1 Formation Evaluation Exercise For Subsurface Methods Geology Course 4233 By Richard Andrews March 5, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MDT JOB PLANNING AND INTERPRETATION
Advertisements

Body Copy font is Verdana set at 32 in white A Focused Play on the Caney & Woodford Shales Oil & Gas Investment Symposium – Small Caps Palm Beach, Florida.
Julie A. LeFever North Dakota Geological Survey
FORM 1027 – BOTTOM HOLE PRESSURE TEST. This presentation will assist you in the completion of the Form The bottom hole pressure test. Date of Last.
Lesson 20 Abnormal Pressure
Williams Fork Formation Reservoir Characterization at
Logs : how to use them for QUALITIATIVE reservoir evaluation
EAS 430: Petroleum Geology
Montana – North Dakota? Middle Member Bakken Play Julie A. LeFever North Dakota Geological Survey.
Formation Evaluation (Lecture) Subsurface Methods 4233
Basic well Logging Analysis – Log Interpretation
Isopach and Isochore Maps
Basic well Logging Analysis – The Spontaneous Potential (SP) Log
Granite Wash Casing Profile Texas Panhandle (District 10) Western Oklahoma OKC Granite Wash Conference – March 6, 2008.
Chapter 2 GEOLOGY. Geologists Wellside Exploitation Sedimentologist.
Bright Green Zone Perforated 14 ft of Lower zone & 330 B/D. This zone may have recharged & will be tested first. 7 Zones above old Perfs total 20.
Lecture items - Electric Properties of Rocks. - Factors affecting resistivity of reservoirs - Electrical Logs (Self Potential log, Conventional resistivity.
WELL LOG (The Bore Hole Image)
Lecture items Sonic log * Definition. * Types * Units & Presentation.
An Approach to Recover Hydrocarbons from Currently Off-Limit Areas of the Antrim Formation, MI Using Low-Impact Technologies DOE Contract DE-FC26-06NT42931.
Some basic Log interpretation
Outline Pore Pressure and Fracture Gradient Drilling Fluid Casing Design Cement Design Drilling Bit Economic Analysis.
Guided by 3D seismic data, property modeling for the depleted reservoir was extended downward to the sparsely drilled deep saline aquifer. The geologic.
Ron Cherry, Maged Fam and Emiliano López
Lecture items Density log * Definition. * Types
Reservoir Characterization Capstone Project Semester 1 PNG 490 – Team 26 April 29 th 2014.
Economic benefits from using formate brines - Latest paper.
1 A Time-Lapse Seismic Modeling Study for CO2 Sequestration at the Dickman Oilfield Ness County, Kansas Jintan Li April 28 th, 2010.
Lecture items Self Potential Log * Theory of measurement.
Petroleum Engineering 406 Lesson 4 Well Control. Read Well Control Manual –Chapter 9 Homework 2 Due Feb. 3, 1999.
Improved Permeability Measurement using T 2 Bin-Distribution and Bulk Volume Irreducible from Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Tools Case Study: Granite Wash,
Well Log Interpretation Basic Relationships
“Perspectives on Montana’s Petroleum Industry” MREA-MPA-MONTAX “Bridges to the Future” Conference October 15, 2009 Dave Ballard President Ballard Petroleum.
DLT1 Wireline and Testing ETC 10/27/2015 Introduction to Laterolog Principles.
Using Well Logs (e-logs) in the Petroleum industry Earth Science World.
Induction Conductivity and Natural Gamma Logs at the Osage Skiatook Research Sites “A” and “B”, Northeastern, Oklahoma By Marvin M. Abbott, Bruce D. Smith,
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 21 Apr 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Last Time: Magnetotellurics (MT) Some (relatively minor) applications in oil & mining.
POROSITY DETERMINATION
Lecture items - Compositions of the Uphole- Downhole Instruments. - Field Operation (Data Acquisition, Processing and Transmission) - Log Runs - Borehole.
Typical modern down-hole wireline equipment
Lecture 18 Ground Water (1) Aquifer and Aquitard Definitions Confined and unconfined aquifer Geological structure.
Seismic Data Driven Reservoir Analysis FORT CHADBOURNE 3-D Coke and Runnels Counties, TX ODOM LIME AND GRAY SAND.
Elver-1 Petrophysical Summary Interpretation based on Memory LWD Data at TD 12 Jan
Well Log Interpretations of Miscellaneous Oklahoma Reservoirs By Richard Andrews March 2009.
Hydrocarbon migration and concretion formation in the Permian White Rim Sandstone; implications for reservoir characterization of carbon capture and sequestration.
“Perspectives on Montana’s Petroleum Industry” MREA-MPA-MONTAX “Bridges to the Future” Conference October 15, 2009 Dave Ballard President Ballard Petroleum.
Bacha Khan University Charsadda
References Bebout, D.G., Loucks, R.G., Gregory, A.R., Report of Investigations No. 91: Frio Sandstone Reservoirs in the Deep Subsurface Along the Texas.
Department of Conservation California Geological Survey
Wellbore Stability in Olmos Formation
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 20 Apr 2016
Study of the Niobrara Formation in the Borie Field Abdulaziz Muhanna Alhubil, Gabrijel Grubac, Joe Lawson, Rachael Molyneux & David Scadden.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 18 Apr 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 Last Time: Magnetotellurics (MT) Some (minor but growing) applications in oil & mining;
University of Kerala, India.
INSTRUCTOR © 2017, John R. Fanchi
Petrophysical evaluation of the Rotliegend in K15-FB-107
Advance Seismic Interpretation Project
What is Well Logging?
Macondo: BP MC 252 A-1.
Well Logging Gly 326.
Reservoir Characterization in Leming Lake, Alberta
Potential for Geological Carbon Sequestration using deep saline aquifers in the Illinois Basin GIS Term Project Julien Botto.
Resistivity Logs High deep resistivity means:
Step 3: Resistivity Logs
Electrical Properties
Log data from 205/21a-6 across an interval of Fractured Basement and an interval of Fault Zone. Log data from 205/21a-6 across an interval of Fractured.
POROSITY DETERMINATION FROM LOGS Most slides in this section are modified primarily from NExT PERF Short Course Notes, However, many of the NExT.
WELL LOG (The Bore Hole Image)
WELL LOG (The Bore Hole Image)
ME Consultancy Services
Presentation transcript:

1 Formation Evaluation Exercise For Subsurface Methods Geology Course 4233 By Richard Andrews March 5, 2009

2 GR & SP RESISTIVITY 2 Rxo/Rt K Calculate S w in this zone every 2 ft. Cromwell Sandstone SP GR shallow deep Rxo/Rt

3 GR & Cal Density & Neutron Φ 6 in Cromwell Sandstone Calculate S w in this zone every 2 ft. Note: This log is shifted down 2 ft from resistivity log.

4 GR & CAL Density & Neutron Porosity 0 API in Red Fork Sandstone ( ) Bartlesville Sandstone ( )

5 GR & SP RESISTIVITY 0 API k Red Fork Sandstone ( ) Bartlesville Sandstone ( )

6 GR & SP RESISTIVITY 0 API k Mississippian Limestone zone Calculate S w every 2 ft in this zone (6190’-6260’). GR & CAL Density & Neutron Porosity 0 API in. 16

7 Questions for formation evaluation exercise 1.Identify zones having hydrocarbon potential throughout the designated intervals in all wells. Calculate S w every 2 feet in the indicated zones using Excel spreadsheet. 2.Identify the expected type of hydrocarbon in each of the 4 zones. 3.In the Red Fork & Bartlesville sandstones: a.How clean are they?? b.What is the GR log profile telling you about the depositional setting and areal distribution of these two sandstones deposits? c.Explain the behavior of the density and neutron porosity logs across these two intervals. 4.In the Cromwell sandstone: a.Why is the density-neutron separation different in the top of the interval versus the bottom? b.Identify zones having permeability. c.Why is there no separation between the shallow and deep resistivity recordings from ? d.Explain the behavior of the Rxo/Rt log in detail. e.If this well was drilled using 9-pound mud and the virgin reservoir pressure was 2500 psi, was this well drilled over or under-balanced?. Would you expect invasion in a permeable formations?