Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAngelina Malone Modified over 8 years ago
1
Need for an Objective Goodness-of-Fit Measure for: Broadband synthetic time histories from different methodologies Broadband synthetic time histories versus strong-motion data
2
Kim B. Olsen and John E. Mayhew: Goodness-of-fit Criteria for Broadband Synthetic Seismograms, with Application to the 2008 Mw 5.4 Chino Hills, Califonia, Earthquake, Seismological Research Letters 80(6): 1002-1007
3
Time-domain Metrics: 1. Cross-Correlation (Waveform Comparison) 2. Peak Acceleration (PGA) 3. Peak Velocity (PGV) 4. Peak Displacement (PGD) 5. Cumulative Energy Spectral Metrics: 1. Smoothed Fourier Amplitude Amplitudes 2. Average Response Spectra (0.1-10s) 3. Spectral Accelerations at NGA Periods 4. Duration at Selected Periods 5. Inelastic/Elastic Ratios (I/E)
4
The Goodness-of-fit Scale 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 Try Again
5
Visual Confirmation of GOF Values GOF FS =51GOF FS =11 GOF RS =75GOF RS =14 GOF PGV =82 GOF PGV =19
6
Redundancy of Metrics Correlation Matrix (33 stations)
7
User supplies a list of weights (w i ) Normalized weights are applied to each metric GOF value ( i ) for the overall site and component GOF values Weights
8
Example of GOF Estimation for M w 5.4 Chino Hills
9
New: map-based GOF PGA SA-0.2s SA-2s IE 0.2-0.5s IE 0.75-2.5s IE 2-5s
10
IE ratios derived from data (gray) and synthetics (black) for the 2008 Chino Hills earthquake. Dots are results from 33 stations, and the solid lines are the corresponding mean values.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.