A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System Mark Neubauer 1, Laura Sartori 2 1 University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Freiburg Seminar, Sept Sascha Caron Finding the Higgs or something else ideas to improve the discovery ideas to improve the discovery potential at.
Advertisements

B-tagging, leptons and missing energy in ATLAS after first data Ivo van Vulpen (Nikhef) on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for the ATLAS Detector Mark Sutton University College London 7 th October 2005.
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ Beauty 2005 in Assisi, June 2005 Sascha Caron for the DØ collaboration Tag beauty fast …
27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
W’  tb  lnubb efficiency VS. electron/muon P T cut muon channel electron channel.
Daniele Benedetti CMS and University of Perugia Chicago 07/02/2004 High Level Trigger for the ttH channel in fully hadronic decay at LHC with the CMS detector.
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
1/14/05M. Shochet/NSF Site Visit1 Recent Work and Future Plans Faculty: Mel Shochet Postdocs:Taka Maruyama (now Tsukuba faculty) Erik Brubaker Grad Students:Jahred.
Online Measurement of LHC Beam Parameters with the ATLAS High Level Trigger David W. Miller on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration 27 May th Real-Time.
BTeV Trigger Architecture Vertex 2002, Nov. 4-8 Michael Wang, Fermilab (for the BTeV collaboration)
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
Simulation Tasks  Understanding Tracking  Understanding Hardware 1.Two types of tasks: a.Implementing known functions in ATLAS framework b.Understanding.
February 19th 2009AlbaNova Instrumentation Seminar1 Christian Bohm Instrumentation Physics, SU Upgrading the ATLAS detector Overview Motivation The current.
FTK poster F. Crescioli Alberto Annovi
June 19, Outcome of the CERN meetings Preparing the upgrade R&D proposal M. Shochet.
Tracking at the ATLAS LVL2 Trigger Athens – HEP2003 Nikos Konstantinidis University College London.
The CMS Level-1 Trigger System Dave Newbold, University of Bristol On behalf of the CMS collaboration.
Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,
Institute for Anything of the University of Everything Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz New Physics at the LHC C.-E. Wulz (Institute of High Energy Physics) 1 Institute.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Faster tracking in hadron collider experiments  The problem  The solution  Conclusions Hans Drevermann (CERN) Nikos Konstantinidis ( Santa Cruz)
Copyright © 2000 OPNET Technologies, Inc. Title – 1 Distributed Trigger System for the LHC experiments Krzysztof Korcyl ATLAS experiment laboratory H.
2004 Xmas MeetingSarah Allwood WW Scattering at ATLAS.
September 30, 2004FTK meeting1 Making the FTK Physics Case M. Shochet 9/30/04.
HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis Studies on the High.
HLT Selection at Phase II John Baines. Assumptions Phase II: 5-7 x10 34 Much of what is currently done at Level-2 will now be done at Level-1, incl. –
The CDF Online Silicon Vertex Tracker I. Fiori INFN & University of Padova 7th International Conference on Advanced Technologies and Particle Physics Villa.
Tracking at Level 2 for the ATLAS High Level Trigger Mark Sutton University College London 26 th September 2006.
C. K. MackayEPS 2003 Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass at the LHC Kate Mackay University of Bristol On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations.
1 Th.Naumann, DESY Zeuthen, HERMES Tracking meeting, Tracking with the Silicon Detectors Th.Naumann H1 DESY Zeuthen A short collection of experiences.
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
G. Volpi - INFN Frascati ANIMMA Search for rare SM or predicted BSM processes push the colliders intensity to new frontiers Rare processes are overwhelmed.
DPF2000, 8/9-12/00 p. 1Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityHiggs Searches in Run II at CDF Prospects for Higgs Searches at CDF in Run II DPF2000.
1 FastTrack: Real Time Silicon Tracking for LHC Alessandro Cerri (borrowing from several talks…)
Alberto AnnoviFTK meeting - September 30, 2004 Ideas for a Fast-Track trigger processor - FTK... an evolution of the CDF Silicon Vertex Trigger (SVT) A.
FTKSim Status and plans FTK Meeting 07/13/2006 F. Crescioli, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, G.Volpi, P. Giannetti.
ATLAS Trigger Development
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
SVT Nov 7, 2002Luciano Ristori - Vertex2002_7Nov02.ppt1 SVT The CDF Silicon Vertex Trigger Vertex 2002 Luciano Ristori Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare.
G Watts/UW Seattle2 SM Hidden Sector Phenomenology as complex as you wish Decay back to SM particles Scalar.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
M. Garcia-Sciveres July 2002 ATLAS A Proton Collider Detector M. Garcia-Sciveres Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
First physics results with the Silicon Vertex Trigger at CDF-II 2 nd Workshop on the CKM Unitarity triangle. April 5 th -9 th IPPP Durham, England, UK.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
July 27, 2002CMS Heavy Ions Bolek Wyslouch1 Heavy Ion Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Bolek Wyslouch MIT for the CMS Collaboration.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
S. Donati University and INFN Pisa 9th Topical Seminar on Innovative Particle and Radiation Detectors, May , Siena, Italy The CDF Online Silicon.
The BTeV Pixel Detector and Trigger System Simon Kwan Fermilab P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510, USA BEACH2002, June 29, 2002 Vancouver, Canada.
FTK high level simulation & the physics case The FTK simulation problem G. Volpi Laboratori Nazionali Frascati, CERN Associate FP07 MC Fellow.
Associative Memory design for the Fast Track processor (FTK) at Atlas I.Sacco (Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna) On behalf Amchip04 project (A. Annovi, M. Beretta,
Suyong Choi (SKKU) SUSY Standard Model Higgs Searches at DØ Suyong Choi SKKU, Korea for DØ Collaboration.
Low Mass Standard Model Higgs Boson Searches at the Tevatron Andrew Mehta Physics at LHC, Split, Croatia, September 29th 2008 On behalf of the CDF and.
Status of FTK Paola Giannetti INFN Pisa for the FTK Group ATLAS Italia November 17, 2009.
GUIDO VOLPI – UNIVERSITY DI PISA FTK-IAPP Mid-Term Review 07/10/ Brussels.
XLIX International Winter Meeting on Nuclear Physics January 2011 Bormio, Italy G. Cattani, on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of.
More technical description:
2018/6/15 The Fast Tracker Real Time Processor and Its Impact on the Muon Isolation, Tau & b-Jet Online Selections at ATLAS Francesco Crescioli1 1University.
Tracking for Triggering Purposes in ATLAS
Silicon Pixel Detector for the PHENIX experiment at the BNL RHIC
Overview of the ATLAS Fast Tracker (FTK) (daughter of the very successful CDF SVT) July 24, 2008 M. Shochet.
Michele Pioppi* on behalf of PRIN _005 group
Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
Presentation transcript:

A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System Mark Neubauer 1, Laura Sartori 2 1 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA – 2 Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, and Marie Curie Fellow OIF, Italy– on behalf of the ATLAS TDAQ Collaboration Why Add a Hardware Tracker? Controlling trigger rates at high-energy hadron collider experiments in a way that maintains the physics capabilities is very challenging The trigger system should be flexible & robust, with sufficient redundancy and operating margin  Providing high-quality track reconstruction by the start of LVL2 processing is an important element in achieving these goals Physics motivation for high luminosity (  large interaction pileup) LHC running: 3 rd -generation fermions will play an important role in LHC physics given the central role mass likely plays in electroweak symmetry breaking. Bottom quarks and τ-leptons produce very specific tracking signatures which can be exploited in triggering. At high luminosity, sophisticated algorithms run at LVL2 will be needed to suppress backgrounds. In the current system, the LVL2 farm is burdened with reconstructing tracks within Regions-of-Interest (ROIs) Global tracking will be important at high interaction pile-up (high luminosity) o Use of primary vertexing and subsequent charged lepton association for improved isolation to reject hadronic jet backgrounds o b-decay events with final state hadrons identified outside of ROIs o Additional combined triggers (e.g. lepton + track) o Track-based missing transverse energy & jets at trigger level, possibly combined wtih calorimeter information We propose to enable early rejection of background events and more LVL2 execution time for sophisticated algorithms by moving track reconstruction into a hardware system (FTK) with massively parallel processing that produces global track reconstruction with nearly offline resolution near the start of LVL2 processing Pipeline memories Derandomizers Readout drivers Readout buffers Full-event buffers Processor sub-farms Hardware Software The Current ATLAS Trigger System ~ MB/s ~2 μs (fixed) ~1-10 ms (variable) ID: ~5,800 silicon pixel and strip detectors (SCT) and ~1000 modules of straw tubes FTK uses pixel and SCT hit information to infer charged particle tracks FTK processes 8 overlapping Φ-regions in parallel 6.2 m 2.1 m The ATLAS Inner Detector (ID) IEEE09, March25-31, Orlando, Florida, USA Proposed FTK in Trigger System FTK Functional Diagram & Architecture Pattern Recognition using Associative Memory (AM) Some Expected Performance The FTK system receives data from ReadOut Drivers (RODs) ROD output is duplicated by a dual output board Tracks reconstructed by the FTK processors are written into ReadOut Buffers (ROBs) for use at the beginning of LVL2 trigger processing FTK operates in parallel with the silicon tracker readout following each LVL1 trigger We are currently evaluating three different possible architectures which balance good tracking efficiency and an acceptable number of track fits per event: 1)Two pattern banks offset by ½ superstrip (SS = binned silicon hits) Require road to be found in both. Reduced effective SS width decreases # of combinations w/ small increase (x2) in patten bank size 2)Tree Search Processor (TSP) Smaller SS binary search after AM. Reduces SS size  fewer combinations 3)Split Architecture First find SCT tracks, then fit with pixels (ala CDF SVT) Bingo analogy A large bank of pre-computed hit patterns is used for very fast tracking (memory  speed) Linearized track fit using full-resolution silicon hits after pattern recognition Comparable FTK tracking resolution to offline tracking (Simulated muons with pt>1 GeV and |η|<2.5) Light quark rejection versus b-tagging efficiency comparing FTK and offline tracking Offline FTK