1. Promoting Student Engagement with Classroom Presenter Richard Anderson Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Washington 1/15/20081Design Machine Group Seminar

2. Classroom Presenter Distributed, Tablet PC Application Initial development, 2001-2002 at MSR Continuing development at UW Collaboration with Microsoft CP3 just released Simple application Ink Overlay on images Export PPT to image Real time ink broadcast UI Designed for use during presentation on tablet Presentation features Instructor notes on slides Slide minimization 1/15/20082Design Machine Group Seminar

3. Classroom Presenter as a distributed application Designed as distributed application for distance learning Enables many scenarios Mobility Walking and talking Sharing materials with students Note taking Classroom interaction Student submissions 1/15/20083Design Machine Group Seminar

4. Ink based presentation Tablet PC Inking on images Simple pen based controls Whiteboard, slide extension Multiple views – instructor/display (dual monitor) Multiple slides decks with filmstrip navigation 1/15/20084Design Machine Group Seminar

5. Classroom Presenter 1/15/2008Design Machine Group Seminar5 Instructor ViewPublic Display

6. “Typical ink usage” 1/15/20086Design Machine Group Seminar

7. Draw a picture of something from Seattle 1/15/20087Design Machine Group Seminar

8. Student Attention vs. Time 8 Attention 10 20 30 40 50 60 Time 1/15/20088Design Machine Group Seminar

9. Classroom Presenter 1/15/20089Design Machine Group Seminar

10. Deployment Studies University of Washington Computer Science Algorithms, Data Structures, Software Engineering, Digital Design College of Forestry Environmental Science and Resource Management Classroom set of HP 1100 Tablet PCs Average of one activity based lecture per week Remaining lectures standard slide based lectures One to three students per tablet 1/15/200810Design Machine Group Seminar

11. Key results Successful classroom deployments Regular use throughout term Generally positive evaluation by all participants Effective tool for achieving instructors’ pedagogical goals Lecture – Activity model Alternating lecturing with activities Avg. 4 activities per lecture (50 min. classes) 4 min work time, 2 min discussion time per activity 50% of class time associated with activities 1/15/200811Design Machine Group Seminar

12. Classroom Activities Active Science/Engineering Teaching Information dissemination with activities to support understanding of the material Pedagogical Goals Classroom Activities 1/15/200812Design Machine Group Seminar

13. Discussion Artifact Use student generated example to explore different aspects of a topic Assess overall understanding Diagnose misconceptions 1/15/200813Design Machine Group Seminar

14. Seattle Precipitation and Temperature January December Temperature Daily average, degrees F Use Blue Precipitation inch per month Use Red 0 20 40 60 80 2 4 6 8 1/15/2008 14Design Machine Group Seminar

15. Discovery Activity Have students derive a concept from an example 1/15/200815Design Machine Group Seminar

16. Topological Sort Given a set of tasks with precedence constraints, find a linear order of the tasks Label vertices with integers 1, 2,..., n If v precedes w, then l(v) < l(w) 142143 321 341 370 378 326 322401 421 431 1/15/200816Design Machine Group Seminar

17. Find a topological order for the following graph E F D A C B K J G H I L 1/15/200817Design Machine Group Seminar

18. Collective Brainstorm Generate student ideas for discussion Build a list of ideas Analyze and evaluate responses 1/15/200818Design Machine Group Seminar

19. Special problem: Large Size List at least three problems trees must face (& solve) because of their large sizes. 1. 2. 3. 19 1/15/200819Design Machine Group Seminar

20. Problem Introduction Have students explore an instance of a problem before topic is introduced 1/15/200820Design Machine Group Seminar

21. Determine the LCS of the following strings BARTHOLEMEWSIMPSON KRUSTYTHECLOWN 21 1/15/200821Design Machine Group Seminar

22. Submissions 1/15/200822Design Machine Group Seminar

23. Design discussion Collect student ideas for public display and discussion Note: CP3 allows students to send information to the instructor, the instructor cannot (currently) return these to students 1/15/2008Design Machine Group Seminar23

24. Sketch the layout of an office for teaching assistants to hold office hours 1/15/2008Design Machine Group Seminar24

25. Challenge problems Competition in getting solutions Simultaneous work Submission and discussion 1/15/200825Design Machine Group Seminar

26. Handwriting Recognition: Identify the following words 1/15/200826Design Machine Group Seminar

27. Recognition results 1/15/200827Design Machine Group Seminar

28. Classroom Usage Data from Undergraduate Algorithms course Logged data – timings of submissions Work time – students working independently on activities Discussion time – student work shown on public display Average work time 4:29 Average display time 2:41 Participation Rates Percentage of students present submitting work Min 11%, Max 100%, Average 69% Some students would answer without submitting Resubmission common 1/15/200828Design Machine Group Seminar

29. Collaboration One to three students per tablet Interaction between students often encouraged Instructors would survey and occasionally comment on student work during activity phase Student work a key part of classroom discussion 1/15/200829Design Machine Group Seminar

30. Anonymity Work displayed on public display without any identification Limited information about submission displayed on the instructor machine Anonymous display valued by the students Students often believe the instructor can identify their work Tagging behavior observed 1/15/200830Design Machine Group Seminar

31. Results Comparison with classroom networks Classroom response systems, “clickers” Single display of rich responses versus aggregated, finite responses Support different classroom goals Comparison with paper based activities Most of the activities can be done with paper! Improved logistics with digital system Anonymity Key is ability to incorporate into public display 1/15/200831Design Machine Group Seminar

32. Classroom Presenter 3 3.0 Release – Available now! Website classroompresenter.cs.washington.edu Most significant changes from CP2 Support for TCP/IP networking Improved ink support Direct import of PPT (no need for deckbuilder) For more information contact Richard Anderson, anderson@cs.washington.eduanderson@cs.washington.edu Natalie Linnell, linnell@cs.washington.edulinnell@cs.washington.edu 1/15/200832Design Machine Group Seminar

33. Any questions? For more information, contact Richard Anderson (anderson@cs.washington.edu)anderson@cs.washington.edu http://classroompresenter.cs.washington.edu 1/15/200833Design Machine Group Seminar

34. Acknowledgement This work has been supported by NSF, HP, and Microsoft Research External Research and Programs Classroom Presenter users have provided incredibly important feedback to the project Many people have contributed to the project including Ruth Anderson, Crystal Hoyer, Jonathan Su, K. M. Davis, Craig Prince, Valentin Razmov, Oliver Chung, Julia Schwarz, Fred Videon, Jay Beavers, Jane Prey, Chris Moffatt, Natalie Linnell, Steve Wolfman, Eitan Feinberg, Peter Davis, Beth Simon 1/15/200834Design Machine Group Seminar