DPS/ CMS RRB-T 2001-116 Core Software for CMS David Stickland for CMS Oct 01, RRB l The Core-Software and Computing was not part of the detector MoU l.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, US CMS Cost & Schedule Mark Reichanadter US CMS Project Engineer DOE/NSF Review 8 May 2001.

Advertisements

Resources for the ATLAS Offline Computing Basis for the Estimates ATLAS Distributed Computing Model Cost Estimates Present Status Sharing of Resources.

ITIL: Service Transition

DOE/NSF U.S. CMS Operations Program Review Closeout Report Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory March 10, 2015 Anadi Canepa, TRIUMF Anna Goussiou, University.

1 Software & Grid Middleware for Tier 2 Centers Rob Gardner Indiana University DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven National.

Information Systems and Data Acquisition for ATLAS What was achievedWhat is proposedTasks Database Access DCS TDAQ Athena ConditionsDB Time varying data.

11 October Project Management Discipline of planning, organizing, and managing resources to bring about the successful completion of specific project.

Slide David Britton, University of Glasgow IET, Oct 09 1 Prof. David Britton GridPP Project leader University of Glasgow GridPP27 15 th Sep 2011 GridPP.

DATA PRESERVATION IN ALICE FEDERICO CARMINATI. MOTIVATION ALICE is a 150 M CHF investment by a large scientific community The ALICE data is unique and.

Slide David Britton, University of Glasgow IET, Oct 09 1 Prof. David Britton GridPP Project leader University of Glasgow GridPP Vendor Day 30 th April.

GridPP Steve Lloyd, Chair of the GridPP Collaboration Board.

Sustaining Change in Higher Education J. Douglas Toma Associate Professor Institute of Higher Education University of Georgia May 28, 2004.

The Evergreen, Background, Methodology and IT Service Management Model

October 24, 2000Milestones, Funding of USCMS S&C Matthias Kasemann1 US CMS Software and Computing Milestones and Funding Profiles Matthias Kasemann Fermilab.

Appendix 2 Automated Tools for Systems Development © 2006 ITT Educational Services Inc. SE350 System Analysis for Software Engineers: Unit 2 Slide 1.

MGS Testing A High Level Overview of Testing in Microsoft Games Studio Joe Djorgee – Test Lead.

12 Dec 2005 J. Schukraft1 ALICE USA ALICE position towards US participation EU participation in emcal Requirements Formal steps & schedule.

-Nikhil Bhatia 28 th October What is RUP? Central Elements of RUP Project Lifecycle Phases Six Engineering Disciplines Three Supporting Disciplines.

REVIEW OF NA61 SOFTWRE UPGRADE PROPOSAL. Mandate The NA61 experiment is contemplating to rewrite its fortran software in modern technology and are requesting.

EGI-InSPIRE RI EGI-InSPIRE EGI-InSPIRE RI Future support of EGI services Tiziana Ferrari/EGI.eu Future support of EGI.

A. Aimar - EP/SFT LCG - Software Process & Infrastructure1 Software Process panel SPI GRIDPP 7 th Collaboration Meeting 30 June – 2 July 2003 A.Aimar -

Event Management & ITIL V3

DEV234 Project Management For.NET Developers Marc Gusmano Director of Emerging Technologies The Information Management Group.

LCG Applications Area – Overview, Planning, Resources Torre Wenaus, BNL/CERN LCG Applications Area Manager LHCC Comprehensive Review.

DT1 Gas Section Debrief of 2005 activities.. The Purpose of the Debrief  Compare plan and achievements.  Analyze how the work is done ? Do we meet the.

LHC Computing Review Recommendations John Harvey CERN/EP March 28 th, th LHCb Software Week.

US-CMS Software and Computing 1st Meeting of the FNAL Oversight Panel, October 2000 Core Applications Software Lucas Taylor Northeastern University.

ATLAS, U.S. ATLAS, and Databases David Malon Argonne National Laboratory DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven National Laboratory.

5 May 98 1 Jürgen Knobloch Computing Planning for ATLAS ATLAS Software Week 5 May 1998 Jürgen Knobloch Slides also on:

Questions for ATLAS  How can the US ATLAS costs per SW FTE be lowered?  Is the scope of the T1 facility matched to the foreseen physics requirements.

Ian Bird GDB; CERN, 8 th May 2013 March 6, 2013

Configuration Management and Change Control Change is inevitable! So it has to be planned for and managed.

CMS Computing and Core-Software USCMS CB Riverside, May 19, 2001 David Stickland, Princeton University CMS Computing and Core-Software Deputy PM.

…building the next IT revolution From Web to Grid…

Tony Doyle - University of Glasgow 8 July 2005Collaboration Board Meeting GridPP Report Tony Doyle.

Slide 1 Systems Analysis and Design with UML Version 2.0, Second Edition Alan Dennis, Barbara Wixom, and David Tegarden Chapter 9: Moving on to Design.

CMS Computing and Core-Software Report to USCMS-AB (Building a Project Plan for CCS) USCMS AB Riverside, May 18, 2001 David Stickland, Princeton University.

1 LHCC RRB SG 16 Sep P. Vande Vyvre CERN-PH On-line Computing M&O LHCC RRB SG 16 Sep 2004 P. Vande Vyvre CERN/PH for 4 LHC DAQ project leaders.

Atlas Computing Planning Helge Meinhard / CERN-EP Atlas Software Workshop Berkeley, 11 May 2000.

CD FY09 Tactical Plan Status FY09 Tactical Plan Status Report for Neutrino Program (MINOS, MINERvA, General) Margaret Votava April 21, 2009 Tactical plan.

Computing Performance Recommendations #10, #11, #12, #15, #16, #17.

U.S. Grid Projects and Involvement in EGEE Ian Foster Argonne National Laboratory University of Chicago EGEE-LHC Town Meeting,

NSF Middleware Initiative Purpose To design, develop, deploy and support a set of reusable, expandable set of middleware functions and services that benefit.

State of Georgia Release Management Training

U.S. ATLAS Computing Facilities Overview Bruce G. Gibbard Brookhaven National Laboratory U.S. LHC Software and Computing Review Brookhaven National Laboratory.

Project Management Why do projects fail? Technical Reasons

Computing Division FY03 Budget and budget outlook for FY04 + CDF International Finance Committee April 4, 2003 Vicky White Head, Computing Division.

12 March, 2002 LCG Applications Area - Introduction slide 1 LCG Applications Session LCG Launch Workshop March 12, 2002 John Harvey, CERN LHCb Computing.

Participation of JINR in CERN- INTAS project ( ) Korenkov V., Mitcin V., Nikonov E., Oleynik D., Pose V., Tikhonenko E. 19 march 2004.

Summary of HEP SW workshop Ian Bird MB 15 th April 2014.

Kati Lassila-Perini EGEE User Support Workshop Outline: – CMS collaboration – User Support clients – User Support task definition – passive support:

LHC Computing, SPC-FC-CC-C; H F Hoffmann1 CERN/2379/Rev: Proposal for building the LHC computing environment at CERN (Phase 1) Goals of Phase.

ILC 2007 Global Design Effort 1 Planning Damping Rings Activities in the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski Cockcroft Institute/University of Liverpool.

PCAP Close Out Feb 2, 2004 BNL. Overall  Good progress in all areas  Good accomplishments in DC-2 (and CTB) –Late, but good.

ALICE RRB-T ALICE Computing – an update F.Carminati 23 October 2001.

Project Management Enabling Quality Marien de Wilde, PMP April 2007.

TIARA – WP6 Involving Industry in TIARA Lucio Rossi (WPD) CERN.

12 March, 2002 LCG Applications Area - Introduction slide 1 LCG Applications Session LCG Launch Workshop March 12, 2002 John Harvey, CERN LHCb Computing.

IPDA Architecture Project International Planetary Data Alliance IPDA Architecture Project Report.

09/05/2006Project Status Report1 Nova DAQ Software Development Project Status Update for 09/05/2006 Gerald Guglielmo (CD/CEPA/OAA)

1 ALICE Summary LHCC Computing Manpower Review September 3, 2003.

JRA1 Middleware re-engineering

Completion and Pre-Exploitation Costs for the Initial ATLAS Detector

JRA3 Introduction Åke Edlund EGEE Security Head

Project Management Processes

Collaboration Board Meeting

Project Management Processes

Agenda Purpose for Project Goals & Objectives Project Process & Status Common Themes Outcomes & Deliverables Next steps.

Preliminary Project Execution Plan

LHC Computing, RRB; H F Hoffmann

Presentation transcript:

DPS/ CMS RRB-T Core Software for CMS David Stickland for CMS Oct 01, RRB l The Core-Software and Computing was not part of the detector MoU l The current requirement is for skilled “software professionals” l Extensive discussion and consensus in Hoffmann Panel (2000) Urgent need for this manpower l Presentation at April 01 RRB Many internal and external discussions in intervening period l Request specific assistance of RRB now ~10 people in 2002

DPS/ CMS RRB-T Slide 2 What does CMS mean by “Software Professionals/ Engineers”? l For manpower accounting purposes, anyone designing or writing technical software that is part of the CT Tasks and Deliverables, is defined as a “Software Professional” l This means for example è Framework, toolkit, authors/maintainers è Release tool developers è Production tool developers l But not è Physics algorithm writers p Physics base program è People running productions p Now must be highly skilled, but a purpose of production SW professionals is to simplify this work è People preparing to build local facilities p Too complex for central organization, many possibilities (lab manpower, grid manpower..) Maintain focus on tasks that are difficult to man in traditional physics base-program’s Somewhat prejudicial against the many people doing this type of highly skilled work now. But intention is that these tasks will eventually not require SW professional skills Somewhat prejudicial against the many people doing this type of highly skilled work now. But intention is that these tasks will eventually not require SW professional skills

DPS/ CMS RRB-T Slide 3 Software Manpower l SW manpower hard to find è Milestones under pressure and at risk l IMoU proposed in April è Currently disfavored – shelved l Act Institute by Institute, Agency by Agency to enable their participation +10 Required in 2002 Two tracks being actively followed: l Improve efficiency of manpower use: è Strengthen Project Management è Identify components that can be delegated away from CERN l Focus scope Definition è Emphasize collaborative efforts p Common Solutions for common problems è Delegate to and/or make use of GRID related projects wherever possible Overall Context: Physicist Users and Developers (PRS) 2000: ~ : ~80 Overall Context: Physicist Users and Developers (PRS) 2000: ~ : ~80

DPS/ CMS RRB-T Slide 4 GRID and LHC Computing Grid Project(s) l GRID Tools and Infrastructure will è Increase efficiency of computing use p Minimize costs! è And enable full worldwide physics collaboration p A Primary goal of the experiment SW Project l But the experiment must be very active in establishing and testing GRID deliverables now Increasing the current manpower stress l Most of the SW Professionals in our WBS are not directly GRID related l Most of the LCGP Manpower is not directed at the internal experiment software challenges

DPS/ CMS RRB-T Slide 5 Current numbers in AFT are over-estimates (fractional people, not all focused on urgent needs) Current numbers in AFT are over-estimates (fractional people, not all focused on urgent needs) CURRENT Needed 2002 (10) Needed 2003 (11)

DPS/ CMS RRB-T Slide 6 India recently proposed two new engineers for online software ! CERN counting includes 50% of each Project Associate

DPS/ CMS RRB-T Slide 7 Summary l Manpower problems of Experiment Core-Software remain critical Can hope for some amelioration by LCGP Are being further stretched by required GRID work now l In most items of Core-Software, SW Professionals are required è Very difficult for many Institutes to provide without special assistance l No pro-rata IMoU è Therefore must build Core-Software manpower one by one p ~10 additional people in each of 2003 and 2004 l Please help your Institutes respond to these challenges è One (or more!) new Software Professional(s) from each country in 2002 would significantly improve our ability to be ready for LHC and to meet today's needs

DPS/ CMS RRB-T Slide 8 CMS Core-Software. (One-Page Summary!) l Manpower problems of CMS Core-Software remain critical. (internal reviews, LHCC..) LHC Computing Grid Project may help  But most of our WBS items are NOT Grid But existing manpower being further stretched by required GRID work now! è SW Professionals: p Frameworks, toolkits, Release tools, Production tools, Quality control.. è But not (as already in other base programs) p Physics algorithm writers p People running productions p People building local facilities l CMS decided against a pro-rata IMoU è Build Core-Software manpower one by one p ~10 additional people in 2003 and in 2004 l Please help your Institutes respond to these challenges è Engineers typically not in existing Physics base-program; Institutes may need help to hire/dedicate this type of resource +10 Required in more in Required in more in 2003 India recently proposed two new engineers for online software ! UK 1-3 gridpp people possible (count 50% for CMS?)