Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Anisotropic RHIC Hiroshi Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba Feb./11/2007 RHIC 高エネルギー原子核反応の物理研究会、 RHIC 現象論松本合宿.

Published byCurtis Moore Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "1 Anisotropic RHIC Hiroshi Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba Feb./11/2007 RHIC 高エネルギー原子核反応の物理研究会、 RHIC 現象論松本合宿."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Anisotropic Flow @ RHIC Hiroshi Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba Feb./11/2007 RHIC 高エネルギー原子核反応の物理研究会、 RHIC 現象論松本合宿

2 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 2 Outline IntroductionIntroduction –Anisotropic flow, eccentricity ResultsResults –Several scaling relations have been observed especially for elliptic flow Eccentricity scaling Scaling of higher order anisotropy m T and NCQ scaling of elliptic flow SummarySummary

3 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 3 Definition & Terminology

4 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 4 Anisotropic Flow What ?What ? –Azimuthally anisotropic emission of particles with respect to the reaction plane Why ?Why ? –The probe for early time –Driven by initial eccentricity of overlap zone Re-interactions among the particles (pressure gradient) –Initial eccentricity --> Final momentum anisotropy Reaction plane X Z Y PxPx PyPy PzPz

5 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 5 Observables Particle azimuthal distributions by Fourier expansionParticle azimuthal distributions by Fourier expansion –Odd harmonics (v 1, v 3, …) vanish at mid-rapidity in symmetric collision v 2 = “Elliptic Flow”v 2 = “Elliptic Flow” S. Voloshin and Y. Zhang, Z. Phys. C70, 665 (1996) A. M. Poskanzer and S. A. Voloshin, Phys. Rev. C58, 1671 (1998)

6 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 6 Methods Event plane methodMulti-particle correlation Advantage & disadvantage Assume all correlations are flow (ii) Easy to implement for identified hadrons (iii) Need to determine event plane (i) Reduce non-flow contribution by higher order correlation (ii) No event plane (iii) Larger statistical error Stat. / Sys. error and non-flow effects Typically, order of stat. error is same as k=1 in right eq. Di-jet contributions can be removed by rapidity gap Stat. (sys.) error increase (decrease) for higher order correlation References J.-Y. Ollitrault, Phys. Rev. D48, 1132 (1993) A. M. Poskanzer and S. A. Voloshin, Phys. Rev. C58, 1671 (1998) N. Borghini, P. M. Dinh, J.-Y. Ollitrault, Phys. Rev. C63, 054906 (2000); Phys. Rev. C64, 054901 (2001) R. S. Bhalerao, N. Borghini, J.-Y. Ollitrault, Nucl. Phys. A727, 373 (2003); Phys. Lett. B580, 157 (2004) Two main types of methods

7 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 7 Event plane method Brackets denote average over all events and all particles,  k n is “event plane resolution”Brackets denote average over all events and all particles,  k n is “event plane resolution” w (weight) is chosen to maximize the event plane resolution (ex. p T, multiplicity etc)w (weight) is chosen to maximize the event plane resolution (ex. p T, multiplicity etc) –The best weight is v n itself 

8 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 8 Event plane @ PHENIX Event plane determination @ Beam-Beam Counter (BBC), |  | ~ 3 - 4Event plane determination @ Beam-Beam Counter (BBC), |  | ~ 3 - 4 Large rapidity gap between measured particles (  ~ 0) and event plane  Reduce non-flow effectsLarge rapidity gap between measured particles (  ~ 0) and event plane  Reduce non-flow effects –di-jet contribution is negligible (nucl-ex/0609009)

9 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 9 Multi-particle correlation Non-flow effects contribute orderNon-flow effects contribute order –1/N in 2-particle correlation –1/N 3 in 4-particle correlation 2-particle correlation 4-particle correlation

10 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 10 Terminology  std : standard eccentricity  std : standard eccentricity –Spatial anisotropy in coordinate space  part  : Participant eccentricity  part  : Participant eccentricity –Effect from the fluctuations in the positions of participant nucleons v 2 {EP 2 } : v 2 with respect to the 2 nd harmonic Event Planev 2 {EP 2 } : v 2 with respect to the 2 nd harmonic Event Plane –v 2 {BBC} : v 2 {EP 2 } by BBC in PHENIX –v 2 {FTPC} : v 2 {EP 2 } by Forward-TPC in STAR –v 2 {EP}(AA-pp) : Modified event plane method v 2 {n} : v 2 from n-th particle cumulantsv 2 {n} : v 2 from n-th particle cumulants v 4 {n} : v 4 from n-th particle cumulantsv 4 {n} : v 4 from n-th particle cumulants

11 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 11 Eccentricity : definition Participant eccentricity in a given event is defined by the axes (x’, y’)Participant eccentricity in a given event is defined by the axes (x’, y’) –  …  denote average over all participant nucleons and events in the same impact parameter –{…} denote the average over all participants in one collision event

12 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 12 Eccentricity vs centrality Fluctuations lead significant increase of eccentricity at most central and peripheralFluctuations lead significant increase of eccentricity at most central and peripheral

13 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 13 Results (i) non-identified hadrons

14 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 14 Integrated v 2 ~ 50 % increase from SPS to RHIC~ 50 % increase from SPS to RHIC Hadron cascade underestimate the magnitude of v 2 at RHICHadron cascade underestimate the magnitude of v 2 at RHIC –Due to the small transverse pressure in early times FOPI : Phys. Lett. B612, 713 (2005). E895 : Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1295 (1999) CERES : Nucl. Phys. A698, 253c (2002). NA49 : Phys. Rev. C68, 034903 (2003) STAR : Nucl. Phys. A715, 45c, (2003). PHENIX : Preliminary. PHOBOS : nucl-ex/0610037 (2006) QM2005, H. Masui RQMD

15 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 15 Eccentricity scaling (i) Assume  = k  v 2Assume  = k  v 2 A Glauber model estimate of  givesA Glauber model estimate of  gives –k = 3.1  0.2 v 2 scales with  and the scaled v 2 values are independent of the system sizev 2 scales with  and the scaled v 2 values are independent of the system size  Scale invariance of ideal hydrodynamics  Scale invariance of ideal hydrodynamics nucl-ex/0608033

16 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 16 Eccentricity scaling (ii) Scaling of v 2 /  part  in Cu+Cu and Au+AuScaling of v 2 /  part  in Cu+Cu and Au+Au Participant eccentricity is relevant geometric quantity for generating elliptic flowParticipant eccentricity is relevant geometric quantity for generating elliptic flow PRL: nucl-ex/0610037 PRC C72, 051901R (2005) PHOBOS Collaboration PRL: nucl-ex/0610037 Cu+Cu 200 GeV Au+Au 200 GeV Statistical errors only

17 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 17 Eccentricity scaling (iii) Linear increase from SPS to RHICLinear increase from SPS to RHIC Eccentricity scaling of v 2 reach hydro limit at most centralEccentricity scaling of v 2 reach hydro limit at most central QM2006, R. NouicerQM2006, S. A. Voloshin

18 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 18 Differential v 2, v 2 (p T ) : PHENIX vs STAR (Au+Au) Non-flow effects are under controlNon-flow effects are under control –v 2 {4}  v 2 {BBC} ~ v 2 {FTPC} < v 2 {2} Similar acceptance : BBC, FTPC QM2006, S. A. Voloshin STAR : Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 252301 (2004) PHENIX : Preliminary

19 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 19 v 2 (p T ) in Cu+Cu Larger non-flow effects in smaller systemLarger non-flow effects in smaller system –Dominant non-flow is ~ O(1/N) PHENIX STAR preliminary (QM06, S. A. Voloshin) v 2 {2} v 2 {FTPC} PHENIX : nucl-ex/0608033

20 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 20 Higher order Non-zero v 4 at RHICNon-zero v 4 at RHIC –v 4 ~ (v 2 ) 2 (Ollitrault) v 4 /(v 2 ) 2 is a probe of ideal hydro behaviorv 4 /(v 2 ) 2 is a probe of ideal hydro behavior –N. Borghini and J.-Y. Ollitrault, Phys. Lett. B642, 227 (2006) QM06, Y. Bai QM05, H. Masui STAR preliminary |  | < 1.3

21 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 21 v 4 /(v 2 ) 2 vs p T Experimentally, v 4 /(v 2 ) 2 ~ 1.2 - 1.5Experimentally, v 4 /(v 2 ) 2 ~ 1.2 - 1.5 –Ideal hydro prediction v 4 /(v 2 ) 2 = 0.5 Maximum non-flow contributionMaximum non-flow contribution Star Preliminary

22 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 22 Summary (i) The magnitude of v 2 is as large as that from perfect fluid hydrodynamics at RHICThe magnitude of v 2 is as large as that from perfect fluid hydrodynamics at RHIC –50 % increase from SPS –Hadron cascade cannot reprduce the magnitude of v 2 Eccentricity scalingEccentricity scaling –Consistent description of Au+Au and Cu+Cu v 2 systematics by participant eccentricity –Different conclusion from different experiments Non-flow effects are under control viaNon-flow effects are under control via –Large rapidity gap (PHENIX, STAR) –Multi-particle correlation (STAR) Higher order, v 4Higher order, v 4 –Non-zero v 4 is observed –v 4 /(v 2 ) 2 ~ 1 > 0.5 but systematic error is huge at high p T

23 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 23 Results (ii) identified hadrons

24 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 24 “m T scaling” of v 2 v 2 {BBC} for identified hadronsv 2 {BBC} for identified hadrons At low p T, m T scaling of v 2At low p T, m T scaling of v 2 –Radial flow leads mass ordering of v 2 Meson-Baryon grouping at intermediate p TMeson-Baryon grouping at intermediate p T –Quark coalescence, recombination

25 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 25 NCQ scaling of v 2 NCQ scaling indicate the collective flow evolves in quark levelNCQ scaling indicate the collective flow evolves in quark level Number of Constituent Quark scaling by quark coalescence / recombination modelNumber of Constituent Quark scaling by quark coalescence / recombination model AssumptionAssumption –Exponential p T spectra –Narrow momentum spread (  - function) –Common v 2 for light quarks (u, d, s) R. J. Fries, et., al, Phys. Rev. C68, 044902 (2003) V. Greco, et., al, Phys. Rev. C68, 034904 (2003)

26 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 26 Multi-strange hadrons Why ?Why ? –  and  are less affected by hadronic interactions –Hadronic interactions at a later stage do not produce enough v 2 Y. Liu et., al, J. Phys. G32, 1121 (2006) J. H. Chen et., al, Phys. Rev. C74, 064902 (2006)

27 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 27 QM06, A. Taranenko STAR preliminary 200 GeV Au+Au SQM06, M. Oldenburg Multi-strange hadrons  meson v2 is more consistent with meson v 2 than baryon v 2  meson v2 is more consistent with meson v 2 than baryon v 2 Show sizable v 2Show sizable v 2 –Collectivity at pre-hadronic stage, s-quark flow

28 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 28 Universal scaling of v 2 Substantial elliptic flow signals are observed for a variety of particles species at RHICSubstantial elliptic flow signals are observed for a variety of particles species at RHIC

29 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 29 Universal scaling of v 2 At mid-rapidity

30 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 30 Summary (ii) Mass ordering at low p TMass ordering at low p T –Predicted by hydrodynamics (radial flow effect) At intermediate p T, NCQ scaling holds a variety of particles speciesAt intermediate p T, NCQ scaling holds a variety of particles species –Indication of light quark (u, d, s) collectivity at pre- hadronic stage Universal v 2 motivated by perfect fulid hydrodynamics is observed for both mesons and baryons over a broad range of kinetic energy, centrality via NCQ scalingUniversal v 2 motivated by perfect fulid hydrodynamics is observed for both mesons and baryons over a broad range of kinetic energy, centrality via NCQ scaling

31 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 31 Back up

32 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 32 Flow measurements 2 main types of methods2 main types of methods –“Event plane” method J.-Y. Ollitrault, Phys. Rev. D48, 1132 (1993) A. M. Poskanzer and S. A. Voloshin, Phys. Rev. C58, 1671 (1998) –Multi-particle correlation method N. Borghini, P. M. Dinh, J.-Y. Ollitrault, Phys. Rev. C63 054906 (2000); Phys. Rev. C64, 054901 (2001) R. S. Bhalerao, N. Borghini, J.-Y. Ollitrault, Nucl. Phys. A727, 373 (2003); Phys. Lett. B580, 157 (2004) Different sensitivity to “non-flow” effectsDifferent sensitivity to “non-flow” effects –Correlations unrelated to the reaction plane, ex. jets, resonance decays etc …

33 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 33 Non-flow effects from Jets (i) Nucl-ex/0609009Nucl-ex/0609009 “Trigger” p T : 2.5 < p T < 4 GeV/c“Trigger” p T : 2.5 < p T < 4 GeV/c “Associated” p T : 1 < p T < 2 GeV/c“Associated” p T : 1 < p T < 2 GeV/c Background Au+Au events from HIJINGBackground Au+Au events from HIJING –Checked to reproduce the charged hadron multiplicity in  from PHOBOS –v 2 is implemented according to the PHENIX v 2 measurement (nucl- ex/0608033) Di-jet pairs are generated from PYTHIADi-jet pairs are generated from PYTHIA

34 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 34 Non-flow effects from Jets (ii) Fake v 2 for leading particlesFake v 2 for leading particles –Fake v 2 is negligible in BBC acceptance (3 <  < 4) NOTENOTE –Results are not corrected event plane resolution

35 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 35 Non-flow effect on v 4 Consider 3-particle correlationConsider 3-particle correlation Maximum non-flow contribute if (i, k) correlate non-flow and (j, k) correlate flowMaximum non-flow contribute if (i, k) correlate non-flow and (j, k) correlate flow flowNon-flow

36 Feb/11/2007H. Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba 36 Signal + Background Background Before subtraction After subtraction Clear  signal   K + K -   K + K - –Typical S/N ~ 0.3 Centrality 20 – 60 %Centrality 20 – 60 % –S/N is good –Event plane resolution is good –Separation of v 2 between meson and baryon is good –Magnitude of v 2 do not vary very much

Download ppt "1 Anisotropic RHIC Hiroshi Masui / Univ. of Tsukuba Feb./11/2007 RHIC 高エネルギー原子核反応の物理研究会、 RHIC 現象論松本合宿."

Similar presentations

Multi-strange Hadron v2 and Partonic Collectivity

Multi-strange Hadron v2 and Partonic Collectivity
PID v2 and v4 from Au+Au Collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV at RHIC

PID v2 and v4 from Au+Au Collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV at RHIC
Mass, Quark-number, Energy Dependence of v 2 and v 4 in Relativistic Nucleus- Nucleus Collisions Yan Lu University of Science and Technology of China Many.

Mass, Quark-number, Energy Dependence of v 2 and v 4 in Relativistic Nucleus- Nucleus Collisions Yan Lu University of Science and Technology of China Many.
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook 1 Arkadij Taranenko Quark Matter 2006 November 13-20, Shanghai, China Nuclear Chemistry Group SUNY Stony Brook, USA PHENIX Studies.

R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook 1 Arkadij Taranenko Quark Matter 2006 November 13-20, Shanghai, China Nuclear Chemistry Group SUNY Stony Brook, USA PHENIX Studies.
Marcus Bleicher, Berkeley, Oct. 2005 Elliptic Flow in High Energetic Nuclear Collisions Marcus Bleicher & Xianglei Zhu FIAS & Institut für Theoretische.

Marcus Bleicher, Berkeley, Oct Elliptic Flow in High Energetic Nuclear Collisions Marcus Bleicher & Xianglei Zhu FIAS & Institut für Theoretische.
1 Flow Analysis Methods Art Poskanzer Color by Roberta Weir Exploring the secrets of the universe.

1 Flow Analysis Methods Art Poskanzer Color by Roberta Weir Exploring the secrets of the universe.
STAR 1 Azimuthal Anisotropy: The Higher Harmonics Art Poskanzer for the Collaboration STAR.

STAR 1 Azimuthal Anisotropy: The Higher Harmonics Art Poskanzer for the Collaboration STAR.
Anisotropic Flow at RHIC Jiayun Chen (for Collaboration) Institute of Particle Physics, HZNU, Wuhan, 430079, P.R.China Brookhaven National Lab, Upton,

Anisotropic Flow at RHIC Jiayun Chen (for Collaboration) Institute of Particle Physics, HZNU, Wuhan, , P.R.China Brookhaven National Lab, Upton,
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook 1 Arkadij Taranenko Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics Big Sky, MT February 12-17,2007 Nuclear Chemistry Group SUNY Stony Brook,

R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook 1 Arkadij Taranenko Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics Big Sky, MT February 12-17,2007 Nuclear Chemistry Group SUNY Stony Brook,
K*(892) Resonance Production in Au+Au and Cu+Cu Collisions at  s NN = 200 GeV & 62.4 GeV Motivation Analysis and Results Summary 1 Sadhana Dash Institute.

K*(892) Resonance Production in Au+Au and Cu+Cu Collisions at  s NN = 200 GeV & 62.4 GeV Motivation Analysis and Results Summary 1 Sadhana Dash Institute.
Measurements of long-range angular correlation and identified particle v 2 in 200 GeV d+Au collisions from PHENIX Shengli Huang Vanderbilt University for.

Measurements of long-range angular correlation and identified particle v 2 in 200 GeV d+Au collisions from PHENIX Shengli Huang Vanderbilt University for.
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook PHENIX Measurements of Anisotropic Flow in Heavy-Ion Collisions at RHIC Energies 1 Nuclear Chemistry Group, SUNY Stony Brook,

R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook PHENIX Measurements of Anisotropic Flow in Heavy-Ion Collisions at RHIC Energies 1 Nuclear Chemistry Group, SUNY Stony Brook,
System size and beam energy dependence of azimuthal anisotropy from PHENIX Michael Issah Vanderbilt University for the PHENIX Collaboration QM2008, Jaipur,

System size and beam energy dependence of azimuthal anisotropy from PHENIX Michael Issah Vanderbilt University for the PHENIX Collaboration QM2008, Jaipur,
High p T identified hadron anisotropic flow and Deuteron production in 200 GeV Au+Au Collisions Shengli Huang Vanderbilt University for the PHENIX Collaboration.

High p T identified hadron anisotropic flow and Deuteron production in 200 GeV Au+Au Collisions Shengli Huang Vanderbilt University for the PHENIX Collaboration.
WWND, San Diego1 Scaling Characteristics of Azimuthal Anisotropy at RHIC Michael Issah SUNY Stony Brook for the PHENIX Collaboration.

WWND, San Diego1 Scaling Characteristics of Azimuthal Anisotropy at RHIC Michael Issah SUNY Stony Brook for the PHENIX Collaboration.
High p T identified charged hadron v 2 and v 4 in 200GeV AuAu collisions by the PHENIX experiment Shengli Huang Vanderbilt University for the PHENIX Collaboration.

High p T identified charged hadron v 2 and v 4 in 200GeV AuAu collisions by the PHENIX experiment Shengli Huang Vanderbilt University for the PHENIX Collaboration.
Two particle correlations with respect to higher harmonic plane in Au+Au 200 GeV collisions at RHIC-PHENIX Takahito Todoroki for the PHENIX Collaboration.

Two particle correlations with respect to higher harmonic plane in Au+Au 200 GeV collisions at RHIC-PHENIX Takahito Todoroki for the PHENIX Collaboration.
Hydrodynamics, flow, and flow fluctuations Jean-Yves Ollitrault IPhT-Saclay Hirschegg 2010: Strongly Interacting Matter under Extreme Conditions International.

Hydrodynamics, flow, and flow fluctuations Jean-Yves Ollitrault IPhT-Saclay Hirschegg 2010: Strongly Interacting Matter under Extreme Conditions International.
Strange and Charm Probes of Hadronization of Bulk Matter at RHIC International Symposium on Multi-Particle Dynamics Aug 9-15, 2005 Huan Zhong Huang University.

Strange and Charm Probes of Hadronization of Bulk Matter at RHIC International Symposium on Multi-Particle Dynamics Aug 9-15, 2005 Huan Zhong Huang University.
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL Masashi Kaneta for the STAR collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. First results from STAR experiment at RHIC - Soft hadron.

Masashi Kaneta, LBNL Masashi Kaneta for the STAR collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. First results from STAR experiment at RHIC - Soft hadron.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google