1. Achieving the Dream Preliminary Assessment of Developmental Strategies Data Team August 13, 2007

2. Many more students tested into college- level or upper-developmental reading

3. And writing.

4. Multiple “views” or results Combined cohorts: 02-04 (through summer 2005) versus 02-06 (fall 2006 – spring 2007).  Pro: Captures three quarters of data during strategy implementation year.  Con: Not enough time in comparison group to account for repeat attempts. First-time, first quarter attempts  Pro: Eliminates repeat attempt issue  Con: Only see one quarter of data each year

5. Combined cohort view

6. First attempt view…MTH 100

7. First attempt view…MTH 102

8. First attempt view…MTH 103

9. First attempt view…RDG 116

10. First attempt view…WRT 115

11. First attempt view…WRT 116

12. Progession Analysis..RDG 116

13. Progession analysis…WRT116

14. Early alerts have increased for developmental courses.

15. And overall, “alerted” students are passing (includes withdrawal in this instance).

16. In both “views” male students did much better.

17. Race results were split

18. Age 23-29 dramatically improved in both views, but traditional age students worsened.

19. Persistence Fall to Winter Rate 02Rate 03Rate 04Rate 05Rate 06 Aggregate67.2%66.9%69.7%65.9%69.1% Male62.5%61.0%67.1%65.1%64.8% Female69.3%70.7%71.6%66.5%71.4% Age 18-2271.1%69.5%72.1%72.8%68.9% Age 23-2956.8%57.7%66.0%46.3%70.4% Age 30 +67.3%68.8%66.7%58.7%68.7% Caucasian68.6%68.4%70.5%66.5%69.8% Af-Amer50.0%44.7%64.5%55.6%43.3% Asian50.0% 100.0%40.0%50.0% Hispanic73.3%37.5%70.0%100.0%80.0% Other47.1%73.5%59.0%69.8%76.6%