Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLenard Knight Modified over 8 years ago
1
Sophisticated Design Automatic Tailgate Week Five and Six Deliverables September 26, 2001 Ted Akiskalos June Doan Tarek Elshazly Maggie Kim David Nimitz Sharon Ramey
2
Patent Search Similarities Differences Interesting Points Selection Quality Function Deployment Level One Analysis Level Two Analysis Week Five and Week Six
3
Similarities: Electric Motor Winding/ raising tailgate Unwinding/ lowering Differences: Cable Cab access Locking Mechanism Manual Operation (if needed) Interesting Point: Motor Position Single Motor Motor Vehicle including a power actuated tailgate Patent # 6,068,321 Date: May 30, 2000
4
Dump Truck Tailgate Patent Number : 5,407,251 April 18, 1995 Similarities: using hydraulic pistons to open and close tailgate Differences: larger scale application use of guides and mobile connection to aid movement Interesting Point: designed specifically for dump truck with obstruction on rear end
5
Similarities: Design is similar to the linkage design suggested by Dr Lipkin Design uses the same concept as the cable truck by pulling on the tailgate to raise it Differences: Design is not exactly like any of the conceptual designs presented Design uses links not cables to push and pull tailgate down or up Interesting Point: Design uses gear ratios to apply needed torque Design might not fit in given space Patent Number: 6,217,097 April 17, 2001 Powered Operated Tailgate
6
Electrically Controlled Tailgate Operator Similarities: Electric Motor Cable Switch Differences: Worm Gear Arrangement and positioning Actuating Mechanism Patent number: 5,449,212 Date: Sep 12, 1995 Interesting points: Tensioning Mechanism Using worm screw to change rotational motion to linear motion No need of spool to store cables
7
Tailgate Hinge Mechanism Similarities (To Featherweight Tailgate Design): Functions to reduce the lowering/lifting weight of the tailgate Both are active systems (human force is required) Uses existing tailgate latch device Differences: Torsion rod rather than torsion springs Placement along hinge axis Attachment to truck bed Interesting Point: The stability of the tailgate in the open position Patent Number:5,988,724 November 23, 1999
8
Tailgate Lowering Mechanism Similarities: Spring powered Cable Manual operation Very easy to install Differences: Spring attached to the box instead of the tailgate Compression spring instead of torsion spring Patent number: 6,196,609 Date: Mar 6, 2001 Interesting points: Can be combined with patent 6,279,979 to minimize risk of cable snapping Same approach to the problem as our design
9
First Level Evaluation Matrix + = Better than Datum - = Worse than Datum S = Same as Datum
10
Second Level Evaluation Matrix 4:Excellent 3:Good 2:Fair 1:Poor
11
Conclusion Selection: “Cable Truck” Superior in First & Second Level Evaluations Next Week: Mockup Presentation of Progress
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.