1. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. © Improving Electric Load Forecasts Using Network Committees Abdel-Aal, RE ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA, ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH; pp: 83-94; Vol: 74 King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals http://www.kfupm.edu.sa Summary Accurate daily peak load forecasts are important for secure and profitable operation of modem power utilities, with deregulation and competition demanding ever-increasing accuracies. Machine learning techniques including neural and abductive networks have been used for this purpose. Network committees have been proposed for improving regression and classification accuracy in many disciplines, but are yet to be widely applied to load forecasting. This paper presents a formal approach to apply the technique using historical load and temperature data spanning multiple years, with individual committee members trained on different years. Correlation among data for successive years is investigated and methods to enhance independence between member models for improving committee performance are described. Both neural and abductive networks implementations are presented and compared. An abductive network three-member committee was developed on data for three successive years and evaluated on the fourth year. Compared to a monolithic model trained on the same full three-year data, the committee reduces the mean absolute percentage error from 2.52% to 2.19%. The corresponding reduction in the mean of the absolute error from 70 MW to 61 MW is statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. References: *ABT CORP, 1990, AIM US MAN ABDELAAL RE, 2004, IEEE T POWER SYST, V19, P164, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2003.820695 ABDULLAH MHL, 2000, P TENCON 2000 KUAL L, P157 ABOULMAGD MA, 2001, P LARG ENG SYST C PO, P105 ANTONIOU CA, 2000, P 4 INT C KNOWL BAS, P205 ASAR A, 1994, IEEE T CONTR SYST T, V2, P135 Copyright: King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals; http://www.kfupm.edu.sa

2. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. © BARRON AR, 1984, SELF ORG METHODS MOD, P87 BORRA S, 2002, COMPUT STAT DATA AN, V38, P407 BREIMAN L, 1996, MACH LEARN, V24, P123 DASILVA APA, 2001, IEEE POW TECH C PORT DREZGA I, 1999, IEEE T POWER SYST, V14, P844 DRUCKER H, 1996, ADV NEUR IN, V8, P479 EDELMAN D, 1999, 3 INT C KNOWL BAS IN, P166 FARLOW SJ, 1984, SELF ORG METHODS MOD, P1 GOH WY, 2003, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V14, P459, DOI 17.10.1109/TNN.2003.809420 GROSS G, 1987, P IEEE, V75, P1558 GUO JJ, 2002, IEEE POW ENG SOC WIN, P77 HSU YY, 1991, IEE PROC-C, V138, P414 JIMENEZ D, 1998, IEEE WORLD C COMP IN, P753 KHOTANZAD A, 1995, IEEE T POWER SYST, V10, P1716 KIM SJ, 1999, IEEE INT JOINT C NEU, P4043 KROGH A, 1995, ADV NEURAL INFORMATI, V7, P231 MATSUMOTO T, 1993, P ANNPS 93, P245 MENDENHALL W, 1994, INTRO PROBABILITY ST MONTGOMERY GJ, 1990, P SPIE C APPL ART NE, P56 MORIOKA Y, 1993, P 2 INT FOR APPL NEU, P60 ONODA T, 1993, P 2 INT FOR APPL NEU, P284 PARK DC, 1991, IEEE T POWER SYST, V6, P442 PARMPERO PS, 1998, P 1998 IEEE INT JOIN, P1723 PODOLAK IT, 2000, 15 INT C PATT REC BA, P957 PRAMPERO P, 1999, 7 INT C IM PROC ITS, P67 RADEVSKI V, 2000, IEEE INNS ENNS INT J, P561 SHIMSHONI Y, 1998, IEEE T SIGNAL PROCES, V46, P1194 SU M, 2001, IEEE INT JOINT C NEU, P2159 SWANN A, 1998, ELECTRON LETT, V34, P1408 WOLPERT DH, 1992, NEURAL NETWORKS, V5, P241 YAO X, 2001, INT JOINT C NEUR NET, P693 YAO X, 2001, P INT JOINT C NEUR N, P693 ZHOU ZH, 2002, ARTIF INTELL MED, V24, P25 For pre-prints please write to: radwan@kfupm.edu.sa Copyright: King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals; http://www.kfupm.edu.sa