Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

“HEAR IT AND FORGET IT, SEE IT AND REMEMBER IT, DO IT AND UNDERSTAND IT” Systems Design Review P13465 – Water Table.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "“HEAR IT AND FORGET IT, SEE IT AND REMEMBER IT, DO IT AND UNDERSTAND IT” Systems Design Review P13465 – Water Table."— Presentation transcript:

1 “HEAR IT AND FORGET IT, SEE IT AND REMEMBER IT, DO IT AND UNDERSTAND IT” Systems Design Review P13465 – Water Table

2 Water Table MSD Team Primary Customers: Ed Hanzlik John Wellin Faculty Guide: Gerald Garavuso Team Members: John Harrington, Project Manager Andrew Nauss, Lead Engineer Timothy Jordan, Project Engineer Dan Abdeen, Project Engineer

3 Today’s Agenda Overview Project Description Project Scope and Planning Customer Needs Functional Decomposition Engineering Metrics/Specifications House of Quality Initial System Concept Generation and Design Initial Concept Generation Concept Selection Feasibility Analysis Systems Model Preliminary Risk Assessment Preliminary Budget What’s next? Project Schedule Review Concluding Comments Questions/Comments/Concerns

4 Project Description – Water Table Force straight flow over an object of some geometry to study fluid dynamic effects Primarily used for displaying concepts of:  Streamlines  Flow Separation  Vortex Shedding Top down view Variable flow speeds Laminar flow regime To be used for educational use Assist in fulfilling the ME department’s mission statement

5 ME Department Mission Statement The ME faculty have adopted the goal of establishing our department as one of the top 25 ME programs first in the nation, and then in the world. Based on a strategic planning retreat in May 2008, the faculty agreed that we, collectively as a department and in collaboration with others, should accomplish three tasks, in pursuit of our goal: Demonstrate a revolutionary advance in engineering education whereby we turn every entering student into graduates who achieve outstanding success. Provide solutions to three compelling problems of national and global significance. Other ME departments must emulate us. We must disseminate our model of education and research, and become the role model to which other institutions aspire.

6 Customer Needs

7 Functional Decomposition

8 Engineering Metrics/Specifications

9

10 House of Quality All specifications correspond to a customer need and vice versa

11 Initial Concept Generation Fluid Flow visualization Flow speed control Holding fixture for specimen Angle-of-attack fixture for specimen Water movement Water reservoir Flow meter Inputting water Expelling water Cart structure Flow straighteners Geometry of water table Test section material

12 Concept Selection Each task on functional decomposition was analyzed

13 Concept Selection Research was conducted to assess each concept Tables were used to assess concepts by comparing concepts with functions/parameters

14 FluidWater Flow visualizationPrimary= electrolysis ; Secondary = beads Flow speed controlControl valves Holding fixture for specimenMagnet on ferrous plate Angle-of-attack controlManual Water movementAC pump (provided) Water reservoirExternal drum Flow meterParticulate visualization Inputting waterPump & valve system Expelling waterPump & valve system Cart structureWooden truss on casters Flow straightenersTube type Geometry of water tableFunneled entrance with 1 inlet, 2 exits Concept Selection Function/Parameter Concept Selected

15 Systems Model Top view on next slide…

16 Systems Model

17

18 Flow Analysis CFD in FLUENT, symmetry used Flow simulation at 1 ft/s (worst case for straightness) Conclusion: Flow at test section meets specification, uniform within about.1 ft/s

19 Electrolysis Feasibility Preliminary testing has been conducted to better understand power requirements and bubble flow. Results  Test 1 | Test 2 Test 1 Test 2  Electrolysis Test Clip Electrolysis Test Clip  Test 2: 24V w/ 4 Tsp.

20 Pump Feasibility Flow rate for 1ft/s through 3” tall and 10” wide test section  93.5 gallons per minute Estimated head between pump and table  3 feet  No pipe losses accounted for Power Output to fluid=Q*ΔP  0.07 horsepower Conclusion: 1/3 hp pump should be sufficient

21 System Flowchart

22 Timing Diagram

23 Risk Assessment

24

25 Preliminary Budget

26 Project Schedule Review Project has been documented and tracked using an excel spreadsheet

27 Project Schedule Review Next major targets for our system… Targets will be expanded upon as project design becomes more defined.

28 Questions/Comments/Concerns


Download ppt "“HEAR IT AND FORGET IT, SEE IT AND REMEMBER IT, DO IT AND UNDERSTAND IT” Systems Design Review P13465 – Water Table."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google