Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Mohammad Khalily Islamic Azad University.  Usually buffer size is finite  Interarrival time and service times are independent  State of the system.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Mohammad Khalily Islamic Azad University.  Usually buffer size is finite  Interarrival time and service times are independent  State of the system."— Presentation transcript:

1 Mohammad Khalily Islamic Azad University

2

3

4  Usually buffer size is finite  Interarrival time and service times are independent  State of the system depends on : 1. Packet arrival process, (Poisson, deterministic, etc) 2. Packet length distribution 3. The service discipline (FCFS, LCFS, priority, etc) 4. # of Server, service process

5

6 Little’s Formula

7

8

9

10

11 E[N] : Average number of customers in a system : Average arrival rate E[T] : Average time spent in the system

12 Mean Number in Queue

13

14 Server Utilization

15 a/b/m/K a: Type of arrival process b: Service time distribution m: Number of servers K: Maximum number of customer allowed in the system Kendall’s Notation for describing a queueing system

16 Arrival process : Poisson process of rate Interarrival time : independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) exponential random variable with mean 1/ Service time : iid exponential random variable with mean 1/ 

17  The time until next arrival is exponential random variable is independent of the service times of customers already in the system.  The memoryless property of the exponential random variable implies that this interarrival time is independent of the present and past history of N(t).  Also on departure time

18 Transition rate diagram of M/M/1 Queue

19 The M/M/1 Queue

20

21 The M/M/1 Queue The Mean Number of Customers in the System

22 The M/M/1 Queue The Mean Total Customer Delay in the System

23 The M/M/1 Queue The Mean Waiting Time in Queue

24 The M/M/1 Queue The Mean Number in Queue

25 The M/M/1 Queue The Server Utilization

26 The Mean number of customer in the system versus utilization for M/M/1 Queue

27 The total customer delay versus utilization for M/M/1 Queue

28 The M/M/1 System with Finite Capacity The M/M/1/K System

29 The M/M/1/K System

30

31 The M/M/1/K System The Mean Number of Customers in the System

32 Typical pmf’s for N(t) of M/M/1/K System

33 The M/M/1/K System The Mean Total Time Spent By Customers in the System

34 The M/M/1/K System The Offered Load (Traffic intensity) and Carried Load

35 Carried Load versus Offered Load for M/M/1/K System with K = 2

36 Mean Customer Delay versus Offered Load for M/M/1/K System with K = 2 and K=10

37 The M/M/c System

38          

39          

40

41 The M/M/c Queueing System Erlang C Formula

42 The M/M/c System

43

44

45

46 M/M/1 Versus M/M/c

47

48 M/M/1 SystemM/M/c System M/M/1 Versus M/M/c

49

50 The M/M/c/c Queueing System

51

52 The M/M/c/c Queueing System Erlang B Formula     

53

54 Erlang B Formula (Example)

55 The M/M/  Queueing System

56 The number of customers in the system is a Poisson random variable

57 M/G/1 Queueing System The state of an M/G/1 system at time t is specified by N(t) together with remaining (“residual”) service time of the customer being served at time t.

58  M/G/1 Queueing System?  G-Network?  Queueing simulations? Arena

59 ?


Download ppt "Mohammad Khalily Islamic Azad University.  Usually buffer size is finite  Interarrival time and service times are independent  State of the system."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google