Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Updated sensitivity estimate Suguru Shimizu Osaka University Sep. 1, 2007 JPARC TREK Collaboration meeting at Saskatchewan (1)Statistical error (2)Systematic.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Updated sensitivity estimate Suguru Shimizu Osaka University Sep. 1, 2007 JPARC TREK Collaboration meeting at Saskatchewan (1)Statistical error (2)Systematic."— Presentation transcript:

1 Updated sensitivity estimate Suguru Shimizu Osaka University Sep. 1, 2007 JPARC TREK Collaboration meeting at Saskatchewan (1)Statistical error (2)Systematic error

2 FOM ∝ A T √ N was calculated by this formula (see FIFC and PAC reports). Analyzing power is α=0.38 (at FOM max.) e + energy measurement is not so important. Just accept high energy e + component. Best e + angle threshold is about 0.4 Analyzing power and FOM 0.92 0.96 e+e+ θ y cosθ beam e + energy (MeV) cosθ e + energy (MeV) cosθ e + energy (MeV) e + angle cut is effective to improve FOM, while e + energy measurement is less important.

3 FOM for  0 angle threshold for the  0 fwd/bwd analysis FOM was determined as a function of cos θ π (see FIFC and PAC reports). =0.68 (at FOM max.) π0π0 θ Beam axis cosθπ Summary of FOM study parameters: e + energy, e + angle,  0 angle A T α  =0.38 =0.68 ΔP T =1.2x10 -4 is obtained with 2.4G K  3 events under the best FOM condition (only pi0 fwd/bwd analysis). PT=PT=

4 Systematic error from B field rotation 1mrad. uncertainty of B field  P T = 10 -3   fwd   bwd  P N fwd P N bwd spectrometer Side ViewEnd View P N fwd P N bwd LeftRight LeftRight B π 0 fwd 1+  P N bwd 1   P N fwd/bwd = 1+2  P N ≠1 systematic error Calibration of the polarimeter misalignment using experimental data is very important. B P T fwd P T bwd π 0 fwd 1+  P T bwd 1   P T fwd/bwd = 1+2  P T

5 R comp. Z comp. Asymmetry Rot(  z) misalignment Rot(  r) misalignment Asymmetry Offset is generated from R component of muon spin Systematic error due to misalignments offset Offset is generated from Z component of muon spin R comp. Z comp. beam ideal B

6 R comp. Z comp. Asymmetry Rot(  z) misalignment Rot(  r) misalignment Introduction of  0 (See E06 technical note No.2) T ime integrated e + left/right asymmetry  z sin  0 +  r cos  0 Asymmetry Offset is generated from R component of muon spin Systematic error due to misalignments offset Offset is generated from Z component of muon spin R comp. Z comp. beam ideal B

7 Time integrated asymmetry  0 : the muon spin phase at t=0 In general, e + left/right asymmetry can be described by oscillating terms and constant terms (see E06 technote No.2) K  Black: π 0 fwd Red : π 0 bwd  0 (deg) Oscillation terms can be canceled out by the time integration.  0 is determined event by event.

8 Cancellation mechanism for misalignments Characteristic θ 0 dependence of P T and . K  3 MC, Non-zero P T π 0 fwd π 0 bwd K  3 MC, P T =0, δz=5 deg π 0 fwd π 0 bwd A(  0 )fwd= A(  0 )bwd =  r cos  0  z sin  0 A(  0 )fwd≠ A(  0 )bwd

9 Cancellation mechanism for misalignments Characteristic θ 0 dependence of P T and . K  3 MC, Non-zero P T K  3 MC, P T =0, δz=5 deg A sub A sum A sub A sum =(A fwd +A bwd )/2. = 0 A sub =(A fwd −A bwd )/2. ≠ 0  effect is drastically reduced by A sub. Effect of misalignments are cancelled out by the θ 0 analysis. A sum ≠ 0 A sub = 0

10 Separation of P T and misalignments effect Misalignments are now harmless! A sum =(A fwd +A bwd )/2. A sub =(A fwd −A bwd )/2. Black: no misalignment, non-zero P T Blue: δz=5deg, non-zero P T i/o : No misalignment δ : δz=δr= 5 deg. A sum A sub i/o δ δ  P T (stat)= 1.3 x 10 -4  P T (syst)< 10 -4 with 2.4G K  3 events

11 Estimation of systematic error due to misalignments Misalignments: Assumption in MC is 5 degree Misalignments: Real case is ~mrad. In case of 5 degree,  P T sys = 10 -4 x 5deg. /mrad ~ 10 -2  P T sys = (2±7)x10  4 was obtained in MC The systematic error is expected to be much smaller than 10 -4. If  P T sys ~10  4 in real case, should be compare

12 Summary of  0 fwd/bwd analysis Sensitivity of  0 fwd/bwd analysis: statistical error 1.2x10 -4 systematic error <1.0x10 -4 in total 1.2x10 -4 To improve the sensitivity (1)  0 left/right analysis (2) Can we use high energy 1  detection with veto counter hit events?

13 P T determination for  0 left/right events  0 left/right analysis P L component are also rotated, together with P T. P L component can be removed by comparing  0 left and right events. Beat pattern due to the finite P T can be observed.

14  0 left/right analysis A sub =(A left -A right )/2 is calculated before time integration of  decay time. Large P L component can be removed by this subtraction. Black:  0 left Red:  0 right e + asymmetry Large P L component is seen. A sub =(A left -A right )/2 P T component can be extracted. K  3 MC, Non-zero P T

15  0 left/right analysis A sub =(A left −A right )/2 is fitted with,  cos(  t+  +  )  : fitting parameter  for e + fwd/bwd analysis  /2for e + in/out analysis bwd-fwd bwd+fwd e + asymmetry in  out in+out A sub =(A left −A right )/2. fwd bwd in out Z R e + detection e+e+   black: e + fwd/bwd red:e + in/out dP T = 1.7 x 10 -4 for 2.4G K  3 events


Download ppt "Updated sensitivity estimate Suguru Shimizu Osaka University Sep. 1, 2007 JPARC TREK Collaboration meeting at Saskatchewan (1)Statistical error (2)Systematic."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google