1. Florida SUS Board of Governors Campus Master Plan Regulation 6C-21 Workgroup Florida Collaborative Resources Consortium Florida State University/University of Central Florida “Facilitating consensus, developing solutions enabling action”

2. Florida Collaborative Resources Consortium Florida State University/University of Central Florida “Facilitating consensus, developing solutions enabling action” Transportation Element Lessons Learned  Consultant Perspectives  Jason McGlashan – HDR Engineering  1995 UCF Master Plan  Whit Blanton – Renaissance Planning Group  1995 UF Master Plan (Campus Development Agreement)

3. Florida Collaborative Resources Consortium Florida State University/University of Central Florida “Facilitating consensus, developing solutions enabling action” Jason McGlashan

4. Florida Collaborative Resources Consortium Florida State University/University of Central Florida “Facilitating consensus, developing solutions enabling action” Transportation Element  Lessons Learned from 1995 UCF Master Plan  Issues  Projecting Traffic  Establishing the Study Area  Defining the Impact  Methodology not well defined  Comprehensive Plan vs. DRI type of study

5. Florida Collaborative Resources Consortium Florida State University/University of Central Florida “Facilitating consensus, developing solutions enabling action” Traffic Impact Study Primer STEPDETERMINESDATA SOURCES AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT Trip GenerationHow Many? SUS Study, ITE, Existing Counts Facilities are poor variables, Update 1993 SUS Trip Generation, Curriculum Based Trip Distribution Where to/from? Regional Travel Demand Model, Surveys University Trip Purpose, Internal Capture response to program changes Mode ChoiceBy what mode? Survey (ride check) Correlate to parking availability and accessibility AssignmentBy what route? Model, Traffic Counts Reflect internal parking demand

6. Florida Collaborative Resources Consortium Florida State University/University of Central Florida “Facilitating consensus, developing solutions enabling action” Lessons Learned  More data needed to improve forecast accuracy  Data prepared in the Master Plan should be shared with MPO and TPO planning efforts  Standard Regional Models use “special generator” adjustments with standard trip purposes to estimate  Projects and funding priorities are based on inaccurate representation of University needs

7. Florida Collaborative Resources Consortium Florida State University/University of Central Florida “Facilitating consensus, developing solutions enabling action” Whit Blanton

8. Florida Collaborative Resources Consortium Florida State University/University of Central Florida “Facilitating consensus, developing solutions enabling action” Florida SUS Board of Governors Campus Master Plan Regulation 6C-21 Workgroup Questions?