1. WORKSTREAM 2 REFLECTIVE ACTION AND INQUIRY TO SUPPORT SHARED EVALUATION Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Spain

3. ETs: Overview of Evaluation Tools  ET2A: with group at the end of the Initial Training (May-July 2015)  ET2B: with individuals who participate at the Initial Training  ET3A: Individual Progress Evaluation: previous experiences, expectations... 1 st session Mag6  ET3B: 1 st -6 th session of Mag6  ET3C: Individual Progress Evaluation 6 th session Mag6 – for children/youth  ET3D: Individual Progress Evaluation 6 th session – for facilitators and NGO/Univ staff.  + Personal progress activities: Google-self; etc. (pendent)

4. ET1 – Baseline data Municipality, neighbourhood, housing, public services, Roma communities, policies, projects, etc. - Analysis underway: it’s relevance is in comparison - Are you satisfied with this tool? - How did you collect data for this tool?

5. ET2A: group at the end of the Initial Training  Deadline: 30 th July.  Delivered: All teams but 1 (or 2)  Analysis underway 1. What fields of everyday life of Roma young people’s participation did you focus on? 2. What is going well for local Roma young people’s participation in these fields now? 3. What needs to change so Roma young people can participate in decisions and actions in these areas?

6. ET2A - group at the end of the Initial Training  Are you satisfied with this tool?  Did it work?  Was is easy to apply it? Did it bring up major issues / concerns?  Difficulties?  Proposals to change? What? How?

7. ET2B - individual Etc... Analysis underway …has training provided you ENOUGH TOOLS to support participation and empowerment for the Roma?

8. ET2B - individual  Are you satisfied with this tool?  Did it work?  Was is easy to apply it? Did it bring up major issues / concerns?  Difficulties?  Proposals to change? What? How?

9. ET3A - Individual Progress Evaluation 1 st session MAG6  Probably, the most questionable tool... Symbolic violance.  Are you satisfied with this tool?  Did it work?  Was is easy to apply it? Did it bring up major issues / concerns?  Difficulties?  Proposals to change/substitute with...? What? How?

10. ET3B - 1 st -6 th session of Mag6 For EC deliverable, in original language  Are you satisfied with this tool?  Did it work?  Was is easy to apply it?  Was it useful for you?  Would you add, quit sth? [UAB team used a session diary, too...]

11. ET3C - Individual Progress - 6 th session for children / youth  Are you satisfied with this tool?  Did it work?  Was is easy to apply it? Did it bring up major issues / concerns?  Difficulties?  Proposals to change/substitute with...? What? How?

12. ET3D: Individual Progress 6 th session – for facilitators and NGO/Univ staff  Are you satisfied with this tool?  Did it work?  Was is easy to apply it? Did it bring up major issues / concerns?  Difficulties?  Proposals to change/substitute with...? What? How?

13. Overview of WS2 Deliverables Activity number ACTIVITY Time frame (Month) DELIVERABLEFORMATDeadlineStatus WS2-A1 Development of the evaluation framework and tools M4 - M6 Evaluation framework and tools document doc by UAB15/04/15DONE Evaluate WS1-A3: initial core trainingM5 - M9ET ET2B ET3D Received pending in progress WS2-A2 Group work with Roma young people to identify their issues of concern and to evaluate local participatory initiatives and opportiunities, in order to get an understanding of current challenges/risk factors and protective factors M10 - M12 MAGIC 6 Meeting sheets ET3B* own language pendingin progress WS2-A3 Evaluation of the group work, to assess successes, challenges and the effectiveness of the training to young Roma, including considering the impact on young people's knowledge and understanding. Reflective evaluation at the end of each pilot group session M13 Training evaluation reports pp2-3 by each partner 3pp Evaluation report based on: ET3A ET3B ET3C ET3D pendingin progress

14. Overview of WS2 Deliverables Activity number ACTIVITY Time frame (Month) DELIVERABLEFORMATDeadlineStatus WS2-A4 Evaluation intermediary meeting sharing learning from the project to date to feed into development of the training manual and the advocacy guide M14 Session evaluation reports 2p by each partner 2pp evaluation report Pending (tomorrow) WS2-A5 Research activity- analysing what works in young people's participation, how to plan self - governance actions of young people, and how to overcome the challenges revealed in the inquiry to date M13 - M15 3pp country report 1 synthetic report Electronic/ Online- and print- 50 pp/ 100 To be definedPending WS2-A6 Writing an initial participation & advocacy guide for Roma young people and working papers M13 - M15 A) Initial participation and advocacy guide for Roma young people Electronic documents - 2 papers x 20 pp/ paper 03/16Pending B) Public policy working papers on supporting Roma children’s participation Electronic document- 2x15 pp 03/16 Pending WS2-A7 Embedding this evaluation ethos in the pilot projects of Renewed Action Learning and Change (WS4) M15 A)Country report (content to be defined) Electronic document- 15 pp 03/16 Pending B) Combined research paper at cross country level Electronic- 20 pp03/16 Pending C) Guide to evaluation for pilot projects Electronic - 30 pp03/16 Pending

15. Thanks for your attention