doc.: IEEE sru Submission 11 November 2013 M Ariyoshi, S Kitazawa (ATR)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Update Proposal on the Draft 5C for Spectrum Resources Usage in WPANs] Date Submitted: [11 November 2013] Source: [Masayuki Ariyoshi, Shoichi Kitazawa] Company [Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International (ATR)] Address [2-2-2 Hikaridai, Seika-cho, Kyoto Japan] Voice:[ ], FAX: [ ], Re: [DCN sru] Abstract:[This document proposes updates on the working draft 5C for SRU in WPANs, aiming at finalisation of the document.] Purpose:[For SG discussions] Notice:This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release:The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P

doc.: IEEE sru Submission 11 November 2013 M Ariyoshi, S Kitazawa (ATR)Slide 2 Proposal of Updating the Draft 5C for Spectrum Resources Usage in WPANs Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Masayuki AriyoshiAdvanced Telecommunications Research Institute International (ATR) Hikari-dai, Seika-cho, Kyoto Japan Shoichi

doc.: IEEE sru Submission Summary Status of the 5C WD ( ) 1.Broad Market Potential: filled 2.Compatibility: filled 3.Distinct Identity: filled but comments are not closed 4.Technical Feasibility: filled but comments are not closed 5.Economic Feasibility: filled but comments are not closed This contribution proposes updates on the items which are still open –3. a), b), and c) –4. a), b), c) and d) –5. a), b), and c) 11 November 2013 M Ariyoshi, S Kitazawa (ATR)Slide 3

doc.: IEEE sru Submission a) Substantially different from other IEEE 802 standards. Current description: IEEE is well suited for networks which are sharing same frequency bands in same areas and are managed utilizing acquired RRMM information. This amendment to for low rate WPANs maximizes the areal SRU efficiency and minimizes performance degradation due to mutual interference. [note: The RRMM function is to be specified in the proposed amendment. It is a bit confusing with the current statement, that this amendment is only an enhancement in SRU efficiency.] Proposal: IEEE uniquely supports wireless sensors and control applications operating in shared spectrum bands. However, the existing does not support mechanisms for adequate SRU particularly in shared spectrum bands. This amendment will maximise the efficiency of areal SRU by utilising acquired RRMM information. Notes: –Clearly describe that: the base standard is unique; the RRMM is within the proposed amendment. 11 November 2013 M Ariyoshi, S Kitazawa (ATR)Slide 4 3. DISTINCT IDENTITY

doc.: IEEE sru Submission b) One unique solution per problem (not two solutions to a problem). Current description: The proposed amendment to IEEE will provide a unique solution for the RRMM and eventual efficient SRU functions. [note: The corroborative descriptions as a unique solution will be added here.] Proposal: The proposed amendment to IEEE will provide a unique solution for RRMM and eventual efficient SRU functions. Notes: –Keep the current description and simply remove the note. 11 November 2013 M Ariyoshi, S Kitazawa (ATR)Slide 5 3. DISTINCT IDENTITY

doc.: IEEE sru Submission c) Easy for the document reader to select the relevant specification. Current description: The proposed amendment for IEEE will include the definitions of RRMM parameters as well as the communication protocol. [note: Need to clarify the definitions of RRMM parameters and protocols: SAP, I/F?] Proposal: The proposed amendment to IEEE will be a clearly distinguishable specification. Notes: –At this stage, it might be better to describe as “distinguishable specification” rather than “definitions of parameters and communication protocol”. 11 November 2013 M Ariyoshi, S Kitazawa (ATR)Slide 6 3. DISTINCT IDENTITY

doc.: IEEE sru Submission a) Demonstrated system feasibility Current description: A variety of network management entities utilizing the proprietary RRMM information have been deployed as the utilitarian exercise in order to improve the efficiency of SRU in operational networks. [note: Examples of the deployed network management entities with RRMM should be to be added.] Proposal: A variety of radio resource management mechanisms based on measurements have been deployed for the systems operating in shared spectrum bands. Those contribute to improve the efficiency of SRU. The concept of those is similar to the RRMM. Notes: –Despite the note above, no examples are included. It is welcome to add some examples, if there are proposals given in the SG. 11 November 2013 M Ariyoshi, S Kitazawa (ATR)Slide 7 4. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY

doc.: IEEE sru Submission b) Proven technology, reasonable testing Current description: Many examples of the RRMM information utilization have not only been published in the literature and demonstrated in laboratories worldwide, but have deployed in operational networks. [note: Some specific examples should be to be provided. Also we should describe the difference in positioning of the prior-art technologies and this proposed standard amendment.] Proposal: Many examples of RRMM mechanisms have been published in the literature and demonstrated in laboratories worldwide. There are also examples that RRMM has been deployed in operational networks. Notes: –Only editorial modification is proposed. –Despite the note above, no specific examples are included, as similar descriptions are found in 5C docs for 15.4k and 15.4q, etc. It is welcome to add some examples, if there are proposals given in the SG. 11 November 2013 M Ariyoshi, S Kitazawa (ATR)Slide 8 4. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY

doc.: IEEE sru Submission c) Confidence in reliability Current description: Confidence in reliability by RRMM protocol has been consistently demonstrated in currently deployed IEEE802 based solutions other than IEEE , for example IEEE802.11k. [note: Do we really want to explain this item by taking an example of k? In this case, we again need to describe the difference in positioning of k and this proposed standard amendment.] Proposal: There are variety of proprietary systems with RRMM mechanisms in operation today, and their reliability is factored into the services offered. Notes: –Proposes rather simpler description. 11 November 2013 M Ariyoshi, S Kitazawa (ATR)Slide 9 4. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY

doc.: IEEE sru Submission d) Coexistence of 802 wireless standards specifying devices for unlicensed operation Current description: An appropriate coexistence assurance document which shows the effectiveness for the coexistence of IEEE802 wireless standards and the efficiency of SRU will be created. [note: This doesn’t seem to be very clear…] Proposal: An appropriate coexistence assurance document will be created, which shows the effectiveness for the coexistence of IEEE802 wireless standards and the efficiency of SRU. Notes: –Only editorial modification is proposed. –Similar descriptions are found in 5C docs for 15.4k and 15.4q, etc. 11 November 2013 M Ariyoshi, S Kitazawa (ATR)Slide TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY

doc.: IEEE sru Submission a) Known cost factors, reliable data Current description: IEEE devices, implementing RRMM protocols, will make use of the existing high volume applications in the shared and license exempt frequency bands including 2.4GHz and 915MHz bands. The incremental cost for implementation is expected to be minimal. [note: Rationale for the incremental cost to be minimal may be described.] Proposal: IEEE devices implementing RRMM mechanisms will make use of the existing high volume applications in the shared and license exempt frequency bands including 2.4GHz and 915MHz bands. The incremental cost for implementation is expected to be reasonable. Notes: –Despite the noted comment is not closed, only minor editorial modification is proposed. –Similar descriptions are found in 5C docs for 15.4k and 15.4q, etc. 11 November 2013 M Ariyoshi, S Kitazawa (ATR)Slide ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY

doc.: IEEE sru Submission b) Reasonable cost for performance Current description: Performance and costs associated with RRMM solutions have been shown to be minimal. [note: A specific case showing the minimised performance and costs should be provided. ] Proposal: Performance and costs associated with the RRMM solutions are expected to be reasonable. Notes: –Despite the noted comment is not closed, only minor editorial modification is proposed. –Similar description is found in 5C doc for 15.4q. 11 November 2013 M Ariyoshi, S Kitazawa (ATR)Slide ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY

doc.: IEEE sru Submission c) Consideration of installation costs Current description: One of the IEEE standard objectives includes low cost installation with minimal or no operator intervention and RRMM facilitates achieving the objectives. [note: This is an objective. Is it sufficient as a consideration on this item?] Proposal: One of the IEEE standard objectives includes low cost installation with minimal or no operator intervention. The RRMM in this amendment facilitates achieving the objectives. Notes: –Only editorial modification is proposed. –Similar description is found in 5C doc for 15.4q. 11 November 2013 M Ariyoshi, S Kitazawa (ATR)Slide ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY

doc.: IEEE sru Submission References 1.Proposal of radio resource management architecture ( ) 2.A Use Case of Self-Organizing Wireless Network for Medical System ( ) 3.IG SRU Working Draft RRMM-usecases and 5C( ) 4.IG SRU Usecase requirements table( ) 5.SRU Working Draft PAR ( ) 6.SRU Working Draft 5C ( ) 11 November 2013 M Ariyoshi, S Kitazawa (ATR)Slide 14