1. October 30, 2004 Year 3 FIPSE Survey Year 3 survey yielded responses from 24 Math chairpersons, 105 Math faculty, 28 Education faculty Data Collection Method: Combination of Retreats and Online Survey

2. October 30, 2004 SBEC Standards 71% Math chairpersons, 59% Math faculty and 86% Education faculty are familiar with SBEC standards. Between 50 and 62.5% Math chairpersons, 50 and 53% Math faculty, and 32 and 71% Education faculty reported that their programs address fully or nearly fully the SBEC standards at all levels. 20% or more don’t know.

3. October 30, 2004 Changes Made in Response to the SBEC Standards Math Faculty Education Faculty Year 1 Year 3 Year 1 Year 3 Curriculum 42.3 % 95.5 % 69.6 % 89.5 % Resources 18.7 % 67.2 % 43.5 % 84.2 % Advising 14.6 % 58.2 % 30.4 % 78.9 %

4. October 30, 2004 Extent of Preparedness of Typical Graduates to Teach Mathematics Required in Grades K- 12 – Comparison of Means Math Chair- persons Math Faculty Education Faculty Year 1 Year 3 Year 1 Year 3 Year 1 Year 3 Early Childhood to Grade 4 3.653.803.723.893.503.91 Grade 4 to 8 3.743.803.884.044.084.00 Grade 8 to 12 4.094.333.964.234.094.10

5. October 30, 2004 Guidelines About 40% of Math chairpersons (3.04), Math faculty (2.96), and Education faculty (2.81) are familiar with the Guidelines Most commonly, Math faculty used Guidelines to make changes in 4-8 curriculum (35.2%) and EC- 4 curriculum (28.6%); 31.4% increased emphasis on cooperative learning, 26.7% increased use of manipulatives

6. October 30, 2004 Likely Use of Guidelines More than 30% Math faculty are likely to: Improve courses by adding rich problems Make additional changes in curriculum Increase collaboration with other institutions on math teacher preparation Improve teacher performance on TExEs Increase institutional support for Math teacher preparation