Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRandell Preston Modified over 8 years ago
1
Catherine Adloff28 Jan 2008 SiD Collaboration Meeting 1 DHCAL and MICROMEGAS at LAPP Catherine Adloff Franck Cadoux Sébastien Cap Cyril Drancourt Ambroise Espagilière Raphael Gallet Claude Girard Nicolas Geffroy Richard Hermel Kostas Karakostas (guest) Yannis Karyotakis Inocencio Monteiro Fabrice Peltier Julie Prast
2
Catherine Adloff28 Jan 2008 SiD Collaboration Meeting 2 LAPP R&D axes MicroMegas studies with analogue readout Realisation of a mini-calorimeter Design and realisation of large surfaces MicroMegas with digital readout Design of the Digital InterFace (DIF) Within the European DHCAL project
3
Catherine Adloff28 Jan 2008 SiD Collaboration Meeting 3 Our choice : the bulk technology Micro Mesh gaseous structure or pads mesh + PCB = 1 block robustness large area uniformity industrial process…
4
Catherine Adloff28 Jan 2008 SiD Collaboration Meeting 4 MicroMegas Prototypes PCB and bulk from CERN ( Rui de Oliveira ) –325 LPI mesh –spacers : 120 m heigh 300 m diameter –pads : 0.98x0.98 cm 2, 200 m between pads The chamber –95% Argon, 5% Isobutane –conversion volume (3mm) –a top in Stainless Steel with a cupper drift cathode The pad readout : analogue –Gassiplex card : 6 gassiplex chips - 96 channels Electronics card built for CAST by DAPNIA (P. Colas, Philippe Abbon) –VME sequencer and ADC from CAEN –CENTAURE acquisition (SUBATECH, Nantes, D.Roy)
5
Catherine Adloff28 Jan 2008 SiD Collaboration Meeting 5 6x16cm 2 active pads MicroMegas Prototypes D. Fougeron PCB rooting with great care (4 layers) Stainless Steel top with holes for X-rays 5 m thick copper drift cathode Chamber assembly in clean environment short dust burning time ! very few sparks during functioning F. Peltier
6
Catherine Adloff28 Jan 2008 SiD Collaboration Meeting 6 MicroMegas Studies X-ray studies (5.9 keV) –Gain –Response versus V mesh –Response versus V drift –Gas flow dependencies –Time stability –HV supply dependencies Cosmics –MIP value measurement –First glance on X-talk
7
Catherine Adloff28 Jan 2008 SiD Collaboration Meeting 7 X-ray Results Entries ADC Counts all pads : 96 entries for each trigger escape peak A. Espargilière pedestal @ 20 ADC X-ray peak (5.9 keV) V mesh = 420 V V drift = 470 V E mesh = 35 kV/cm E drift = 167 V/cm T2K(same techno) : FWHM = 26% Gassiplex Readout : Peak = 680 ADC cnts = 996 mV 277 fC Gain 7600 FWHM = 25.5% 55 Fe source (5.9 keV 228e - in drift volume) Trigger on mesh : preamp (T output) + fast ampli
8
Catherine Adloff28 Jan 2008 SiD Collaboration Meeting 8 X-ray Results K. Karakostas expected exponential behaviour V drift = V mesh + 70 V E drift = 233 V/cm Response versus V mesh
9
Catherine Adloff28 Jan 2008 SiD Collaboration Meeting 9 X-ray Results Saturates for Flow > 0.20 l/h 7 volume/h Gain when Drift field K. Karakostas Response versus V drift and Gas flow dependencies V mesh = 395 V E mesh = 33 kV/cm E drift = 167-367 V/cm
10
Catherine Adloff28 Jan 2008 SiD Collaboration Meeting 10 X-ray Results Time Stability Gain when Atmospheric Pressure K. Karakostas
11
Catherine Adloff28 Jan 2008 SiD Collaboration Meeting 11 X-ray Results Gain when Atmospheric Pressure Time Stability Slope = - 4.9 ADC/mbar = 2 fC/mbar K. Karakostas
12
Catherine Adloff28 Jan 2008 SiD Collaboration Meeting 12 Cosmics Trigger on 3 scintillators coincidence Charge 210(mV)/25/0.312(mV/fC) = 27 fC Mesh Signal : Preamp (E output) + shaper (gain=25)
13
Catherine Adloff28 Jan 2008 SiD Collaboration Meeting 13 Cosmics Muon in 3mm drift volume = 29e - Gassiplex Readout : Charge 80(1500mV)/1024/3.6(mV/fC) = 32 fC reflects scintillators geometry ADC Counts Nb of Events Mean (Pedestal) = 21 Sigma(Pedestal) = 1.4 muon selection : ADC(Pad with highest signal) > 40 Gain 6900 Chamber mapping (geographic occupancy) V mesh = 410 V V drift = 470 V E mesh = 34 kV/cm E drift = 167 V/cm
14
Catherine Adloff28 Jan 2008 SiD Collaboration Meeting 14 Cosmics Dominant Crosstalk? 20% of the events with a muon have the second highest signal close to the muon pad After muon selection : distance between pad with highest signal (muon pad) and pad with 2 nd highest signal (second pad) Normalised Number of Events (%) PCB routing along X (same Y than muon pad)
15
Catherine Adloff28 Jan 2008 SiD Collaboration Meeting 15 Cosmics Signal(muon pad) / Signal(second pad) Signal(second pad) > 2.8 pedestal : 50% of the events Signal(second pad) > 10 pedestal : 20% of the events crosswise muons
16
Catherine Adloff28 Jan 2008 SiD Collaboration Meeting 16 Future X-ray source, Cosmics, Test Beam –pad homogeneity –prototypes disparity –more detailed X-talk studies –different gas mixture –efficiency measurements
17
Catherine Adloff28 Jan 2008 SiD Collaboration Meeting 17 Test Beam Mini-calorimeter prototype (analogue readout) –3 MicroMegas 6cmx16cm –2 MicroMegas 12cmx32cm –5 Stainless steel slabs Mini-calorimeter prototype (digital readout) –4 GRPC –2 µMEGAS/GEM –6 Stainless steel slabs Exposure to PS/SPS at CERN or Tevatron in the first half of 2008 to validate the whole chain SiD community is welcomed to participate !
18
Catherine Adloff28 Jan 2008 SiD Collaboration Meeting 18 MicroMegas 12cmx32cm With Analogue Readout 12x32cm 2 active pads
19
Catherine Adloff28 Jan 2008 SiD Collaboration Meeting 19 MicroMegas 8cmx32cm With digital readout (4 HARDROC chips) IPNL-LLR PCB (500 m interpad) Will be the first bulk with chips on PCB active part 8x32cm 2 active pads
20
Catherine Adloff28 Jan 2008 SiD Collaboration Meeting 20 Top (2cm SS) + Drift Cathode + Frame + Gas Supply Bottom (Fibreglass + 2cm SS) 6 Bulks (PCB + 144 FE chips + MESH) with 4.5 mm gap Joint 1002 3 DIF Design of a 1m 2 MicroMegas Case with 3 DIF (Digital InterFace) 4,5 mm
21
Catherine Adloff28 Jan 2008 SiD Collaboration Meeting 21 Design of a 1m 2 MicroMegas 10 mm total thickness including –4 mm SS (absorber) –6 mm active volume 10 mm Gas tightness realised on the chamber edges (no need to have gastight PCB)
22
Catherine Adloff28 Jan 2008 SiD Collaboration Meeting 22 Different designs 2 DIF case : FE chip : Hirose connector : Terminaison board, : Flat Printed Circuit (kapton) 3 DIF case Thin pin connector
23
Catherine Adloff28 Jan 2008 SiD Collaboration Meeting 23 Design of the Digital InterFace (DIF) Separated from the slab for more flexibility. up to 100 FE chips (HARDROC or IPNL chip) with power cycling Interfaces with : –The final DAQ (via LDA, …) –The analog DAQ –Neighboring DIFs. –PC through USB for standalone tests and debugs. FPGA ASIC Config ASIC read DAQ interface Slow control Power Supplies next DIF LDA (HDMI) analog DAQ (SCSI) USB JTAG HARDROCs analog output next DIF Monitoring LDO ADC +/-5V 3.3V 2.5V ….. Mezzanine EP3C16F484 SLAB n bulks
24
Catherine Adloff28 Jan 2008 SiD Collaboration Meeting 24 Conclusion First results on small MicroMegas prototypes MicroMegas Techno looks promising and competitive with other gas detectors. Large area prototype under way : towards 1m 3 (project supported by ANR) Possibility to build a larger community
25
Catherine Adloff28 Jan 2008 SiD Collaboration Meeting 25 Backup slides
26
Catherine Adloff28 Jan 2008 SiD Collaboration Meeting 26 X-ray Results T1 Optimisation for Gassiplex readout Charge = 820(1500mV)/1024/3.6(mV/fC) = 334 fC T1 (ns) Mean (ADC Counts) Pad signal : Gassiplex readout K. Karakostas V mesh = 390 V V drift = 440 V E mesh = 32.5 kV/cm E drift = 167 V/cm
27
Catherine Adloff28 Jan 2008 SiD Collaboration Meeting 27 X-ray Results HV supply dependencies V mesh = 390 V V drift = 450 V E mesh = 32.5 kV/cm E drift = 200 V/cm old and not reliable HV supply No significant difference between HV supplies
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.