Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Department of Mathematics and Science Millard E. Lightburn, Ph.D. District Science Supervisor Mary Tweedy and Keisha Kidd Curriculum Support Specialists.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Department of Mathematics and Science Millard E. Lightburn, Ph.D. District Science Supervisor Mary Tweedy and Keisha Kidd Curriculum Support Specialists."— Presentation transcript:

1 Department of Mathematics and Science Millard E. Lightburn, Ph.D. District Science Supervisor Mary Tweedy and Keisha Kidd Curriculum Support Specialists DATA ANALYSIS GRADE 5 SCIENCE SUMMER SYMPOSIUM

2 Data can… provide feedback on the past and provide a basis to begin planning for the future What Kind of Information can Data Provide us? Department of Mathematics and Science

3 IMPORTANCE OF DATA Facilitate a clear understanding of the gaps between where the school or class is and where it wants to be. Show if school or class goals and objectives are being accomplished. Predict and prevent failures. Predict and ensure successes. Establish foundation for Continuous School Improvement/SIP. Data drives instruction, and professional development. Department of Mathematics and Science

4 Effective Use of Classroom Data Teaching Using Results Planning Student Learning Assessing Source: Dr. Yuwadee Wongbundhit

5 GRADE 5 SCIENCE INTERIM ASSESSMENT RESULTS (2012-2013) DATA DISAGGREGATION Department of Mathematics and Science

6 Quarterly Assessment Results K-5 2012-2013 *Cut score for Gr 5 Winter IA= 53% satisfactory Quarter 1 Results 6 GradesAverage Performance Mastery/ Proficiency Grade 551%**49% Grade 460%32% Grade 360%36% Grade 272%64% Grade 166%41% Kinder85%76% GradesAverage Performance Mastery/ Proficiency Grade 5 53%*52% Grade 4 56%19% Grade 3 62%38% Grade 2 79%76% Grade 1 71%59% Kinder 91%93% QUARTER 2 RESULTS QUARTER 1 RESULTS **Cut score for Gr 5 FALL IA= 51% satisfactory Department of Mathematics and Science

7

8 AssessmentNumber of Students Average Percent Correct Percent Proficient Baseline 23,07647%6% Fall Interim 24,03551%49% Winter Interim 24,45753%52% 2012-2013 Interim Results Grade 5 Science AssessmentAverage % Correct Nature of Science 48% Earth Space Science 57% Physical Science 56% Life Science 49% 2013 Winter Interim Results by Question Group Department of Mathematics and Science

9 Debriefing Protocol Teacher’s debriefing protocol Grade Level Debriefing Protocol

10 Sample Data Chats form Student Name and ID ____________________ Math FCAT: Achiev. Level _____ DSS ______ Reading FCAT: Achiev. Level _____ DSS _____ Science Assessment data: Baseline: _____ Monthly ____ Fall IA ______ Winter IA _____ Post-Test ______ Student Goals:_______________________ Teacher Comment_________________ Data Chats Department of Mathematics and Science

11 Grade 5 Science Interim cut scores are based on statistical regression analysis between students performance on Interim Assessment and scale scores on 2012 FCAT 2.0: Fall IA satisfactory cut score: 51% or higher Winter IA satisfactory cut score: 53% or higher (Cut Scores) Gr. 5 Science Interims Cut Scores Department of Mathematics and Science

12 DOE Report on Gr. 5 Science Content Focus from 2013 FCAT 2.0 DOE Report on Gr. 5 Science Content Focus from 2013 FCAT 2.0 Grade 5 Science Content Focus (FCAT 2.0 2013) Department of Mathematics and Science

13 FCAT 2.0 Content Focus Analysis BenchmarksContent Focus20122013 Reporting Category 1. Nature of Science SC.5.N.1.1Defending conclusions; Identifying a control group34 SC.5.N.2.1Explanations based on evidence; Identifying empirical evidence; Importance of observations 43 SC.5.N.2.2Importance of repeated trials; Reasons for differences in data33 Reporting Category Point Total10 Reporting Category 2. Earth and Space Science SC.4.E.5.4Appearance of stars; Appearance of the Moon; Earth's revolution23 SC.4.E.6.2Classifying rocks11 SC.4.E.6.3Florida resources; Renewable v. nonrenewable resources13 SC.4.E.6.4Weathering—ice11 SC.5.E.5.1Components of a galaxy; Energy from stars; Star brightness; Star brightness and distance 14 SC.5.E.5.3Distinguishing between inner and outer planets; Planet characteristics22 SC.5.E.7.1Water cycle—states of matter41 SC.5.E.7.3Weather—humidity41 Reporting Category Point Total16

14 FCAT 2.0 Content Focus Analysis cont’d… …. BenchmarksContent Focus20122013 Reporting Category 3. Physical Science SC.5.P.8.1Comparing objects—volume31 SC.5.P.8.3Dissolving—stirring21 SC.5.P.9.1Identifying chemical change11 SC.5.P.10.1Heat energy produced by friction; How light travels; Light behavior refraction; Mechanical energy 34 SC.5.P.10.2Energy causing a change; Energy causing motion12 SC.5.P.10.4Converting electric energy to light energy; Electric circuits; Neutral objects attracted to charged objects 33 SC.5.P.13.1Forces—friction; Forces—magnetic22 SC.5.P.13.2Force and motion relationships; Speed12 Reporting Category Point Total16 Department of Mathematics and Science

15 FCAT 2.0 Content Focus Analysis cont’d… BenchmarksContent Focus20122013 Reporting Category 4. Life Science SC.3.L.14.1Germination; Plant structures; Seed dispersal34 SC.4.L.16.4Comparing insect life cycles11 SC.4.L.17.3Energy flow through a food chain; Producers12 SC.5.L.14.1Organ functions—intestines11 SC.5.L.14.2Animal classification—invertebrates; Animal classification—vertebrates; Comparing animal structures; Comparing plant and animal structures; Plant classification—flowering plants 45 SC.5.L.17.1Behavioral adaptations31 Reporting Category Point Total1614 The Next Generation Sunshine State Standards (NGSSS) benchmarks and content foci assessed on the 2013 FCAT 2.0 assessment are not predictive of future FCAT 2.0 content. Content Focus Reports should not be used to make decisions about instruction at the individual student level Department of Mathematics and Science

16 Scale Score for Each Achievement Level (140- 260) Scale Score for Each Achievement Level (140- 260) Gr. 5 Science FCAT 2.0 Department of Mathematics and Science

17 Grade 5 Science FCAT 2.0 Achievement Level Descriptions Grade 5 Science FCAT 2.0 Achievement Level Descriptions Gr. 5 Science FCAT 2.0 Department of Mathematics and Science

18 FCAT Science - Grade 5 Year Total Students Tested % Levels 3-5 Physical/ChemicalEarth/SpaceLife/EnvironmentalScientific Thinking Possible Points Avg. % Correct Possible Points Avg. % Correct Possible PointsAvg. % Correct Possible Points Avg. % Correct 201325,560511663%1675%1471%1060% 201226,208491663%1669%1471%1070% 201126,422491369%1164%1369%1464% 201026,367441464%1070%1362%1457% 200925,801421258%1354%1362%1354% 200825,875391258%1450%1362%1258% 200725,993341250%1547%1250%1250% GRADE 5 SCIENCE FCAT RESULTS 2007-2011 DISTRICT LEVEL

19 Performance by Reporting Categories (Gr 5 Science FCAT) 2012-2013 (Retro)

20 Performance by achievement levels (Gr 5 Science FCAT 2012-13)

21

22 Grade 5 FCAT Science Comparative Results for MDCPS, State, Broward & Palm Beach (2012-2013)

23 Actionable Data by Dr. Yuwadee Wongbundhit http://osi.dadeschools.net/actiondata/ -School Performance Data, FCAT, Baseline and Interims http://oada.dadeschools.net http://curriculum.dadeschools.net Data Online Resources


Download ppt "Department of Mathematics and Science Millard E. Lightburn, Ph.D. District Science Supervisor Mary Tweedy and Keisha Kidd Curriculum Support Specialists."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google