HERE ? Video from the Arizona School Administrators PUSD Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Committee.

Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.

Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements Day 2: Evidence 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED.

Teachscape Overview John Monahan, Instructional Supervisor

Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 9/9/2015PBevan, D.ED.

The Danielson Framework and Your Evaluation AK Teaching Standard DP_8c: Engages in Instructional Development Activities Danielson Domain 4e: Growing and.

LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.

An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.

Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our staff and those in school districts,

The Danielson Framework ….how does this change things?

Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.

THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.

NC Teacher Evaluation Process

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.

The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.

1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November

Introduction to Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System and Framework for Teaching.

Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.

Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.

Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our teachers and those in school districts,

Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.

 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.

In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.

BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.

Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Introduction to Peer Observations.

PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.

A framework for teaching (Danielson, 1996) Domain 2: The classroom environment – 2a: Creating an environment of respect and rapport – 2b: Establishing.

The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Domain 3: Instruction Communicating Clearly and Accurately Using Questioning.

A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)

NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness B. Examining the Framework

DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.

Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/

Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.

Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.

STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.

FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.

Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment

Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.

Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.

Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.

Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Explore Explore Explore Math Teacher Leaders October 18, 2011.

What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for

Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,

Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process

NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.

Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 7/8/2016pbevan 1.

Welcome Learning Targets for Today I will build schema for Danielson’s Framework for Teaching. I will connect Framework principles to powerful planning.

In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.

MSBSD Educator Evaluation

Framework For Teaching (FFT)

An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation

Changes to the Educator Evaluation System

Introduction to Framework for Teaching Classroom Observations

Introduction to Core Professionalism

Presentation transcript:

DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting

Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common language for all involvement in the model  Provide levels of quality indicators Distinguished, Proficient, Basic and Unsatisfactory

Prior to Pre-Conference  Principal and Teacher  Collaboratively select components to focus on during observation  Teacher completes lesson plan format  Teacher may complete some of the compnent quesitons ahead of time (optional)

Essential 10 Components  1c: Selecting Instructional Goals  1e: Designing Coherent Instruction  1f: Designing Student Assessments  2b: Establishing a Culture of Learning  2c: Managing Classroom Procedures  2d: Managing Student Behavior  3b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques  3c: Engaging Students in Learning  4a: Reflection on Teaching  4c: Communicating with Families

The Next 5  1a: Demonstrating Knowledge of Content & Pedagogy  1b: Demonstrating Knowledge of Students  2a: Creating an Environment of Resect and Rapport  3d: Using Assessment in Instruction  4f: Showing Professionalism

Pre-Conference  Discuss:  the 5-10 components collaboratively chosen between the teacher and the evaluator from the District Essential 10  the lesson plan form and “conversation/discussion” questions  the component questions related to the components (teacher may complete in writing and/or be prepared to discuss).

Pre-Conference  Artifacts must be brought to the conference to support components not observed in the lesson (typically those components in Domains 1 and 4).  Evaluator will provide the teacher with copies of element level rubrics.

Lesson and Rubrics

Prior to Post-Observation Conference  The teacher self reflects on Danielson rubrics that align with components chosen for the observation.  Evaluator completes the same rubrics that align with the components.

Post-Observation Conference  Discuss results of teacher and evaluator rubrics as well as develop a plan for continued growth.

Following Post-Observation Conference  The formal observation cover sheet is completed and the level of performance for each component will be documented.  Both the teacher and the evaluation sign the cover sheet acknowledging the conversation on the results of the observation.

Example of the Cover Sheet

What is going well? Challenges? Current Practices