Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCalvin Charles Modified over 8 years ago
1
2010-11 Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011
2
NCLB Trajectory 2010-11 Reading Math Grade 4 82% (76) 81% (74.7%) Grade 880% (73.3%) 79% (72%) Grade 11 84.5% (79.3%) 84.5% (79.3%) GOAL
3
2010-11 FAY Proficiencies by Grade Level
4
2010-11 Reading Comprehension Proficiency Data with ITBS/ITED 4 th Grade 90.0% - highest percentage in past 5 years 90.0% - highest percentage in past 5 years 8 th Grade 83.1% - rose from 75.3% last year 83.1% - rose from 75.3% last year 11 th Grade 83.1% - highest proficiency in past 5 years 83.1% - highest proficiency in past 5 years
5
2010-11 Math Proficiency Data with ITBS/ITED 4 th Grade 90.8% - increased 2%, consistently in this range 90.8% - increased 2%, consistently in this range 8 th Grade 87.7% - increased over 13% 87.7% - increased over 13% 11 th Grade 79.6% - dropped slightly but remains in range of past years proficiency rates 79.6% - dropped slightly but remains in range of past years proficiency rates
6
Sampling of Cohort for Reading Comprehension Reading Comprehension 3 rd grade4 th grade5 th grade6 th grade District 06-0785.2%87.3%87.9%80.7% 07-0885.0%84.5%85.8%73.8% 08-0987.5%84.6%92.5%74.4% 09-1084.1%89.1%84.9%80.5% 10-1190.6%90.2%89.7%79.6%
7
4 th Grade Subgroup Data Shows gaps for low SES are: Reading => 10% Reading => 10% Math => 8.8% Math => 8.8% IEP data: Reading => 59% decreased to 52.2% Reading => 59% decreased to 52.2% Math => 49.9% increased to 60.8% Math => 49.9% increased to 60.8% 8 th Grade data shows gaps for low SES are: Reading = 13% Reading = 13% Math = 11.3% Math = 11.3%
8
8 th Grade Subgroups Data Shows gaps for low SES are: Reading = 13% Reading = 13% Math = 11.3% Math = 11.3% IEP data: Reading => 31.6% increased to 54.2% Reading => 31.6% increased to 54.2% Math => 36.8% increased to 58.3% Math => 36.8% increased to 58.3%
9
11 th Grade Subgroup Data Shows gaps for low SES are: Reading => 16.1% Reading => 16.1% Math => 11.3% Math => 11.3% IEP Data: Reading => 47.1% decreases to 36.8% Reading => 47.1% decreases to 36.8% Math => 29.4% decreases to 21.1% Math => 29.4% decreases to 21.1%
10
No Child Left Behind School in Need of Assistance (SINA) North Scott High School: Math – Missed Low SES North Scott High School: Math – Missed Low SES Reading – Met North Scott Junior High: Math – Met AYP (IEP) North Scott Junior High: Math – Met AYP (IEP) Reading –Met with Safe Harbor (IEP, low SES) Reading –Met with Safe Harbor (IEP, low SES) Ed White Elementary: Reading – Met AYP Ed White Elementary: Reading – Met AYP
11
District MAP Testing - Math Spring 2010-11 13.5 +1.0 13.1 +2.5 9.7 +0.0 6.4 +0.4 3.0 -3.0 1.6 -3.4 2.7 +0.7 12.5 10.6 9.7 6.0 5.9 5.02.0
12
District MAP Testing – Reading Spring 2010-11 7.0 -2.4 5.6 -1.4 5.5 -0.1 3.8 -0.5 6.0 +3.2 -2.2 -5.2 2.6 +0.6 9.37.1 5.6 4.2 3.2 3.0 2.0
14
5 Year Trends – Average ACT Scores
15
2011 Spring BRI Data Grade Level Total # students # students at grade level or above Percent of students meeting goal 120719996.14% 220820096.15% 321721197.14% 423619281.36% 523020589.13% 621518485.58% 723014261.74% 82489638.71% 923114060.61% 1023917673.64%
16
Three Data Points Grade LevelBRIITBS/ITEDMAP 397.24%90.74%93.02% 481.36%90.79%91.67% 589.13%89.47%85.71% 685.58%78.34%85.58% 761.74%85.05%79.57% 838.71%85.90%81.85% 960.61%81.00%66.11% 1073.64%82.53%66.11%
17
Other Factors K-8 Attendance Rate: 96.4% K-8 Attendance Rate: 96.4% Graduation Rate: 90.7% Graduation Rate: 90.7%
18
2010-11 Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.