Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Geography Field Methods Human Geography Field Methods vs. Physical Geography Field Methods.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Geography Field Methods Human Geography Field Methods vs. Physical Geography Field Methods."— Presentation transcript:

1 Geography Field Methods Human Geography Field Methods vs. Physical Geography Field Methods

2 Field Journals ala Luna Leopold Date Location Purpose Remembrance People Notes

3

4 (some) Human Geography Field Methods Qualitative vs. Quantitative –Surveys –Questionnaires –Interviews, in situ and otherwise Participant-observation vs. Observing-participant Ethnography Archival research Landscape interpretation Cognitive mapping Photo-documenting

5

6 (some) Physical Geography Field Methods Quantitative vs. Qualitative –Mathematical models –Theoretical models Getting “dirty” –Soil, water, landform, plants, animals, weather “Technical” equipment –Stream gauge –Meteorological assessment –Clinometer, thermister, solarimeter

7

8 Do human and physical geography field methods overlap? –What are some of the overlaps?

9 Mixed Methods Human Comfort Index Visitor impact on a Park Building/Urban Sprawl Alternative energy use and design Forest fire impacts Distance Decay GIS/RS for assessment

10 Readings & Resource Reading: Toros, A. Deniz, L. Şaylan, O. Şen, and M. Baloğlu. 2005. Spatial variability of chilling temperature in Turkey and its effect on human comfort. Meteorology & Atmospheric Physics 88, 107–118. Reading: Brown & Gillespie, Microclimate Landscape Design Resource: Dave Fronander, biogeographer –Field Studies around Sea of Cortez


Download ppt "Geography Field Methods Human Geography Field Methods vs. Physical Geography Field Methods."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google