Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMarybeth Haynes Modified over 9 years ago
1
Observation of the forbidden transitions between the A 1 u and b 3 g - states of C 2 Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology Okayama Univ. Wang Chen, Jian Tang, Kentarou Kawaguchi
2
Introduction B 1g+B 1g+ B 1 g a 3u a 3u d 3 g c 3 u + b 3 g - X 1 g + A 1 u Phillips Ballik-Ramsay 15g15g Kokkin et al. (2006) Bornhauser et al. (2011) 29258.592(5) cm -1 C 2 : many singlet, triplet and even quintet states at lower energy Many transition systems were observed, perturbations exist very often Swan interaction Bernath
3
Deperturbation for the spin-orbit interaction spin-orbit interaction between b 3 g - and X 1 g + states : X 1 g + |H SO |b 3 g - = A bX v X |v b The first deperturbation analysis: E. A. Ballik and D. A. Ramsay, ApJ. 137, 84-101 (1963) E ( a 3 u ) – E ( X 1 g + ) = 716.24 5 cm -1 Further analysis with high resolution FTIR spectrum C. Amiot, J. Chauville and J. P. Maillard, JMS 75, 19-40 (1979) E ( a 3 u ) – E ( X 1 g + ) = 718.318(1) cm -1 Our new analysis: 68 th OSU Symposium (Columbus 2013) E (a 3 u ) – E( X 1 g + ) = 720.002(4) cm -1
4
Two definitions of Hamiltonians for 3 Merer & Brown JMS. 74, 488 (1979) R.N.Zare et.al., JMS. 46, 37 (1973) F1:F1: F2:F2: F3:F3: Amiot et al.(1979) T e = 718.3 cm -1 (Zare)716.7 cm -1 (M&B) Our value T e = 721.6 cm -1 (Zare) 720.0 cm -1 (M&B) The change was due to the different ways for deperturbation
5
Global analysis by Amiot et al.(1979) Analysis for the unperturbed lines of b 3 g - - a 3 u Determine the effective molecular constants for various vibrational states Derive the Dunham coefficients for vibrational dependency Deperturbation for the perturbed lines Obtain the energy difference E(a 3 u ) – E(X 1 g + ) spin-orbit interaction constant A bX
6
Problem in the previous deperturbation Roux et al., JMS 109, 334 (1985) cm -1 ‘perturbed’ ‘unperturbed’ 5.05 5.62 6.03 5.86 Analysis for the “unperturbed” lines includes small interaction: incomplete deperturbation Ununified A bx values for different ‘v’ 5.7(4) cm -1 Ave.
7
Our new deperturbation analysis Global analysis simultaneously for the Phillips system and the Ballik-Ramsay system Molecular constants with vibrational expansion are used The overlap integrals v’|v in X 1 g + |H SO |b 3 g - = A bX v X |v b are calculated with Le Roy’s program (2005) New values for our new deperturbation: E ( a 3 u –X 1 g + ) = 720.002(4) cm -1 A bX = 6.30(1) cm -1 E. Kagi & K. Kawaguchi, JMStruct. 795, 179 (2006) A deperturbation analysis by this method has been successful before for MgO For totally: 3950 lines (v max = 7, J max = 60) Standard deviation = 0.004 cm -1
8
Determined molecular constants for C 2 A bX 6.298(12) cm -1 720.0015(42)
9
Perturbation at crossing rotational levels Roux et al., JMS 109, 334 (1985) b3g-b3g- X1g+X1g+ v = 3 v = 5 v = 4 v = 6 v = 3 v = 2 v = 1 v = 0 J=14 J=38 J=28 J=52 J=40 J=52 J=62 J< 0 Our result J = 2 !
10
J = 0 0 = J 2 4 6 8 2 4 6 2 4 6 8 X 1 g v=6 b 3 g v=3 F1F1 F3F3 E=0.08 cm -1 0.52 cm -1 Interaction at the crossing levels 0.55 cm -1 0.03 cm -1 H SO = 0.89 cm -1
11
Intensity for forbidden transitions b 3 g - v=3 J=2(F 1 ) X 1 g + v=6 J=2 A bX a 3 u v=4 Forbidden I Forbidden :I Allowed = b 2 : a 2 = 0.83 A 1 u v=4 Forbidden Allowed Ballik-Ramsay band Allowed Phillips band
12
Observed FTIR emission spectrum P.N.Ghosh, M.N.Deo and K.Kawaguchi, ApJ, 525, 539 (1999) CH 4 ( 80 mTorr )/He ( 6 Torr )Resolution : 0.02 cm - 1 C2C2 CH 4 v=(0-0) (1-2) (2-3) (3-4) Ballik-Ramsay Bernath
13
Forbidden transition Observed forbidden transitions
14
b 3 g - v=3 F 1 J=2 X 1 g + v=6 A bX Forbidden of Q 12 (2) Q 12 (2)Forbidden Q(2) F 2 Prediction:O-C=-0.0254 cm -1 By fitting:O-C=-0.0108 cm -1 Forbidden X 1 g + – a 3 u v=6 – 4 Q(2) F 2 Allowed b 3 g + – a 3 u v=3 – 4 Q 12 (2) Forbidden transition a 3 u v=4 J=2 F2F2
15
Forbidden of Q 1 (2) b 3 g - v=3 F 1 F1F1 J=2 Q 1 (2) Forbidden Q(2)F 1 X 1 g + v=6 A bX a 3 u v=4 J=2 Q 12 (2) Prediction:O-C=-0.0158 cm -1 By fitting:O-C=-0.0018 cm -1 Allowed b 3 g + – a 3 u v=3 – 4 Q 1 (2) Forbidden X 1 g + – a 3 u v=6 – 4 Q(2)F 1 Forbidden transition F2F2 Forbidden Q(2) F 2
16
Forbidden of R 3 (13) Prediction:O-C=-0.0243 cm -1 By fitting:O-C=-0.0061 cm -1 b 3 g - v=3 F 3 a 3 u v=4 F 3 J=14 J=13 R 3 (13) Forbidden R(13) F 3 X 1 g + v=6 A bX Forbidden X 1 g + – a 3 u v=6 – 4 Q(2)F 1 Forbidden transition Allowed b 3 g + – a 3 u v=3 – 4 R 3 (13)
17
Observed forbidden transitions X 1 g + (v=6) - a 3 u (v=4) J v (O-C) 2-2(F 2 ) 3569.9558 (-0.0108) 2-2(F 1 ) 3591.7409 (-0.0018) 14-13(F 3 ) 3597.8123 (-0.0061)
18
Conclusion Our deperturbation analysis led to E ( a 3 u – X 1 g + ) = 720.002(4) cm -1 which is 3.3 cm -1 larger than the previous value 716.69 cm -1. Energy crossing at J = 2 of X 1 g + (v=6) and b 3 g ( v=3 ) is found newly with strong interaction and led to the forbidden transitions observed. Three forbidden transitions for v=6-4 of X 1 g + - a 3 u showed in our spectrum in the predicted frequencies and intensities, which verified our deperturbation analysis.
19
Intensity for forbidden transitions b 3 g - v=3 F 1 J=2 X 1 g + v=6 A bX a3ua3u Forbidden b 3 g - v=3 F 3 a3ua3u J=14 Forbidden X 1 g + v=6 A bX I Forbidden :I Allowed = 0.83I Forbidden :I Allowed = 0.06
20
Our deperturbation analysis Global analysis simultaneously for the Phillips system and the Ballik-Ramsay system Molecular constants with vibrational expansion are used
21
Previous global analysis for unperturbed lines Amiot et al., JMS 75, 19 (1979)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.