Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDella Glenn Modified over 8 years ago
1
Yan-Qing Ma ( 马滟青 ) Peking University The Second Sino-Americas Workshop and School on the Bound-State Problem in Continuum QCD, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Nov. 16 th, 2015
2
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 2/34 Hadronization Observed by detector: Why hadronization? How hadronization? Study hadron production! Produced at initial: Partons (guess) Hadrons Hadronization in QCD
3
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 3/34 Heavy quarkonium The simplest system: two body problem “Hydrogen atom in QCD”, “an ideal laboratory in QCD” Production: best way to study hadronization
4
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 4/34 Property Multiple well-separated scales : Quark mass: M Momentum:Mv Energy:Mv 2 Involving both perturbative and nonperturbative physics
5
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 5/34 Factorization and hadronization models Short-distance and long distance parts Approximation: on-shell pair + hadronization
6
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 6/34 Historical review of quarkonium production Einhorn, Ellis (1975), Chang (1980), Berger, Jone (1981), … Fritzsch (1977), Halzen (1977), … Bodwin, Braaten, Lepage, 9407339, … Kang, Qiu, Sterman, 1109.1520 Fleming, Leibovich, Mehen, Rothstein 1207.2578 Kang, YQM, Qiu, Sterman, 1401.0923, … Kang, YQM, Venugopalan, 1309.7337 Qiu, Sun, Xiao, Yuan, 1310.2230, … Bodwin, Braaten, Lee, 0504014
7
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 7/34 Outline I. Success and failure of NRQCD framework
8
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 8/34 NRQCD Factorization Factorization formula Bodwin, Braaten, Lepage, 9407339 Hadronization (LDMEs) Long distance (~1/(m c v)) input. Parton distribution function Long distance (~1/ Λ QCD ) Production of heavy quark pair Short distance (~1/m c ) perturbative calculable.
9
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 9/34 YQM, Wang, Chao, 1002.3987
10
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 10/34 ATLAS, 1404.7035 Comparison with new data Perfect agreement!
11
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 11/34 LO NRQCD: polarization puzzle CDF, 0704.0638
12
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 12/34 Polarization@NLO NRQCD: Butenschöen, Kniehl, 1201.1872 Chao,YQM,Shao,Wang,Zhang,1201.2675 Gong,Wan,Wang,Zhang,1205.6682 Results depend on the extracted CO LDMEs
13
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 13/34 Problems with NLO NRQCD Perturbation convergent? Need how many orders? See Yu Jia’s talk for NNLO calculation
14
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 14/34 NRQCD: summary Most puzzles can be understood qualitatively at NLO No all order proof of NRQCD factorization Other methods are needed for these extreme regions Factorization correct at least up to NNLO Nayak, Qiu, Sterman, 0509021
15
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 15/34 Outline I. Success and failure of NRQCD framework
16
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 16/34 Leading power: collinear factorization, single parton fragmentation Collins, Soper (1982) Braaten, Yuan, 9303205 Nayak, Qiu, Sterman, 0509021 NLP: important for heavy quarkonium produciton Kang, Qiu, Sterman, 1109.1520 Kang, YQM, Qiu, Sterman, 1401.0923 Kang, YQM, Qiu, Sterman, 1411.2456 A rigorous collinear factorization method up to NLP
17
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 17/34 2 Collinear factorization approach Ideas: Factorization correct to all order Qiu, Sterman (1991) Kang, YQM, Qiu, Sterman, 1401.0923
18
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 18/34 Factorization Factorization formalism:
19
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 19/34 Evolution Kang, YQM, Qiu, Sterman, 1401.0923 Evolution equations at NLP: Independence of the factorization scale:
20
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 20/34 Predictive power Calculation of short-distance hard parts in pQCD: Calculation of evolution kernels in pQCD: Kang, YQM, Qiu, Sterman, 1401.0923 Kang, YQM, Qiu, Sterman, 1411.2456
21
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 21/34 Input fragmentation function YQM, Zhang, Qiu, 1311.7078 YQM, Zhang, Qiu, 1401.0524 YQM, Zhang, Qiu, 1501.04556 NLO is now available for all channels Complicated: different quarkonium states require different input distributions! Apply NRQCD to the input distributions at initial scale
22
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 22/34 Reproducing plain NRQCD YQM, Qiu, Sterman, Zhang, 1407.0383 LO LP+NLP comparing with NLO NRQCD LO analytical results reproduce NLO NRQCD calculations (numerical) !
23
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 23/34 The collinear factorization framework is ready to use, potentially better convergence Calculating hard parts to NLO Before resummation, potentially can reproduce NNLO NRQCD Global analysis, based on collinear factorization formalism including NLP and evolution A lot of works to be done! Solving the double parton evolution equations
24
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 24/34 Outline I. Success and failure of NRQCD framework
25
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 25/34
26
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 26/34 Berger, Qiu, Wang, 0404158 Sun, Yuan, Yuan, 1210.3432 Sudakov double logarithm Feng, Lansberg, Wang, 1504.00317 Small-x effect can be important
27
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 27/34 CGC effective field theory Color Glass Condensate McLerran, Venugopalan, 9309289
28
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 28/34 CGC+CEM Fujii, Gelis, Venugopalan, 0603099 Fujii, Watanabe, 1304.2221 Ducloue, Lappi, Mantysaari, 1503.02789 Watanabe, Xiao, 1507.06564 But CEM: A simply and intuitive model
29
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 29/34 CGC+NRQCD Kang, YQM, Venugopalan, 1309.7337 Qiu, Sun, Xiao, Yuan, 1310.2230 NRQCD factorization: Via many channels, both CS and CO
30
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 30/34 Dilute-dense formula at LO Short distance for CO channels in CGC Short distance for CS channels in CGC Kang, YQM, Venugopalan, 1309.7337 Scope of application: High energy p+A or p+p collision Quarkonium produced in forward rapidity region
31
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 31/34
32
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 32/34 YQM, Venugopalan, 1408.4075 RHIC data at central rapidity: agreement is not very good As expected: CGC+NRQCD good for high energy and forward rapidity
33
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 33/34 YQM, Venugopalan, Zhang, 1503.07772
34
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 34/34 Apply for other quarkonium states is possible NLO calculation in CGC+NRQCD framework is important and urgent!! Plenty of data at LHC NRQCD+CGC: the most rigorous method Sudakov resummation in CEM+CGC : How to resum in NRQCD+CGC? Watanabe, Xiao, 1507.06564 Thank you!
35
Back up
36
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 36/34 Bodwin, Chung, Kim, Lee, 1403.3612 Faccioli,Knunz,Lourenco,Seixas,Wohri,1403.3970 agreed by new studies
37
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 37/34 CGC+CEM Fujii, Gelis, Venugopalan, 0603099 Fujii, Watanabe, 1304.2221 Ducloue, Lappi, Mantysaari, 1503.02789 Watanabe, Xiao, 1507.06564 CEM:
38
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 38/34 CGC+CEM: p+p Fujii, Watanabe, 1304.2221 Bad agreement:
39
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 39/34 CGC+CEM: p+A Fujii, Watanabe, 1304.2221 Bad agreement:
40
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 40/34 ALICE, 1308.6726 Fujii, Watanabe, 1304.2221 RHIC: LHC: Disagree with data Rule out the CGC method???
41
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 41/34 CGC+CEM: improved (1) Ducloue, Lappi, Mantysaari, 1503.02789 Using the collinear “hybrid” frame work Introduce impact-parameter-dependent initial condition Marginally describe data
42
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 42/34 CGC+CEM: improved (2) Watanabe, Xiao, 1507.06564
43
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 43/34 Comparison with other methods Quasi-classical approximation Our CS channel reproduce the work: Dominguez, Kharzeev, Levin, Mueller, Tuchin, 1109.1250 Only dipoles are involved in CEM calculation. No quadrupole. Kang, YQM, Venugopalan, 1309.7337
44
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 44/34 Parameters for p+p YQM, Venugopalan, 1408.4075 An approximation for quadrupole Self-consistent: exact when any two adjacent positions coincide Checked: a good approximation to the quadrupole Dipole distributions: Albacete, Dumitru, Fujii, Nara,1209.2001 NRQCD CO matrix elements Chao,YQM,Shao,Wang,Zhang,1201.2675
45
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 45/34 Good agreement with data Worst agreement with RHIC data at central rapidity
46
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 46/34 Good agreement with data Worst agreement with RHIC data at central rapidity
47
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 47/34 Parameters for p+A YQM, Venugopalan, Zhang, 1503.07772 Dusling, Gelis, Lappi, Venugopalan, 0911.2720
48
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 48/34 Good agreement with data Worst agreement with RHIC data at central rapidity
49
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 49/34 Many uncertainties can be cancelled in the ratio
50
Yan-Qing Ma, Peking University CCNU, Nov. 16 th, 2015 50/34 Agreement with data
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.