1. The Effect of Limb-Length Discrepancy on Gait* by KIT M. SONG, SUZANNE E. HALLIDAY, and DAVID G. LITTLE J Bone Joint Surg Am Volume 79(11):1690-8 November 1, 1997 ©1997 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

2. Fig. 1 Bar graph of the diagnosis, the amount of limb-length discrepancy (LLD), and the distribution of the discrepancy between the femur and the tibia for each patient. KIT M. SONG et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:1690-8 ©1997 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

3. Fig. 2-A Graph of the average kinetic differences between children who used toe-walking as a compensatory strategy and those who walked plantigrade. KIT M. SONG et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:1690-8 ©1997 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

4. Fig. 2-B Graph of the average differences in moments about the knee in the sagittal plane between the two extremities in children who used persistent flexion of the long limb as a compensatory strategy. KIT M. SONG et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:1690-8 ©1997 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

5. Fig. 3 Bar graph of the per cent limb-length discrepancy in children who used toe-walking as a compensatory strategy and in those who walked plantigrade. KIT M. SONG et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:1690-8 ©1997 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

6. Fig. 4 Bar graph showing the relationship between the per cent limb-length discrepancy and the pelvic obliquity for each patient. KIT M. SONG et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:1690-8 ©1997 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.