Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Challenges of working with a traumatic frontal lobe brain injury

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Challenges of working with a traumatic frontal lobe brain injury"— Presentation transcript:

1 Challenges of working with a traumatic frontal lobe brain injury
Bobbie, Caroline, Jason and Jo Jason

2 Content Introduction and definitions Psychological Issues
Brain injury –terms Types of traumatic brain injury Neuroanatomy Frontal lobe – overview Orbitofrontal damage Executive functioning Working memory Baddeley’s working model Deficits in executive functioning Neuropsychological assessments Epidemiology Psychological Issues Interpersonal issues Systemic issues Emotional impact Theories of depression Adjustment Behavioural difficulties Interventions Functional analysis Behavioural approaches Aims of cognitive rehabilitation Organisational issues National policy& guidance Ethical issues Summary Discussion Questions Jason Complexity of traumatic brain injury – psychological, social, financial, behavioural, relational, yadiyadiyada

3 INTRODUCTION & DEFINITIONS
Jason

4 Brain injury Types of injury: Acquired brain injury (ABI) “Damage to the brain, which occurs after birth and is not related to a congenital or a degenerative disease. These impairments may be temporary or permanent and cause partial or functional disability or psychosocial maladjustment .” The World Health Organization (1996) Traumatic brain injury (TBI) “Traumatic brain injury (TBI), a form of acquired brain injury, occurs when a sudden trauma causes damage to the brain. TBI can result when the head suddenly and violently hits an object, or when an object pierces the skull and enters brain tissue.” National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (2012) Difficulties Lack of consistency with definitions Brain injury network (2012) has called for this to be addressed Bobbie There is a lot of varied terminology around brain injury so though we would explain some of the terms that we’ll use during the presentation Acquired Brain injury or ABI Traumatic brain injury (TBI) Confusing terminology, difference in UK and America, in America these are often treated as two separate conditions whereas in the UK a traumatic brain injury is also seen as a type of acquired brain injury. the Brain injury network has called for the inconsistencies to be addressed.

5 Types of Traumatic brain injury
Three types: Concussion: An impact to the head that jars the brain and temporally disrupts its normal functioning Closed head injury: A concussion or head trauma, the symptoms of which include loss of consciousness after the trauma, confusion, headache, nausea or vomiting, blurred vision, loss of short-term memory and perseverating. Contusion: A severe head trauma in which the brain is not just jarred but the impact also causes bruising to the brain. (Davey 2008; p.504) Bobbie So briefly some of the impacts that an injury can have ; Concussion – Closed head injury is a concussion or head trauma where in addition to other symptoms the individual may experience confusion, short term memory difficulties and perseveration. and Contusion -

6 Neuroanatomy Jo

7 Frontal lobe - Overview
Emotional control centre and home to personality Area of brain where damage presents with broadest range of symptoms (Kolb & Milner, 1981) Involved in motor function, spontaneity, problem solving, memory, judgement, language, initiation, social and sexual behaviour and impulse control Damage can affect flexibility of thinking, problem solving, attention and memory even following a ‘good’ recovery from a TBI (Stuss et al., 1985) MRI studies identified frontal as most common region of injury following mild to moderate traumatic brain injury (Levin et al., 1987) Jo

8 Orbitofrontal cortex damage
Area of the brain associated with: regulating planning behaviour sensitivity to reward and punishment ToM sensory integration representing the affective value of reinforcers, and decision making & expectation Destruction of the OFC through acquired brain injury typically leads to a pattern of disinhibited behaviour. Caroline Destruction of the OFC through acquired brain injury typically leads to a pattern of disinhibited behaviour. Examples include swearing excessively, hypersexuality, poor social interaction, compulsive gambling, drug use (including alcohol and tobacco), and poor empathising ability. Disinhibited behaviour by patients with some forms of frontotemporal dementia is thought to be caused by degeneration of the OFC Bechara et al,1994; Kringelbach, 2005; Schore, 2000; Stone, Baron-Cohen, & Knight, 1998; Snowden et al 2001

9 Associated head injury difficulties
Epilepsy Hormonal changes Coma Marital breakdown Loss of self Relating to others Executive functioning (Dysexecutive syndrome) Caroline Here are some general areas of difficulty, some of which we will explore in more detail in this presentation.

10 Executive functioning - Historical
Abnormal cognition and behaviour following the war (Luria, 1966) First documented case Phineas Gage (Harlow, 1848) Costandi, M (2010) Early EF models described it in unitary, homogenous terms with no individual components and generalised to the frontal lobes, “frontal lobe syndrome” (Anderson, Jacobs & Anderson 2008, p. xxviii) Jason Increasing attention has been paid to the concept of EF spanning well over half century after case reports by Luria (1966) on abnormal cognition and behaviour following war injuries. Although, EF type deficits had been reported over a century early, with the most frequently cited example of frontal lobe damage affecting EF being that of Phineas Gage. Whose erratic behaviour and change of personality after a tamping iron penetrated his skull and damaged his frontal cortex, are well documented (Harlow, 1848). The early models of EF described it in unitary, homogenous terms with no individual components and generalised to the frontal lobes, “frontal lobe syndrome (Anderson, Jacobs & Anderson 2008, p. xxviii).

11 Executive functioning - Definition
Limitations of frontal lobe syndrome (Anderson, Jacobs & Anderson 2008, p. xxviii) EF umbrella term describing a range of highly complex and interrelated group of cognitive phenomena such as: attention control, inhibition, working memory, goal setting, planning, problem solving, multi tasking and abstract reasoning (Senn, Espy, & Kaufmann, 2004; Welsh, Pennington, & Groisser, 1991) In order to achieve a goal-directed behaviour (Levin & Hanten, 2005; Lezak, 2004). Critique Agreed upon definitions problematic (Anderson, 2008; p. 6) While initially appealing, the limitations of this standpoint soon became apparent when those working in the field noticed individual patterns of deficits in different patients and that varing areas affected within the frontal lobes did not produce the same behavioural profiles across patients group. This has led the more recent to the view of EF as an umbrella term to describe a range of highly complex interrelated group of cognitive phenomena such as attention control, inhibition, working memory, goal setting, planning, solving, multi tasking and abstract reasoning (Senn, Espy, & Kaufmann, 2004; Welsh, Pennington, & Groisser, 1991) that enable goal-directed behaviour (Levin & Hanten, 2005; Lezak, 2004). E.g going to the shops. Critique - makes an agreed upon definition problematic.

12 Executive functioning – Models
Should be theoretically sound, encompass the various cognitive functions, explain the different presentation of impairments, provide a link between brain and behaviour and be able to suggest assessment methods as well as interventions (Gioia, Guy & Isquith, 2001; p.329). Self Regulation model; the ability to inhibit behavioural responses (Barkley, 1997) Developmental model; how EF profile develops in children (Anderson, 2002). (for brief review of prominent EF models see Anderson 2008). Critique - No one model has been uniformally accepted but, current work is evolving at defining an integrated one see Cascade- of control model (Banich, 2009) Jason This has led to a number of theoretical models being proposed looking at both distinct and overlapping areas that have influenced research and clinical practice. Gioia, Guy & Isquith (2001, p.329) has suggested that to be useful such a model should be theoretically sound, encompass the various cognitive functions, explain the different presentation of impairments, provide a link between brain and behaviour and be able to suggest assessment methods as well as interventions. The differences of the underlying assumptions as well as the rationale for formulating these models, explains both the number and variety available. Some focus on a specific domain like self regulation (Barkley, 1997) while others are adopt a developmental stance (Anderson, 2002). See Anderson (2008) for a review of EF. Critique - There are a number of models proposed as no one model has been uniformally accepted but, current work is evolving at defining an integrated one see Cascade-of control model (Banich, 2009)

13 Working Memory One leading model that addresses Gioia et al (2001) recommendations is the working memory model of Baddeley and Hitch (1974; see also Baddeley 1997 and 2001); Two discrete functions holding information as the focus of attention and the retrieval of information from long term memory (Spillers, & Unsworth, 2011; p, 1532). Jason One leading model that addresses the recommendations laid out by Gioia et al (2001) is working memory model Baddeley and Hitch (1974). Working memory is defined has having two discrete functions; holding information as the focus of attention and the retrieval of information from long term memory (Spillers, & Unsworth, 2011; p, 1532).

14 Baddeley’s working memory model
Central Executive Visuospatial Sketchpad Episodic buffer Phonological loop Visual Episodic Language Semantics LTM Jason In Baddeleys’s (2001) working memory model there are two sub systems that manage this process, one concerned with verbal information, the phonological loop, the other with visual and spatial information, the visuospatial sketch pad. These are in turn managed by an attentional controller, the central executive. The model further includes an additional feature for the central executive namely the episodic buffer; this is argued to form an interface between the two subsystems and long term memory. See model diagram.

15 Deficits in Executive Functioning
TBI can lead to deficits in executive functioning such as working memory, in particularly the central executive of Baddeleys model, where it is argued that the systems impaired are collective known as Dysexecutive syndrome (DES) (Wilson, Alderman,Burgess, Emslie, and Evans 2003; p. 33) DES is used as umbrella term to describe a pattern of deficits in executive functioning such as planning, abstract thinking and behavioural control (Baddeley 1988; p214) Assessment of these deficits are typically conducted using performance based neuropsychological tests (Gerstadt, Hong, & Diamond,1994) Critique ecological validity of such tests has been questioned because the tests are highly structured, administered in a distraction-free environment, and in some instances, provide cues on how to respond (Goldbery & Podell, 2000) Jason TBI can lead to deficits in executive functioning and namely baddeleys theory of working memory and in particularly the central executive of his model are argued as the systems impaired in what is known as Dysexecutive syndrome. DES is used as umbrella term to describe a pattern of deficits in executive functioning such as planning, abstract thinking and behavioural control. Dysexecutive syndrome based on Baddeleys hypothetical construct of a central executive, (Wilson, Evans, Emslie, Alderman & Burgess; p214) Goldberg, E., & Podell, L. (2000). Adaptive decision making, ecological validity, and the frontal lobes. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22, 56–68.

16 Neuropsychological assessments
Two test that address these criticism are the Behavioural assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (Wilson, Alderman, Burgess, Emslie, & Evans 1996) Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System both of which use a battery of test to identify specific executive functioning deficits (D-KEFS, Delis, Kaplan & Krammer, 2001) The BADS (1996) is designed to require participants to plan, initiate, monitor and adjust behaviour in response to the explicit and implicit demands of a series of tasks using six test, such as the zoo map which test the ability to plan while following a set of rules. It also contains the 20 item dysexecutive questionnaire which lists statements common problems of everyday life and to rate them according to their personal experience (Wilson, Alderman,Burgess, Emslie, and Evans 2003; p. 33). While the D-KEFS (2001) aims for a similar goal in both children and adults but using nine tests. It is also able to be utilised in different clinical populations from TBI like multiple sclerosis (Parmenter et al, 2007) Jason Two test that address these criticism are the Behavioural assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System both of which use a battery of test to identify specific executive functioning deficits The BADS (1996) is designed to require participants to plan, initiate, monitor and adjust behaviour in response to the explicit and implicit demands of a series of tasks using six test, such as the zoo map which test the ability to plan while following a set of rules. It also contains the 20 item dysexecutive questionnaire which lists statements common problems of everyday life and to rate them according to their personal experience While the D-KEFS (2001) aims for a similar goal in both children and adults but using nine tests. It is also able to be utilised in different clinical populations from TBI like multiple sclerosis

17 ? Epidemiology No FL damage statistics found
Hospital Episode statistics for 2000/2001 112,978 admissions to hospitals in England with a primary diagnosis of head injury. 75% were male 33% were children NICE, (2007) 70-88% of people who sustain a head injury are male 10-19% are aged ≥ 65 years ? Bobbie Triage - assessment - investigation and early management of head injury in infants, children and adults, NICE Clinical Guideline (September 2007).

18 PSYCHOLOGICAL ISSUES Team

19 Interpersonal issues Difficulties with empathy, perspective taking and cognitive flexibility (Grattan, 1994) Theories of interpersonal relationships Attachment theory Social exchange theory (Homans, 1958) Human relationships formed by use of cost-benefit analysis & the comparison of alternatives (Although some critique re. basis in economic theory; based on openness which not relevant to all & places relationships in linear structure rather than flexible in path followed – Miller, 2005) Uncertainty reduction theory (Berger and Calabrese, 1975) Individuals seek to reduce uncertainty with each other when first interacting, based on self-disclosure Critics discuss driving force of interaction is desire of positive relational experiences (e.g. Sunnafrank, 1986) Jo

20 Interpersonal issues All discuss in some form a sense of giving and receiving of emotional and/or cognitive information Empathy positively associated with relationship satisfaction, negatively associated with depression and conflict; depression and conflict negatively associated with relationship satisfaction (Cramer, 2010) Cognitive flexibility positively related to interpersonal effectiveness (Adler, Rosenfold & Proctor, 2007) Jo

21 Systemic issues Neighbours/society Colleagues Extended family Parents
Partner Children Friends Jo References etc. to be added Employer Healthcare/social professionals

22 Emotional issues Major depressive disorder (MDD) may be the most common and disabling psychiatric condition in individuals with TBI Poorer cognitive functioning, aggression and anxiety, greater functional disability, poorer recovery, higher rates of suicide attempts, and greater health care costs associated with MDD after TBI (Bombardier et al., 2010) Incidence of major depression among 559 people with traumatic brain injury was nearly eight times greater than would be expected in the general population "less than half of the people who were found to have major depression received any treatment during the first year“ (Fann et al., 2010) Treating depression can be effective and can decrease functional impairment, somatic symptoms, and perception of impairment (Varney et al., 1987) Jo

23 Theories of depression
Learned helplessness theory: Clinical depression may result from perceived absence of control over a situation’s outcome (Seligman, 1975) When suffering uncontrollable events, can impact on emotions, aggressions, physiology and problem-solving tasks (Roth, 1980) Critique Does not account for varying reactions to same situations (Peterson & Park, 1998) Jo

24 Emotional Impact “Coping refers to the persons’ cognitive and behavioural efforts to manage (reduce, minimise, master or tolerate) the internal and external demands of the person-environment transaction that is appraised as taxing or exceeding the person’s resources.” Folkman, Lazarus, Gruen & DeLongis (1986, pg. 572) Direct result of the structural lesion Psychological reaction to the lesion (Brown et al, 1988) Somatising Evidence for both Caroline

25 Adjustment Adjustment disorders
Many patients suffer poor psychosocial adjustment and experience a reduced quality of life Wolters et al. (2010) Effectiveness of psychotherapy and adjustment Ratzel-kurzdorfer, Franke & Wolfersdorf (2003) Strain & Newcorn (2006) Caroline

26 Behavioural difficulties associated with frontal lobe injury impact
Challenging behaviour CAROLINE Caroline Effects of Injury Site of damage Extent of damage Emotional reaction to injury Epilepsy Environmental Factors Interpersonal relationships (staff, family, friends) Occupation / Leisure Litigation

27 INTERVENTIONS Team

28 Functional analysis “challenging behaviours exhibited by those with ABI are significant obstacles to achieving successful rehabilitative outcomes.” “the neurorehabilitation field has been slow to embrace the practice of functional analyses” Rahman, Oliver & Alderman(2010, pg ) Rahman et al (2010) 9 ABI survivors with challenging Behaviours method - descriptive functional analysis. Found – all participants exhibited at least one behaviour which was socially reinforced. - Functional analysis was a useful assessment intervention Recommended - Assessment using functional analysis in the field of neurorehabilitation. Critique - There were a variety of injury types and frontal lobe damage was not specified. Clinical interventions based on functional assessments are still limited. (Ager & O’May, 2001) Bobbie Challenging behaviours described were physical and verbal aggression, self injury, agitation and sexually inappropriate behaviours. Descriptive functional analysis – assessment of environmental conditions that precipitate Challenging behaviours Social , perceptual and material stimuli that reinforce them 152 hours of observation across all participants. Functional implications of CB can be appraised. “what purpose does the b serve?” “does it fulfil a communicative role ?” “how is it reinforced?” Attention maintaining function in 13 cases, 5 participants presented challenging behaviours with multiple functions.

29 Behavioural approaches
Behavioural treatment models have been successfully applied for ABI (Corrigan & Bach, 2005) Rahman et al (2010) “such behaviours can be decreased and managed by adopting treatment approaches based on operant conditioning.” any combination of 3 reinforcers motivate challenging behaviours (Carr,1977) Social positive reinforcement. Social attention, or tangible items /activities given in response to behaviours (Kodak, Northup and Kelley, 2007) Social-negative reinforcement Behaviours which serve to remove postpone or reduce aspects e.g not needing to do tasks or engage in social contacts (Iwata, Pace, Kalsher, Cowdery, & Cataldo,1990 ) Automatic reinforcement non environmental BUT internal e.g.Pain attenuation (Sandman & Hetrick, 1995) Experimental functional analysis – systematic manipulation of environmental controls to identify which bring about a change in behaviour. (Rahman et al , 2010) Bobbie Corrigan and Bach …… Following on from their work on functional analysis Rahman et al also suggested that behavioural approaches are used in working with ABI patients who exhibit challenging behaviours that are assessed as functional. Operant conditioning association between behaviour and consequence. They based their recommendations on the work of Carr

30 Aims of cognitive rehabilitation
Teaching the patient and family to adapt their lifestyle Taking into account the severity of cognitive and behavioural problems Patient being stimulated to learn new skills and compensatory strategies To return to activities of daily life and participate in society Wilson (2000) Caroline

31 Cognitive Rehabilitation - an approach
Parente (in Shaughnessy & Beyer, 2010) An American approach for working with patients with brain injury, incorporates therapy group and individual work. Focusses on topics identified as problematic by the client and family Examples – Memory training - devices – mobile phones, digital recorders , planners and checklists Disinhibition and hostility – family & patient learning to defuse situations, cue words. Emotional dysregulation & Impulse control – Medication, making client aware of issue, looking at scenarios and possible responses. Awareness of normative social behaviour – teach techniques, pair work, video recordings. Other focusses Loss of hope Co-occuring PTSD Shame and embarrassment (around social behaviour) Caroline Shaughnessy and Beyer interviewed Parente who runs groups in America for people with Head injury and their families and has written numerous articles and a book on the topic. Cue words – words that are known to the patient and family members and if situation is becoming hostile then one person will say the word and this triggers an agreement to leave the room and spend a period of time apart.

32 Organisational Local issues – referrals into neuropsychological services Head injury and PTSD? Who treats them? NHS vs private, increasing pressure to meet targets and prove effectiveness in outcome measures, impact on actual treatment received? Increase in traumatic brain injuries in veterans returning from war America, rehab, v pricey Who provides rehabilitation? JO AND CAROLINE Caroline

33 Organisational NICE guidelines, - Only for Triage, Assessment, Investigation and early management of head injury. Does not address the rehabilitation or long-term care of patients with a head injury (NICE 2007). There was an action plan of services for Acquired brain injury In Northern Ireland in 2009 The plan suggested amongst other suggestions; Making the services more Joined up Standardised care pathway including targets around waiting times improving information around prevalence to plan future service provision Recognising the importance of family support & importance of promoting independence Support education and training of staff . Between 2009/10 and 2011/12 and additional £1.2 million was invested in implementing these changes No equivalent yet in England and Wales British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine - called for a joint framework between employment , social services , and independent/voluntary providers to guide brain injury services (British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine 2008; p. 3) Bobbie Nice guideline that exists is for infants, children and adults NICE guideline that does exist - When a person who has undergone imaging of the head and/or been admitted to hospital experiences persisting problems, there should be an opportunity available for referral from primary care to an outpatient appointment with a professional trained in assessment and management of sequelae of brain injury (for example, clinical psychologist, neurologist, neurosurgeon, specialist in rehabilitation medicine). An investigation of brain injury services was carried out in Northern Ireland in 2009 which showed….. As far as we could ascertain there is no equivalent for England and Wales Services are disjointed and the current provision a patient receives argueably depends on - underlying cause of the condition - complexity and severity - age of the individual - existing comorbidities social and geographical factors This has been recognised by a number of charities and pressure groups and the British society has called for ….

34 Organisational National Audit Office ( 2011)Report Almost £1billion wasted through people with neurological conditions being unnecessarily admitted to hospital. The MS Society, Motor Neurone Disease (MND) Association, Parkinson’s UK Neurological Alliance, Neurological Commissioning Support – urging Government to create a targeted, properly resourced national strategy for neurological conditions which would include acquired brain injury. Bobbie This is further supported by a report carried out by the NAO in 2011… And the following charities and groups have urged the government to create a …

35 Issues of ethics and capacity
Communication problems Informed consent Family issues DNA policy – appropriate for FL patients (Spontaneity, impulse control, disinhibited behaviour etc.) Clinical responsibility / Organisational Which services are best to deal with traumatic brain injury and in particular support with the challenging behaviour? Compensation claims Bobbie In terms of ethical issues we were aware of the communication difficulties and abilitiy to express their needs that can be experienced by clients with frontal lobe damage and the potential difficulties that could arise from this in terms of gaining informed consent. Difficulties in relationships with family could mean that the clients permisssion to share information with their family could be changeable and this needs to be monitored by staff. We thought about appointments and how usual policy is to discharge a client after a number of unattended appointments . Given that these clients are likely to experience difficulties around spontaneity, impulse control and disinhibited behaviour we felt that there could easily be situations that arose unexpectedly and resulted in non attendance at appointments. With the current arrangement of services there is a lack of clarity around where particular responsibilities lye and if this is confusing for services the difficulties for those attempting to access services is apparent. When patients sustain head injurys this may lead to legal proceedings and compensation claims which can be a complicating factor in assessing and working with them as we may be asked to participate in the legal process. Social care needs

36 Ethical issues Sexual difficulties – under acknowledged, lack of information Study by Rolls, Honack, Wade and McGrath (1994) Problematic sexual behaviour in patients with FL - sexually explicit language, - actual sexual advances - being over friendly, kissing and hugging - exposure Difficulties for the patient and partner Headway (charity) Patient information leaflets mention sexual difficulties (? Psychological ) – suggests; - sexual counselling from e.g. Relate - a clinical neuropsychologist who specialises in sexual relationships Bobbie Psychological – arising from changes in role, status, becoming cared for , self esteem issues, possible relationship problems Orbital frontal lobe damage – peculiar sexual habits It was difficult to find information around this . FOR INFO ONLY How it works Limbic system – Thalmus is the 1st point of contact for incoming info Info passes through the limbic system to the hypothalamus (hypothalamus decides what is important) one of the roles of the hypothalamus is sex drive. When it is working properly it screams “have sex now” That information is sent to the frontal lobe for filtering e.g the suggestions “lets find an opportunity” When there is frontal lobe damage , may be filtered out so having sex is not prioritised OR Filtering system does not work.

37 Summary Introduction and definitions Psychological Issues
Brain injury –terms Types of traumatic brain injury Neuroanatomy Frontal lobe – overview Orbitofrontal damage Executive functioning Working memory Baddeley’s working model Deficits in executive functioning Neuropsychological assessments Epidemiology Psychological Issues Interpersonal issues Systemic issues Emotional impact incl. theories of depression Adjustment Behavioural difficulties Interventions Functional analysis Behavioural approaches Aims of cognitive rehabilitation Organisational issues National policy & guidance Ethical issues Jo

38 Discussion Think about the experience and knowledge you have of working with services offering neuropsychological assessment, formulation and intervention Imagine you are a qualified psychologist working in this field. Based on the above, complete a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) analysis of factors you think are likely to be experienced by psychologists in this area Jo

39 Environment Discussion Political Economic Social Technological Legal
Additional areas for consideration: Political Economic Social Technological Legal Environment Jo

40 Questions Team

41 References Adler, R.B., Rosenfold, L.B. & Proctor, R.F. (2007) Interplay: The process of interpersonal communication, 10th Ed., Oxford University Press: New York. Ager, A., & O’May, F. (2001). Issues in the definition and implementation of “best practice” for staff delivery of interventions for challenging behaviour. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 26, 243–256. Anderson, P. (2002). Assessment and development of executive function (EF) during childhood. Child Neuropsychology, 8(2), Anderson P.J. (2008). Models of executive function. In V Anderson, Jacobs R, Anderson PJ. Executive functions and the frontal lobes: A lifespan perspective. New York: Taylor & Francis. pp. 3–21. Baddeley, A. (1997). Human Memory: Theory and practice, revised edn, Psychology Press: Hove. Baddeley A.D. (2002) Is working memory still working? American Psychologist; 56 (11), Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–90). New York: Academic Press. Baddeley, A., & Wilson, B. (1988). Frontal amnesia and the dysexecutive syndrome. Brain and Cognition, 7, Banich, M.T. (2009). Executive function the search for an integrated account. Current directions in Psychological Science18, (2), Barkley, R.A. Behavioural inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121, (1),

42 References Bechara, A., Damasio, A.R., Damasio H., & Anderson, S.W. (1994) "Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex". Cognition 50: 7-15. Bombardier, C. .H., Fann, J. R., Temkin, N. .R., Esselman, P. C., Barber, J. & Dikmen, S. S. (2010). Rates of Major Depressive Disorder and Clinical Outcomes Following Traumatic Brain Injury. JAMA, 303 (19): Brain Injury network, (2012 ) who are we , retrieved from on 13/01/2012 British Society for Rehabilitation Medicine (2008). Vocational assessment and rehabilitation after acquired brain injury inter-agency guidelines. Retrieved from Costandi, M. (2010, November 8). Phineas Gage and the effect of an iron bar through the head on personality. The Guardian. Retrieved from Davey, G. (2008) Psychopathology Research, Assessment and Treatment In Clinical Psychology. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. Delis, D. C., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. (2001). Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation. Folkman, S. Lazarus, R. S., Gruen, R. J. & DeLongis, A. (1986) Appraisal, coping, health status and psychological symptoms Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, Gerstadt, C. L., Hong, Y. J., & Diamond, A. (1994). The relationship between cognition and action: Performance of children 3[1/2]–7 years old on Stroop-like day–night test. Cognition, 53, 129–153. Goldberg, E., & Podell, L. (2000). Adaptive decision making, ecological validity, and the frontal lobes. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22, 56–68.

43 References Gioia, G.A., Guy, S.C., Isquith, P.K. (2001), Assessment of Executive Functions in Children with Neurologic Impairment. In G.A. Gioia, S.C. Guy, & P.K. Isquith (Eds.), Psychological and Development Assessment, (pp ). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Guess, D., & Carr, E. (1991). Emergence and maintenance of stereotypy and self-injury.American Journal on Mental Retardation, 96, 299– 319. Headway (2012) sex and sexuality after brain injury, retrieved from on 13/01/2012 Harlow, J. (1848). The passage of an iron rod through the head. Boston medical and surgical journal, 39, Retrieved from Hospital Episode statistics 2000 – 2001 retrieved from , January 2012 Kringelbach, M.L. (2005) The orbitofrontal cortex: linking reward to hedonic experience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6: Iwata, B. A., Pace, G. M., Kalsher, M. J., Cowdery, G. E., & Cataldo, M. F. (1990). Experimental analysis and extinction of self-injurious escape behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 11–27. Kodak, T., Northup, J., & Kelley, M. E. (2007). An evaluation of the types of attention that maintain problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 167–171. Kolb, B., & Milner, B. (1981). Performance of complex arm and facial movements after focal brain lesions. Neuropsychologia, 19: Lovaas, I., Newsom, C., & Hickman, C. (1987). Self–stimulatory behavior and perceptual reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 45–68. Carr, E. G. (1977). Motivation of self-injurious behavior: A review of some hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 800–816. Levin et al. (1987). Magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography in relation to the neurobehavioral sequelae of mild and moderate head injuries. Journal of Neurosurgery, 66,

44 References Levin, H.S., Culhane, K.A., Hartmann, J., Evankovich, K., Mattson, A.J., Howard, H., et al. (1991). Developmental changes in performance on tests of purported frontal lobe functioning. Developmental Neuropsychology, 7(3), Lezak, M.D. (2004). Neuropsychological Assessment. New York: Oxford University Press. Luria, A.R. (1966). Higher cortical functions in man. New York: Basic Books. National Audit Office (December 2011) services for people with neurological conditions, The stationary office: London. National Institute of Neurological disorders and stroke (2012 ) Traumatic Brain Injury Information Page retrieved from on 13/01/12 Parementer, B.A., Zivadinov, R., Kerenyi, L., Gavett, R., Weinstock-Guttman, B., Dwyer, M.G., Garg, N., Munchauer, F., & Benedict, R. (2007). Validity of the Wisconsin Card sorting and Delis –Kaplan Executive functioning system (D-KEFS) sorting tests in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical Experimental Neuropsychology, 29, (2), Rahman,B., Oliver,C.& Alderman,N.(2010) Descriptive analysis of challenging behaviours shown by adults with acquired brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation,20 (2), 212–238 Repp, A. C., Felce, D., & Barton, L. E. (1988). Basing the treatment of stereotypic and selfinjurious behaviors on hypotheses of their causes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 281–289. Sandman, C. A., & Hetrick, W. P. (1995). Opiate mechanisms in self-injury. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 1, 130–136. Senn, T. E., Espy, K. A., & Kaufmann, P. M. (2004). Using path analysis to understand executive function organisation in preschool children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 26, 445–464. Shaughnessy,M.F.& Beyer,J.(2010) An interview with Rick Parente:head injury and brain trauma, N.American journal of psychology, Vol.12, No 2, Schore A.N., (2000) Attachment & the Regulation of the Right BrainAttachment & human Development 2(1) Snowden, J. S.; Bathgate, D.; Varma, A.; Blackshaw, A.; Gibbons, Z. C. & Neary. D. (2001) Distinct behavioural profiles in frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia. Journal of Neurological Neurosurgical Psychiatry 70:

45 References Spillers, G.J., & N. Unsworth. (2011). Variation in Working Memory Capacity and Temporal–Contextual Retrieval From Episodic Memory. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 37, (6), DOI: /a Stone, V.E.; Baron-Cohen, S. & Knight, R. T. (1998a) "Frontal Lobe Contributions to Theory of Mind." Journal of Medical Investigation 10: Stuss, D. et al. (1985). Subtle neuropsychological deficits in patients with good recovery after closed head injury. Neurosurgery, 17, Wilson, B. A., Alderman, N., Burgess, P. W., Emslie, H., & Evans, J. J. (1996). Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome. London: Harcourt Assessment. Wilson, B.A., Alderman, N., Burgess, P.W., Emslie, H., and Evans J.J. (2003). Behavioural assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS). Journal of Occupational Psychology Employment and Disability, 5 (2), Wolters, G., Stapert, S., Brands, I. & Van Heugten, C. (2010) Coping styles in relation to cognitive rehabilitation and quality of life after brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 20(4), World health organisation (1996) Geneva Fann JR, Katon WJ, Uomoto JM. (1995) Psychiatric disorders and functional disability in outpatients with traumatic brain injuries. Am J Psychiatry, 152: Varney, N.R, Martzke, J.S, & Roberts R.J. (1987) Major depression in patients with closed head injury. Neuropsychology, 1(7), 9.

46 Further reading National Policy and guidance
Brain Injury Association of America National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Brain Injury Association of Canada Brain Injury Association of Queensland Australia Headway - the brain injury association Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences Ontario Brain Injury Association NICE guidelines, but only for Triage, assessment, investigation and early management of head injury in infants, children and adults Head injury (CG56 It does not address the rehabilitation or long-term care of patients with a head injury Rehabilitation following acquired brain injury National clinical guidelines - by Royal College of physicians Included recommendation for clinical psychology provision! per of population (pg18) More British ones – found at Headway


Download ppt "Challenges of working with a traumatic frontal lobe brain injury"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google