1. Variation in emergence timing promotes variability in smolting and early male maturation in Yakima River spring Chinook salmon Yes - this is the same title as last year, Molly used the old one since I was late in sending her a new one The talk will be different (I promise) Brian Beckman, Don Larsen, Paul Parkins, Deb Harstad, Dina Spangenberg and Kathy Cooper NOAA Fisheries and SAFS University of Washington

2. 8 10 12 14 16 18 spawn emerge Smolt age 1.5 Jacks age 3 4’s5’s Spring Chinook salmon life cycle: A simple story miniJacks age 2 0-age smolt microJacks (precocious parr) age 1 That is getting more complicated hours of daylight MaySepJanMaySepJanMaySepJanMaySepJanMaySepJanMaySep summer winter

3. Does this variation occur in Yakima River spring Chinook salmon? What is/are mechanism(s) inducing variation? Does this variation occur in the wild? (a thought experiment)

4. 10 years of sampling, >12,000 fish = 2 precocious parr (<0.02%) Why so few microJacks?

5. One of the reasons CESRF is special: (there are many) Seasonal timing for ponding fry

6. Fry are ponded “late” - avoid silting of ponds, smaller size Compress and shift late (incubate at cold temp) CESRF 3 months 3 weeks “normal” distribution of emergence time

7. Experimental Question: What is the effect of emergence timing on life-history decisions? Pond fry at 3 different photoperiods 1 December (early) 15 February (middle) 1 May (late) Experimental approach:

8. feed fry at 3 different rates Low High Satiation (1st half of experiment only) Experimental approach II:

9. 8 10 12 14 16 18 D J F M A M J J A S O N D Hours of daylight Emergence dates Experimental emergence (ponding) times spanned range from aggressive hatchery program to coldest, high elevation sites

10. 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 Emergence and growth of fish varied Thanks to Charlie Strom and CESRF staff for eggs Length (mm) Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul

11. parr freshwatersea water smolts 0% survival 100% survival Monitoring Smolting #1: 24 hr seawater challenge

12. Monitoring Smolting #2: gill Na + K + ATPase

13. Are smolting patterns different?

14. -10 10 30 50 70 90 110 Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul LateEmerge 24 hr SW survival (%) Gill Na + K + ATPase activity Late emerge fish smolt in the spring as yearlings

15. -10 10 30 50 70 90 110 MiddleEmerge Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul 24 hr SW survival (%) Gill Na + K + ATPase activity Middle emerge fish smolt in the spring as yearlings a little something happening

16. Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul 24 hr SW survival (%) Gill Na + K + ATPase activity Smolting in early emerge fish is variable

17. Smolting summary: early emerging fish smolted both in the summer/ autumn (under-yearling) and spring (yearling). middle and late emerging fish smolted in the spring as yearlings.

18. Are male maturation patterns different?

19. Monitor Age-1 (precocious parr) Maturation: milt expression or simple dissection

20. Females % of total fish Gender ratios were similar between treatments and were not different than 50:50 emergence timing early middle late feed rate

21. microJacks (age 1) % of total males emergence timing early middle late The late emergence treatment produced almost no microJacks Lo Hi

22. 0 10 20 30 40 50 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May emergence timing Proportion of microJacks (age 1) varies negatively with emergence timing % of total males middle, SF middle, LF middle, HF late, SF late, LF late, HF early, SF early, LF early, HF

23. emergence timing Lo Hi % of total males Proportion of miniJacks (age 2) varies with treatment

24. If a parr becomes a microJack there was no opportunity for that fish to subsequently become a miniJack parr smolt miniJack microJack  So, need to redo the math: %miniJacks = # miniJacks/(#total males - #microJacks)

25. No difference in % miniJacks among emergence timing => Propensity to mature as a miniJack dependent on growth the previous year No significant differences between emergence times % of males not microJacks

26. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 The overall accounting: Total mature males (micro + mini) is higher in early emerging fish earlymiddlelate Lo Hi % of total males

27. Do these results have any ecological implications?

28. Roza Dam Yakima Ellensburg The Yakima Basin

29. Cle Elum Easton The upper Yakima Basin Teanaway River Cle Elum River A dam no dam

30. Andy Dittman Not a beer a temperature logger Teanaway River Cle Elum River

31. Winter temperature units Differences in water temperature may drive differences in life history measured estimated

32. D J F M A M J J A S O N % microJacks in experiment Cle Elum calculated emergence Teanaway calculated emergence Proportion of microJacks in the Upper Yakima Basin may differ based on differences in temperature 0 10 20 30 40 50

33. Roza Dam Yakima Ellensburg The Yakima Basin What about the lower river?

34. Early life history of Yakima River spring Chinook salmon may be variable Thermal regimes may vary regionally within the Yakima Basin This thermal variation may have significant affects on life history variability One of the primary mechanisms through which thermal affects may modulate life history is variation in emergence timing Conclusions