1. Accountability 101 Tom Corll Central Texas College Thomas.corll@ctcd.edu

2. Accountability101 Intent: Consolidate or eliminate repetitious reports… –Assessment of Instructional Programs –Budget Narrative Report –Strategic Planning Review –Quality Enhancement Program Report

3. Accountability 101 Transitioning  Challenges  Well established system  Longevity of staff and faculty  William Bridges – 20%, 60%, 20%  Proposed meetings with Chairs  Viewed as faculty issue, not staff  Support  President, Faculty Senate  Vocational Chairs

4. Accountability 101 Establishing a foundation  Obtaining participation/buy-in  Executive officers  Meetings with Academic and Vocational Chairs  Working with Deans and Directors

5. Accountability 101 Focusing/Getting started… The Strategic Plan was determined to be the starting point, to build a new paradigm for reporting

6. Strategic Planning Establish accountability based on three questions: ♦ What was our function? ♦ How well were we performing? ♦ What could we do to improve?

7. Accountability 101 SWOT Process ♦ SACS standards ♦ Initially sent out over 160 standards ♦ Reduced to 50 standards

8. Accountability 101

11. Initial reactions  Faculty/staff submissions  Many based on job descriptions  Distribution of 12 column template  Development of job aid  Use of data collection plans

12. Accountability 101 Staff and Faculty Responses  Academic and Vocational Chairs (90% participation)  Staff (80% participation)  Deans – (90% participation but standards are minimum at best)

13. Accountability 101 Number of OutcomesNumber of Measures IE Cycle Program/Service Unit 2007200820072008 1Agriculture0353 2Business Management 2345 3Computer Information 0364 4Cosmetology1334 5Criminal Justice2334 6Electronics13 4 5

14. Conclusion Questions?